|
The Chase? This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Augh |
|
46 | 32.39% |
| gently caress |
|
96 | 67.61% |
| Total: | 142 votes | ||
|
Because we have to hear about it forever just like Danica's pole last year.
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 04:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 01:28 |
|
|
Yeah, it's not suprising, nearly all the ECR engines were in the top 10 and you can bet your loving rear end pap pap only put the best in DA3
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 04:27
|
|
|
BMB5150 posted:Who cares about qualifying as if it really matters by lap 2 or last year turn 1. Exactly, so why not get a car on the pole that will create the most publicity going into the 500? Personperson14 posted:Yeah, it's not suprising, nearly all the ECR engines were in the top 10 and you can bet your loving rear end pap pap only put the best in DA3 And NASCAR put the best restrictor plate in it 
Applebees Appetizer fucked around with this message at 05:00 on Feb 17, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 04:55
|
|
|
leica posted:drat, NASCAR isn't even remotely subtle about it anymore. How loving obvious, gently caress this sport. NACARE!
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 05:07
|
|
|
Don't hate it makes ya look dumb. All of RCR is on their poo poo at plate tracks like SHR was last year when Danica won the pole. Nascar didn't do poo poo, the entire team is clearly on another level and of course AD is at the top of the food chain
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 05:12
|
|
|
Some Random rear end in a top hat posted:Don't hate it makes ya look dumb. All of RCR is on their poo poo at plate tracks like SHR was last year when Danica won the pole. Nascar didn't do poo poo, the entire team is clearly on another level and of course AD is at the top of the food chain You only say that because RCR supplies your engines. Seriously, good post man.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 05:23
|
|
|
leica posted:And NASCAR put the best restrictor plate in it Serious question because I'm dumb, are there any standard protocols in place to ensure that restrictor plates are distributed in a truly random, incorruptible fashion?
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 05:35
|
|
|
Shadow Puppet Of posted:Serious question because I'm dumb, are there any standard protocols in place to ensure that restrictor plates are distributed in a truly random, incorruptible fashion? Yes. NASCAR has much more to lose than gain by ever allowing a serious suggestion of Something like that that to occur. At the very worst they might let something pass tech that could be considered very grey in the rulebook, but nothing like violating one of their own cardinal, unforgivable sins of loving with the motor.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 05:39
|
|
|
Some Random rear end in a top hat posted:Yes. NASCAR has much more to lose than gain by ever allowing a serious suggestion of Something like that that to occur. At the very worst they might let something pass tech that could be considered very grey in the rulebook, but nothing like violating one of their own cardinal, unforgivable sins of loving with the motor. The ghost of Jimmy Spencer / McDonald's sponsorship looms. For you youngins quote:At the time, Johnson's driver was an energetic, inexperienced, and occasionally reckless youngster named Jimmy Spencer, who was nicknamed "Mr. Excitement" for his wild, aggressive driving. But Spencer enjoyed little success with Johnson's team, and his sponsor, McDonald's, was rumored to be leaving the sport. NASCAR desperately wanted to avoid McDonald's departure. To lose a big-name like McDonald's would be bad for business, and many believed NASCAR would do almost anything to keep the fast-food giant in the sport. Uncle Jam fucked around with this message at 05:51 on Feb 17, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 05:41
|
|
|
Some Random rear end in a top hat posted:Yes. NASCAR has much more to lose than gain by ever allowing a serious suggestion of Something like that that to occur. At the very worst they might let something pass tech that could be considered very grey in the rulebook, but nothing like violating one of their own cardinal, unforgivable sins of loving with the motor. I agree that NASCAR (probably) wouldn't gently caress with restrictor plates, that comment was tongue in cheek, but I would not put it past them to look the other way during inspection if it suits them. I'm not a conspiracy theorist in the slightest, I'm not a hater (I have loved this sport for decades), and I shouldn't look dumb for questioning NASCAR's motives. The loving drivers question their motives all the time! The posters in this forum do as well! I don't like bringing this up a lot in these threads, but I was a member of the NASCAR media (photographer) for three years. I heard stories from veteran photographers and writers about some of the poo poo that goes on, they ALL sounded like a bunch of conspiracy theorists to me at first, but as time went on I started to really wonder about poo poo. Especially when I would hear the same stories from different people, people that I had become friends with that were respected photographers. I dunno man, maybe I'm jaded? The sport I used to love sucks now so maybe that's part of it. Guess I just need to stop paying attention completely. [edit] I'm not saying that it's a fact that NASCAR helped the #3 to the pole, but it sure as hell is possible. Applebees Appetizer fucked around with this message at 07:58 on Feb 17, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 07:35
|
|
|
Any of you kids old enough to remember the  that DEI was given a "help" to ensure Jr would go well at the Restrictor plate tracks in the 8?Well.. and Mikey too I guess.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 14:45
|
|
|
NASCAR and the WWF should merge and have the drivers wrestle for starting position.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 15:23
|
|
|
Nascar always gives the "advantage" to the entire team to make it look like the whole team is doing well
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 15:48
|
|
|
leica posted:I agree that NASCAR (probably) wouldn't gently caress with restrictor plates, that comment was tongue in cheek, but I would not put it past them to look the other way during inspection if it suits them. I'm not a conspiracy theorist in the slightest, I'm not a hater (I have loved this sport for decades), and I shouldn't look dumb for questioning NASCAR's motives. The loving drivers question their motives all the time! The posters in this forum do as well! Oh I don't disagree at all, i'm sure plenty of shady poo poo goes on in the garage re: tech, but there's plenty of ways for NASCAR to confer an advantage to an already strong team if it suits them without touching the plate. I don't put many things past them if they're hellbent on advancing a storyline, but I specifically think that the plates are not something they'd gently caress with, especially given that they don't really need to use that avenue if they want to help somebody. Plenty of other ways to skin that cat
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 17:49
|
|
|
Imagine if a car went into the stands and a federal investigation found a variance like that. Conspiracy theories in NASCAR tend to fall apart like truther ones do, for much the same reasons. The people in charge are incompetent, not evil. From my life in the corporate world, I can tell you that the two look remarkably similar.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 23:36
|
|
|
VikingSkull posted:Imagine if a car went into the stands and a federal investigation found a variance like that. If, NASCAR was truely fixed, there'd be no way Dale Jr. would have been this irrelevant this long.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 00:34
|
|
|
VikingSkull posted:Imagine if a car went into the stands and a federal investigation found a variance like that. I wish they had been incompetent about things like reeling sponsorships away from cars to put them in as a series 'official' sponsor. Whenever it comes to money (TV Rights, track revenue, sponsorship, simpson lawsuit) they always seem to come out on top. Sucking on track product is terrible to watch, but when they blow up their own TV Rights records everything is running well for them.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 00:54
|
|
|
FuzzySkinner posted:If, NASCAR was truely fixed, there'd be no way Dale Jr. would have been this irrelevant this long. Heh. Just watched the clash, an entertaining race and denny time 
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 01:11
|
|
|
Uncle Jam posted:I wish they had been incompetent about things like reeling sponsorships away from cars to put them in as a series 'official' sponsor. Whenever it comes to money (TV Rights, track revenue, sponsorship, simpson lawsuit) they always seem to come out on top. If we, as idiots, see them being dumb by sucking money up like mad, doesn't that then make them even more stupid for doing it? FuzzySkinner posted:If, NASCAR was truely fixed, there'd be no way Dale Jr. would have been this irrelevant this long. This, but harder. Why not plant the WMD's yourself? Seizure Meat fucked around with this message at 01:24 on Feb 18, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 01:21
|
|
|
Is the Battle at the Beach tonight? I need K&N and Modified clownshoes.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 01:27
|
|
|
Tomorrow, on Fox Sports 2.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 01:28
|
|
|
No one is talking about the Danica bewb?
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 02:08
|
|
|
front wing flexing posted:No one is talking about the Danica bewb?  http://imgur.com/hTNoXzv
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 02:17
|
|
|
mmmmmm Seem like someone intercepted a Stenhouse only picture. Oops.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 02:19
|
|
|
BMB5150 posted:mmmmmm Seem like someone intercepted a Stenhouse only picture. Oops. Released by Sports Illustrated of all places.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 02:24
|
|
|
oh boy can't wait to hear about this all week
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 02:25
|
|
|
Wait she has boobs?
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 02:26
|
|
|
Good job Sports Illustrated! edit: apparently it was taken in 2008. This whole thing is odd shyduck fucked around with this message at 02:32 on Feb 18, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 02:26
|
|
|
front wing flexing posted:Released by Sports Illustrated of all places.  That's spectacular.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 02:27
|
|
|
Cannot wait for The King to add his two cents on that teat. You know the man's seen quite a few flashed at him in his day and to this very day.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 02:31
|
|
|
really loving really this week of all times 
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 02:31
|
|
|
front wing flexing posted:No one is talking about the Danica bewb? you did this, remember that
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 02:33
|
|
|
I think it's possible that in the past, there's been some sort of manipulation. Hell, take a look at what happened with Wendell Scott back in the day. But the gang up at Daytona Beach is pretty incompetent when it comes to most things. They seem to be (like Uncle Jam said) very skilled in lining up Exclusive Sponsors, and TV Contracts. But then you watch the races themselves and they seem very out of touch in terms of ways to: a.) Excite the base. b.) Lure outsiders to watch the sport. lulz.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 02:37
|
|
|
The biggest problem they have is the tech guys are all as smart as the crew guys. Put a couple loving idiots in the tech line and poo poo would get magical. SRA give a couple some comic books next time, that's what Smokey said he did.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 02:38
|
|
|
"I'm not the big story at Speedweeks, huh? Watch this..." VikingSkull posted:really Wait until her career is teetering on the edge of oblivion and the sextape is magically revealed.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 02:52
|
|
|
I like how Y'all whining about NASCAR and fixing. Its like not one of you remember when I posted, a month ago, that RCR has been cheating at plate racing for 25 years and hasn't needed NASCAR's help. They didn't need it this past weekend either. Just calm the gently caress down. By sunday and JJs 4th 500 win, it will be all about his death march to a 7th title.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 02:54
|
|
|
That boob pic looks like a photoshop to me, how could you see any nipple at that angle? It just looks off.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 02:56
|
|
|
This loving thread. edit Mods if you please, NASCAR 2014 (Spring): how could you see any nipple at that angle?
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 03:11
|
|
|
GUYS DERRIKE COPE IS RACING IN THE NATIONWIDE RACE. 1990 DAYTONA 500 CHAMPION DERRIKE COPE! https://twitter.com/DadofLiamB/status/435585060968726528/photo/1/large
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 03:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 01:28 |
|
|
leica posted:That boob pic looks like a photoshop to me, how could you see any nipple at that angle? It just looks off. Bags of sand.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 03:39
|
|