|
Max posted:First Best
|
# ¿ Apr 14, 2020 01:49 |
|
|
# ¿ May 21, 2024 15:51 |
|
Token Female posted:9. Join the discord for this thread. Roles will be given here and such. Join here
|
# ¿ Apr 14, 2020 01:52 |
|
Quandary posted:It's been like a decade, how the hell is this still all the exact same people playing mafia? I haven't played in years. I've been saving myself for this moment
|
# ¿ Apr 14, 2020 18:34 |
|
This is gonna be really good or really bad probably bad
|
# ¿ Apr 14, 2020 23:01 |
|
Tom Tucker posted:Oh man there are so many people I remember from 13 years ago but I'm trying to put a memory to the name. I'll help. You're all loving morons, I am right listen to me!
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2020 02:56 |
|
CapnAndy posted:Wait IRC and AIM aren't things any more? Discord is IRC with emojis, it's pretty good
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2020 04:18 |
|
It's starting to come back to me... ##vote merk
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2020 17:21 |
|
kingcobweb posted:I made that GBS game THIRTEEN YEARS AGO and people from then are still around. Good lord I think I'm the only Mafia 1 person "still around", definitely the only Mafia 1 MVP still around "still around" meaning "plays a game every four years"
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2020 18:16 |
|
Dexanth posted:dont we have that already This sounds like death eater talk. Consider this a strong FINGER OF SUSPICION on Dexanth. I am happy with my merk vote for now though, he must pay for the crimes of the past.
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2020 18:32 |
|
Scientastic posted:Punishing people for crimes is extremely dementor Trap sprung. Only a death eater would vote for me! ##vote Scientastic
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2020 18:37 |
|
Dexanth posted:consider this my big FINGER OF TACOS on you I respect this, consider my FINGER OF SUSPICION lifted
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2020 18:42 |
|
##vote Token Female no mods no masters
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2020 18:55 |
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Sorry, this was determined to be #1 scumtell while you were away. ##vote Jose I know, only town would commit to making the #1 scumtell though, so why are you voting for town?
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2020 19:15 |
|
Epsilon Plus posted:false IMO - if I got accused of "white knighting", among other things on Day 1, my immediate response would be to post something like "hmmm yes a compelling case but hast thou considered *farts wetly*" Why are you white knighting for Liger?!? Hmm???? I agree with this post though
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2020 22:40 |
|
Spoonsy posted:I still maintain (and have been lynched for this idea) that the D1 lynch, unless someone does something idiotic or there is a clear attempt at a railroad by scum that doesn’t know what it’s doing, is a crapshoot. The shitpost phase only ends if you let it
|
# ¿ Apr 16, 2020 15:48 |
|
I generally agree with everyone who says D1 sucks always and if you execute scum you usually got lucky. Out of everything posted so far Scientastic's posts bug me the most, the out of the gate liger case felt uninspiring and forced but I lean "bad townie d1 case" more than "bad scum d1 case" bowmore and yuming and ASAPRockySituation should post more
|
# ¿ Apr 16, 2020 15:58 |
|
yuming posted:Jose This is a common complaint with me on day 1. I'm not good at identifying scum on day 1 (and I argue nobody is, sometimes people are just lucky) and I think that executing scum on d1 is usually counterproductive because it doesn't give them enough time to tie themselves to their scum buddies. None of the existing arguments are compelling to me, it all just reads like the usual d1 bickering that happens. I've even reread most of the post histories in the game looking for something because I want to get the game moving, but there just isn't anything there yet.
|
# ¿ Apr 16, 2020 19:05 |
|
kingcobweb posted:Strong disagree, killing scum is... good. Tying scum to one another only happens with true rookie players imo At this point we are all pretty much rookies again
|
# ¿ Apr 16, 2020 19:10 |
|
I would like everyone to post a description of how you play as scum and how you play as town to make it easier for everyone to assess I'll start Town: Like this Scum: Not like this
|
# ¿ Apr 16, 2020 20:17 |
|
Khris Kruel posted:lol clearly I stabbed myself into a hornet nest of scum. Khris Kruel posted:This was clearly a rally call of scum to take pressure off Jen X Khris Kruel posted:yes, exactly. I hit scum purchase, and the rats came out to defend. Khris Kruel posted:I'm caught up. Tom Tucker and kingcobweb saw the same post I voted xo as scummy, and I'm confident he jumped on me to defend Jen X This Jen X obsession is weird, nobody is bandwagoning you to save Jen X from your one vote. Are you actually the role you say is hunting you and trying to kill Jen?
|
# ¿ Apr 17, 2020 04:29 |
|
I'm fine with the KK launch, you can pretend I voted for him, I'm just holding off in case anyone else wants to say anything before hammer.
|
# ¿ Apr 17, 2020 04:40 |
|
Oh hey the thread is open, gonna try to catch up now
|
# ¿ Apr 18, 2020 22:56 |
|
I've got to run for the rest of the night, but I wanted to post my thoughts so far. I've finished rereading the histories for some key players of day 1, I haven't skimmed day 2 but not read in detail yet. Now that we've got a few flips, I wanted to go back and see if anyone had a motive for the night kills. Jen didn't push too hard for anyone (her strongest suspicion was Kashuno), I don't think her death was motivated by her cases Scientastic on the other hand pushed hard on xopods (OFFICER LIGER and Epsilon Plus were his other suspicions, I have a town read on Epsilon and haven't reviewed OFFICER LIGER in depth yet, the xopods stuff was just too compelling) Scientastic posted:Happy to do this too. That xopods post is really really terrible. I think the linking himself to merk is bad, it really reads like "I am not shirking my respsonsibilities, but make sure you realise that I am sharing the responsibility with one or two other players" Scientastic posted:##Vote Xopods Scientastic posted:Doesn't anyone else see how xopods is trying to have his cake and eat it here? He keeps on talking about how accountable hes being and how by making a big deal out of pushing this case, he's nobly putting himself in the firing line, but actually he keeps shifting the focus (and accountability) onto someone else. With the hindsight of knowing KK was scum and Scientastic is dead I think he was right about xopods and I think he was likely killed to take the heat off of xopods. xopods starts out with a couple of "me toos". He posts quite a bit without providing content, arguing procedure rather than content His "gotcha" moment with Scientastic just feels off xopods posted:Good thing you don't think that inconsistency is scummy, cause this is inconsistent as hell. xopods posted:Okay, but the point you're responding to in the first quote relates to scum hunting and whether self-consciousness is a scum tell. You seem to be saying that it's not, because Town also have a motivation not to seem scummy. He's trying very hard to present arguments as logical and others as inconsistent. He hits Andy for this too, but silently drops any further mention xopods posted:I think Town and Scum can both be inconsistent but they're inconsistent in different ways. It's not the mere inconsistency that bothers me here, it's that it reveals a certain insincerity and self-consciousness IMO. xopods posted:Also, for anyone on the fence about KK or not really seeing it, there's a strong case to be made for a D1 lunch that can clearly be attributed to one or a small number of players. He had the motive to kill Scientastic, he pushed really hard on KK while always bringing up merk and DBD to spread out the "blame", to a degree that seems over the top. I think xopods is scum you guys ##vote xopods
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2020 01:58 |
|
Tom Tucker posted:There's a 10% chance this works. Can someone tell me how to add a gif to a post? I haven't yet, I'm behind on day 2. I see it now, there is a good chance I would have glossed over it given the size but I'll read it after I'm done raiding
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2020 02:53 |
|
Tom Tucker posted:There's a 10% chance this works. Can someone tell me how to add a gif to a post? OK, not gonna lie, I scrolled up to read your post and I was nodding along thinking "Tom Tucker gets it" then I realized I was reading my own post. Then I read your post, and I was still nodding along. I think we're on the same page
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2020 04:13 |
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Yep, agree. Why? You haven't posted about either of them except for a joke(?) vote on Liger
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2020 05:03 |
|
Mikujin posted:This far into the witch-hunt this post just strikes me as weird. I get what Jose it getting at, but it just seems... kinda irrelevant to any actual discussion. Couple that with the fact his only previous posts amount to "no one is good at D1, please excuse me for not trying everyone knows I don't try on D1" and It leaves a sour taste. The timing of the post was because I was behind and catching up to the bandwagon, I was trying to make rational sense of KK's weird behavior, his posting did not make sense to me if he was town. It turns out he was just a bad irrational townie though. I don't think it is accurate to say I don't try on D1, I don't make many D1 cases, and I don't think most D1 cases are very good, but I'm still reading the game and getting a feel for the interactions between the various players. Sure, it isn't super helpful in terms of finding scum day 1 but I think it pays off eventually. Anyway, I said it earlier, but I think xopods is the most likely to be scum on the bandwagon. I'm still in the process of rereading everyone, but he seems like the most likely candidate.
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2020 05:22 |
|
Kloaked00 posted:The other person that ended up catching my attention is Jose. I was looking at the votes on other people to look for #2 above, and in looking at Jose's posting history, it doesn't look very good. There's the usual vote phase voting stuff, then once we started real discussion, there's still not much content at all. He had a joke vote on merk in the joke phase, then his second vote on Scientastic is here on April 15 at 1:37pm I had an unusually hard time with D1, and I'm usually not very good at D1 content. I'm working on doing better on D2, I've got a notes doc and everything which is something I haven't done in a decade or more. quote:And gives an excuse for why even though he's started playing mafia back when me, Spoonsy, TT and CapnAndy did, why he's bad now: quote:You can look through his post history yourselves, but you won't find really any content there. Now, I do agree that the veterans might be rusty and might not be used to any new metas, but we still know how to play mafia. And that includes Jose. He knows better than how he's playing right now and his lack of contribution for D1 though he knows better comes off as really scummy to me. I wish I had more content to post D1 too, but I think that my little bit of D1 content was more than some other people in the game.
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2020 15:04 |
|
Hal Incandenza posted:I do think his xopods case earlier felt forced though as I said Why do you think it felt forced?
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2020 15:11 |
|
Spoonsy posted:No, I missed that while looking at the vote count mechanism stuff. Spoonsy posted:They made a choice to go missing? This fishing feels ill advised at best and scummy at worst
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2020 15:25 |
|
Hal Incandenza posted:A lot of it was reiterating things that have been said already and so it feels like you felt you had to have some content to appear like you were hunting before you could vote but you could have basically said "I agree with most of the points on xopods" and amounted to the same thing quote:Also I'm just biased against cases that seem to be founded in "well the person who was the NK said they found so and so suspicious" because I just don't think scum use that as motivation especially early in a huge game like this and it's a crutch scum use as a jumping off point. Hal Incandenza posted:You sure are fishing a lot around this, what are you hoping to discover here. Dang it don't post stuff right before me
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2020 15:32 |
|
It doesn't convince me he's not scum but thisxopods posted:I just want to highlight these two posts for everyone's future reference. quote:... Hal is correct that I'm just playing like I always do...
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2020 15:45 |
|
Kloaked00 posted:I also think PQ is town simply based in the fact that I don’t feel scum would want to relay any extra information to the town if they can help it, even if it’s information that some town may already likely have. And the way he said it doesn’t read as a scum gambit, it reads honest to me On the other hand if I was scum and I had information that I thought might make me look vaguely townie I'd want to share it to look like a helpful townie. Assuming the information is accurate it will become public knowledge on D3 so if you've got that information and you're scum you may as well use it while you can
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2020 15:55 |
|
For the people who think Epsilon is scum, what is your read of this post?Epsilon Plus posted:I want you out of the game just for lovely posts like these tbh It feels authentic to me. I don't think scum would say this about fakeclaims in this way. It's not a free pass where I think Epsilon is confirmed town or anything, but it is more compelling to me than the cases against him at this point.
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2020 16:04 |
|
Kloaked00 posted:Eh, with this being a Token HP game, it’s strong precedent and clearly stated here that scum all have fake claims, so I don’t think that really has any part in helping my read Right, but scum would know they have fake claims so I don't think they would make that comment. Only a townie who wasn't paying attention wouldn't know that scum have fake claims.
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2020 16:15 |
|
xopods posted:Of the games I've played since I got back, only two have finished and can be discussed. I just read a couple pages of your posts in both Cookfia and FF8, I honestly don't see the similarities between your posting here and your posting there. Your weird posts about KK and tying yourself to DBD and merk just feel very tonally different than anything I see in those two games (at least the early parts I read). Is there an analog case in one of those games that you think fits this? You keep saying that this is your meta, show me the receipts.
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2020 16:30 |
|
Pussy Quipped posted:Honestly it’s pretty wifom but I feel like he did it on purpose to get town points for not understanding the fake claim situation CapnAndy posted:C’mon, dude, this is WIFOM as hell. It’s the simplest thing in the world to imagine scum with a fakeclaim deciding that, since they know they have a fakeclaim, pretending to not know that would seem townie, and you can take that logic as many steps as you want. Ya'll should read the second half of my post instead of tripping over yourselves to yell WIFOM
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2020 21:18 |
|
CapnAndy posted:I read it. Read mine again: it is trivially easy to imagine a scum, who knows they have a fakeclaim, thinking to themselves "well since i know I have a fakeclaim, that's scum knowledge, so if I pretend to not know about them I sound townie". All it requires is missing the same post in the rules that your case for it being a townie play is predicated on missing anyway. It's extremely WIFOM. I don't think the two scenarios of "townie didn't read OP and thinks they caught a scum slip" and "scum pretends to be a townie who didn't read the OP and acts like they've caught a fake scum slip in order to prove they are townie" are equally likely. I think Epsilon's post comes across as authentic, and that they are more likely to be town than scum. I could certainly be wrong, but for now Epsilon is in my townie pile
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2020 21:52 |
|
I think WIFOM is overused and usually lazy. If actions are equally likely regardless of alignment, then sure, it's WIFOM. If an action is more likely for one alignment than the other, but is technically possible for both, then dismissing it and saying "WIFOM" is lazy and missing the point. Like, if Westley had put the poison in one of the cups while Vizzini was watching the entire time Vizzini wouldn't have had a hard time picking the right cup, but since it was a 50/50 thing he went around in circles. I lean towards closer to 75/25 for the Epsilon Gambit™ so I don't think it is valid to just dismiss it as WIFOM. Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2020 22:01 |
|
|
# ¿ May 21, 2024 15:51 |
|
kingcobweb posted:Can you elaborate on how scum xopods would play this differently? I hope you aren't scum taking advantage of my tendency to not suspect people who agree with me because it is working
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2020 22:36 |