|
There's also the massive disadvantage of having to pay the employer's portion of your income taxes as well.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2013 01:38 |
|
|
# ? May 16, 2024 18:02 |
|
Misogynist posted:1099s are good for people who are doing actual contract work for short periods of time. Contract-to-hire in an at-will employment state is a scam 100% of the time, pure and simple. I was a contractor-to-hire at the place I'm working right now, in NY, which is at-will. Of course, I was a contractor for all of 8 days and I never had to change my tax status from W2 so it doesn't really count I wouldn't want to work 1099 because it just seems like so much more work when tax time comes, even disregarding the benefits situation. Inspector_666 fucked around with this message at 01:44 on Sep 14, 2013 |
# ? Sep 14, 2013 01:42 |
|
Erkenntnis posted:Just had three rounds of phone interviews. Anyone YOTJ without a face-to-face? I'm interested in the position, which would be dedicated datacenter technical support for a couple of instructors that work for a large IT organization, and it's like a 15 minute drive from my (parent's) place. I have my current job interviewing entirely on the phone in 3 rounds, only 1 of which I had met for a brief time at a limited event prior to. It's possible.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2013 01:49 |
|
Geoj posted:There's also the massive disadvantage of having to pay the employer's portion of your income taxes as well.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2013 02:03 |
|
Spudalicious posted:So I just gave up a (low paying) cushy government job to go work for an observatory that has every system on its own, no centralized authentication, no policies regarding pretty much anything. Also they run a mix of dos,osx, linux, unix, and windows (every version). Like others have said you need to start out by documenting as much of the environment as you can, this means:
Collect as much data as you can, if the environment needs an overhual and want to fix it properly you should really I mean really grab as much bad poo poo about the environment you can. After which you need to visio, backup, research, and document the poo poo out of because you will need the ammo to help validate an expense to overhaul the environment. Show the productivity loss of the current network and infrastructure, it will be your best friend when showing why you need to spend XXX'k to show value on a environmental overhaul to fix poo poo.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2013 03:11 |
|
Misogynist posted:Your employer doesn't pay any of your income tax, that's what makes it an income tax. The employer is responsible for 50% of the FICA payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare; if you are a 1099, you need to bear the entire burden, which combines to almost 20% of gross before income taxes even get involved. Plan on taking home around 55% of gross when all is said and done. It's not that bad. You can deduct the employer half of the FICA tax from your Adjusted Gross Income, as well as Health Care premium payments or any Roth IRA contributions (up to the yearly maximum). After all that, your federal and state standard deductions and personal exception hacks off another chunk of your taxable income. I was given an hourly range for the position, and my taxable income is only like 32k from a gross of like 56k. Total effective tax rate for me ends up around 28% of my gross.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2013 04:28 |
|
What's the standard negotiated premium for 1099 work? I'm thinking about doing one or two contracts in the future.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2013 05:47 |
|
Inspector_71 posted:I was a contractor-to-hire at the place I'm working right now, in NY, which is at-will. W-2 contracting or contract to hire positions are different than 1099 jobs. 1099 jobs *should* only be used for short term contract work, usually based of a Statement Of Work with clearly defined deliverables. An example of an appropriate 1099 contract job: Company X needs a custom Sharepoint site created which shouldn't take longer than 2 months and they will pay 30,000 for the work. The person doing the work doesn't have a set schedule, does not use company resources or computers to accomplish his work, and goes on his merry way once the contract is over. The IRS says quote:The general rule is that an individual is an independent contractor if the payer has the right to control or direct only the result of the work and not what will be done and how it will be done. If you're being told how to do your work, have an expected schedule, and all the other trappings of a normal job, that is cut and dry 1099 contract abuse. As far as a 1099 premium I've seen anywhere from 1.5 X to 3 X where X is the expected hourly/weekly rate for an equivalent W-2 job with a decent benefit package. If you would make 30 dollars an hour doing the work for a normal company I would expect you to be charging at least 70+ dollars an hour on a 1099 contract. You're losing out on self employment taxes, health insurance, 401K match, unemployment insurance, etc. I really hate companies that abuse IT folks with 1099 contracts because they're too cheap to hire employees. W-2 contractors have their uses, but I feel bad for them as well.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2013 06:17 |
|
Driving home how important being able to Google is for being a good sys admin. I virtualized the server that time forgot tonight, but it hung on startup. Guh? What in the, it's just virtualizing, how is this difficult? So I type into google exactly: p2v "applying your personal settings". The very.first.result. is exactly the answer. I guess it's knowing what to Google. "help my 2003 server wont start when i virtualize it and I didnt really think about it before I did it" isn't really helpful, but you put the right couple of words in, and you're home free. Thank god for the internet. MC Fruit Stripe fucked around with this message at 10:29 on Sep 14, 2013 |
# ? Sep 14, 2013 10:22 |
|
Trawling craigslist looking for an entry-level job... found this gem of an application page. http://computercentersusa.wufoo.com/forms/z7x3p9/ Think I'll pass. Another job with a very interesting requirement that you be from the future: "5+ years experience installing Exchange 2013" Malkar fucked around with this message at 19:05 on Sep 15, 2013 |
# ? Sep 15, 2013 18:58 |
|
Malkar posted:Trawling craigslist looking for an entry-level job... found this gem of an application page.
|
# ? Sep 15, 2013 19:23 |
|
Maybe it's for the people out in the sticks who don't get FIOS/ Gfiber?
|
# ? Sep 15, 2013 20:14 |
|
Java
|
# ? Sep 15, 2013 20:37 |
|
gently caress, I was about to make the same post.
|
# ? Sep 15, 2013 21:04 |
|
FISHMANPET posted:Is there some piece of software I can use to easily track dependencies around infrastructure? For example when I configure some weird software that I have to point at a specific domain controller, I'd like to make a dependency between those two items, so if someone else wants to replace that domain controller, they can just check all its dependencies to know what's going to be effected? I made my own FileMaker db for computers and cellphones. I connect things like software licenses to the PC they're installed on, and the person each unit is assigned to. You could do something similar with dependencies just by relating the records. I can look up a user and see their equipment, click to go to the equipment entry and see associated software, etc. each entry also has a notes field for manual history.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2013 18:25 |
|
Dilbert As gently caress posted:Like others have said you need to start out by documenting as much of the environment as you can, this means: When you make this list, don't forget to note which directories / applications need to be backed up, and when you can reboot the server to install patches. In fact, I'd check every box to see when it was last security patched since I'm guessing they're not using WSUS or anything else to centralize patch deployment. Demonstrating the security vulnerabilities that existed for a long time on your network is a good way to get a security budget.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2013 18:59 |
|
Ok I need some advice. I jumped from student help desk at a tier one university into a AV/faculty-assistant role that I've gotten really bored and burnt-out in. I've been here for two years, and I recently got my CCNA to help get me out of here into a faster-paced role where I can actually work with technology that I find interesting. I passed my CCNA on Friday, and this was just posted on my University's job board:quote:Telecom Network Help Desk Intermediate So my main question is, should I hold off for a position that is more network focused, or take this position for the experience and hopefully leverage that to get to the job I really want? I am a little stuck because while I have this cert now, I don't have any network experience to back it up with, other than simple helpdesk work. Is it unrealistic to expect I will be able to find a networking job right out of the gate with minimal experience and a cert?
|
# ? Sep 17, 2013 17:06 |
|
Dilbert As gently caress posted:Like others have said you need to start out by documenting as much of the environment as you can, this means: All good steps to take, thanks. I've gotten centos installed on my home computer now to get my linux chops back and holy moly am I rusty. I spent a year working in an all-unix shop a while back (ubuntu 6.06 days), and I was pretty surprised that when I loaded the OS it found all my device drivers without a problem. In other news, my last two weeks here are going to be rough. My boss's parents are in the hospital, coworker's grandparent passed away, and there's two conferences that need on-site IT assistance because god forbid they need to plug in a projector. All of that on top of handling day to day user issues and documenting "everything you know about our remote sites". Unfortunately I was the primary point of contact for a few of our remote users and now I need to document how to troubleshoot vpn, remote storage access, procedures for new users that can't come to our primary site, etc. All in all probably 15-25 different step-by-step guides, and I have precious little time
|
# ? Sep 17, 2013 17:15 |
|
Spudalicious posted:I was the primary point of contact for a few of our remote users This is why I bitch bitch bitch when people don't use the help desk email. I bitch the user out when they email me directly, and I bitch out my boss when he lets someone get away with it.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2013 17:17 |
|
The Third Man posted:So my main question is, should I hold off for a position that is more network focused, or take this position for the experience and hopefully leverage that to get to the job I really want? I am a little stuck because while I have this cert now, I don't have any network experience to back it up with, other than simple helpdesk work. Is it unrealistic to expect I will be able to find a networking job right out of the gate with minimal experience and a cert? Tier 1 isn't much past help desk. And I don't see how that job is going to provide much experience as anything past reading scripts and dealing with end user issues (i.e. real networking) sounds like it's gest escalated by you/past you. Maybe the work differently there, but most shops would work as I described. You're probably looking for something a whole lot more networkey, and I don't see any reason you shouldn't be able to land a gig that's more suited to the cert you just got.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2013 17:29 |
|
FISHMANPET posted:This is why I bitch bitch bitch when people don't use the help desk email. I bitch the user out when they email me directly, and I bitch out my boss when he lets someone get away with it. What's help desk email? My direct email is the help desk email for 250 users.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2013 17:30 |
|
Motronic posted:Tier 1 isn't much past help desk. And I don't see how that job is going to provide much experience as anything past reading scripts and dealing with end user issues (i.e. real networking) sounds like it's gest escalated by you/past you. Maybe the work differently there, but most shops would work as I described. So you don't think my lack of any on-the-job networking experience would hinder me from getting a sort of junior-level networking position? For what it's worth, I want to stay within my university for the time being and this job does pay better than what I have now, and I'm not sure when an full networking position would be available. Of course, I haven't actually talked to anybody yet I'm just going off the official jobs bulletin... While I am getting pretty burnt out where I am now, the job security is pretty good and it's very low-stress. It's pretty cushy but I'm not learning anything and the pay is pretty low.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2013 18:15 |
|
The Third Man posted:So you don't think my lack of any on-the-job networking experience would hinder me from getting a sort of junior-level networking position? That's what junior level networking positions are for. You need to get away from helldesk if you want to do any real work that requires thought and skill and be able to progress in this industry. Changing backup tapes and resetting people's passwords and voicemail pins isn't going to help you accomplish that.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2013 18:33 |
|
I would love more than anything to be able to not work directly with end users, but I'm just second guessing my abilities given my limited experience. To be completely honest, I was student help desk for a few years, which meant getting email clients working, messing with wireless settings, imaging computers, and forwarding people to central IT. The last couple years have been more of the same frankly, but salaried and more one-on-one with faculty. I don't have any experience with backups, or monitoring, or any infrastructure at all really.. Is it enough to show up with a piece of paper and a desire to succeed? I mean, I want to get away from this but I just don't know if I will be taken seriously. I also haven't seen junior positions advertised in the few months I've been watching the job board, either. I think I should maybe track down a person in central IT who is in actually in networking to talk to... The Third Man fucked around with this message at 19:02 on Sep 17, 2013 |
# ? Sep 17, 2013 18:59 |
|
The Third Man posted:I don't have any experience with backups, or monitoring, or any infrastructure at all really.. Is it enough to show up with a piece of paper and a desire to succeed? I mean, I want to get away from this but I just don't know if I will be taken seriously. If you're showing up with that piece of paper and willing to learn and demonstrate that you are serious a junior network admin type position is exactly what you should be looking for. Your previous experience on helldesk with basic network setup/troubleshooting on clients is a good thing to highlight on your resume and when talking to people aout this. Also, definitely talk to whomever you can who is in any department or position that looks like something you want to do. Find out what they use internally (monitoring, switch gear, etc), do your research, and show up PREPARED with a resume that highlights the things that they use that you have experience with. Experience absolutely includes "I set up a home lab and a copy of <x network monitoring software that they use>." Since you don't have a lot of professional experience you will stand out if you manufacture your own relevant experience through your own self-education on the topic. And that also shows that you CAN self-educate which is hugely important to stay relevant in this industry. And if they don't have any advertised positions, see if they want to take someone on anyway. It doesn't hurt to ask. Maybe they have some other open positions who's responsibilities can be moved around to carve out a spot for you.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2013 19:32 |
|
Thanks a lot for your advice, I think my next step will be to contact someone in area I want to be in and see what they are looking for. The worst thing that can happen is they will want more experience and I'll still have time to put in an application for the other position.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2013 19:55 |
|
Being told now also that they refuse to pay for any of my certs until I sign a contract...that they want me to work on my certs first for to try and lock me down for 3 years. They're also baffled at the people demanding 80k+ for their "Director of IT" job when the previous was getting 40k, and had less experience than I did coming here.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2013 21:07 |
|
CDW posted:Being told now also that they refuse to pay for any of my certs until I sign a contract...that they want me to work on my certs first for to try and lock me down for 3 years. That's a good sign that you don't want to spend 3 years there.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2013 21:10 |
|
Paladine_PSoT posted:That's a good sign that you don't want to spend 3 years there. 30 years, I'm the only real IT staff (of 6 months) and the longest salesperson active right now is 2 years. The only problem is getting out and trying to find another job, again.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2013 21:46 |
|
CDW posted:30 years, I'm the only real IT staff (of 6 months) and the longest salesperson active right now is 2 years. Just get out of the initial "Looking for a job sucks" phase and it won't be so bad, it's always hard to start looking for a job, once you do get rolling it makes it easier, just make a schedule, devote X time a day/week/whatever to work on it.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2013 22:23 |
|
So I have been tasked with finding a file archiving solution for a client, and have no idea where to begin. Anybody got any recommendations?
|
# ? Sep 17, 2013 22:41 |
|
Inspector_71 posted:So I have been tasked with finding a file archiving solution for a client, and have no idea where to begin. Anybody got any recommendations? Is this for some sort of compliance requirement or just because they hate throwing anything away?
|
# ? Sep 18, 2013 00:38 |
|
Inspector_71 posted:So I have been tasked with finding a file archiving solution for a client, and have no idea where to begin. Anybody got any recommendations? Backup Exec has an archive option but it sort of sucks because it deletes the source data. In other words the idea behind their solution is to reduce storage space on your file server. Mimecast has an online option you could look at. We ended up rolling our own solution using a combination of shadow copies and one way dfs replication
|
# ? Sep 18, 2013 00:53 |
|
Inspector_71 posted:So I have been tasked with finding a file archiving solution for a client, and have no idea where to begin. Anybody got any recommendations?
|
# ? Sep 18, 2013 00:55 |
|
Zorak of Michigan posted:Is this for some sort of compliance requirement or just because they hate throwing anything away? It's not for compliance... Syano posted:Backup Exec has an archive option but it sort of sucks because it deletes the source data. In other words the idea behind their solution is to reduce storage space on your file server. ...and this may actually work, since that's pretty much what the goal is. Misogynist posted:What do you actually need this to do, to how much data, for how many users, with what kind of access, and at what budget? The goal is to free up space on the fileserver by moving files that aren't regularly accessed to another set of drives that the end user won't have access to while maintaining the file structure and maintaining logs/getting alerts if something breaks. The data is only a few TB for a couple dozen users, this isn't "big data" stuff by any means. I don't have a hard budget, but lower is definitely better. I know absolutely zilch about storage stuff, so as you can see I don't even really know what I need to know.
|
# ? Sep 18, 2013 01:02 |
|
Syano posted:Backup Exec has an archive option but it sort of sucks because it deletes the source data. In other words the idea behind their solution is to reduce storage space on your file server. Mimecast has an online option you could look at. We ended up rolling our own solution using a combination of shadow copies and one way dfs replication I just wish backup Exec wasn't a huge piece of poo poo that feels like it is a program from 2006 which just gets a new gui; but sadly I don't know much else.
|
# ? Sep 18, 2013 01:06 |
|
MF_James posted:Just get out of the initial "Looking for a job sucks" phase and it won't be so bad, it's always hard to start looking for a job, once you do get rolling it makes it easier, just make a schedule, devote X time a day/week/whatever to work on it. Do you guys just hit up the usual sites (dice, monster, careerbuilder, craigslist, etc) or anything special? I'm starting to look pretty actively now, ready to YOTJ
|
# ? Sep 18, 2013 01:07 |
|
Inspector_71 posted:The goal is to free up space on the fileserver by moving files that aren't regularly accessed to another set of drives that the end user won't have access to while maintaining the file structure and maintaining logs/getting alerts if something breaks. The data is only a few TB for a couple dozen users, this isn't "big data" stuff by any means. I don't have a hard budget, but lower is definitely better. rsync cronjob???
|
# ? Sep 18, 2013 01:15 |
|
Inspector_71 posted:It's not for compliance... Oh well there you have it. The backup exec option is exactly what you want. Its literally under 1k to license the option for a single file server. Of course you have to already have BE and its associated agent licenses in place.
|
# ? Sep 18, 2013 01:18 |
|
|
# ? May 16, 2024 18:02 |
|
code:
|
# ? Sep 18, 2013 01:21 |