|
4
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 09:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 06:05 |
|
|
3
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 14:56
|
|
|
2
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 15:18
|
|
|
3
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 15:43
|
|
|
1
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 15:54
|
|
|
6. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 16:10
|
|
|
5, if you can get the left edge of the R to line up with the left edge of the F. And I'm super in.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 16:19
|
|
|
Breadnought posted:5, if you can get the left edge of the R to line up with the left edge of the F.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 16:52
|
|
|
7.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 16:57
|
|
|
someone do one that integrates a graph of reciprocity failure for portra 400, not me though i'm just an ideas guy
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 17:26
|
|
|
Dren posted:someone do one that integrates a graph of reciprocity failure for portra 400, not me though i'm just an ideas guy 
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 17:40
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 18:59
|
|
|
yes
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 19:05
|
|
|
+1 but the title is "reciprocal failure"
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 19:10
|
|
|
Technically the part next to the word "failure" is the linear region - the reciprocity failure is the region next to the word "reciprocity"  
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 19:17
|
|
|
The fact that they're swapped is in itself a failure.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 19:22
|
|
|
i would like to be in on this zine business if it is not too late
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 19:24
|
|
|
MrBlandAverage posted:Technically the part next to the word "failure" is the linear region - the reciprocity failure is the region next to the word "reciprocity" This is true, but thought it looked odd done properly  
PushingKingston fucked around with this message at 19:45 on Nov 16, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 19:24
|
|
|
PushingKingston posted:This is true, but thought it looked odd done properly   just spitballin shapes and contrasts
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 19:44
|
|
|
Mido posted:
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 19:54
|
|
|
Nothing says class like Tiems New Roman
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 20:00
|
|
|
alternative and more subtle take on the current title hype: Trending Towards Failure
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 20:01
|
|
|
i would like to do this please
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 20:24
|
|
|
I'm interested in doing this also.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 20:49
|
|
|
I like this a lot. (I also like 5, and agree with Breadnought.)
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 20:57
|
|
|
Mido posted:
This is a pretty good attempt, maybe with the black text overlapping differently so it masks less of the white, or have only some letters go over, maybe ? e  but with better fonts unpacked robinhood fucked around with this message at 21:58 on Nov 16, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 21:12
|
|
|
I want to throw the question of how this is going to be curated out there, because I think that is a necessity if we want this to suck as little as possible!! So what are some ideas for preventing the worst of the worst photos from being in this? Thanks, RangerScum
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 21:56
|
|
|
I feel like a theme would maybe be a good idea.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 22:01
|
|
|
RangerScum posted:I want to throw the question of how this is going to be curated out there, because I think that is a necessity if we want this to suck as little as possible!! Hi RangerScum, We should base it on how many glitter comments the photo has on flickr. Your pal, Pukestain vxsarin fucked around with this message at 22:08 on Nov 16, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 22:04
|
|
|
theme: don't submit photos you know are terrible.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 22:07
|
|
|
the photo must have a nice feeling to it, suzanne
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 22:09
|
|
|
Saint Fu posted:I feel like a theme would maybe be a good idea. Someone with a vision for how to organize submissions taking sole charge of curating would be a good idea. Setting a theme ahead of time would be an awful lot like the monthly contest threads and could be kinda ehhh. A difficulty with curation and this financial model is balancing financial support from the submitters against how many of each submitter's works are accepted. A practical way around this problem would be to cap accepted submissions per submitter and set a flat rate for inclusion regardless of how much work is accepted (1 picture/poem/whatever accepted pays the same as 3).
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 22:12
|
|
|
First of all: no theme. Unless it'sThoogsby posted:theme: don't submit photos you know are terrible. As for curating generally... The original idea, having every participant get a two page spread, was put forward because it makes life significantly easier based on a few practical considerations. It works well with the physical constraints of the book (pages need to be in multiples of four), it avoids some people having their work split across back to back pages and its fair financially. Perhaps the best way of doing it is to have everyone submit five pieces of their (not lovely) work and only the best pieces will be considered. I'm sure even the gooniest of Dorkroom street photographers have something that won't completely gently caress up this book.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 22:32
|
|
|
elgarbo posted:I'm sure even the gooniest of Dorkroom street photographers have something that won't completely gently caress up this book.  we'll see about that
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 22:33
|
|
|
elgarbo posted:I'm sure even the gooniest of Dorkroom street photographers have something that won't completely gently caress up this book. Been to PAD recently?
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 22:34
|
|
|
Thoogsby posted:Been to PAD recently? Admittedly no. Perhaps the solution is to accept submissions and then mercilessly cull shitposts. Don't participate if you're not willing to face the cold, brutal truth of rejection.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 23:00
|
|
|
elgarbo posted:Admittedly no. As long as you're comfortable rejecting submissions I think this is a good idea.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 23:03
|
|
|
ansel autisms posted:As long as you're comfortable rejecting submissions I think this is a good idea. Or if you are on the fence about some and would like an open discussion about them feel free to post it in here. Maybe people will get butthurt for a little bit but that's what makes this forum ~the best~.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 23:16
|
|
|
elgarbo posted:Perhaps the solution is to accept submissions and then mercilessly cull shitposts. Don't participate if you're not willing to face the cold, brutal truth of rejection. An overall theme wouldn't really work since our photos all have a wide spread of themes, which in itself is what would make the zine interesting. Considering you're the one who initiated this Dorkroom zine and are pretty much most of the work, I think you can be the one to do the curation and rejections. Those who aren't happy with your rejections can go start their own zine :P So yeah, I'd go with your submit 5 photos idea and then you pick the best 2 for the zine. You'll also probably want to cap the number of participants to maybe 30 so that this doesn't get out of hand. PS: If you're not comfortable being the curator, I nominate 365 Nog Hogger, who is the Official Dorkroom Mod-Approved Arbiter Of What Is And Is Not Art.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 23:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 06:05 |
|
|
RangerScum posted:Or if you are on the fence about some and would like an open discussion about them feel free to post it in here. Maybe people will get butthurt for a little bit but that's what makes this forum ~the best~. An excellent plan. If you submit your work to this zine you need to accept that you may be publicly judged and potentially rejected.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 23:19
|
|