Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
voiceless anal fricative
May 6, 2007

Kangaxx is the dumbed fight in the game. Either you're not protected and so your whole party is imprisoned in two rounds, or you're protected and you just click on him and go make a bagel.

For the record you can also use Berserker Rage or SI:Abjuration alongside Death Ward (for his occasional castings of Wail of the Banshee).

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

inscrutable horse
May 20, 2010

Parsing sage, rotating time



Kangaxx is great for hoarders like me, because it's one of those instances where it's "legitimate" to use those rare consumables, like those scrolls of prot. magic/undead and so on. But yeah, it's a rather arbitrary, or even binary, fight.


There's something very zen about that description, though :)

Scorchy
Jul 15, 2006

Smug Statement: Elementary, my dear meatbag.

inscrutable horse posted:

Kangaxx is great for hoarders like me, because it's one of those instances where it's "legitimate" to use those rare consumables, like those scrolls of prot. magic/undead and so on.

If you were a true hoarder you'd of course use a simulacrum off Vhailor's helm to cast the scrolls and not waste the originals.

Skellybones
May 31, 2011




Fun Shoe
The Claw of Khazgorath is confusing me. The stats say:

AC +1, Missle AC +4

So is that a typo or does it actually make you easier to hit?

Suspicious
Apr 30, 2005
You know he's the villain, because he's got shifty eyes.
It doesn't. The + always indicates a bonus, even when that stat is better when lower.

Captain Oblivious
Oct 12, 2007

I'm not like other posters

fong posted:

Kangaxx is the dumbed fight in the game. Either you're not protected and so your whole party is imprisoned in two rounds, or you're protected and you just click on him and go make a bagel.

For the record you can also use Berserker Rage or SI:Abjuration alongside Death Ward (for his occasional castings of Wail of the Banshee).

Vhailor Helm double Daystar to blow up his first form while Berserked, followed by clubbing him with the Mace of Disruption is pretty much my standard method yeah. Kangaxx is a pretty silly guy.

Basic Chunnel
Sep 21, 2010

Jesus! Jesus Christ! Say his name! Jesus! Jesus! Come down now!

I liked Neera's ToB quest. Really, all of Neera's questline stuff is good, and it actually approaches thematic resonance (or whatever) in that the Neera / Thayan baddie conflict is essentially a mirror image of the Bhaalspawn / Sarevok conflict. They never explicitly make it text, but it's there.

I also enjoyed the Szass Tamm feature / fights, tho the VA they gave him wasn't great. He was maybe my favorite Forgotten Realms cheese villain as a kid so it was cool to run that quest, including the obligatory WotC plot armor they slapped on him.

Insurrectionist
May 21, 2007
So, do we know when we'll find out how BG2:EE did sales-wise? Looking at Steam, despite being far down the top-sellers list, the only games that aren't on Autumn Sale above it are Assassin's Creed, CoD:Ghosts and Football Manager 2014. But that doesn't necessarily mean it sold all that well.

Skellybones
May 31, 2011




Fun Shoe

Suspicious posted:

It doesn't. The + always indicates a bonus, even when that stat is better when lower.

Okay, that's a really good item then.

Captain Oblivious
Oct 12, 2007

I'm not like other posters

Basic Chunnel posted:

I liked Neera's ToB quest. Really, all of Neera's questline stuff is good, and it actually approaches thematic resonance (or whatever) in that the Neera / Thayan baddie conflict is essentially a mirror image of the Bhaalspawn / Sarevok conflict. They never explicitly make it text, but it's there.

I also enjoyed the Szass Tamm feature / fights, tho the VA they gave him wasn't great. He was maybe my favorite Forgotten Realms cheese villain as a kid so it was cool to run that quest, including the obligatory WotC plot armor they slapped on him.

Ultimately the Neera quests fell flat for me because, knowing what I do of Thay, I have a really hard time believing they would give the first gently caress about Wild Mages.

Basic Chunnel
Sep 21, 2010

Jesus! Jesus Christ! Say his name! Jesus! Jesus! Come down now!

Insurrectionist posted:

So, do we know when we'll find out how BG2:EE did sales-wise? Looking at Steam, despite being far down the top-sellers list, the only games that aren't on Autumn Sale above it are Assassin's Creed, CoD:Ghosts and Football Manager 2014. But that doesn't necessarily mean it sold all that well.
I bought it day of release and it wasn't on the bestseller charts, but there was probably some lag there, so grain of salt. I imagine it did gangbusters in Europe, these games always do. It's a solid product though, and the stuff they can claim to have done is as good or better than what was there before.

I think it's pretty clear that a BG3 isn't happening, not due to any fault of Beamdog's / Overhaul's (I've been playing games long enough not to be outraged by bugs and the stuff they made is good) but because the rights are still with Atari as far as I'm aware, and if anything an increase in the property's profile will only make a sequel less likely. I imagine WotC / Atari will want to make it a Big Deal Game but Atari hasn't had Big Deal Game money for years (nor should they). I know Obsidian Entertainment were pitching their own ideas not too long ago and didn't hear anything. D&D CRPGs are in development hell right now outside of the MMOs that boardrooms reflexively throw money at.

So who knows what's happening now. They still seem to be patching, which is good (making Hexxat a vampire in the engine mechanics was clever in theory but seems to have borked some things, natch). Literally everyone else would hate it on principle but I think a DLC model in the short term would be cool, maybe throw together another Watcher's Keep-esque dungeon, or even a CNPC, why not. It's not like ToB could get any less balanced.

Basic Chunnel fucked around with this message at 12:51 on Nov 30, 2013

Insurrectionist
May 21, 2007
I definitely wouldn't mind DLC content, especially since (so far) I've found the BG2 additions a lot better than in BG1 (Liked Hexxat and Rasaad's stuff quite a bit, Dorn and Neera are still not good characters but in BG1 they were bad characters with boring quests, now they're somewhat less bad/more fleshed-out characters with nicer quests). Assuming it's reasonably priced, of course.

GuyDudeBroMan
Jun 3, 2013

by Ralp
So I managed to get through BG1:EE with all the new NPC's and they didnt kill each other or force me to kick one out.

Can I do the same in BG2:EE?

I really don't want to play though this game more than once. I want to experience all new NPC's on the same playthrough. Possible?

GuyDudeBroMan fucked around with this message at 13:04 on Nov 30, 2013

Basic Chunnel
Sep 21, 2010

Jesus! Jesus Christ! Say his name! Jesus! Jesus! Come down now!

If they didn't program exceptions for Assad or whatever his name is, there won't be conflict between new party members. He seems pretty chill? Idk.

Zilkin
Jan 9, 2009

Basic Chunnel posted:

So who knows what's happening now. They still seem to be patching, which is good (making Hexxat a vampire in the engine mechanics was clever in theory but seems to have borked some things, natch). Literally everyone else would hate it on principle but I think a DLC model in the short term would be cool, maybe throw together another Watcher's Keep-esque dungeon, or even a CNPC, why not. It's not like ToB could get any less balanced.

There's almost certainly DLC content coming. They've mentioned wanting to do some after BG2EE is out, and unless these things sold really poorly that's most likely still the plan. Also they still need to finish the Linux, iPad(BG2EE), and Android versions.

Cythereal
Nov 8, 2009

I love the potoo,
and the potoo loves you.

Basic Chunnel posted:

I think it's pretty clear that a BG3 isn't happening, not due to any fault of Beamdog's / Overhaul's (I've been playing games long enough not to be outraged by bugs and the stuff they made is good) but because the rights are still with Atari as far as I'm aware, and if anything an increase in the property's profile will only make a sequel less likely. I imagine WotC / Atari will want to make it a Big Deal Game but Atari hasn't had Big Deal Game money for years (nor should they). I know Obsidian Entertainment were pitching their own ideas not too long ago and didn't hear anything. D&D CRPGs are in development hell right now outside of the MMOs that boardrooms reflexively throw money at.

For me, it comes down to the fact that the Enhanced Editions offer very little that modded installations of the original games don't. There's a smattering of mediocre-to-average new NPCs, the zoom function, one or two bug fixes, and availability on another platform or two. As I understand it, the terms of Beamdog's license means that they couldn't make any substantial changes to the games or existing content, like fleshing out Throne of Bhaal and making Melissan a worthy villain like Sarevok and Irenicus, or moving the games into 3.5E rules.

CRPGs in general seem to be a dying breed. Bioware's the only company left that's actively making Western-style RPGs, and their latest series of games have ranged from mediocre (Dragon Age 2) to extremely inconsistent in quality (Mass Effect 3 and The Old Republic). Credit where it is due, Beamdog seems to be doing a valiant job with what they've got (romances with vampires-we-swear-are-vampires-in-name-only aside), but the genre just isn't what it used to be.

verybad
Apr 23, 2010

Now with 100% less DoTA crotchshots

Cythereal posted:

For me, it comes down to the fact that the Enhanced Editions offer very little that modded installations of the original games don't.

I guess that's true on paper, but man the game just feels so much smoother with the new engine that I just can't bear to play the originals.

Insurrectionist
May 21, 2007
Yeah, just looking at the feature-list before playing made me go 'eh' too, but I definitely haven't been disappointed with any of the changes (well, except bugs), or the amount of content, so far. And really, while Dorn, for example, is very one-dimensional through BG1 and the start of 2...it really isn't any different from any of the original NPCs. And both Dorn and Neera have been a lot better after I started getting further into their quests, while I never had an issue with Rasaad/Hexxat (except her not having a lot of interjections).

2 Track EP
May 29, 2009
I think defending victims of child rape is tumblr SJW PC extremism. Kids lie about being raped all the time, I know because I work with them.

Cythereal posted:

For me, it comes down to the fact that the Enhanced Editions offer very little that modded installations of the original games don't. There's a smattering of mediocre-to-average new NPCs, the zoom function, one or two bug fixes, and availability on another platform or two. As I understand it, the terms of Beamdog's license means that they couldn't make any substantial changes to the games or existing content, like fleshing out Throne of Bhaal and making Melissan a worthy villain like Sarevok and Irenicus, or moving the games into 3.5E rules.

CRPGs in general seem to be a dying breed. Bioware's the only company left that's actively making Western-style RPGs, and their latest series of games have ranged from mediocre (Dragon Age 2) to extremely inconsistent in quality (Mass Effect 3 and The Old Republic). Credit where it is due, Beamdog seems to be doing a valiant job with what they've got (romances with vampires-we-swear-are-vampires-in-name-only aside), but the genre just isn't what it used to be.

Don't forget that you have at least two major upcoming Infinity Engine spiritual sequel CRPGs by non-Bioware developers:

http://eternity.obsidian.net/
https://torment.inxile-entertainment.com



Also I haven't played BG in probably a decade but I picked it up to play with a friend who had never played it and it feels like a whole new game - maybe it's because I played IWD2 lately but BG:EE feels completely alien, did BG originally have these weird dual/multiclassing restrictions? I don't remember them.

Cythereal
Nov 8, 2009

I love the potoo,
and the potoo loves you.

2 Track EP posted:

did BG originally have these weird dual/multiclassing restrictions? I don't remember them.

It did. BG1 was straight 2E DnD, which is where the dual/multiclass stuff comes from, then BG2 moved into 2.5E by adding the barbarian, monk, and sorcerer classes, plus the class kits.

verybad
Apr 23, 2010

Now with 100% less DoTA crotchshots
I must say, this Ironman run I'm on is making the game much more interesting. I'm constantly thinking about how to make best use of my resources, and even the "bullshit" mechanics like scribing failure and random HP on level up are kind of interesting now. This honestly feels like how the game is meant to be played. Of course, that's not really true -- the game is way too willing to inflict horrible bullshit on you just for kicks for that to be the intended design, and it's not really possible to do a clean run as a first timer, aaand it's a really long game too. Still, I can't help but think that maybe these games should've had a checkpoint save system instead of free quick save/load type of thing it has.

DeathChicken
Jul 9, 2012

Nonsense. I have not yet begun to defile myself.

Judging by the new Shadowrun, people would have behaved like the world had come to an end.

verybad
Apr 23, 2010

Now with 100% less DoTA crotchshots
Yeah I know it's not a popular opinion or anything. I used to hate it too, but then :darksouls: happened.

jBrereton
May 30, 2013
Grimey Drawer

DeathChicken posted:

Judging by the new Shadowrun, people would have behaved like the world had come to an end.
Because checkpoint saving is terrible. It's right up there with boss fights after unskippable cutscenes in terms of frustrating mechanics.

If you want to not save, that option is always available to you.

Cythereal
Nov 8, 2009

I love the potoo,
and the potoo loves you.

verybad posted:

This honestly feels like how the game is meant to be played. Of course, that's not really true -- the game is way too willing to inflict horrible bullshit on you just for kicks for that to be the intended design, and it's not really possible to do a clean run as a first timer, aaand it's a really long game too.

I'm fairly certain that that is the intended design, actually. There's a reason there are so many NPCs you can recruit, after all, and this was before Bioware settled into the character-focused mindset. You're playing a Dungeons and Dragons game, and DMs inflicting horrible bullshit on players just for kicks is both normal and expected.

Rookersh
Aug 19, 2010

Captain Oblivious posted:

Ultimately the Neera quests fell flat for me because, knowing what I do of Thay, I have a really hard time believing they would give the first gently caress about Wild Mages.

Last I checked, back in BG1/2 Wild Mages would have been extremely rare, and extremely powerful, entirely because the Weave was still intact. Remember, this isn't yet Thay under Szass, it's Thay under the Zulkirs, and if one of them felt a powerful wild mage was worth studying, that's all that would be needed to chase her.

Though I find it strange you fight Szass Tamm considering the Spellplague hadn't happened yet.

Cythereal
Nov 8, 2009

I love the potoo,
and the potoo loves you.

Rookersh posted:

Last I checked, back in BG1/2 Wild Mages would have been extremely rare, and extremely powerful, entirely because the Weave was still intact.

No, it was not. Wild magic was introduced in 2E when Mystra (mk. 1) died, creating wild magic and dead magic zones across Faerun that the churches of Mystra and Torm were only slowly healing. The Spellplague, as I understand it (I've paid little attention to 4E) just dramatically expanded and accelerated the damage and deterioration already present.

Rookersh
Aug 19, 2010

Cythereal posted:

No, it was not. Wild magic was introduced in 2E when Mystra (mk. 1) died, creating wild magic and dead magic zones across Faerun that the churches of Mystra and Torm were only slowly healing. The Spellplague, as I understand it (I've paid little attention to 4E) just dramatically expanded and accelerated the damage and deterioration already present.

Which would still support my point. Wild Mages came into being due to the Time of Troubles, but only became more prevalent with the Spellplague. As the Bhaalspawn Crisis occurs only a few years after the Time of Troubles ( but a hundred years or so before the Spellplague. ), Wild Mages would still be a very new phenomenon, and this would attract the Red Wizards of Thay. A random peasant girl who could control that kind of magic that easily would not be ignored by the Red Wizards, they'd send somebody to go get her for study/force recruitment. Especially since all it would take is a single Zulkir to be curious enough to send his men to go grab her, as this was before a united Thay.

Rookersh fucked around with this message at 16:58 on Nov 30, 2013

RoadCrewWorker
Nov 19, 2007

camels aren't so great
So i have BG1+2 from GOG, and just discovered some old messed up "Big World" install on some old harddrive that weighs in at 20+ GB and (if i remember correctly) took at least 18 hours to install years back. Apparently is also includes BG1 and expansions into the BG2 engine? I've heard it's generally pretty awful though.

Is there some current mod pack that merges those games along with the general "must have" mods (hardcore or crappy self fanfic inserts excluded of course) so i can install that and never touch the install again? I've had bad experiences with PS:T invalidating 60+ hour savegames because some mod went wrong and had dependencies all over the place, so now i dread the idea of adding fix-patches or any sort of mod after having invested hours into a new save.

Factor_VIII
Feb 2, 2005

Les soldats se trouvent dans la vérité.

jBrereton posted:

Because checkpoint saving is terrible. It's right up there with boss fights after unskippable cutscenes in terms of frustrating mechanics.

If you want to not save, that option is always available to you.
Agreed. I think that having to replay the same content over and over because a difficult fight or obstacle kills you later in the game but before the next checkpoint is frustrating rather than fun. To me it looks like a lazy way to pad out gameplay time.

verybad
Apr 23, 2010

Now with 100% less DoTA crotchshots

jBrereton posted:

Because checkpoint saving is terrible. It's right up there with boss fights after unskippable cutscenes in terms of frustrating mechanics.

A frustrating mechanic is not necessarily a bad one. Dark Souls is a massively frustrating experience, but also a brilliant one. No other (single player) game I've played has had that same feeling of achievement when you make it through a difficult area and finally beat the boss that has been grinding you to paste for the last two hours.

Cythereal
Nov 8, 2009

I love the potoo,
and the potoo loves you.

RoadCrewWorker posted:

So i have BG1+2 from GOG, and just discovered some old messed up "Big World" install on some old harddrive that weighs in at 20+ GB and (if i remember correctly) took at least 18 hours to install years back. Apparently is also includes BG1 and expansions into the BG2 engine? I've heard it's generally pretty awful though.

Is there some current mod pack that merges those games along with the general "must have" mods (hardcore or crappy self fanfic inserts excluded of course) so i can install that and never touch the install again? I've had bad experiences with PS:T invalidating 60+ hour savegames because some mod went wrong and had dependencies all over the place, so now i dread the idea of adding fix-patches or any sort of mod after having invested hours into a new save.

The Big World Project installs virtually every mod ever made for the Baldur's Gate games. Some of them are good. Many are average. Many are bad, and some are downright lovely. And in terms of technical stability, it makes a house of cards look like the pyramids.

There is no mod pack for the series. Get your choice of Tutu or Trilogy, the fix pack, then any other mods you want. Opinions among players on what the "must have" mods are versus the "hardcore or crappy self fanfic inserts" mods are sharply divided. Some people love the Saerileth, Tsujatha, and Chloe mods. Others (most) hate them. Take your pick.

Lemon-Lime
Aug 6, 2009

Cythereal posted:

or moving the games into 3.5E rules.

Why would anyone involved even want to do this? Putting aside the fact that 3.5 is terrible, it was outdated years before Beamdog even existed.

Who knows, maybe we'll get a spiritual sequel that uses Next (which is poo poo, but at least less poo poo than 3.5) or even better, 13th Age.

Captain Oblivious
Oct 12, 2007

I'm not like other posters

Cythereal posted:

I'm fairly certain that that is the intended design, actually. There's a reason there are so many NPCs you can recruit, after all, and this was before Bioware settled into the character-focused mindset. You're playing a Dungeons and Dragons game, and DMs inflicting horrible bullshit on players just for kicks is both normal and expected.

It really isn't. Gygaxian DMing hasn't been the norm for decades.

RoadCrewWorker
Nov 19, 2007

camels aren't so great

Cythereal posted:

The Big World Project installs virtually every mod ever made for the Baldur's Gate games. Some of them are good. Many are average. Many are bad, and some are downright lovely. And in terms of technical stability, it makes a house of cards look like the pyramids.

There is no mod pack for the series. Get your choice of Tutu or Trilogy, the fix pack, then any other mods you want. Opinions among players on what the "must have" mods are versus the "hardcore or crappy self fanfic inserts" mods are sharply divided. Some people love the Saerileth, Tsujatha, and Chloe mods. Others (most) hate them. Take your pick.
Thank you for the suggestions, that sounds like it'll give me much less headaches in the short and likely long run. :)

maev
Dec 6, 2010
Economically illiterate Tory Boy Bollocks brain.
Keep away from children

Lemon Curdistan posted:

Why would anyone involved even want to do this? Putting aside the fact that 3.5 is terrible, it was outdated years before Beamdog even existed.

Who knows, maybe we'll get a spiritual sequel that uses Next (which is poo poo, but at least less poo poo than 3.5) or even better, 13th Age.

3.5 was the golden era of DND for me, and for a lot of the games.

Cythereal
Nov 8, 2009

I love the potoo,
and the potoo loves you.

Lemon Curdistan posted:

Why would anyone involved even want to do this? Putting aside the fact that 3.5 is terrible, it was outdated years before Beamdog even existed.

Let's not start edition wars. I happen to like 3.5E and how it was implemented in IWD2 and NWN2. Had the Enhanced Editions brought the series into 3.5E rules, I likely would have bought them. They did not.

quote:

It really isn't. Gygaxian DMing hasn't been the norm for decades.

You do realize how old these games are and what BG1 in particular was meant to evoke, right? Both for DnD and CRPGs at that time, blindsiding players and making them think carefully about how to approach something were par for the course.

quote:

Thank you for the suggestions, that sounds like it'll give me much less headaches in the short and likely long run. :)

You're welcome. Mods are very much down to individual taste for the most part.

Piell
Sep 3, 2006

Grey Worm's Ken doll-like groin throbbed with the anticipatory pleasure that only a slightly warm and moist piece of lemoncake could offer


Young Orc
3.5 is, at least, a bit more logical than 2E's dumb "lower is better, but only sometimes!" bits of confusion for new players.

Captain Oblivious
Oct 12, 2007

I'm not like other posters
I am well aware of what BG1 is meant to evoke. It is a wildly different game from BG2 in that and many other respects.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

MrTheDevious
May 7, 2006

Ahh nostalgia, you cruel bitch
Goddamn this game is so huge. Every time I think my quest log is starting to empty out a little, I run into 20 more. I'm normally a massively anti-sidequest kinda guy...even Skyrim I just did the main quest then thieves/assassins guild stuff and was done. Something about BG2 though, I can't stop. I feel like I'm going to be really really sad once I finally finish everything and my first playthrough is over :unsmith:

Dark Souls is the only other game since Morrowind that I enjoyed this drat much

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply