|
Dusty Lens posted:I haven't gotten my own response yet. This isn't right, if the melt value of items on your friends account is less than the amount your friend spent on the account, then anything up to the melt value should be refundable (physical items delivered/order, subscription excluded). Leaving aside the issue of subscriptions for the moment. Your friend needs to push this as that's real shady. As an example if they are trying to say spending $200, gifting $100 then receiving $100 means there is only $100 refundable on the account. That's not correct, there's $200 on the account and all is refundable. This would catch out anyone who had a packaged laundered in the LTI work around process that CIG created and encouraged for a LTI promise they later abandoned anyway. If the melt value on the account is over what was paid on the account, then sure they only have to refund up to whatever was paid. AP fucked around with this message at 21:34 on Oct 7, 2015 |
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 01:24 |
|
|
imperialparadox posted:So is this better or worse than the guys who say "I bought a $500 spaceship but hid it from my wife?" Knowing the SC people: He prolly hides that from his wife. Then posts a thread about how his wife caught him beating it to someone banging a horse and she's totally an intolerant bitch seriously gently caress that broad.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:25
|
|
|
Got my $225 refund on spaceships. Up $300 now  Refunds were easy, at least there were 2weeks ago.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:25
|
|
|
Bootcha posted:There are a few other people who have spent just a little bit more than Wulf on fake spaceships. Who are less visible but equally crazy. Oh deffo there's a few people I've seen in the $20k+ range. There was that one guy who donated like $25k on reddit for example who was basically saying "Your say in how this game goes should depend on how much money you "donated"." And he kept calling them donations.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:27
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:
Wait what? Poors play Shmuck Shittyhead now? 
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:28
|
|
|
The amount of schadenfreude and smug elitism in this thread has gone far past faintly amusing, and now is positively revolting. I wish you morons would lay off the shitposting and turn to, I don't know, whatever (if anything) you have in your life outside of SC. For the last time: CR has stated repeatedly that Star Citizen will be released in November of 2014. Do you really think it is unreasonal to wait until then before you spout your ridiculous rumors? This is a perfectly standard development time for a game of this scope, and none of your hyperbole will change that, or the community's faith in the developers. We are a #starfamily. We will swarm your forums in the holiday season of 2014, and ascertain that none of you heretics and apostates be able to partake of our serene bliss. So cry, goons, and feel sorry. But not for us. Feel sorry for yourselves, and for your selfish denial that in the end will cost you much, much more than any satisfaction you feel right now. You will regret you slighted us.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:28
|
|
|
Shala posted:There was that one guy who donated like $25k on reddit for example who was basically saying "Your say in how this game goes should depend on how much money you "donated"." It probably should. But 25k is just a drop in the ocean, so your say is a little diluted. edit: hotas. HOT-rear end.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:28
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:The amount of schadenfreude and smug elitism in this thread has gone far past faintly amusing, and now is positively revolting. I wish you morons would lay off the shitposting and turn to, I don't know, whatever (if anything) you have in your life outside of SC. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:32
|
|
|
Bootcha posted:There are a few other people who have spent just a little bit more than Wulf on fake spaceships. Who are less visible but equally crazy. He's the most public whale, there was another disabled guy who spent more but he's not in the press and also doesn't seem to be gross along with crazy like dickwulf. Sadly for you the answer is probably "or not". Even if all the current stuff going on is not true, with the amount they have produced at this point and the most minimal burn rate you can figure based on their size there is no way they can deliver what was promised.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:33
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:The amount of schadenfreude and smug elitism in this thread has gone far past faintly amusing, and now is positively revolting. I wish you morons would lay off the shitposting and turn to, I don't know, whatever (if anything) you have in your life outside of SC. Agreed
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:35
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:The amount of schadenfreude and smug elitism in this thread has gone far past faintly amusing, and now is positively revolting. I wish you morons would lay off the shitposting and turn to, I don't know, whatever (if anything) you have in your life outside of SC. Source your quotes.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:38
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:The amount of schadenfreude and smug elitism in this thread has gone far past faintly amusing, and now is positively revolting. I wish you morons would lay off the shitposting and turn to, I don't know, whatever (if anything) you have in your life outside of SC. please for the love of gently caress source this thank you
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:45
|
|
|
Is incest mandatory in this #starfamily?
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:45
|
|
|
DancingShade posted:Is incest mandatory in this #starfamily? It's not incest, it's a donation to your starfather's happiness. Now drop those spacepants and prepare for docking.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:47
|
|
|
Eonwe posted:please for the love of gently caress source this Sorry to disappoint, but that was all me. I thought it was obvious, but on reflection, I guess it really wasn't. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:47
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:Sorry to disappoint, but that was all me. I thought it was obvious, but on reflection, I guess it really wasn't. was it at least ironic
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:48
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:Sorry to disappoint, but that was all me. I thought it was obvious, but on reflection, I guess it really wasn't. I for one am with you all the way
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:48
|
|
|
Shala posted:And he kept calling them donations.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:48
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:In any good marriage there is give and take on creating a cockpit scenario for fake pretend games out of shabby chic barn furniture, that's just a given imo 
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:50
|
|
|
Goredema posted:It's not incest, it's a donation to your starfather's happiness. Now drop those spacepants and prepare for docking. I suddenly feel the need to buy some Kool-Aid.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:50
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:Sorry to disappoint, but that was all me. I thought it was obvious, but on reflection, I guess it really wasn't. I got it, I bit the poo poo out of the hook until "2014" and then I lol'd irl
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:50
|
|
|
Eonwe posted:was it at least ironic How dare you question my unquestioning obedience to our LORD and SAVIOR
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:51
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:How dare you question my unquestioning obedience to our LORD and SAVIOR ok phew
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:51
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:How dare you question my unquestioning obedience to our LORD and SAVIOR Well see now I don't know what to think
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:52
|
|
|
I love Chris Roberts.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:54
|
|
|
AP posted:This isn't right, if the melt value of items on your friends account is less than the amount your friend spent on the account, then anything up to the melt value should be refundable (physical items delivered/order, subscription excluded). Leaving aside the issue of subscriptions for the moment. I imagine that CIG has two responses ready. 1) We're doing this to prevent people from cashing out on ships that were collectively purchased. Which is stupid. 2) We might not need to offer refunds anyways. We're not sure. Probably not. But we're really just doing this to avoid saying that we're refusing refunds and trying to gather a damages case. This is super shady. I know that my own response is going to be a laugh as I put in a lot of time during the LTI turnaround phase and I rather doubt that I have anything on my account that was an original transaction. My buddy is just going to try to reclaim as close to a 1:1 as he can on the secondary market. When my own response comes up I'm going to press them to further explain their policy, when it came into effect and where I can read up on it and the basis for CIG's reasoning behind pledge dollars vanishing when gifted. If they give me a response, which I rather doubt they will, I'll be sure to post it along. Being said I imagine this is the same process anyone else who is currently waiting on refunds will soon be going through.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:55
|
|
|
Prepare your butts. https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/comment/5689405/#Comment_5689405
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:55
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:How dare you question my unquestioning obedience to our LORD and SAVIOR Because he's like ... Jesus if you think about it. The forums crucified him on the cross of Desktop Commander, only for him to come back and rule ... like what happened to the Romans. Either way I don't think now is the time to make lovely posts OP
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:57
|
|
|
spacetoaster posted:Prepare your butts. I have a buttkicker and it's awesome, it's awesome because they take no work to implement into games
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 22:00
|
|
|
spacetoaster posted:Prepare your butts. What the gently caress a butt kicker? I now officially proclaim the world at peak stupid.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 22:01
|
|
|
I want to pledge using a shakeweight.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 22:01
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:What the gently caress a butt kicker? I now officially proclaim the world at peak stupid.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 22:03
|
|
|
Dusty Lens posted:I imagine that CIG has two responses ready. It wouldn't stand up in the EU as it's all just store credit on the account, they even sell gift cards which work exactly the same way as melting does. Your friend should push it though as if they really are going to try sticking to that it should be made public so people can laugh at them more.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 22:03
|
|
|
Someone on Reddit offered me $325 for my pixels in my post. Someone else offered $350 in PMs. Then a guy with 15 trades on record offered me $400 in PMs and then in my post saying it should "drive up the sale price" for me in the next 24 hours. I don't think these people understand how buying and selling works.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 22:05
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:Someone on Reddit offered me $325 for my pixels in my post. Someone else offered $350 in PMs. Then a guy with 15 trades on record offered me $400 in PMs and then in my post saying it should "drive up the sale price" for me in the next 24 hours. Godspeed to you, you are living the dream.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 22:06
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:What the gently caress a butt kicker? I now officially proclaim the world at peak stupid. They are cool, stupid on paper but great in practice, they don't do rumble effects or anything they just make my rear end tingle with delight
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 22:06
|
|
|
AP posted:It wouldn't stand up in the EU as it's all just store credit on the account, they even sell gift cards which work exactly the same way as melting does. Your friend should push it though as if they really are going to try sticking to that it should be made public so people can laugh at them more. I'm not sure how it stands up in California either as there are substantial laws regarding gift cards and other forms of unredeemed credit.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 22:06
|
|
|
 Buttkickers, meet your match.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 22:09
|
|
|
they dont need a lfe pass to get buttkickers working. Anything under like 200hz will get them going. I honestly think devices like that should only work under like 60hz.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 22:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 01:24 |
|
|
Wafflz posted:Sadly for you the answer is probably "or not". Even if all the current stuff going on is not true, with the amount they have produced at this point and the most minimal burn rate you can figure based on their size there is no way they can deliver what was promised. It's not so much deliver what was promised, that's not an issue for me. The question is will SQ42 get out the door before its strangled to death by micromanagement, has enough substantial content to warrant new purchases, and doesn't get completely panned by critics out of spite or for actual shortcomings. Because every new sale of SQ42 after taxes is pure company profit, not "additional capital" like from pledges, and I'm entitled to a slice of that profit.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 22:10
|
|
