Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Ardennes
May 12, 2002

yeah I eat rear end posted:

I never said it was a perfect system but there's a reason the soviet union collapsed and the US is still standing (even if it's in a bit of a slump lately).

People who unironically get on their knees for the stalins/maos of the world are no better than nazis imho.

There is a reason, but in all honesty, it probably had nothing really to do with capitalism versus socialism. If it was the "Tsarist Union" instead of the Soviet Union under the same constraints it would have still collapsed.

Hell, you could say that Russia regardless of what happened after 1917 was probably completely hosed.

Ardennes fucked around with this message at 14:45 on Dec 10, 2017

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

uncop posted:

The problem is westerners calling countries communist on the basis of their leaders being (actually or nominally) communists. I mean not even the own propaganda of any of these ”real-socialist” countries called them communist. Since the economic content of these countries never mattered, it’s not surprising that one would miss the economic (but not political) convergence toward western-style capitalism that started in the 60’s and 70’s. I would say as a reaction to isolated authoritarian party states’ inherent inability to make a definitive break with capitalism in the first place (leaving more dynamic and/or exploitative capitalism as the best strategy), but that’s beside the point.

They largely couldn't for the fundamental reason of trade.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

uncop posted:

I would say that the real pressing reason was a military one, the commie bloc put together was fairly self-sufficient and the true arena of economic competition with the west was in military capacity. A big military requires a big economy, which required rapid industrialization through intensified exploitation, which required a political authority opposed to the workers rather than by and for them, invalidating any basis for a self-sustaining movement away from capitalist relations. And like every single one of those regimes was born out of some international military conflict.

During the 1920s/1930s, the Soviet Union was absolutely not self-sufficient and ran a giant trade deficit. One reason workers were pushed so hard was to try to basically produce exports to pay for all the imports the country needed. There was no way for the Soviets to isolate themselves fully from the rest of the world, especially since they needed basic machinery they couldn't build themselves (admittedly so would have a capitalist Russia). The only things the Soviets could re-ably export during most of this period was grain, eggs, and oil.

(Also, there really was no sane choice but to produce a large military from the 1930s through the Cold War.)

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
Yeah, I can see why you guys hate the poo poo out of historians and the books they write.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
Anyway, China is if anything still quite centrally planned on an industrial level, just not completely so.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

yeah I eat rear end posted:

That's more because of irresponsible gambling and excess alcohol use

So basically you already live in a Soviet Union inside of your head.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Magius1337est posted:

ok but we're getting rid of the humanities degrees

Yeah right man, Americans already know too much as it is. I mean there is no point in learning from history.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

comedyblissoption posted:

If you were a white collar worker in America receiving healthcare benefits, the amount you pay monthly is likely far below what the company pays for insurance as part of your compensation. You also pay large amounts of compulsory taxes for medicare and medicaid. The payroll taxes for these public healthcare programs are also additionally "matched" by the employer. This is just dumb accounting trickery to hide part of your compensation that you are paying for these programs. A fair comparison between how much you pay in germany and the US would account for all of these costs.

If someone makes an argument that American healthcare is great because at least they don't have to pay all those taxes out of their paycheck for healthcare, they are ignorant or an idiot. A remarkable fact is that taxes on public sector healthcare in the US exceeds all per capita spending of private and public sector healthcare in the UK.

Between what most people pay between federal and state taxes, FICA (both their individual/employer costs), and their out of pocket health care costs, the "burden" of living in Europe really actually doesn't seem that much.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
Btw, 15-20% of the population of the gulag there for religious/political crimes.

46% of the population of prisoners in the US prison system are sentenced for drug convictions, most of them non-violent.

Ardennes fucked around with this message at 12:50 on Dec 12, 2017

  • Locked thread