|
Weed Status: legal but in a kind of disappointing way Welcome to the Canadian politics megathread! If you're just joining us, our country is a fairly geographically diverse and regionally segmented population of about 35 million. Approximately 68% of the voting population just elected a Liberal majority government. This returns us to the historical average of about 70% of people who actually give a poo poo to vote every few years. How Things Stand On November 4th, new Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will swear in a new cabinet. He has promised to keep the portfolio numbers down, and appoint a record number of women to these positions. He has also promised to move swiftly on areas of concern, which I will outline below. This being a majority government, the Liberals now have a guaranteed four years in power unless they choose to contravene the fixed election law for some bizarre reason. This gives them the kind of mandate that can radically change the country - or, more likely, moderately revamp a few election planks while finding insane new ways to screw up. The Liberal platform has been interesting, since they seem to have taken stands on several things that seem contradictory- such as unwavering support for Keystone XL's NEB assessment, while also pushing for strengthened assessments and opposing the appropriation of native land for Northern Gateway. The platform is best viewed at Trudeau Metre, which not only lists every plank in the Liberal platform, but the progress made on each. What we can all agree on is there is a renewed sense of purpose in Canada for having rejected Stephen Harper, even from some of the defeated NDP. The other parties are licking their wounds, and there will be lots of talk about leadership races to replace Harper. Mulcair has not signalled that he would step down, but, with a decimated seat allotment, we're not sure what will happen in a few years. The Issues There are so many ways that the Conservatives have been messing with Canada that I'm unsure of where to start. The following list may reflect my bias:
Sources for News I personally rely on a couple of things to get my news. First of all, if you can sign up to the iPolitics Brief (may require a subscription, but mine has expired and I still get it), you are guaranteed at least basic knowledge of what to search on Google News that day. Our major national news sources are, sadly, the National Post, Macleans, Globe and Mail, and the CBC. For partisan news on the left and right, you will want to check out Rabble.ca and Sun News Network, respectively. I also make judicious use of Blogging Tories. Good regionals include the Tyee for BC, Toronto Star, Ottawa Citizen, and I guess Cyberpresse or Le Devoir for Quebec? Alternative news includes the CANADALAND podcast, the National Observer, and iPolitics. Opinion editorials to watch include Chris Selley's pundit round up, Aaron Wherry, Paul Wells, Andrew Coyne, Johns Ibbitson and Ivison (I'm not convinced they're different people), Dan Gardner... this list is pretty leftist, but Coyne makes up for all of the others. The rest of the time I use RSS feeds, Google news search alerts, and Twitter. If you're handy, you can use RSS feeds and your Twitter account in conjunction with something like Flipboard (as I do) to find articles that are making big waves. Watch #cdnpoli for a while to get an idea of the best twitter feeds to watch for serious retweeters, then follow them and watch who they're retweeting. Easy, and your smartphone can keep you up to date at all times. Just Admit It You Scrolled Down To See This Part and You'll Have To Be Disappointed The Only Person Who Matters Right Now, His Undeniable Sexiness Justin Trudeau and the Queen Kafka Esq. fucked around with this message at 01:16 on Nov 13, 2018 |
# ¿ Oct 26, 2015 21:26 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 14:46 |
|
quote:Good Monday morning to you.
|
# ¿ Oct 26, 2015 21:29 |
|
It's a 2 minute walk if you're slow.
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2015 00:30 |
|
I'm already thinking of closing this thread.
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2015 02:11 |
|
Baudin posted:How about instead of talking about what kind of furry we're the most attracted to we start talking about the new local MPs we just received from the glorious voting apparatus known as First Past the Post! A Genius that belongs in an Apple Store, not the House of Commons.
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2015 04:11 |
|
Helsing posted:How many gay angels can dance on a homophobic pinhead? One John Baird.
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2015 04:37 |
|
JawKnee posted:Kafka pls put in the OP that weed is not yet legal, to be updated when weed is in fact legal, so folks need not drift past the OP Just to gently caress with CI, done.
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2015 06:16 |
|
Jordan7hm posted:Good new thread. http://www.michaelgeist.ca/2015/06/why-the-liberal-party-defence-of-its-support-for-bill-c-51-falls-flat/
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2015 06:19 |
|
Melian Dialogue posted:Is there a reason the OP this time around is much more subjective? The last OPs have always given just a blanket statement of issues at play, but this one goes into some pretty opinionated stuff (like repealing C-51 for example). I always liked the other OPs because they very journalistically outlined the major topics and issues without being on one side or another of the issue. I wrote quite a few of those. I don't think it's out of line to remind people that Trudeau is a lily-livered pretty boy who refused to have a position for a long time. Also, shut up, I tried very hard to not be critical up there, you'll hurt my feelings, you fascist.
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2015 06:23 |
|
Okay, well nit pick away, you feckless thug. edit: I'm not going to ram anything down your throat, C-51 is a massive increase in information sharing and, just on the principle of it, we need to be extraordinarily cautious. Between this and the "you're with us or with the child pornographers" bill, the Liberals seem to have no problems with increasing the spying that they pioneered in 2003. I also think that Trudeau's reforms are going to be the first thing he forgets to do, and he'll throw a bone or two to distract the media from this incredibly non-sexy issue whenever it comes up. Just watch him. Kafka Esq. fucked around with this message at 07:50 on Oct 27, 2015 |
# ¿ Oct 27, 2015 06:28 |
|
Melian Dialogue posted:Sure, but this doesn't negate my point about being fecklessly unbiased in the OP. Declaring the necessity to repeal a bill is a pretty strong indictment of it, don't you think?
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2015 07:55 |
|
edit: also, can you stop being concerned about the OP? Nobody reads it after the first page, you dummy Frankly, Swagger, I just don't think you get what a civil liberty is and how much of a failure this bill is at respecting them. Let's go through the platform on C-51 as per Trudeau Metre:
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2015 08:04 |
|
Melian Dialogue posted:Well, unfortunately, I may not "understand what a civil liberty is" but those on the other side of the fence don't really understand what a national security is. C-51 solves a problem that doesn't exist, and is doing so in a way that is hastily thrown together by a power-hungry Conservative government. Trudeau's reforms will mean poo poo, as a whipped sunset vote 3 years from now will still be under a loving Liberal government. A judge issuing a warrant for bulk data collection also means poo poo because they have no idea what they'll find. And information sharing amongst agencies means some bulk data could be sent to the RCMP who then trips over their own dick and rapes you to death because they're incompetent. It should be repealed and a framework not created by the Conservatives should be dreamed up with guys like Michael Geist at the helm.
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2015 15:16 |
|
jm20 posted:Don't be a fascist The joke that follows the colon is the thread itself.
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2015 15:23 |
|
Swagger, I cannot see anything in the document you posted that is convincing. On the other hand, I have been reading widely respected expert Michael Geist, who is very concerned about the lack of actual oversight (not a toothless review or a secret tribunal reporting to the prime minister) over information sharing with broad definitions. Not to mention the liberals have intimated they will be expanding the bulk collection, rather than collapsing it. This is hardly surprising - they started the spying apparatus expansion over a decade ago. Then, like now, they ignored advice that supplementary legislation like CSIS act or the privacy act need to be revamped for the new reality. The liberals have not said anything regarding that. We now know a lot about how state spying trends to get completely out of control from the NSA leaks, so what keeps driving you to claim it'll be okay this time? http://www.michaelgeist.ca/2015/03/a-conversation-about-bill-c-51-how-the-anti-terrorism-bill-undermines-canadian-privacy/
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2015 23:56 |
|
I'm upset about the regressiveness of these taxes, it should just be a one hundred percent tax on PT6A.
|
# ¿ Oct 28, 2015 00:33 |
|
Kafka Esq. posted:Swagger, I cannot see anything in the document you posted that is convincing. On the other hand, I have been reading widely respected expert Michael Geist, who is very concerned about the lack of actual oversight (not a toothless review or a secret tribunal reporting to the prime minister) over information sharing with broad definitions. Not to mention the liberals have intimated they will be expanding the bulk collection, rather than collapsing it. This is hardly surprising - they started the spying apparatus expansion over a decade ago. Then, like now, they ignored advice that supplementary legislation like CSIS act or the privacy act need to be revamped for the new reality. The liberals have not said anything regarding that. Swagger, I'd still like to get a response to this, a real privacy expert saying you're wrong. Would you be a sweetheart and respond? The most troubling thing is that SIRC only watches a few of the agencies with access to the information that can be mined up, as noted by the privacy commissioner: quote:At this early stage, I can say that I am concerned with the breadth of the new authorities to be conferred by the proposed new Security of Canada Information Sharing Act. This Act would seemingly allow departments and agencies to share the personal information of all individuals, including ordinary Canadians who may not be suspected of terrorist activities, for the purpose of detecting and identifying new security threats. It is not clear that this would be a proportional measure that respects the privacy rights of Canadians. In the public discussion on Bill C-51, it will be important to be clear about whose information would be shared with national security agencies, for which specific purpose and under what conditions, including any applicable safeguards.
|
# ¿ Oct 28, 2015 05:00 |
|
Melian Dialogue posted:In fact, the new information sharing framework has even more specific definitions than the s.12 mandate of CSIS! Read the legislative summary I posted, they show a side by side table examining the two. You mean the part where they change will or necessary into wiggle words? Don't be an idiot, the definitions are both broad. The argument had been made that they made the definition broader to ensnare more people, but I don't think that was going to be too hard anyway given the old definition. My argument is the same as the CBA and Geist, that no oversight exists for the information sharing and increased spot powers they built into C-51 and C-13. The agencies have been massively expanded, the warrant process will probably be as terrible as FISA turned out to be in America, SIRC only has authority to review the activities of a few of these agencies and is slow and toothless. Frankly, I don't think you know what you're reading in these bills. You can't simply wave away the criticisms without even a citation. Give me the page in which they show a side by side comparison of how they tightened up the CSIS mandate, because all I see are the loosening of the preventive measures clauses and the criminal code being butchered.
|
# ¿ Oct 28, 2015 06:03 |
|
Melian Dialogue posted:I don't really have any interest with debating this with you if you're just going to hand wave away my points as "not reading the bill" or that Im simply being an idiot, it doesnt really show me any good faith that you're interested in the points Im making. No, obviously, when someone pushes back on "here's the thing, read it!" by saying "what you said is in there isn't in there", you should run away. quote:Good Wednesday morning to you. Kafka Esq. fucked around with this message at 14:36 on Oct 28, 2015 |
# ¿ Oct 28, 2015 14:18 |
|
flakeloaf posted:Serious question, at what point does the Sun run so far afoul of basic journalistic standards that someone holds them to account? lol
|
# ¿ Oct 28, 2015 15:58 |
|
flakeloaf posted:That's actually kinda reasonable. In 2015, a piece of paper that describes the stuff that happened yesterday is of limited utility. I really do not need somebody to analyze breaking news within a few hours of it happening, since they'll just be giving me foundationless speculation. I honestly rarely feel enlightened by that kind of news.
|
# ¿ Oct 28, 2015 17:05 |
|
jfood posted:I know it's hard to fathom, but you want it this way. I believe he's a first time offender on a couple of non-indictables so jail-time isn't a particularly great option. We do want justice to be equitable and reasoned, don't we? Yeah.
|
# ¿ Oct 28, 2015 17:16 |
|
flakeloaf posted:Cocaine possession is straight-indictable, isn't it? I honestly don't know, which is shameful but hey I'm out of practice. The decision will make it clear.
|
# ¿ Oct 28, 2015 17:28 |
|
Rime posted:Whoa guys, whoa, I've just had a crazy drunk idea: A fund that is preferably controlled by some kind of Protectorate...
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2015 02:14 |
|
He was the shadow cabinet minister of democratic reform, and he would know. Disclaimer: I worked in his constituency office for a few years.
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2015 02:35 |
|
JohnnyCanuck posted:I don't care what he was shadow minister for*, how does he know that after repeatedly promising - both before and after the election - that this would be the last Canadian Federal election under FPTP that the government won't honour its promise? Would you be very surprised that the Liberal government would introduce a non-proportional voting system? That's rich.
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2015 02:54 |
|
Lustful Man Hugs posted:Small world. I was volunteering in his office (and then his campaign) this year. Would I have seen you around? Do you know Timothy or Bridgette?
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2015 06:59 |
|
Lustful Man Hugs posted:Yep. They were staffers on the campaign too, and of course they were at the office as well. Small world.
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2015 07:08 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:"Employment Minister Pierre Poilievre is also said to be eyeing a run at the top job." Hey, at least the Liberals and Pierre will agree that you're either with us or the child pornographers.
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2015 22:05 |
|
jm20 posted:
I was just going to say, "do you?" But yours was better. Edit: eugh, Harper's drummer was found guilty of sex acts with a 13 year old. Steve really had no idea who he was working with. Kafka Esq. fucked around with this message at 12:42 on Oct 30, 2015 |
# ¿ Oct 30, 2015 12:25 |
|
To the RCMP investigators viewing this thread: I'm not WITH them. I'm just NEAR them.
|
# ¿ Oct 30, 2015 15:51 |
|
Square Peg posted:If the G20 is any indication, that don't mean poo poo. You're preaching to the choir.
|
# ¿ Oct 30, 2015 16:16 |
|
It's easy if they plea bargain!
|
# ¿ Oct 30, 2015 16:44 |
|
Unions are good, guilds are bad.
|
# ¿ Oct 30, 2015 18:08 |
|
quote:Evening all,
|
# ¿ Oct 30, 2015 22:52 |
|
Jordan7hm posted:I am really happy this person is no longer an MP. More goons in parliament, I say.
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2015 03:26 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-zuqCHCbbc
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2015 00:47 |
|
Cynical support of CI's iconoclastic bullshit requires at least a mention of peacekeeping. Edit: hope you enjoy being in Ezra Levant's company.
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2015 16:20 |
|
Trudeau is such a dork, walking down the drive repeating "sunny ways, sunny ways".
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2015 16:01 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 14:46 |
|
Tonda MacCharles @TondaMacC Brison, Duncan, McCauley, Morneau,Sajjan, Leblanc, Foote, Dion, Hajdul, Goodale, McKenna, Garneau, Philpott, Bennett. Obviously Dion for Environment, Garneau for State, McKenna for International Cooperation/State? edit: Morneau has been outed as Finance.
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2015 16:14 |