|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 13:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 14:20 |
|
|
Oh poo poo, now we're going places.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 13:16
|
|
|
I love how the movie poster images on Wikipedia are so loving small you can never read a single word on the actual poster. The mandatory resolution for movie posters on that site must be like loving 300x100 or something. They couldn't allow anything even 20% bigger so you could read the loving thing? I'm not asking for HD resolutions. Just like 600px so you can read the loving thing! Literally the biggest movie on earth of all time and I can't even read the loving tagline under the title. gently caress you, Wikipedia! Like 11 more kilobytes and I you would be able to actually see the loving poster but no, Wikipedia is run on an AOL server in 1997 apparently. But a picture of some guy's nutsack is 9000x120000 so these idiots who run the site aren't even consistent.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 14:16
|
|
|
Lmao I immediately get fromsoft character creator vibes from this face but im sure it has nothing to do with the 100 hours of Elden Ring I've played lately
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 14:20
|
|
|
Blooster posted:I love how the movie poster images on Wikipedia are so loving small you can never read a single word on the actual poster. The mandatory resolution for movie posters on that site must be like loving 300x100 or something. They couldn't allow anything even 20% bigger so you could read the loving thing? I'm not asking for HD resolutions. Just like 600px so you can read the loving thing! That's Jimbo Wales' nutsack and you will give it the UTMOST RESPECT
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 14:52
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 15:05
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 15:07
|
|
|
Blooster posted:I love how the movie poster images on Wikipedia are so loving small you can never read a single word on the actual poster. The mandatory resolution for movie posters on that site must be like loving 300x100 or something. They couldn't allow anything even 20% bigger so you could read the loving thing? I'm not asking for HD resolutions. Just like 600px so you can read the loving thing! Wait, are you saying the nutsack should be lower resolution? 
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 18:10
|
|
|
Never! Always highest resolution for nutsack!
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 18:13
|
|
|
By popular demand posted:Never! Always highest resolution for nutsack! NESticle is all the resolution you need friend
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 18:37
|
|
|
gently caress off Gurf. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 19:51
|
|
|
Doll House Ghost posted:Favourite image from Wiki These are my people
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 19:54
|
|
|
Nerkolus Kerge
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 20:19
|
|
|
What's with the giant bump on the baby's neck
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 20:33
|
|
|
Drunk Nerds posted:What's with the giant bump on the baby's neck I don't like you're description of my genitalia.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 20:35
|
|
|
My favorite genres of photos on Wikipedia are: 1. Pictures of celebrities that were taken surreptitiously, of them with their head down: eating in a mall food court, at an airport, signing a book, or something. 2. Pictures of private parts and bodily fluids that were obviously taken by the uploader for exhibitionist purposes. William Bear fucked around with this message at 20:44 on Mar 19, 2022 |
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 20:39
|
|
|
idk if anyone cares but to get around the faceapp watermark for the free version you can just screenshot the pic you want to use so the watermark can be cropped out. thats my faceapp tip of the day thanks everybpdy 
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 20:45
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 22:35
|
|
|
Blooster posted:I love how the movie poster images on Wikipedia are so loving small you can never read a single word on the actual poster. The mandatory resolution for movie posters on that site must be like loving 300x100 or something. They couldn't allow anything even 20% bigger so you could read the loving thing? I'm not asking for HD resolutions. Just like 600px so you can read the loving thing! their policy is that screenshots and posters have to be so small that they're useless, that way there's no chance there's any copyright issues
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 22:38
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2022 04:30
|
|
|
William Bear posted:My favorite genres of photos on Wikipedia are: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larisa_Oleynik
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2022 04:34
|
|
|
pixaal posted:Given the spelling I'm going to guess someone was trolling and uploaded it to see how long it would stay up. Impressive as poo poo so far don't tell the editors. i checked the profile of the person who uploaded the image and it's a company that does medical images and everything else they've posted looks fine, it's just this one image that's bafflingly horrible
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2022 06:57
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2022 19:23
|
|
|
7 stages of avenattization
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2022 19:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 14:20 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2022 08:18
|
|
