Aleksei Vasiliev posted:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Muhammad#The BIG difference between GOD & God

There is now a trend to differentiate between GOD & God. Besides 'GOD' being a sign of the ultimate respect, there's a recent additional definition of GOD: the 'system as a whole'/the 'universal quantum computer'. It's been proven by the world's leading quantum computer researchers that not only do particles collide, they compute. Jews and Muslims generally have no problem with this new scientific definition of GOD. What about Christians? Where there is a computer, there are programs. And where there are programs, there is God (incarnate): the original and number 1 programmer. This article is rightfully locked. However, all the references to "God" should be changed to "GOD". - Ben Franklin 75.74.180.52 (talk) 19:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Aleksei Vasiliev posted:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Muhammad#The BIG difference between GOD & God

There is now a trend to differentiate between GOD & God. Besides 'GOD' being a sign of the ultimate respect, there's a recent additional definition of GOD: the 'system as a whole'/the 'universal quantum computer'. It's been proven by the world's leading quantum computer researchers that not only do particles collide, they compute. Jews and Muslims generally have no problem with this new scientific definition of GOD. What about Christians? Where there is a computer, there are programs. And where there are programs, there is God (incarnate): the original and number 1 programmer. This article is rightfully locked. However, all the references to "God" should be changed to "GOD". - Ben Franklin 75.74.180.52 (talk) 19:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

quote:

I tweaked the following... In English Gematria with the key of A=1,B=2...Z=26, English=74=E5+N14+G7+L12+I9+S19+H8, gematria=74=G7+E5+M13+A1+T20+R18+I9+A1, the key=74=T20+H8+E5+K11+E5+Y25. Also, religion=74/89=R18+E5+L12+I9+G7+I9+O(15)+N14, Jewish=74=J10+E5+W23+I9+S19+H8, Jesus=74=J10+E5+S19+U21+S19, Muhammad=74=M13+U21+H8+A1+M13+M13+A1+D4. The ancient principle of Jewish gematria/Greek isopsephy/Arabic Abjad numerals/(hisab al-jummal) had/has the main principle of words with the same alphanumeric sum have a connect between them. 'Coincidentally', connect=74 and between=74. - Benjamin Franklin75.74.180.52 (talk) 15:50, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

It's still absurd; using English (Latin) numerology in regard Jewish, Christian, or Islamic works is absurd. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Arthur: Wrong! And gematria is NOT numerology, although a numerologist can use it. A numerologist can also use your height and weight, but that doesn't make your height and weight numerology. But what's absurd is that you can't see the simple(74=S19+I9+M13+P16+L12+E5) connect(74=C3+O15+N14+N14+E5+C3+T20) between(74=B2+E5+T20+W23+E5+E5+N14) English(74) & Gematria(74). I'll bet $74 that you did no research on English gematria before revealing your ignorance on this topic (and possibly your prejudice) took over and you deleted something very important! 949OT. I even gave Wikipedia references to gematria, isopsephy, and Abjad numerals! I'm going to return the article to where it was before you deleted it and I ask you NOT to delete it again. And do some homework on a topic before you act like you are an expert on it! 42113B 1989T. - Benjamin Franklin 75.74.180.52 (talk) 12:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Arthur: I just realized that even though you find "English numerology absurd", you just deleted my revision and left the absurd part! Where's the logic in that? - Benjamin Franklin 75.74.180.52 (talk) 13:25, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

You're right. I did leave the absurd part, as I thought there had been a source for it, even though absurd. It's gone, now. Under the circumstances, we need a comprehensible reliable source to include English "gematria". — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:54, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

quote:

Legend of Osiris(74) and story of Moses

I added the following... *Egyptian legend of Osiris(=74=O+S19+I9+R18+I9+S19), Isis, Horus, Set + 70 others: 74 altogether. *Bible story of Moses, Aaron and his two sons + 70 elders of Israel: 74 altogether - Exodus 24:1. - Benjamin Franklin75.74.180.52 (talk) 16:56, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Nonsense. Using English letters in regard an Egyptian god is absurd. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:24, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Arthur: Your statement makes no sense. This is in English, so everyone - including non-scholars like yourself - are going to "use English letters in regard" to everything! Do you question the Egyptian religious story of 74: Osiris, Isis, Horus, Set & 70 others? Do you question the Biblical story of 74: Moses, Aaron and his two sons + 70 elders? Open any Bible to Exodus 24:1. It appears you have an anti-religious agenda here, correct? In your haste to erase Osiris=74 from the record, you deleted these easily confirmed truths. Your actions are the opposite of a scholar; you're are a destroyer of knowledge. You are in the same category as those who burned the Library of Alexandria and the Nazis who burned the books they didn't like! - Benjamin Franklin 75.74.180.52 (talk) 12:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

In regard the English spelling of "Osiris", the article points out that "Usiris" is an alternative spelling. Your reference to the story of Moses really is numerology, there is no Biblical indication that "74" is significant. What else have you got? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

quote:

"Selah" appears 74 times in the Bible (71 in Psalms and 3 in Habakkuk)

I added in -In Other Fields- *Selah appears 74 times in the Bible (71 in Psalms and 3 in Habakkuk. - Benjamin Franklin 75.74.180.52 (talk) 13:22, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Trivial. The number of appearances of anything in the Bible, the Koran, or any other work, is trivial unless there are reliable sources for the significance. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:00, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Sweevo posted:

the guy who wrote that is also obsessed with adding bible references to the article on the number 74

RZApublican posted:

hey it's losethos man

Aleksei Vasiliev posted:

42nd_cabal.gif

prefect posted:

nobody should be allowed to use the word "quantum" without first passing a test to prove they know what it actually means

Sagebrush posted:

i think it's a good shibboleth. if someone uses the word "quantum" and they don't have at least a bsc in physics you can safely ignore everything they say

Sagebrush posted:

no, you don't

Sagebrush posted:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2100s_(decade)

check under 2101

prefect posted:

nobody should be allowed to use the word "quantum" without first passing a test to prove they know what it actually means

Carthag posted:

* 2300: Google's master plan to index all the world's information and make it searchable could be achieved, according to Eric Schmidt.[10]

Sagebrush posted:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2100s_(decade)

check under 2101

Carthag posted:

* 2300: Google's master plan to index all the world's information and sell it to advertisers could be achieved, according to Eric Schmidt.[10]

Sham bam bamina! posted:

The International Time Capsule Society (ITCS), based at Oglethorpe University in Atlanta, Georgia, is an organization established to promote the study of time capsules.^{[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]} Since 1990 it has been documenting all types of time capsule projects worldwide.^{[1][3][4][5][6][7]}

Improbable Lobster posted:

Widdiful posted:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DanTahHedgehog

syscall girl posted:

i didn't watch casablanca until i was 20 and i felt like i'd already seen every scene because of how ingrained it is in popular culture

still holds up though

prefect posted:

My name is Dan, I'm thirteen, male, and I like drawing Sonic fan-comics. ... My favorite movies are Casablanca, Avatar and Citizen Kane.