Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Scalding Coffee
Jun 26, 2006

You're already dead

The Goatfather posted:

even in civ5 battleships are immediately made obsolete by bombers


note that this hasnt actually ever gone to a real war against a real foe but if we actually end up fighting the soviets in the 70s theyll just nuke it
Do you really want the navy to launch its entire nuclear arsenal? Submarines will laugh off nukes fired from Socialist states. Everyone was loving terrified of a single nuke going off for several decades and the navy has many. Just be glad the world is too much of a pussy to force a nuclear confrontation.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

poverty goat
Feb 15, 2004



subs launching the nukes is whaty happens when everything else has gone to poo poo. if nukes are on the table a surface navy at sea is just a freebie with negligible civilian and environmental collateral and it's not going to provoke a full doomsday nuclear response because its not the end of the world

Pendent
Nov 16, 2011

The bonds of blood transcend all others.
But no blood runs stronger than that of Sanguinius
Grimey Drawer
Are you saying that the US wouldn't nuke the poo poo out of somebody that nuked one our our carrier groups? This isn't a country precisely known for turning the other cheek.

poverty goat
Feb 15, 2004



If it was Iraq of course we would but we're talking about fighting the future nazi USSR or whatever where a full nuclear exchange means the end of the world

hohhat
Sep 25, 2014
Plenty of the M.A.D. scenarios start with little tit-for-tat nuclear strikes that escalate into a major exchange.




Dreadnoughts are void-capable and can be deployed on space hulks that have no life support systems.

Scalding Coffee
Jun 26, 2006

You're already dead

The Goatfather posted:

If it was Iraq of course we would but we're talking about fighting the future nazi USSR or whatever where a full nuclear exchange means the end of the world
We only need enough to glass an uppity country. Better do it before we give Iran nukes.

Vernii
Dec 7, 2006

Imperial Hippo posted:

Came for the battleships, left disappointed.

Here's some cool paintings of Jutland and dreadnoughts slugging it out instead of dumb warhammer toys.





Harald
Jul 10, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

Vernii posted:

Here's some cool paintings of Jutland and dreadnoughts slugging it out instead of dumb warhammer toys.







Thank. You..

Kilmers Elbow
Jun 15, 2012


I thought that picture looked familiar.

In a happy coincidence I've just started reading this....

ANIME IS BLOOD
Sep 4, 2008

by zen death robot

Vernii posted:

Here's some cool paintings of Jutland and dreadnoughts slugging it out instead of dumb warhammer toys.







:gizz:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Waroduce
Aug 5, 2008

Agag posted:

Isoroku Yamamoto was talking about battleships being obsolete in the mid 1930's, and how the IJN should be building more carriers. Oops.





Some Astartes dreadnoughts are over 10,000 years old.

Just bjorn actually I think hes the oldest loyalist left. Everyone else dead or lost on the warp

  • Locked thread