|
|
#
¿
Sep 3, 2016 17:41
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 23:00 |
|
|
 akickassduke@gmail.com
|
|
#
¿
Sep 4, 2016 22:06
|
|
|
NEW RULE! NEW RULE! It's the thought that counts Week 1: Receiving targets are worth 5 points
|
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2016 02:00
|
|
|
New Rule! New Rule! The best offense is a bad defense REVERSE DEFENSE SCORING!!! All of the defense scoring will have negatives changed to positives and positives changed to negatives, except for the -100 for sacks which is already negative. This includes the 500 points for defensive TDs which will now be -500
|
|
#
¿
Sep 13, 2016 17:39
|
|
|
Fenrir posted:I love you fuckers that added punters and punt yards <3 I hate it because I dropped the guy who is probably going to be the most used punter ever and someone waiver sniped me when I tried to get him back. He's going to score like 3000 points a game...... unless someone changes the punting scoring again next week  Marshmallow Blue posted:Left Sacks at -100 as you expressed. If you wanted sacks to be +100, let me know No that's exactly what I wanted. I wanted to flip the scoring, but keep the other rules that were already made intact. Since sacks were already negative, I figured just leave them as is E: doesn't look like you made any of the under 300 yards allowed negative though Teemu Pokemon fucked around with this message at 19:49 on Sep 14, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 19:44
|
|
|
Yeah....maybe I'm planning on it!! 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 19:49
|
|
|
Is it too late to tweak my rule a bit, because I'm looking at the scoring and I think I can do a little better with it
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 19:57
|
|
|
Fair enough, Wormwood, but you're just going to make me more plotting and disobedient! fix the scoring for yards allowed though tia
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 20:05
|
|
|
Someone still needs to fix this: Those should be negative e: actually I think that 350-399 is usually -1, so that one is fine Marshmallow Blue posted:Someone last year tried to block my Pats players by Calvinballing "no players from teams that don't have a city in their name", so I went and found New England, Indiana or some crap like that, and got to start my guys. You're a hero. A petty, glorious hero
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2016 16:45
|
|
|
New Rule!! New Rule!! This town ain't big enough for the both of us Deactivate a RB slot
|
|
#
¿
Sep 21, 2016 00:17
|
|
|
Nephzinho posted:New Rule New Rule So, if I'm reading this right, this week's lineup is currently: QB QB RB RB WR (Because you can't close the spot that Marshmallow Blue just opened?) TE FLEX FLEX K HC ?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2016 15:37
|
|
|
NEW RULE!! NEW RULE!! I'm here against my will, I refuse to cooperate Incompletions are worth 10 points, Interceptions and fumbles are worth 50
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2016 16:00
|
|
|
Fumbles lost is negative still, and I don't think the kicking scoring was ever changed last week (which I'm not sure if that effects any of the outcomes)
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2016 19:08
|
|
|
so much punting
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2016 04:28
|
|
|
I'M TELLING!!! My opponent broke the Calvinball rule; I vote we replace Le'Veon Bell with Brandon Bolden from the WW, which would result in -1330 points, and in turn, would let me win by 72 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2016 16:58
|
|
|
D/ST isn't active currently NEW RULE!! NEW RULE!! Activate D/ST
|
|
#
¿
Oct 6, 2016 22:35
|
|
|
New Rule!! New Rule!! Get Rid Of Slimy FootballS Incompletions are worth 100 points Receiving Targets are worth 200, Receptions are worth -200 Fumbles are worth 300, fumbles lost worth an extra 100 (I think some of these might overlap with scoring changes from previous weeks so they might not be changing at all) Teemu Pokemon fucked around with this message at 20:41 on Oct 12, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2016 20:34
|
|
|
Fenrir posted:Are we doing 3 rules at a time now? I mean, both of y'all just literally posted 3 rules at a time. It's a little ridiculous... I mean the 3 each that you posted don't even relate to the same position. One is changing a QB rule, a WR rule and a turnover rule simultaneously, the other is changing a QB rule, a RB rule and a P rule simultaneously. Yeah okay, that's fine. I'm new here so I'm just going on what I've seen and I think that we've let a few of those multi-category rule changes go, so I didn't really think anything of it. As far as the rule I created, I would say just stick with the fumbles in that case then. e: aw I didn't check my lineup in time for when RB and HC were taken out and I left in Denver HC  They didn't score any points though because Denver Bad
Teemu Pokemon fucked around with this message at 20:20 on Oct 14, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2016 20:18
|
|
|
NEW RULE!! NEW RULE!! Return to sender All D/ST touchdowns are worth 1000 points
|
|
#
¿
Oct 20, 2016 18:42
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 23:00 |
|
|
New Rule!! New Rule!! The only thing HC wins are worth 1000 points e: lol I've been waiting for two weeks for someone to make this rule and the Pats are on bye 
Teemu Pokemon fucked around with this message at 04:26 on Nov 3, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Nov 3, 2016 04:24
|
|