|
Pacific Rim had big robots and monsters, if you expected anything else from the movie I don't know what to say.
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 02:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 14:20 |
|
|
Pootybutt posted:lol nah You suck sorry about your suck hopefully you can fix it with a bullet
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 02:17
|
|
|
Pootybutt posted:lol nah your avatar is too dangerously close to anime to claim you have good taste
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 02:21
|
|
|
hatty posted:Gravity is really bad you guys Gravity was really awesome visually. I just didn't buy a panicky whiny Sandra Bullock as an astronaut. She pretty much ruined the movie.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 02:22
|
|
|
Tricky D posted:Pacific Rim had big robots and monsters, if you expected anything else from the movie I don't know what to say. It had like 15 minutes of giant robots and monsters, the other 2+ hours were training montages and Charlie Hunnam's terrible accent.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 02:25
|
|
|
the venn diagram of people who think gravity sucks and people who experienced gravity as a 600MB download on a 13" laptop in a filthy one bedroom basement apartment is a donut
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 02:27
|
|
|
Internaut! posted:the venn diagram of people who think gravity sucks and people who experienced gravity as a 600MB download on a 13" laptop in a filthy one bedroom basement apartment is a donut I saw it in the theaters and it is bad
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 02:31
|
|
|
Dave Concepcion posted:interstellar sucked
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 02:37
|
|
|
the great deceiver posted:you have loving terrible taste my man Elysium was pretty bad. There is maybe 40 solid minutes of a good movie in there. Could have been so much better.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:02
|
|
|
Tricky D posted:Pacific Rim had big robots and monsters, if you expected anything else from the movie I don't know what to say. That's true, but it had big robots and monsters and still managed to be boring as gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:30
|
|
|
schindlers listicle was pretty fucken poo poo
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:32
|
|
|
Orkin Mang posted:schindlers listicle was pretty fucken poo poo #13 will surprise you!
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:36
|
|
|
Helical Nightmares posted:Elysium was pretty bad. There is maybe 40 solid minutes of a good movie in there. that was the only movie on the list i havent seen so i will take your word
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:40
|
|
|
Jurassic world is the dumbest movie I've seen since Avatar. I like Chris Pratt and I like dinosaurs. I even went into it basically expecting it to suck. It sucked even harder than I thought it could. It's like they wrote three lines on a bar napkin: -Dinosaurs = cool -Military = bad -Chris Pratt = raptor cowboy? (!!!) And then they started shooting a multi million dollar blockbuster with that tattered napkin in lieu of a plot. It was the most vapid, soulless appeal to spectacle in ages and that says a loving ton when it came out the same year as Star Wars 4-2: Deathstar Boogaloo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:42
|
|
|
Elysium sucks because you think you are gonna get a climax of some down trodden lower classes running a train on their whole little gay 1 percent space fort but nah all them folks in hollywood got money too so you end up getting some hack the gibson and send the space ambulance bullshit
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:42
|
|
|
I'm 26 years old and inside out was good 
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:46
|
|
|
I haven't seen it but I have a really hard time imagining a Pixar property not about talking vehicles being bad.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:50
|
|
|
Sleeveless posted:It had like 15 minutes of giant robots and monsters, the other 2+ hours were training montages and Charlie Hunnam's terrible accent. i agree. Pacific Rim had some unforgivable pacing problems A few more I can add to this thread: the two new Mission Impossible movies. Not sure why they're so highly rated. They're not bad movies and I'm even a Tom Cruise apologist, but they don't feel like anything special or original, more like two hour episodes of "CSI" or "24" with octuple the budget. The villains aren't even memorable, something important for this kind of movie. I saw Rogue Nation a month ago and can't remember who the hell the bad guy was. This one goes back eight years already but since Dark Knight was mentioned I'll throw this in: The Simpsons Movie. Baffling how everyone liked it. Titanic jokes? Greenday? Hottest screenplay of 1997. Even if the jokes were topical they weren't too funny. Maybe everything was rewritten too many times. I got that sense. The Simpsons Movie was BOOOOOORING
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:07
|
|
|
Mokelumne Trekka posted:the characters didn't have much depth. it emphasized violence but not really its impact on people. the police officer and his kid weren't developed much yet they seemed to be the movie's backbone I guess Del Toro's character was my main beef with Sicario. He was like a grimdark comic book character and it kind of took me out of the movie. It wasnt a bad movie, but it could have been a lot better.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:17
|
|
|
Professor Shark posted:The Hobbit movies are what finally made me understand the idea of "movies with no soul" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Ty30Ck9huk  shire sausage 
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:28
|
|
|
That whole menu was so good
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:43
|
|
|
I totally forgot about Elysium, and that's saying a lot on it's own. District 9 was loving AWESOME and I had high expectations of Elysium. God drat, was I let down. I'm REALLY looking forward to the Warcraft movie, as an old Warcraft fanboy as well as loving Moon. I know I might be extremely disappointed, but gotta support Bowie's son mannnnn.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 05:42
|
|
|
i wanna build my own hobbit slam so fuckin bad
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 05:54
|
|
|
Professor Shark posted:The Hobbit movies are what finally made me understand the idea of "movies with no soul" i got a friend who loved the book of the hobbitt and also the latest movie version of lotr but hated the hobbit movie. Lotr and the hobbo might as well be the same movie to me for all the difference i can see.l but one they love and one they hate, they didnt even finish the first hobbit movie SMILLENNIALSMILLEN fucked around with this message at 06:03 on Feb 2, 2016 |
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:00
|
|
|
Mokelumne Trekka posted:i agree. Pacific Rim had some unforgivable pacing problems is this a joke i thought everybody hated the simpsons movie
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:02
|
|
|
I walked out of The Great Gatsby. Baz lurhmann sucks And yeah the first hobbit movie was a huge disappointment so I didn't see the other two
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:15
|
|
|
Elysium was definitely not good.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 07:06
|
|
|
Tricky D posted:Pacific Rim had big robots and monsters, if you expected anything else from the movie I don't know what to say. I expected the cool russians to have at least one cool moment, instead the cool russians got owned by some rear end in a top hat monster instantly
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 07:07
|
|
|
And yeah Elysium was poo poo. Horrible editing and pacing and the characters were poo poo. I liked the FEW SECONDS of action in the movie though, like when they blow a guy away with some sci-fi rifle
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 07:09
|
|
|
Zzulu posted:And yeah Elysium was poo poo. Horrible editing and pacing and the characters were poo poo. I liked the FEW SECONDS of action in the movie though, like when they blow a guy away with some sci-fi rifle Yeah, the guy getting his head blown open, and then the reconstruction of his head in the medical machine were the best things in that movie.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 07:28
|
|
|
Zzulu posted:I expected the cool russians to have at least one cool moment, instead the cool russians got owned by some rear end in a top hat monster instantly I remember getting upset at the amount of THROWS they perform in that movie, especially while in the loving water.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 07:28
|
|
|
Inherent Vice. Almost forgot I even saw that.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 08:16
|
|
|
Pootybutt posted:Inherent Vice. Almost forgot I even saw that. Other than a couple minor omissions it was true to the spirit of the novel which is definitely a hazy rear end pot fueled noir story. What were you expecting exactly?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 08:23
|
|
|
Shaquin posted:Other than a couple minor omissions it was true to the spirit of the novel which is definitely a hazy rear end pot fueled noir story. What were you expecting exactly? No idea, is the thing. Mostly just heard "like big lebowski but not really." It had some fun moments, Wilson's funny in it, but it kinda just blinked from my memory till just now.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 08:38
|
|
|
GBS had a goldmined thread about this. Best entry: What has it gots in its colonsses?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 11:44
|
|
|
I was really disappointed by Interstellar and The Revenant.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 11:49
|
|
|
radiatinglines posted:
The last one is one of the worst big budget films I've ever seen.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 11:59
|
|
|
Ryoshi posted:I haven't seen it but I have a really hard time imagining a Pixar property not about talking vehicles being bad. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 12:13
|
|
|
I'm not defending any specific family movies, but personifying animals/toys/anything has kind of been a staple of children's animation (and even live action) since the birth of film.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 17:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 14:20 |
|
|
Professor Shark posted:List of Movies, from Recent to Oldest, that Professor Shark has enjoyed in the last few years: I pretty much agree with this. 21+22 Jump street are legit funny. Some of the best comedy writing in the last 10 years.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 17:33
|
|
)