|
rookhunter posted:I think you are generally right but there seems to be exceptions. That shape was what caught my eye when I first clicked on the thread. I'm a native Charlestonian, so one of the first polysyllable words I learned in school was "peninsula," while drawing that familiar shape. I think the clues in the images will mostly be things like that -- visuals that are recognizable if you're very familiar with a place, or if you can actually go there and look around. Morally Inept posted:From the look of that one that was found, the key was broken. After so many years I'm sure the whole thing may have just disintegrated into the soil (except for any metal parts). I'm hoping that the Charleston cask is still intact or mostly intact since the ground doesn't freeze here. That's assuming that Hugo didn't get it, wherever it is. Edit: Thanks for those Cleveland pics! That shores up another pet theory of mine, that Preiss went to some trouble to bury the casques in tucked-away places in the parks he picked, where the digging wouldn't be destructive or cause an eyesore. That makes sense in terms of not deliberately tearing up beautiful parks, and also for being able to bury something without leaving traces that would attract a lot of attention. While I was walking through WPG today and thinking about that, I was struck by just how few places like that there were, even in a relatively large park like White Point Gardens. Maybe that will help in narrowing down possible locations. bonestructure fucked around with this message at 23:48 on Jun 20, 2013 |
# ? Jun 20, 2013 23:39 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 04:10 |
|
Dr. Gitmo Moneyson posted:People thought the Boston cask corresponded to Salt Lake City because one of the rocks around the window is shaped a little bit like Utah or something. I've always thought it looked more like an American Flag than anything else, with the telltale crack giving it the flag shape, rather than an elongated one. Total hunch, I've got nothing concrete on that part of the painting.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2013 23:40 |
|
bonestructure posted:I'm hoping that the Charleston cask is still intact or mostly intact since the ground doesn't freeze here. That's assuming that Hugo didn't get it, wherever it is.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2013 23:47 |
|
I dont remember seeing this brought up before, so apologies if it was, but I have found two references to the first 2 lines of verse #3 associated with Boston First: quote:If Thucydides is quote:After his years in Waltham, Xeno- Besides painting he also decorated houses so maybe there is a house near hyde park he decorated? Maybe the one he lived in? Here is a link to the pdf about him: http://www.historicnewengland.org/preservation/your-older-or-historic-home/articles/pdf209.pdf second: There is this quote: quote:On the eve of the American Revolution, Horace Walpole predicted, in 1774: So maybe the location is actually between New York and Boston? Then it goes on with quote:In the area of his direction 5 steps could mean 5 langitudes north and then there is a green tower of lights somewhere maybe? I will check this further, just throwing this out now. edit: After looking further, there is actually a light tower in a town to the north, in Marblehead. And it was changed quote:in 1938 to fixed green http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marblehead_Light_(Massachusetts) And in Marble Head there is Castle Rock, looking like this: http://mw2.google.com/mw-panoramio/photos/medium/9665702.jpg Edit: Sorry for heavy editing, but I didnt want to make a new post for the same 2 lines of the verse. demonicon fucked around with this message at 00:30 on Jun 21, 2013 |
# ? Jun 20, 2013 23:50 |
|
rookhunter posted:Cask 2 It's not a perfect match: But it's also not too darn bad. Good catch. And the Fort Sumter ornament is even pointing out (approximately, depending on how you tilt the image to make the road match up) toward Ft. Sumter. Thing is, I'm not sure what it tells us about where the treasure is. I would say that if it fit better through resizing then wherever the gem in the corner is, that's where the treasure would be. But it doesn't really match anywhere too nicely. The closest thing is the Fort Moultrie Monument, which once again give that a strong case, but you'd have to do some extreme resizing/tilting of the image to make the gem overlay there, so much so that the road wouldn't match anymore.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2013 23:53 |
|
That clue is vexxing me more than anything else right now. I spent some more time poring over HLS and Harvard Yard today and can't find anything. In general I don't like clues that obscure or that much of a reach, but who the hell knows. They could mean something else? Roads, buildings, who knows. It could also be a sign that I'm just flat out wrong about the location, but Chicago was found without solving every line in the verse, so I'm not giving up hope
|
# ? Jun 20, 2013 23:55 |
|
Somewhat Heroic posted:While only seeing this thread last night and not reading ~60 pages of postings, what am I missing where there is a green dot in Salt Lake City as a location of one of these; but none of the verses seem to go with it. Was the old wiki incorrect on this? I apologize in advance if this has already been explained, I live in salt lake and would love to get in on old treasure hunting! Yeah, everyone (including me) is pretty set on cask 11 being Boston, but I guess there's no harm in looking around SLC for things that match the image. Or, maybe traveling north a bit to 42N 112W. Who knows.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2013 23:55 |
|
We should totally make a thread to solve the Thomas Beale Codes after this.
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 00:25 |
|
Cool, thanks chaps! Probably no buried treasures in these hills anyhow.
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 00:41 |
|
Raccoon Leaf posted:Houston The three-leaf HPARD logo was only adopted in 2003, and one of the Chronicle columnists poked fun at them about it because of "leaves of three, let it be". Before that there was this logo, which you can still see on some signs here and there: Maybe that's not that important to your hypothesis though?
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 00:55 |
|
demonicon posted:First I really love this thread, and all the possible clues and all the puzzle solving that goes on in here. I havent finished reading this thread yet, but I wanted to point one little thing out, that just crossed my mind, maybe its even come up already. I'd like feedback on an idea, and would also like to know from the Q4T veterans if this has come up at any point. I posted previously that the woman in the Cask 12 image could be a general depiction of the goddess Columbia in addition to having the Statue of Liberty's face, and posted a couple of pictures of statues showing Columbia with her arms in almost the exact same pose. Assuming it's in NYC, take the idea that the woman could be Columbia and consider the lion's face in her dress, and you get Columbia University, whose mascot is the lion. Does anything else in the picture or one of the verses point there?
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 01:32 |
|
Okay, to finally make a condensed post I would really like to make a case for Cask #11 being north from Boston, namely Marblehead First, if we look at the first lines of the verses: quote:If Thucydides is There is this quote Horace Walpole posted:On the eve of the American Revolution, Horace Walpole predicted, in 1774: I dont know how famous this quote is in the U.S. but it is a quote that does associate Thycydides with Boston and Xenophon with New York. Coincidentally New York is South of Boston. If we then look at the lines "Take five steps (cities) In the area of his direction (this would be north)" And count 5 cities north from Boston we come to a city named Marblehead. This City, since 1938 has a light tower with green lights, which are fixed lights since 1960. This corresponds to the next lines "A green tower of lights" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marblehead_Light_(Massachusetts)). The following lines probably refer to landmarks when you actually get there, so I will ignore them for now. Then we have the Image depicting a Bird and a Castle. If we look at marble head we see Castle Rock, that depending on what photo and angle you look at looks like the one on the picture. Marblehead Neck is home to a bird sanctuary, as well as Castle Rock and Chandler Hovey Park at its northern tip, where Marblehead Light is located. The birds most commonly found there are these guys: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warbler Again, depending an what photo you use, they closely resemble the bird on the picture. Also, we have a few "balls" in the picture that could remind one of marbles. Additionally Marblehead is an old and very historic town with a lot of parks and landmarks and some smaller islands located in the sea. A lot of good places to bury the cask. Also, further along in the Verse there is talk about a light showing the target of the dig site, which would be very possible for a light tower with a fixed light to do. Finally, and this is a bit farther stretched, there is this book (written 1978), about marblehead (look at the woman on the cover) http://www.booktopia.com.au/marblehead-joan-thompson/prod9780595153930.html I will investigate further, but maybe some of you guys more knowledgeable about the area could tell me if I am gone in the completely wrong direction or if I could be onto something here. demonicon fucked around with this message at 02:08 on Jun 21, 2013 |
# ? Jun 21, 2013 01:44 |
|
Don't entirely buy it, but its not insane. They're probably in major cities, most likely accessible from major airports. The verse solve is tough, you can fit then anywhere. And arbitrarily deciding it means 5 cities north is really a reach, but in general I like your thinking - it's not impossible, but I'd need to see pictures of the stuff you say is similar. There isn't much of a Revere connection either. I dont think the bird is going to be a vague match like that (if one at all) - it will be something visual to the spot, or symbolize something. xie fucked around with this message at 02:12 on Jun 21, 2013 |
# ? Jun 21, 2013 02:09 |
|
It seems like the position of the gem in the portraits doesn't have a bearing on the final digging spot or location, based on Cleveland and Chicago. Unless we find one that proves otherwise, I think it's a misleading detail.
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 02:18 |
|
I just finished editing my post on page 60 for SF. I think I just spotted a match to the woman's crossed arms.
Urban Smurf fucked around with this message at 03:50 on Jun 21, 2013 |
# ? Jun 21, 2013 02:56 |
|
Urban Smurf posted:I just finished editing my post on page 61 for SF. I think I just spotted a match to the woman's crossed arms. I doubt those trees looked much like that 30 years ago, if they even existed. I think you're largely just seeing random stuff and forcing into your theory.
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 03:01 |
|
Urban Smurf posted:I just finished editing my post on page 61 for SF. I think I just spotted a match to the woman's crossed arms. Yeah that's your most insane theory yet. rookhunter posted:Cask 2 I think this is worth looking into, but what does it tell us?
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 03:26 |
|
Urban Smurf posted:
Well I'm convinced!
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 03:33 |
|
Deteriorata posted:I doubt those trees looked much like that 30 years ago, if they even existed. I think you're largely just seeing random stuff and forcing into your theory. Anyone's theory looks like it's forced. You do raise a very good point about trees and how they change over the years, decades in this case. I've been studying trees and their growth for awhile. It's interesting to look at the different species and their environments. Depending on things like rainfall, exposure, soil type, altitude, and latitude they have trends. I doubt we'll find a picture of these exact trees from 1980, but maybe we can find some similar trees in the area and work to establish some confidence in this prospect. I have learned that lots of trees along windy coastal areas are quite old 50-100 years and they still look small. It's hard to tell from this google image, but even if the tree didn't look like a pattern fit, I'm already establishing some good logical constraints for considering this spot.
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 03:34 |
|
Do Not Resuscitate posted:Question: I always thought it was a pelican/bird on its side. Alcatraz was called Island of the Pelicans
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 03:37 |
|
I'll be around Harvard for a few hours tomorrow starting at ten if anyone wants to meet up. Maybe get lunch together or something. Plan to walk to the coliseum.
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 03:49 |
|
demonicon posted:Marblehead Definitely look into this further. I have to call you out on the warbler claim though. My wife is a bird person (her mother is a starling) and she took one look at that sentence and laughed. Keep an eye out for a bird statue, or something related to a bird-of-prey like a hawk or falcon.
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 04:31 |
|
dms666 posted:I always thought it was a pelican/bird on its side. Alcatraz was called Island of the Pelicans That's definitely not a pelican, its beak is tiny. Has there been more progress on the New Orleans cask? I thought that Audubon Park was a great lead.
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 05:02 |
|
Somewhat Heroic posted:Cool, thanks chaps! Probably no buried treasures in these hills anyhow. Don't give up so soon! We don't have any goons looking around SLC. I'll get you started: on the illustration, the most clearly defined numbers are 42 and 112. The coordinates 42N 112W put you pretty close to a city called Logan, a bit north of SLC. There are letters on the woman's sleeve that spell BOS. BOS is the code for Boston's airport. You know the name of our airport? Logan. There...have fun with it. Oh and feel free to try out other verses too. Nothing says for certain that the one we picked has to go with the illustration.
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 05:21 |
|
Urban Smurf posted:Anyone's theory looks like it's forced. Ok, this just crossed the line into troll territory. That's how I'm going to explain it to myself. Edit: I can still put this on my resume, right? TX297 fucked around with this message at 07:34 on Jun 21, 2013 |
# ? Jun 21, 2013 06:46 |
|
I'd really like to get someone in StL involved, as Preiss hinted pretty strongly at it & nobody is working it. Not all theories look forced, or if they do, they at least make some sense. Saying the Gh in SF was Ghiradelli may have been forced, but it was falsifiable & the thought process makes sense... xie fucked around with this message at 06:51 on Jun 21, 2013 |
# ? Jun 21, 2013 06:49 |
|
xie posted:I'd really like to get someone in StL involved, as Preiss hinted pretty strongly at it & nobody is working it. Would you be using the legeater cask picture for St. Louis?
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 07:00 |
|
Probably, since I'm not convinced that lamp is unique. It's a cast, not an art piece, and there are similar ones that have been found, albeit with a different top. But really, Boston is suspect (though less so than I said 3 weeks ago!), NY seems solid but besides the gargoyle lacks image clues, etc. The guy who dug up Cleveland dismissed the correct theory at first (Egbert didn't crack it, just finished it off) because it was "known" that it was in PA.
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 07:04 |
|
xie posted:Probably, since I'm not convinced that lamp is unique. It's a cast, not an art piece, and there are similar ones that have been found, albeit with a different top. Okay, if that is the case then what other picture then would be the one that is buried outside of the states. I know I read in this thread that Preiss admitted that there was something buried in Canada. So, what would your guess be as to which cask is not close enough fitting all the other locations that it could be in Canada?
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 07:51 |
|
I think some people on Q4T feel that one could be Vancouver, but I forget which. Possibly Charleston/SF? I haven't waded through absolutely everything so far. I'd say any of them that lack a single direct image match are suspect, no matter how much we think we know about them. Cleveland->Philadelphia was because of the OBVIOUS Bell & letter L for liberty, so even if we think there's a single location marker in the painting it's up for grabs. The issue once again is that Preiss confirmed a St. Louis connection. Either something else is going to be in a St. Louis park, a park named St. Louis, etc. You can interpret his e-mails to kingdom come, I don't want to get too far down that rabbit hole. I just think it's really dumb to ignore possibilities because of what we think we know. It was years ago but as I said, the Cleveland solve was completely out of left field, someone basically came into the Philly thread (where people had already spent significant time on the ground) and said "uh I think it's here" and it still took quite a bit of photo convincing. xie fucked around with this message at 15:07 on Jun 21, 2013 |
# ? Jun 21, 2013 15:00 |
|
xie posted:I'd really like to get someone in StL involved, as Preiss hinted pretty strongly at it & nobody is working it. I'm in StL, I've been following this thread pretty closely. I've only half-heartedly looked into the Montreal/Boston ones as being connected with StL, but nothing has really jumped out at me as immediately suggesting Missouri/St. Louis at all. I'll try to work it this evening when I get home from work, though.
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 15:24 |
|
xie posted:I'm not convinced that lamp is unique. It's a cast, not an art piece, and there are similar ones that have been found...I think some people on Q4T feel that one could be Vancouver The only person talking about Vancouver is Urban Smurf. Everyone else on Q4T thinks the Canada casque is most likely Montreal, because nothing else matching the legeater has been discovered. The only other images with a vague resemblance that have been posted at Q4T are that thing in Boston library and this page from a Fiske ironworks catalogue. Neither is a close match. I'm not saying the lamp is unique, I'm just saying no-one has found another yet. BJG fucked around with this message at 15:34 on Jun 21, 2013 |
# ? Jun 21, 2013 15:27 |
|
Jick Magger posted:I'm in StL, I've been following this thread pretty closely. I've only half-heartedly looked into the Montreal/Boston ones as being connected with StL, but nothing has really jumped out at me as immediately suggesting Missouri/St. Louis at all. I'll try to work it this evening when I get home from work, though. I had initially thought that the Montreal one could be STL given the jewel box but the legeater so strongly suggests Montreal that I dropped it. If we could find the legeater in STL...
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 15:27 |
|
I'll be curious what someone else thinks of my Boston site. I just really don't like the "St. Louid" [sic] thing meaning Louis Armstrong - it just is such a huge reach that I don't want to close off one of the more concrete clues we have.
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 15:48 |
|
xie posted:It was years ago but as I said, the Cleveland solve was completely out of left field, someone basically came into the Philly thread (where people had already spent significant time on the ground) and said "uh I think it's here" and it still took quite a bit of photo convincing. I was wondering how they ignored the dead-on Ohio map in the image, but then I remembered that there's a building called the Ohio House in Fairmount Park.
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 15:48 |
|
xie posted:I just really don't like the "St. Louid" [sic] thing meaning Louis Armstrong - it just is such a huge reach that I don't want to close off one of the more concrete clues we have. I agree, I've gone off that too. I'm coming round to Jackson Square and St Louis cathedral, which seems more plausible, especially if the verse in the theory Byron was responding to was the verse for New Orleans. I'm open-minded about St Louis, it's just that I can't see it being any image other than (9), and the leads for Montreal seem stronger. There's some stuff pertaining to Canada on P27 of the introduction. The 1649 battle took place near Georgian Bay. There's a square called Place Jacques-Cartier in Montreal near Habitat 67 and St Helen's. BJG fucked around with this message at 15:59 on Jun 21, 2013 |
# ? Jun 21, 2013 15:49 |
|
The Monkey Man posted:I was wondering how they ignored the dead-on Ohio map in the image, but then I remembered that there's a building called the Ohio House in Fairmount Park. I just don't think they saw it - it wasn't brought up before then. The Terminal Tower wasn't seen either - the guy posted the park first & once everyone felt it was too strong to ignore. Once it was established it was probably in the cultural gardens in Cleveland the rest fell into place. I didn't see a single post about the map - that might've eluded everyone at the time completely. (At least publicly on Q4T, there was obviously a lot of offline/elsewhere work being done in 2003.) That's pretty much how I hope Boston goes, and I like that if I'm right, we're working with known-solid methodology.
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 15:50 |
|
The Monkey Man posted:I was wondering how they ignored the dead-on Ohio map in the image, but then I remembered that there's a building called the Ohio House in Fairmount Park. Haha, these kinds of coincidences are a real bastard.
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 15:57 |
|
GWBBQ posted:I'd like feedback on an idea, and would also like to know from the Q4T veterans if this has come up at any point. I posted previously that the woman in the Cask 12 image could be a general depiction of the goddess Columbia in addition to having the Statue of Liberty's face, and posted a couple of pictures of statues showing Columbia with her arms in almost the exact same pose. Assuming it's in NYC, take the idea that the woman could be Columbia and consider the lion's face in her dress, and you get Columbia University, whose mascot is the lion. Does anything else in the picture or one of the verses point there? This has been suggested for the bird: I'm open to the treasure being in Manhattan so I'llsee if I can find anything to link verse. Yip Yips posted:I think this is worth looking into, but what does it tell us?
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 16:23 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 04:10 |
|
OK, I'm curious about this. I've been leafing through the book and found these lines on pages 29 and 30: According the origins map, the Alven came from the Lowlands, and in the Litany of the Jewels (where they're described as gnomes, not dwarves) their treasure stone was an opal. Opal is the birthstone for October, which I think is the picture we're using for Montreal. Has this been addressed by the Q4T folks (or anyone else)? I get the legeater is pretty unique to Montreal, but is there any discussion of this picture actually referencing Manhattan? (the book also has references to Massachusetts, Florida, and the Pacific NW)
|
# ? Jun 21, 2013 17:27 |