|
Undead Unicorn posted:She went on a twitter spree explaining why TvTropes wrong. Way to not get the joke, friend. On that note - do you have a link to the tweets, preferably in a more readable, archivey form?
|
# ? Oct 19, 2013 06:13 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 22:26 |
|
Weldon Pemberton posted:Out of interest, is there a legit literary term for what TvTropes calls "expy"/"no celebrities were harmed"? Obviously a story where the whole plot or theme is lifted from real life events is a roman a clef, but I want to know if there's a specific term for a single character based on a real person being put into an original situation. While I was revising for an exam on Restoration Comedy I wanted to have a handy word to use to explain that most of the rake characters are based on the earl of Rochester and the king, but didn't know any except for the dumb fake TVTropes ones. Obviously I didn't use them because that would have been retarded, but I really feel like there is some specific name for the phenomenon and google didn't help me find it. 'Portrait' or 'based on' is what most academics I've heard say. Academia has technical terms for stuff that would be unwieldy to describe in detail - 'iambic pentameter' is tidier than 'It goes de-dum de-dum de-dum de-dum de-dum' - but on the whole, it tends not to create gratuitous terms. If you can say it in plain English, you don't need A Trope For That. Besides that, academics are well-read as a matter of course, so can understand that it's a thing that happens in more than one work of art without needing an insider term to feel smart for knowing that.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2013 07:57 |
|
So I'm doing a project on racism in comic books. Surely academic resource TVTropes can help me out by looking at other social issues in the medium:quote:thats a fairly good idea, but the problem is identifying sexisum. for a start, i dont consider red hood to be sexist. starfire is a promisculous slut, yes, but it makes sense for her new characterisation- she was a political slave for a militant race, now she is free to make her own descions, her own choices. if she wants to dress like that and have uncondition sex, that is her own descion. she is also the one in controll- she is the one who suggests it, not roy, and in the aftermath scene she is shown to have been clearly on top. heck, starfire says as much in the comic- "i am free to do what i want when i want". if anything, it could be assumed sexist against men by implying that all men want sex. It's not sexist, it's in-character for her to be a slut quote:sorry, i have a tendancy to disscuse fictional characters and situations as if they were real. but still, my point is that with her new background, she is not out of character (unless she had been raped, at which point i would expect her to avoid all phyisical contact like the plague), so the writer isnt nessicalry writing her like that because hes sexist, but beacuse thats what that character is expected to if she was a real person in that situation. The guy goes on. He really can't make a comment on sexism without dropping the word slut. But he's totally not a misogynist, guys! quote:To be fair, that's not their fault. Starfire's been characterized that way for a long, long time. I can't recall if she started out that way in the original 80s series, but for as long as I've been reading comics, she's been pretty much a Good Bad Girl. It isn't the comic's fault that the character was Bowdlerized in order to reach a young market in the cartoon, but that's the problem you face when you adapt a character for specific audiences over and over again. Modern Batman, for example, is a mish-mash of all the different film, TV and radio adaptations that have existed over the years. When someone brings up that Starfire from the Teen Titans cartoon was a popular character and that you could get a whole new market of fans by building on that characterization: quote:Honestly, neither of those options are very appealing. For one thing, if you're concerned about feminism, the Starfire of the cartoon was a hormone-addled Love Interest whose major characterization was having a crush on a boy and being socially awkward. I'm not saying it didn't work, but it's not exactly the pinnacle of three-dimensional characterization. Yes, she was popular, but that was for an entirely different audience. Guys, making this comic character not a sexist pinup is hard. So since either side has mistakes let's just show the naked one.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2013 20:16 |
|
Ugh, now you're taking me back to arguments I've participated in on comic book message boards.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2013 20:57 |
|
posted:she is not out of character (unless she had been raped, at which point i would expect her to avoid all phyisical contact like the plague)
|
# ? Oct 19, 2013 21:14 |
|
So I've been playing the new Pokemon game and decided to see what TV Tropes had to say about how the series is sometimes dark and odd. Let's check the Pokemon Nightmare fuel page and see what examples we can find. I know it's low hanging fruit but I'm not even cherry picking, all these examples just came from the bottom folder.quote:
Oh how horrifying. It's a killer Picasso. quote:Razor Claw's description is "A wickedly sharp claw perfect for raking enemies. It allows a certain kind of Pokémon to evolve."; one of the definition of rake is "to claw at; to scratch". Now imagine doing that with sharp claws... Oh no, sharp claws. This is a thing that will haunt me tonight. quote:In Black 2 and White 2, there's a Backpacker in the Lostlorn Forest who, if you answer yes to his question, gives you TM95, Snarl. He then starts on his way off and transforms into a Zoroark. That's pretty weird. The entire implication there was that he was a Zoroark using its illusion ability. How is that scary? quote:Almia Castle in the second Pokémon Rangers game. An abandoned castle up north that's literally frozen. And it's kinda easy to get lost. Additionally, its kitchen is messy Stuff of nightmares people. quote:In the Gen II games, the aptly-named Dark Cave can be accessed before getting Flash. It wouldn't be wise to do so, because it's easy to get stuck without knowing the way out. And Rock Tunnel could be accessed without flash, what is your point? That you're scared of the dark in a childrens game? quote:In the Anime, the episode Electric Soldier Porygon was banned from ever airing again, due to a bright flashing background at one point in the episode that reportedly gave over 600 children siezures, talk about super-effective. To this day, Porygon has only ever shown up once more as a short appearance in one of the movies, and niether Porygon-2 or Porygon-Z have ever appeared in the anime or movies even once. This is most likely due to fear of outraged parents. So it's scary because the episode caused seizures? That two minor monsters will never appear in the show or series? That parents will be angry if they appeared and it happened again? Help me out here, I'm not sure that I follow you. quote:The Ancient Mew Card. Terrifying. quote:Sturdy lets a Pokémon survive OHKO attacks like being frozen at absolute zero or having its internal organs drilled into mush... or even just a stupidly powerful attack. By that time in real life, the Pokémon would have gone beyond pain, barely coherent and screaming at you to make it stop. Pokemon with sturdy are immune to OHKOs. quote:Kakuna may look goofy, but cocoons look just like that. Okay are they arguing that cocoons are scary? Because they're not. Jesus, look at me sperg about what is scary in a pokemon game and what isn't. Although it might not be scary to me since I'm older than 10 years old and I'm not a shut-in. Testekill fucked around with this message at 15:06 on Oct 20, 2013 |
# ? Oct 20, 2013 15:04 |
|
Testekill posted:
Where have I seen him before? BARO!
|
# ? Oct 20, 2013 15:09 |
|
Testekill posted:So I've been playing the new Pokemon game and decided to see what TV Tropes had to say about how the series is sometimes dark and odd. Let's check the Pokemon Nightmare fuel page and see what examples we can find. I know it's low hanging fruit but I'm not even cherry picking, all these examples just came from the bottom folder. That guy wasn't horrifying! Back in the day I used to go looking for him in that game because he was a card pinata. If you're scared of an easy match of cards with disproportionate rewards 'cause the guy has Mickey Mouse ears, you're beyond pathetic.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2013 15:30 |
|
quote:Razor Claw's description is "A wickedly sharp claw perfect for raking enemies. It allows a certain kind of Pokémon to evolve."; one of the definition of rake is "to claw at; to scratch". Now imagine doing that with sharp claws...
|
# ? Oct 20, 2013 16:30 |
|
TinTower posted:Where have I seen him before?
|
# ? Oct 20, 2013 20:16 |
|
Testekill posted:Oh no, sharp claws. This is a thing that will haunt me tonight.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2013 20:33 |
|
Djeser posted:You guys joke but you don't realize Pokemon are fighting each other. They could get hurt Pokemon aren't meant to fight! Not like this! (Linkara in the background: NOT LIKE THIS!)
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 01:44 |
|
TinTower posted:Where have I seen him before? Son of a bitch, I'd completely forgotten that there was a character based on Imakuni in Quartz.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 02:06 |
|
There is a thread in their writers' forum called Post Your Concept. I was expecting to see them practicing story pitches. I don't know why I was expecting that.quote:"It was 1906, and the Greater London Difference Engine was debating the ethics of radium dials with a sentient perpetual motion machine. Meanwhile, the world was ending." quote:My story Archmage Reborn takes place in a world known as The Haven by its inhabitants. It is very Earth-like, though there are differences such as a golden-colored moon and that the world's landmass is a sort of "Pangea", one large landmass, though there are two separate landmasses that are kept secret from the rest of the world. quote:I once posted on here about my idea of creating an inversion Lyrical of Nanoha. Here's what I mean. quote:Simple concept for my NaNoWriMo: SCP meets MythBusters in a blog format. e: Note that all of these concern either backstory or worldbuilding, only one mentions a protagonist, and none of them really touch on their story's conflict or themes. Djeser fucked around with this message at 23:48 on Oct 21, 2013 |
# ? Oct 21, 2013 23:45 |
|
Djeser posted:There is a thread in their writers' forum called Post Your Concept. I was expecting to see them practicing story pitches. I don't know why I was expecting that. Here's a challenge: try to find a concept in that thread that isn't sci-fi or fantasy.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 00:17 |
|
DaveWoo posted:Here's a challenge: try to find a concept in that thread that isn't sci-fi or fantasy. Is an idea that is thoroughly anime technically fantasy? If not then do I have the next summer bestsellers for you! quote:
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 00:35 |
|
DaveWoo posted:Here's a challenge: try to find a concept in that thread that isn't sci-fi or fantasy. This was the closest thing I could find: Tarsen posted:Hmm~ So wait, hypnosis works unless the subject just... doesn't want to do it? Normally I'd say this is a pretty glaring flaw, but I guess this one makes sense because BLAAAAAAAANK
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 00:41 |
|
I wonder if Tropers are aware that Speculative Fiction does not need to be just stock fantasy or science fiction. It's right in the loving name: Speculative. What ifs. But nope, gotta reach that nerd appeal quotient some way, and then bury your idea in meaningless faff and tropes.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 03:32 |
|
quote:My story Archmage Reborn takes place in a world known as The Haven by its inhabitants. It is very Earth-like, though there are differences such as a golden-colored moon and that the world's landmass is a sort of "Pangea", one large landmass, though there are two separate landmasses that are kept secret from the rest of the world. This one drove me bonkers. Who cares what colour the moon is? What difference does the shape of the landmass, or landmasses, make? Why should I care about the Iron whatever or the other guys? Who are the characters in this? Looking at all of this made me think that I never once thought about the shape of the landmass upon which The Hobbit, as an example, takes place, even if maps WERE readily available in the version of the novel I read as a kid. And the troper who posts it, they realize, at the very end, that they spend six or seven paragraphs wanking over their world building and never mentioned the names of any characters at all, but then say "oh well, I'll keep going on this, then!" Do they know they don't have to hit post? They can re-write the post to actually contain pertinent information. HackensackBackpack fucked around with this message at 06:14 on Oct 22, 2013 |
# ? Oct 22, 2013 06:08 |
|
Djeser posted:Note that all of these concern either backstory or worldbuilding, only one mentions a protagonist. This detail seems especially damning. Why is it that they're so focused on events and not people? Let's see what the wiki has to say on the subject. Characters posted:People in the world you are looking to for entertainment. That's it, followed by a long list of random character types like "Astrologer" and "Intrepid Merchant." "People in the world you are looking to for entertainment." Jesus Christ. How about the other so-called "super-tropes?" They do a little better describing plot, but they feel compelled to put in a note making clear they're not talking about My Little Pony rear end. There is no entry for "story." Conflict isn't too bad either, and they stress the importance of the concept, but again there's a heavy focus on Sci-fi and Fantasy. quote:1.Man vs. Man, as in Character(s) vs Character(s). A monster, or a robot, or aliens, or whatever! There's absolutely nothing in here about two character's wants and needs clashing to make conflict. quote:3.Man vs. Nature or other Hostile Environment. or a Situation of some sort. Even Death Traps could count here. ...yeah, but there's wider philosophical implications that can be at play. It's just not survival stories. Glad they included that bit about death traps though. I wouldn't that point to get muddied. quote:Traditionalists boil it down to the first three, redefining "Man" as a defeatable entity and "Nature" as anything that has to be survived or changed rather than defeated. According to the three basic conflicts, Zombie Apocalypse would thus be Man Vs. Nature. Christ. Can't they think of any other examples? (Also, I'm trying to figure out just why this specification is here. When would a zombie attack be defined as any of the other types of conflict?) The page on theme spends most of its running confusing the issue by comparing it to The Aesop, what they call a moral. Why they think a theme can't be moral in consideration, I don't know. Maybe they think morals are for babies? They also advise that to learn about a work's theme you should visit its Analysis page. Examples: Religion, Mythology and Folklore posted:•Norse Mythology: Heroism in the face of defeat. Let's just boil down rich and complex religions to obvious stereotypes. Judaism: OBEY THE LAWS. Tabletop Games posted:•Paranoia: The Law (Friend Computer) is crazy. How do you miss it? It's right in the title. quote:Warhammer 40,000 - The overarching motif is war. There is always a war in 40k, every last living thing is involved somehow, even when there is no Alien Invasion, no Chaos conspiracy, they make their own wars, their own crusades to fill the void. Even at the cusp of victory, as the Great Crusade came to a close, the Astartes legions turned their guns on one another. There is no escape, no respite, no hope for victory. In the Grim Darkness of the far future, there is only war. I don't know the fine points of W40K, but isn't it just an over-the-top excuse to have crazy miniatures battles? Web Original posted:•The Whateley Universe seems to be fundamentally about prejudice. In a super hero world, there's prejudice against mutants and their powers, but in a lot of ways the stories are at least as much about prejudice against LGBT people, since every one in Team Kimba is a mutant who is LGBT in some way, perhaps against their will. Wonderful. I thought it was about indulging sex-change kink. They only have examples for Religion, Table-Top RPGs, and Web stuff. No literature, film, poetry, or nonsense like that. Amazingly, there's not examples for Anime or MLP either. I'm kind of surprised.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 07:36 |
|
Bear Sleuth posted:The page on theme spends most of its running confusing the issue by comparing it to The Aesop, what they call a moral. Why they think a theme can't be moral in consideration, I don't know. Maybe they think morals are for babies? They also advise that to learn about a work's theme you should visit its Analysis page. They have them, they're sorted into subpages. You can find the links towards the top of the screen. Their pages on literature and film are surprisingly not terrible, though I may be unpleasantly surprised by something I missed. EDIT: and their section on My Little Pony only has like two sentences. This is surprisingly not-poo poo for TV Tropes. MinistryofLard fucked around with this message at 10:02 on Oct 22, 2013 |
# ? Oct 22, 2013 09:57 |
|
Bear Sleuth posted:
"This tabletop wargame is focused on the concept of war." Truly a stunning piece of analysis.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 10:24 |
|
Bear Sleuth posted:I don't know the fine points of W40K, but isn't it just an over-the-top excuse to have crazy miniatures battles? And a parody of a certain right-leaning British government. The biggest, baddest Ork in the galaxy is Margaret Thatcher (Ghazkull Mag Uruk Thraka)
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 10:24 |
|
Bear Sleuth posted:The page on theme spends most of its running confusing the issue by comparing it to The Aesop, what they call a moral. Why they think a theme can't be moral in consideration, I don't know. Maybe they think morals are for babies? I got a real 4chan vibe from some of the quotes posted in the last thread, ones that even went so far as to use the abhorrent phrase "moralfag" with no sense of irony. I don't have any direct quotes, but so many of them seem to like going off on complete and utter tangents about censorship when they're discussing their "projects", probably because their fantasies (a word with multiple valid meanings in this context) are so often totally filthy and wretched. The "crackdown" on all the paedophile nonsense covered in the last thread had some real gems in this respect. Sort of related, there was one classic where a Troper called out former Governor of Tokyo Shintaro Ishihara and implied that his moves to ban questionable anime and manga were the most despicable things he would ever do; Ishihara has stated that Chinese and Korean people are sub-human, compared Roppongi to Hell on Earth due to its population of black people and denied that the Rape of Nanking ever happened, amongst other great things. Does anyone happen to have that? Hopefully I just misremembered! I think it goes hand-in-hand with a broader problem, that the whole insular environment and set of attitudes incubated on TV Tropes encourage people to think that they're above certain types of media (stereotypically I'd say "anything that's not anime or spectacularly nerdy in all the wrong ways" but it seems like that's not actually far from the truth when you see people defending Terrible Sexual Niche-Catering Anime #73 and not Lolita) as well as things like themes or didactics. It wouldn't be so bad - heck, it's not too far removed from a whole host of awful, smarmy Internet sites filled with people who want to celebrate their love of media by sucking the life out of it, if that is in any way shape or form consoling - only you get the sense that they think they're indisputably right about all these things, particularly when some of them laughably call it an academic resource. Of course all themes are didactics and of course morals are simply the playthings of hypocritical soapboxers. It's not like anyone ever told a good story or painted a wonderful picture while also having something important to say about society. quote:They also advise that to learn about a work's theme you should visit its Analysis page. Sergei Eisenstein posted:We don't have an article named Analysis/SergeiEisenstein. Yasujiro Ozu posted:We don't have an article named Analysis/YasujiroOzu. Charles Dickens posted:We don't have an article named Analysis/CharlesDickens. James Joyce posted:We don't have an article named Analysis/JamesJoyce.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 11:53 |
|
Well, of course there's no analysis for those things. Don't you know that True Art Is Incomprehensible?
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 12:34 |
|
my dad posted:And a parody of a certain right-leaning British government. The biggest, baddest Ork in the galaxy is Margaret Thatcher (Ghazkull Mag Uruk Thraka) Bloody hell, somehow I didn't even notice that despite knowing the orks are basically football hooligans. I suppose there's consolation to be found in the fact 40K being hugely satirical in a lot of places is lost on a lot of people, especially tropers.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 12:41 |
|
In my sleepless haze I just realized that "Fast Eddie" is actually a character from one of my favorite inane scifi bar books. Spyder Robinson's Calahan series. gently caress you TVTropes creator. gently caress you for taking that name. gently caress you for even associating it for me with your filthy mug.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 14:53 |
|
OWLS! posted:In my sleepless haze I just realized that "Fast Eddie" is actually a character from one of my favorite inane scifi bar books. Spyder Robinson's Calahan series.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 16:00 |
|
Bear Sleuth posted:This detail seems especially damning. Why is it that they're so focused on events and not people? That said, one I could actually see potentially working is the one about the guy going to get his laptop repaired. It would probably have to be a Harold and Kumar-ish farce, and would take the author of Welcome to the NHK or Genshiken to pull it off.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 16:06 |
|
Hedgehog Pie posted:We don't have an article named Analysis/JamesJoyce. I was kind of hoping there would be a trope list for his love letters.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 17:42 |
|
Sham bam bamina! posted:For some reason, I think it's more likely that he took it from the WWI ace. Your books are safe. I think it's even more likely to be 'Fast' Eddie Savitz quote:Edward Isadore Savitz (also known as Uncle Eddie, Fast Eddie and Dr. Feel Good) was an American businessman who offered teenage boys money, concert tickets and football tickets for their soiled underwear, and various sexual acts including: oral and anal sex, slamming his penis in a door, penis sword fights, urinating on him, vomiting in his mouth and defecating in his mouth through a potty chair. He reportedly kept the feces in pizza boxes in his apartment. He told the boys to eat cheese to make the feces taste better. There now doesn't that seem more fitting
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 17:49 |
|
Some dude got banned for calling Max Brooks an idiot for having the army get eaten by zombies in his zombie novel. Since copypasting them would chew up huge amounts of the page, here's his long-winded technical rant on getting banned. Part deux: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=5cma6iojg5o27puhulc24sje&page=165#4119 Part trois: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=5cma6iojg5o27puhulc24sje&page=165#4121 Be sure to read a TV Tropes mod finally making some goddamn sense for once! Razorwired posted:So I'm doing a project on racism in comic books. Surely academic resource TVTropes can help me out by looking at other social issues in the medium: Off topic as gently caress, but the "Tomato Surprise" trope page (which is basically 'twist ending as applied to reveal of identity' or some such) gives this pretty cool comic book that was made during the Civil Rights movement. It's a pretty cool read. JackMackerel fucked around with this message at 03:33 on Oct 24, 2013 |
# ? Oct 24, 2013 02:48 |
|
Is there a way to view a user's post history on the forums? From their user page I can click through to their list of edits on the wiki but I seem to be too to find post history.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2013 21:43 |
|
The best you can do is search the forums for their user name. TV Tropes is not a very well designed site
|
# ? Oct 24, 2013 22:29 |
|
That one great comic that was made during the middle of the Civil Rights movement got me thinking back to something earlier in this thread.Stottie Kyek posted:Jesus gently caress. It's like his understanding of communism comes from image macros misquoting/misattributing quotes to Karl Marx and those hippie shops that sell Che Guevara T-shirts. Thanks for posting this. It actually made me feel better. Now, is there something absolutely reprehensible about any of those people that those quotes are from, because I don't want to start putting those quotes around blindly in my room.
|
# ? Oct 25, 2013 08:17 |
|
EagerSleeper posted:That one great comic that was made during the middle of the Civil Rights movement got me thinking back to something earlier in this thread. They're all famous communists, so they're complex figures and it's hard to find a neutral source about their views. I'd say that Engels is objectively a bad person, the others are perfectly respectable communists. Engels would agree with Jimprofit's views on women, especially if those women were slowing down the revolution. Marx is obviously most famous for Marxism and not exactly a feminist, but more pragmatic than Engels and not an outright misogynist. Lenin and Sankara pushed hard for women's rights while in power, and both had successors who made the situation worse. The Russian Civil War killed 2 million people, I'll let you decide whether that makes Lenin too reprehensible for your wall of quotes. Tropes commonly associated with Dirty Communists are: quote:The Baroness
|
# ? Oct 25, 2013 09:45 |
|
I just went to the Boots site to check something, and was reminded of an old TVTropes classic: For those who are unfamiliar with what I'm talking about : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrE8VEphVHs
|
# ? Oct 25, 2013 13:24 |
|
JackMackerel posted:Some dude got banned for calling Max Brooks an idiot for having the army get eaten by zombies in his zombie novel. Since copypasting them would chew up huge amounts of the page, here's his long-winded technical rant on getting banned. I think you can pretty much summarise that with the words: 'Calling someone an idiot counts as "bashing" them? Who knew?!' quote:I'll let you decide whether that makes Lenin too reprehensible for your wall of quotes. Or whether it means EVEN LENIN didn't sink to sexism. Depending on taste. Robert Conquest's limerick seems appropriate here: quote:There was an old bastard named Lenin Meanwhile, I went to have a look at their views on Fascism. Got into their forum on Liberal Fascism, which was about as intelligent a discussion as you'd expect. Interestingly, you can't call a sci fi author an idiot, but it's apparently okay to call Rousseau one - excuse me, to call Rosseau one - and to call Karl Popper 'one of the worst historians of philosophy the world has ever seen'; those snooty intellectuals have it coming. But the bit that really got me puzzled was this little gem: quote:There's no father of fascism. Fascism doesn't really mean anything, anyway. It's just a vague term for "I don't like this". 'Fascism doesn't really mean anything, anyway' links to a trope called 'Sarcasm Mode', and 'It's just a vague term for "I don't like this", bewilderingly, links without explanation to their page on George Orwell. Which says, in total: quote:Creator: George Orwell It's full of links, of course, same way my lawn is full of weeds, but I'm not bloody pasting them all. I think being told that 'His works tend to be considered cynical' (with links to those indispensable tropes Deadpan Snarker, Crapsack World and Black and Gray Morality) tells us everything we need to know. Because I am a serious scholar who wishes to drink deep from the font of wisdom, however, I did look one up: Four Legs Good, Two Legs Better. On the off-chance that anyone here has somehow managed to make it this far without reading Animal Farm: the phrase is about the erasure of history under violent authority. The sheep on Animal Farm began by chanting 'Four legs good, two legs bad!' to teach them solidarity with other animals against the human oppressors, but when the pigs are in full control and start walking upright and enjoying human luxuries, the sheep chant 'Four legs good, two legs better!' So ... the trope means what, do you think? A reference to new ideologies that betray and distort old ideals? An evocation of the authoritarian mindset that repeats any belief the leaders dictate? A description of the way that those in power demand a society's values to shape themselves around their own convenience? quote:This trope is about the fact that some of the animals on the same end of the Sliding Scale of Anthropomorphism are more likely to stand upright and others are more likely to stay on all fours. In other words, it is about one animal on two legs and an animal on four legs being close to each other on Sliding Scale of Anthropomorphism. I ... I think I'm going to go now. There's doubtless a barrel of irony to be had out of their discussions of Newspeak, but I'm afraid that if I spend any more time thinking about it, my brain will melt and run out of my ears. Apple Tree fucked around with this message at 15:17 on Oct 25, 2013 |
# ? Oct 25, 2013 15:13 |
|
Weldon Pemberton posted:I just went to the Boots site to check something, and was reminded of an old TVTropes classic: I wonder if people working in toy stores (or the toy sections of department stores) get training on how to deal with overage toy "lovers" like the bronies.
|
# ? Oct 25, 2013 15:35 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 22:26 |
|
EagerSleeper posted:That one great comic that was made during the middle of the Civil Rights movement got me thinking back to something earlier in this thread. That dude quoted was Jim Profit, infamous... thing who's been banned from Wikipedia and TV Tropes for having some distorted loving view about Communism. He also wanted to murder the SA mods. He's made videos about him raging at getting banned from the place. It's like Chris-Chan, if he was a Marxist. This was the video I posted,, and upon scrolling through his video directory with morbid curiosity, he's got a few more: Raging at moderators... after being banned three years ago... bragging that he owns the site... for being made fun of by one of the moderators. Going balls-out internet tough guy on Satanic TV Tropes. I'm pretty sure this guy is a troll, but he's loving good.
|
# ? Oct 25, 2013 22:24 |