Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...
Aww, what happened to The Hope For Red October?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...
Pay more into pension schemes, says pension industry!

They are right, though. DC pensions are terrible and poo poo and the decline of DB schemes is yet another way the young are being screwed by the boomers.

A lot of people will also be renting into old age because buying a house is impossible. God knows how they'll be able to afford that on a tiny pension.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Phoon posted:

Its funny because if (in the event of parole uprising) the megarich flee to new zealand it wont matter, we can still seize all their assets that arent in new zealand and then theyll just be people living in the middle of nowhere with no income
One road in means no way out when the mobs come calling

Not sure they've thought this through

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

JosephWongKS posted:

David Cameron seems to have be almost completely unscathed by all of Mandelson's Ashcroft's allegations so far, up to and including the allegations involving his carnal knowledge of a severed pig's head. How? How? Are Labour and the other opposition parties that weak, or does David Cameron / the Tories truly have that much of a stranglehold over the levers of power in the UK?

Zephro posted:

Prediction time: this will not damage Cameron significantly
But did you know that Ed Miliband once pulled a face while eating a bacon sandwich and we can never let him live it down?

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ABghHHFv5k

If you haven't seen this it's worth watching. Is Eamon Holmes always this rambling and bad? OK MR CORBYN LET'S TALK ABOUT ARSENE WENGER

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

MrL_JaKiri posted:

Terrorism isn't an existential threat to the continued existence of a sovereign state like the UK
The depressing thing is that outside of academia this has become a radical opinion held only by pacifists, communists and terrorist sympathisers instead of a blindingly obvious truth.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Guavanaut posted:

A lot more people (especially outside of academia) care a lot more about the continued existence of themselves and their family than a sovereign state like the UK. I don't especially disagree with them either, if there were some sort of WMD like a Proudhon bomb which would kill states and leave people standing, it would be better than nuclear weapons or even standard warfare.

The key here isn't arguing that terrorism isn't a threat to the UK state apparatus, but arguing that there are massively bigger threats to them personally like drivers over 70 or an underfunded NHS or even the anti-terrorism measures themselves, but you'd be arguing against the media and state apparatus that depends on that fear for its own perpetuation.
Yeah, terrorism isn't really an existential threat to anyone. Heart disease and cancer and traffic accidents are, but they're boring and we don't get to look statesmanlike and play with our wicked cool fighter planes when we talk about those.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Zohar posted:

There were people in D&D last year mocking Democrat voters in the US because a higher portion of them believe that climate change is an existential threat than that ISIS is.
I hear ISIS are stitching together a navy capable of crossing the Atlantic and invading America out of scrap steel and bits of wood RIGHT NOW

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...
May 2020 Jeremy "Jezza" Corbyn is elected Prime Minister Lord Protector of the United Soviet Republic of England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

June 2020: remembering Mr Corbyn's stance on Trident, every other nuclear power launches their missiles at Britain. They've been waiting decades to kill tens of millions of people for no particular reason, and they aren't about to let this opportunity pass them by.

On the plus side, there is no more nukechat, even unto the end of days

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...
As a matter of pure pragmatism defending the right of ISIS members to a fair trial is going to be an uphill struggle. You'd have an easier ride defending the rights of a BNP member, especially since they are probably less fascistic than your average ISIS nutjob.

edit: Corbyn found this out with his comments about it being better for bin Laden to have had a trial than to have been executed; same deal.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Oberleutnant posted:

Graun homepage. Theresa May is going to say that migrants are stealing our jobs, threatening our "national cohesion" and are to blame for low wages.
I only got one word and pissflaps washes my mouth out with fairy liquid every time I use it so figure it out for yourselves.
Interestingly the low wages / jobs argument is the classic Left reason for opposing immigration. Another play for some left-wing voters?

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Oberleutnant posted:

no, it's "poo poo your old racist relative says at the family bbq".
That's what the "national cohesion" phrase is trying to appeal to. Opposing immigration on the grounds that it undercuts the wages of the low-paid and low-skilled was a pretty standard trade-union/left-wing view until 20 or so years ago when (neo)liberalism conquered everything. Free movement of capital and labour is a classic liberal position.

Random example:

http://www.theweek.co.uk/25095/dutch-advance-socialist-case-against-immigration

quote:

Anyone who argues that, as a political force, socialism is dead, ought to visit the Netherlands. The Socialist Party of the Netherlands (SP) is the fastest growing political group in the country.

They won 25 seats in the last general election - an increase of 16 seats - and made huge gains in last year's local elections. They are now the third largest party in Holland in terms of members and could well replace the Dutch Labour Party as the main alternative to the Christian Democrats.

Why are they so successful? I would suggest that it is because they are a socialist party that actually has socialist policies. They oppose the privatisation of public services, advocate higher taxes on the very wealthy and have condemned the "the culture of greed" caused by "a capitalism based on inflated bonuses and easy money". They oppose war and Nato and the nascent European superstate. They were the only left-wing Dutch party in Parliament to oppose the new EU Constitution in the 2005 referendum.

[...]

Part of its popularity with the voters lies in one particular policy which differentiates it from British or other European parties of the left: they oppose large scale immigration. The SP see the 'free movement of labour' as part of the neoliberal globalist package - something which benefits big business but not ordinary people.
Etc etc

Given how hard the Tories have been trying to appeal to Labour voters recently I wouldn't be surprised if this is meant to do exactly the same thing.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Tesseraction posted:

Eh, it's neither a left nor a right-wing position. You can complain about wages being low from a right-wing position, and the 'taking our jobs' rhetoric is straight-up right-wing fearmongering.
It's an argument that was/is most often found in the old, traditional, union-dominated Left, and the decision to frame immigration like this fits right in with the general Tory plan that was obvious from Osborne's speech - to make a grab for a bunch of Labour votes. Hence all this "we're the party of labour", "we're the party of work and workers", "we're the only centrists left" stuff, as well as things like raising the personal tax allowance, raising the minimum wage and so on (not the tax credit thing, admittedly). It's all part of the same propaganda campaign and it's aimed squarely at a bunch of different Labour-voting demographics. Talking about immigration in terms common both to the right (the "cultural cohesion" bit) and the left (the "undercutting good hard-working Brits" bit) looks aimed pretty squarely at the millions of one-time Labour voters who were either thinking of defecting to UKIP or who have already done so.

Zephro fucked around with this message at 10:19 on Oct 6, 2015

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Total Meatlove posted:

buzzfeed of all people did some investigative journalism
A couple of years ago Buzzfeed hired the former boss of the Sunday Times's Insight team, which, back in the day, used to be famous for its investigative journalism. She was given a whack of cash to create a department with the explicit brief to do stuff exactly like this. They want to move more into serious journalism, and the clickbait exists to pay for the serious / investigative stuff, neither of which has ever been profitable at any point in the history of news.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Oberleutnant posted:

Yeah, it's the kind of point made by people and groups who accept that capitalism is a done deal and the only option is to make the best possible space in it for your lot.
aka millions of labour voters, yes

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Tesseraction posted:

See: 'not left-wing'
Ah. The No True Scotsman strategy for winning elections.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Oberleutnant posted:

One of the most fundamental aspects of class politics is internationalism - class solidarity trumping national identity, and accepting that members of the proletariat or working class have more in common with each other regardless of nationality than they do with the bourgeoisie of their own nation or culture. You can't really pull a No True Scotsman over this. It's a crucial part of the concept.
I'm less interested in properly defining the Platonic essence of True Leftism™ than I am in the Tories making a big (and apparently successful, if Sero's post is any indication) play to be see as the "party of the centre" and to grab a load of votes from people who self-describe as left-wing and might be thought to be natural Labour voters.

Zephro fucked around with this message at 12:35 on Oct 6, 2015

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Tesseraction posted:

No, the 'understands what the term left-wing means' strategy of diction.

Left-wing politics are about equality, right-wing politics are about hierarchy. That is all there is to the terms. If you don't see how 'gently caress you, got mine' is a hierarchical system then there's little that can be done.
OK, you're right. "Left wing" is a term that can only be applied to people who believe in every one of a long list of specific policies, specifically including universal freedom of movement, rather than a broad brush that takes in people with lots of different beliefs, some of which may not be shared with other people who self-describe as left-wing.

Now that we've performed the tedious UKMT ritual of peacocking our personal Correct credentials and arguing over ideology, I still think that May's speech is part of a concerted Tory strategy to attract Labour voters, in this case Labour voters who've defected to UKIP (and who, as we have just established, are not True Leftwingers), or who are thinking of doing so, or who just don't like immigration generally. Which is a lot of them. The strategy in general seems, at least for now, to be getting some traction. It is smart politics, because while Corbyn may be in favour of free movement of labour a lot of his supporters (specifically the old labour crowd) will be much less keen. So he's either go to try to change the public's mind, which is difficult, or let the Tories colonise this particular area, which is bad for his electoral prospects. He can't even easily call them out on their failure to bring immigration down as promised in the 2010 election.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Zephro posted:

OK, you're right. "Left wing" is a term that can only be applied to people who believe in every one of a long list of specific policies, specifically including universal freedom of movement, rather than a broad brush that takes in people with lots of different beliefs, some of which may not be shared with other people who self-describe as left-wing.
OK, no, this is a bit childish. I'll rephrase. There are millions of people out there who self-describe as left wing, or who hold a bunch of positions traditionally identified with the left, who oppose immigration because they worry that it's depressing wages and/or costing them jobs, and who don't give half a poo poo what you or I say about whether that makes them True Leftwingers or not. Quite a few of them vote Labour, although a significant chunk have defected to UKIP or are flirting with the idea. It is smart politics for the Tories to appeal to them because

1) it's not something Corbyn can easily deflect because immigration is a big point of difference between him and a substantial chunk of his base.
2) crafting policies aimed at voters who traditionally vote Labour bolsters the Tory narrative of occupying the centre ground / being the 'worker's party' etc.

Zephro fucked around with this message at 13:13 on Oct 6, 2015

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Ddraig posted:

This is always weird to me, since it's pretty much a creation of lovely practices by the councils or whatever. I used to live in an area of Cardiff that was predominantly Asian. My little sister went to the local school, which by necessity, it being the only school around, predominantly had Asian children going there because it was the closest school.

I know this isn't the case elsewhere and there are examples of the polar opposite in some areas since when I went to school there was about 2 Asian kids in our entire year and I think about 2 black kids in the entire school. That's because the catchment area predominantly had white families living there.

I guess it makes for a good right wing scare story about how the browns are taking over, but as far as I can tell this has always been the case that there's certain parts of any given city/town that have more of a specific type of ethnic background than others.
I dont' think it's particularly to do with the councils. If you're moving to a foreign country you might want to get started by living near a bunch of people who are also from wherever you've just left, to minimise the shock and to provide a ready-made support network. Doubly so if you already have relatives / friends in the country. You're going to want to live near them if you can. It's the same basic reason you get expat ghettoes in Hong Kong or Bangkok or wherever.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

WhiskeyWhiskers posted:

Pretty sure I remember reading somewhere about the UK doing the opposite. The forced relocation of immigrants in social housing to different council areas specifically to break up ghettos and increase social capital. Which when you're a reactionary fuckwit who thinks ghettos aren't simply a transitionary defence mechanism, but an attempt to start a parallel fifth column Muslim society, sounds great.
Singapore (which is authoritarian as gently caress) did/does this, I've not heard of it in Britain, though.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Kegluneq posted:

Wasn't that supposedly a diktat issued from above that took most of the editorial staff by surprise?

The Indy has been strongly pro-Corbyn, there have been a load of positive stories shared through Facebook.
Yep, they were told to endorse him by Lebedev, the not-even-slightly-dodgy Russian oligarch who owns the Indy (and the Evening Standard).

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

TomViolence posted:

EDIT: Racking my brains and I just can't for the life of me think of anything significant that happened in a year ending with '39. :iiam:
1939: Otto Hahn achieves nuclear fusion? Hewlett-Packard is founded in California? The end of the Arab Revolt in Palestine?

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Coohoolin posted:

Right, because England is a tropical paradise.
Tresco is pretty nice to be fair

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Prince John posted:

May I invite you down south to the English Riviera? I had to take a photo to show my (funnily enough, Swiss) tutor at uni that we had palm trees, he was so disbelieving.
Like I said, Tresco* has the full-on bleached-white sand and turquoise sea thing if you go in the summer.


*One of the Scilly Isles

Only registered members can see post attachments!

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

JFairfax posted:

The children of a British man have called on David Cameron to intervene to save their father from being subjected to 350 lashes in Saudi Arabia. Karl Andree, 74, faces being publicly flogged as part of a punishment imposed after bottles of homemade wine were reportedly found last year in his car by Saudi police enforcing strict laws prohibiting alcohol.

The family of the oil executive, who is being held at Jeddah’s Briman prison, say he is already weak as a result of cancer and fear that the flogging will kill him. They said in a statement reported by the Sun: “Our father has given 25 years of his working life to Saudi Arabia, and this is how he is treated. Until his arrest, he has always been happy working there and felt safe.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/13/karl-andree-briton-350-lashes-saudi-arabia-david-cameron
On the one hand, Saudi Arabia is a repressive backwards barbaric shithole. On the other hand, if you move there voluntarily I'm not sure you get to complain about it being a repressive, backwards, barbaric shithole.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/politics/article4584272.ece

quote:

A cabinet row has broken out between two senior ministers over the fate of a controversial prisons deal with Saudi Arabia.

Michael Gove, the lord chancellor and justice secretary, was accused of naivety by Philip Hammond, the foreign secretary, over his demand that a £5.9 million deal with Saudi Arabia be scrapped. The dispute became so entrenched that it was raised at a meeting of the National Security Council, The Times has learnt.
Good. A broken clock and all that. gently caress Saudi Arabia, we shouldn't be wasting taxpayer's money propping up a medieval dictatorship.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Jedit posted:

That blogger who got sentenced to 1000 lashes still hasn't had his second fifty because he's not in good enough health to withstand them, and he started out young and fit. What do you think will happen when they flog a cancer survivor in his 70s? The Saudis are intent on literally killing a man for possession of alcohol - something that doesn't violate any kind of Islamic law, which only cares about you consuming it. If you aren't complaining about that poo poo, then gently caress off.
This is all true, but what do you expect if you move to a barbaric shithole? You have to comply with their lovely, barbaric laws. Saudi Arabia executes plenty of its own citizens for 'crimes' like apostasy or adultery and it's rare that anyone bats an eyelid. Yet when it's a foreigner who's got himself into this situation voluntarily suddenly we demand that Britain interfere.

I dunno, I can see your point, but it would leave less of a bad taste if there were more routine complaints about how badly Saudi Arabia treats people who aren't there by deliberate economic choice and who have no choice but to suffer under its lovely religious laws, namely its own citizens. This feels like "Westerner who moved to Saudi voluntarily, and made a rational, clear-eyed decision to subject himself to Saudi's sorry excuse for a legal system, should now be exempt from Saudi's crappy law because he's a Westerner".

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...
I dunno, though. It is barbaric and horrible, so maybe the best option would be to demand he be released and then sever all official ties with Saudi Arabia, seize all their UK assets and tell them to go gently caress themselves. Which will never happen, of course, but it would be the right course of action.

edit: if there's any country that deserves invading/bombing in the glorious War on Terror Saudi Arabia is top of the list

Zephro fucked around with this message at 10:43 on Oct 13, 2015

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

JoylessJester posted:

regularly going into deflation. PARTY OF ECONOMIC STEWARDSHIP.
Look citizen I think you'll find your paltry wage packet goes further now. We're putting cash into the pockets of Ordinary Families™ who are Striving™ to Get On™

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...
It's me, I'm George Osborne

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...
Good. You never know where one of The Terrorists might be lurking.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Angepain posted:

penopodes
penopodesii

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...
I thought the reason English is a structureless mishmash is because it started life as a Germanic language then a bunch of Romance-speaking toffs sailed over and oppressed everyone for centuries.

I mean we can't even do our classics right; "television" is a half-Latin half-Greek compound word. I saw a great T-shirt once that said "polyamory is wrong: you can have multiamory or polyphilia but mixing Latin and Greek roots is just not on!"

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

ThomasPaine posted:

It's pretty well accepted that scientific and medical elites used knowledge of latin/greek, among other things, in order to control access to their fields, ensuring that only those they admitted could get a foothold. This was particularly apparent as they professionalised and you had exams/certification etc becoming a prerequisite to getting a job. Prior to this things would be recorded in whatever language but afterwards always in the classical ones. All about maintaining professional legitimacy and keeping the riff raff out in order to do so.
Username/post combo :golfclap:

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Oberleutnant posted:

Never not use emotes imo :shobon:
:rolleyes:

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Tesseraction posted:

In Greek it would be hoi polloi.
plural "the hoi polloiii"

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Kaislioc posted:

Losing child abuse dossiers, having suspects go free, having guns mysteriously fly to the other side of the room without any fingerprints, having people tragically fall into and self-zip bags, immediately and permanently deleting information related to child abuse etc. etc.

The evidence is overwhelming. The United Kingdom has fallen victim to a coordinated ring of butter fingers.

Edit: Whoops! Just accidentally buried an axe in my own head. Egg (or axe as the case may be) on my face.
I've put a tenner on Jeremy Corbyn eventually going missing for a few days then being found on a ledge halfway up a mountain having mysteriously and savagely kicked himself to death and then half covered his own dead body with rocks

Zephro fucked around with this message at 10:40 on Oct 16, 2015

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

JFairfax posted:

I thought doggerland was the durdham downs
Pretty sure it's the National Trust carpark down the road past about 9 at night

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...
loving spheres and the difficulty of representing a curved surface on a flat plane

  • Locked thread