Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
OXBALLS DOT COM
Sep 11, 2005

by FactsAreUseless
Young Orc

Snowdens Secret posted:

I don't think there's been any indication of why we're not getting the A3/S3 hatch in the US beyond the fact that the previous A3 hatch sold like complete crap here. I don't recall the Golf R doing so hot when available before, either.

Well the common factor is that they were all pretty ridiculously expensive for small cars, especially the Golf R.


Also, the costs of federalization haven't really gone down any, so unless some treaty actually unifies the process (fat chance) you probably still won't see niche models cross over. Especially since there's additional costs for marketing it as well as indirect costs like product line complexity, making life harder for dealers, and potentially cannibalizing sales of more profitable vehicles. One of the reasons for killing the 5 series wagon, for instance, was because they found that it took sales away from the 7 series sedan. And because of economies of scale, carmakers would much rather sell you a popular model than a tiny niche model since if they go for the same price, the popular model is probably goign to be cheaper to make since the parts are being produced in greater volume.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin
I'm always skeptical about the whole thing because there *are* plenty of wierd niche models that they sell here, they're just not the *right* ones. BMW managed to get enough money for the X6 Activehybrid, that was a twin turbo V8 AWD hybrid coupe SUV, and how many did they sell?

...but apparently a 5 series wagon or a manual trans in the 335d is going to completely loving break them. :effort:

KakerMix
Apr 8, 2004

8.2 M.P.G.
:byetankie:

Cream_Filling posted:

Well the common factor is that they were all pretty ridiculously expensive for small cars, especially the Golf R.

One of the reasons for killing the 5 series wagon, for instance, was because they found that it took sales away from the 7 series sedan.

The 5-Series GT they gave us in place of the 5 wagon was the one that started stealing 7 series sales and BMW went 'Oh dang'.

Throatwarbler posted:

I'm always skeptical about the whole thing because there *are* plenty of wierd niche models that they sell here, they're just not the *right* ones. BMW managed to get enough money for the X6 Activehybrid, that was a twin turbo V8 AWD hybrid coupe SUV, and how many did they sell?

...but apparently a 5 series wagon or a manual trans in the 335d is going to completely loving break them. :effort:

Yeah, I'm constantly getting asked at various dealers we shop around at to look at various types of SUVs. Who the gently caress buys these things? I can get one of these fatty hatchback things but I can't get an S4 wagon. Sure Volvo is bringing over a tiny amount of those v60 Polestar wagons but I don't like Volvo enough to compromise on the auto-only transmission and other weird compromises for the sake of having a hot Volvo wagon.

KakerMix fucked around with this message at 02:24 on Apr 1, 2014

Fender Anarchist
May 20, 2009

Fender Anarchist

Cream_Filling posted:

Well the common factor is that they were all pretty ridiculously expensive for small cars, especially the Golf R.

Also, the costs of federalization haven't really gone down any, so unless some treaty actually unifies the process (fat chance) you probably still won't see niche models cross over.

Your other points are valid, but I think the idea is that if all safety and emissions standards are the same here as they are abroad, federalization won't really be a thing anymore, since they'll meet all markets' standards from the get-go.

OXBALLS DOT COM
Sep 11, 2005

by FactsAreUseless
Young Orc

Throatwarbler posted:

I'm always skeptical about the whole thing because there *are* plenty of wierd niche models that they sell here, they're just not the *right* ones. BMW managed to get enough money for the X6 Activehybrid, that was a twin turbo V8 AWD hybrid coupe SUV, and how many did they sell?

...but apparently a 5 series wagon or a manual trans in the 335d is going to completely loving break them. :effort:

Dunno, maybe the Activehybrid was never meant to turn a profit and is just there to be a halo hybrid that nobody buys.


KakerMix posted:

The 5-Series GT they gave us in place of the 5 wagon was the one that started stealing 7 series sales and BMW went 'Oh dang'.

No I remember hearing that this was a thing with the 5 series wagon, too. Presumably they hoped that the GT, which is smaller and shorter than the wagon, wouldn't steal from 7 series sales as much but I guess it still does anyway.

fknlo
Jul 6, 2009


Fun Shoe

KakerMix posted:


Yeah, I'm constantly getting asked at various dealers we shop around at to look at various types of SUVs. Who the gently caress buys these things? I can get one of these fatty hatchback things but I can't get an S4 wagon. Sure Volvo is bringing over a tiny amount of those v60 Polestar wagons but I don't like Volvo enough to compromise on the auto-only transmission and other weird compromises for the sake of having a hot Volvo wagon.

Just remember that the only wagon Audi even sells in the US now is the A4 allroad. That's it. Gotta focus on bringing the Q1 and Q3 to market!

Finger Prince
Jan 5, 2007


I've just had to return a brand new Mazda CX-5 rental due to a cracked windshield (loving landscaping truck). Got a Ford Edge in return.
We had the CX-5 for about 3 days, and it is seriously nice. Interior is really good, the steering feel and weight is excellent, visibility is good, handling is nice, looks really sharp.
The Edge is more "deluxe" inside, but more gimmicky and somehow not as nice. I'd consider a CX-5 to own, so far I wouldn't consider an Edge.
One thing we noticed about these crossovers is the lack of a parcel shelf or cover for the cargo area, which is a bit disconcerting. Does the dealer/factory generally offer them as options?

KillHour
Oct 28, 2007


Phone posted:

Cadillac's advertising has been pretty good the past few years, but that ad just comes off as some purestrain jingoism.

The Ford one is try-hard as gently caress, but it's fairly cute.

The sad thing is that the Cadillac commercial is genius in that it plays to their target audience - WASPs that think they have money because they earned it, Goddamnit! All those lazy bastards in their econoboxes don't deserve it, and are (literally) going to hell for not working hard enough. Because Jesus was a true capitalist, dontcha know?

DEUCE SLUICE
Feb 6, 2004

I dreamt I was an old dog, stuck in a honeypot. It was horrifying.
Yeah, gently caress those Frenchies with their sane work-life balance. I work my rear end off and have this...Cadillac? Really, that's it? gently caress.

KozmoNaut
Apr 23, 2008

Happiness is a warm
Turbo Plasma Rifle


I know I would certainly rather have more free time and a bigass Citroën :france:

Xguard86
Nov 22, 2004

"You don't understand his pain. Everywhere he goes he sees women working, wearing pants, speaking in gatherings, voting. Surely they will burn in the white hot flames of Hell"

KillHour posted:

The sad thing is that the Cadillac commercial is genius in that it plays to their target audience - WASPs that think they have money qualify for a loan because they earned it, Goddamnit! All those lazy bastards in their econoboxes don't deserve it, and are (literally) going to hell for not working hard enough. Because Jesus was a true capitalist, dontcha know?

More accurate.

Militant Lesbian
Oct 3, 2002

KozmoNaut posted:

I know I would certainly rather have more free time and a bigass Citroën :france:

I feel it's very appropriate that I drive a German car, since my job is very laid back and liberal with handing out time off, almost like one o' them socialist European employers or something. Also my boss has been encouraging our shift to slow down so we don't run ourselves out of work.

redgubbinz
May 1, 2007

DEUCE SLUICE posted:

Yeah, gently caress those Frenchies with their sane work-life balance. I work my rear end off and have this...Cadillac? Really, that's it? gently caress.

Dude. Motorized cup holders. If that isn't worth early heart disease, ulcers, back problems and alienation of your family I don't know what is.

warcake
Apr 10, 2010

Throatwarbler posted:

I'm always skeptical about the whole thing because there *are* plenty of wierd niche models that they sell here, they're just not the *right* ones. BMW managed to get enough money for the X6 Activehybrid, that was a twin turbo V8 AWD hybrid coupe SUV, and how many did they sell?

...but apparently a 5 series wagon or a manual trans in the 335d is going to completely loving break them. :effort:

I don't think the 335d was available anywhere with a manual transmission, it was auto only here in the UK.

fknlo
Jul 6, 2009


Fun Shoe

warcake posted:

I don't think the 335d was available anywhere with a manual transmission, it was auto only here in the UK.

I'm pretty sure it's an issue with all the torks. Can you get any of the reasonably powerful small diesels with an auto anywhere?

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin
In other GM Marketing news, Ram outsells Silverado.

http://www.autonews.com/article/20140401/RETAIL01/140409976/ram-pickup-outsells-silverado-for-first-time-since-1999

quote:

DETROIT -- It’s no April Fool’s joke, though General Motors may wish it were.

The Ram pickup outsold the Chevrolet Silverado in March, the first monthly win by the Ram over Chevrolet’s full-sized pickup in nearly 15 years.

The Ram was the second-best seller among full-sized pickups, behind the Ford F-series.

Ram sold 42,532 pickups in March, up 26 percent -- its highest March total since 2007. Chevrolet sold 42,247 Silverados last month, up 7 percent.

Sales of the F-series were up 5 percent to 70,940.

The Ram, then sold under the Dodge brand, last beat the Chevrolet’s full-sized pickup in August 1999. .

GM spokesman Jim Cain dismissed the Ram outselling the Silverado, contending Ram was buying market share with incentives. Both Chevrolet and Ram had truck promotions in March.

“The 1980s called. They want their marketing strategy back,” Cain told Automotive News when asked about Ram outselling Silverado. “It’s really easy to deeply discount your truck, mine the subprime market and offer cheap lease deals to buy market share.”

A Ram brand spokesman declined to comment on GM’s view and said Ram will continue to focus on its products.

The redesigned Silverado, which was named 2014 North American Truck of the Year at the Detroit auto show in January, has been struggling to gain traction in the United States since its introduction last summer.

The Silverado’s March sales were further hampered after dealers were told late in the month to stop selling certain models pending a repair to correct a potential transmission fluid line leak that could result in a fire.

Barclay’s analyst Brian Johnson noted in late February that the Silverado and Sierra redesign for the 2014 model year marked the first time General Motors had lost market share after launching a redesigned pickup.

Analysts said Silverado’s redesign had been conservative and “evolutionary, not revolutionary.” Meanwhile, they credited Ram with offering innovations such as a coil spring suspension, light-duty diesel engine, eight-speed transmission and the Rambox storage system.

Silverado’s sales lead over the Ram has been dwindling steadily for several years.

In 1993, Chevrolet’s pickup outsold what was then its Dodge competitor by nearly 450,000 units as Chrysler prepared to launch its radically restyled, big-rig inspired 1994 Dodge Ram.

By 2013, Silverado’s sales gain over Ram had dwindled to 124,741.

Powershift
Nov 23, 2009


That's no big surprise. The ram has come a long way since 1999, the silverado not so much.

It turns out not making progress while relying on commercials that say "progress sucks" and "america, baseball, apple pie!" is still a poo poo business strategy. Nice to see them not accepting that they're doing something wrong, as well. Especially when the first thing you're greeted with when you go to the chevrolet website is $7,500 on the hood of their brand new, just released this year pickup, vs the $7200 dodge advertises on the hood of theirs.

OXBALLS DOT COM
Sep 11, 2005

by FactsAreUseless
Young Orc
Just more evidence that Dan Akerson is perhaps the worst auto company CEO of the decade, possibly longer. It really sucks because GM was just starting to get their poo poo together, too.

Snowdens Secret
Dec 29, 2008
Someone got you a obnoxiously racist av.

Throatwarbler posted:

In other GM Marketing news, Ram outsells Silverado.

http://www.autonews.com/article/20140401/RETAIL01/140409976/ram-pickup-outsells-silverado-for-first-time-since-1999

quote:

“The 1980s called. They want their marketing strategy back,” Cain told Automotive News when asked about Ram outselling Silverado.

This line is terrible both as the reference that it is (especially this month) and the mere fact that a grown man and theoretical professional used it out loud

Sir Tonk
Apr 18, 2006
Young Orc
So is this Ford's April Fool's joke for 2014?

http://www.trucktrend.com/future/concepts/1404_2016_ford_svt_bronco_coming_soon/

Snowdens Secret
Dec 29, 2008
Someone got you a obnoxiously racist av.

quote:

This was all part of an elaborate scheme for one of our biggest April Fools pranks ever. Please take a few minutes to wipe away the tears from your eyes. Now before you decide to punch us square in the jaw for doing this to you, just remember one thing, if our voices are loud enough, we just might see an SVT Bronco from the Blue Oval in the near future.

It does look nice tho

Q_res
Oct 29, 2005

We're fucking built for this shit!
No, it's Truck Trends' April Fools joke.

D C
Jun 20, 2004

1-800-HOTLINEBLING
1-800-HOTLINEBLING
1-800-HOTLINEBLING

did you read the article?

Terrible Robot
Jul 2, 2010

FRIED CHICKEN
Slippery Tilde
I forget which magazine it was that ran a huge article about AMC coming back and bringing out badass retro designs of all their old cars, but they got 17-year-old me really good. I was so pissed when I realized what month the magazine was printed for.

fake edit: Found it, it was a Hot Rod Magazine issue, of course. Goddamn I wanted it to be true so bad.

http://www.hotrod.com/featuredvehicles/hrdp_0804_amc_concept_cars/viewall.html

Friar Zucchini
Aug 6, 2010

:golfclap:

That Bronco is too good to be real. April Fools is a bitch. And so is Truck Trend for that matter since they posted the fucker.

oRenj9
Aug 3, 2004

Who loves oRenj soda?!?
College Slice

Powershift posted:

That's no big surprise. The ram has come a long way since 1999, the silverado not so much.

It turns out not making progress while relying on commercials that say "progress sucks" and "america, baseball, apple pie!" is still a poo poo business strategy. Nice to see them not accepting that they're doing something wrong, as well. Especially when the first thing you're greeted with when you go to the chevrolet website is $7,500 on the hood of their brand new, just released this year pickup, vs the $7200 dodge advertises on the hood of theirs.

This is spot on. The best response would have been to mention the RAM is just benefiting from pent up demand for the just-released 3.0L diesel. This approach would require GM's brass to acknowledge that they made a failed gamble with the assumption that V6 half-tons were just a fad. Now they have a brand new pickup that roughly one-third of the market will ignore because GM is completely unequipped to handle disruptions.

Akerson really did gently caress GM; at this point, I'm not sure they can even be saved. It is pretty reasonable to assume that, had Lutz stayed on board, the new Silverado would have a bitchin Ecotek V6 that would shame everything else on the market. This is the second important vehicle launch that Akerson screwed up (Malibu being the other).


Snowdens Secret posted:

This line is terrible both as the reference that it is (especially this month) and the mere fact that a grown man and theoretical professional used it out loud

That's just further evidence that the people in charge at GM are, through incompetence or malice, running it into the ground.

Edit:

quote:

Transmission choices are either a 6R140 6-speed automatic transmission or a ZF-6 speed manual transmission in case you like to row your own while running down the highway.

This line is confirmation of an April Fools joke. To my knowledge Ford doesn't use a ZF transmission anywhere in their lineup anymore. The Mustang gets either a Getrag/Ford unit or a Tremec TR-6060 depending on application.

oRenj9 fucked around with this message at 05:44 on Apr 2, 2014

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin

oRenj9 posted:

This is spot on. The best response would have been to mention the RAM is just benefiting from pent up demand for the just-released 3.0L diesel. This approach would require GM's brass to acknowledge that they made a failed gamble with the assumption that V6 half-tons were just a fad. Now they have a brand new pickup that roughly one-third of the market will ignore because GM is completely unequipped to handle disruptions.

Akerson really did gently caress GM; at this point, I'm not sure they can even be saved. It is pretty reasonable to assume that, had Lutz stayed on board, the new Silverado would have a bitchin Ecotek V6 that would shame everything else on the market. This is the second important vehicle launch that Akerson screwed up (Malibu being the other).


That's just further evidence that the people in charge at GM are, through incompetence or malice, running it into the ground.


How has GM ignored V6 trucks? The Chevy V6 is no worse than any of the other V6s in terms of either torque or fuel economy, it's down a little bit on power but who cares. It's even called Ecotec too.

Q_res
Oct 29, 2005

We're fucking built for this shit!
Actually, GM's new V6 is probably the best V6 (that's not turbocharged or diesel) in any of the trucks.

KennyLoggins
Dec 3, 2004
Welcome to the Danger Zone
Yeah the new 4.3L V6 sounds pretty decent.

I thought GM stated in the recent past that if they see consumer demand they can have a 1500 diesel to market in less then a year or something.

Aeka 2.0
Nov 16, 2000

:ohdear: Have you seen my apex seals? I seem to have lost them.




Dinosaur Gum

davebo posted:

The 2014 rework is one of those reworks where I wish I could cherry pick what I like about that and mix it with what I like about my 2012 model. I definitely prefer my taillights but I love the flat bottom steering wheel in the new one. Also, show us a nice profile pic with the terrible turbo badge. Has the aftermarket found something better to do with that space yet?

I think it's pretty redundant to have a strip of of LED's right over the fog lights but drat if I don't wish mine had them. And I realize people make kits to put them in the older ones but that's too much trouble.

I like the turbo badge :( . They moved the led strip to the top of the headlights. There is none above the fogs. I'm not a fan of the flat bottom wheel. This would be nice in a quick ratio wheel, but in a car like this it is more bothersome when making turns. Also this electronic steering takes some time to get used to.

Aeka 2.0 fucked around with this message at 15:53 on Apr 3, 2014

Phone
Jul 30, 2005

親子丼をほしい。

KennyLoggins posted:

Yeah the new 4.3L V6 sounds pretty decent.

I thought GM stated in the recent past that if they see consumer demand they can have a 1500 diesel to market in less then a year or something.

Well, uh... Ford has the PowerMiniStroke coming out soon and both Toyota and Nissan are hopping on the new Cummins 5.0 train...

PeterWeller
Apr 21, 2003

I told you that story so I could tell you this one.

Phone posted:

Well, uh... Ford has the PowerMiniStroke coming out soon and both Toyota and Nissan are hopping on the new Cummins 5.0 train...

That's not necessarily a sign of consumer demand. I don't know if a lot of people are actually clamoring for diesel half-tons or if manufacturers see them as a way to hit fuel economy targets.

Anyway, the powertrain is not the new GM trucks' problem. The redesigned V6 is a solid competitor to the Pentastar and Ford 3.7. The 5.3 slots in well against the Ecoboost, 5.0, and Hemi. GM might not give you class leading numbers, but they do give you class competitive numbers.

The problem with the new GM trucks is that they simply don't offer anything new aside from a luxury trim level. There's no real reason for the faithful to trade up, and there's nothing flashy to steal customers from other brands.

Fender Anarchist
May 20, 2009

Fender Anarchist

PeterWeller posted:

That's not necessarily a sign of consumer demand. I don't know if a lot of people are actually clamoring for diesel half-tons or if manufacturers see them as a way to hit fuel economy targets.

Anyway, the powertrain is not the new GM trucks' problem. The redesigned V6 is a solid competitor to the Pentastar and Ford 3.7. The 5.3 slots in well against the Ecoboost, 5.0, and Hemi. GM might not give you class leading numbers, but they do give you class competitive numbers.

The problem with the new GM trucks is that they simply don't offer anything new aside from a luxury trim level. There's no real reason for the faithful to trade up, and there's nothing flashy to steal customers from other brands.

UHHHHHHHHHHHHHH they're made from steel like submarines. You loving pleb. :colbert:

I agree though, Ford has outstanding gas engines and excellent interior quality and features (My :hurr:d Touch aside), and Dodge Ram has the Rambox and the best HD engine in the Cummins, along with a nicer ride from the rear coil springs. GM's stuff is merely adequate.

Keyser_Soze
May 5, 2009

Pillbug

Powershift posted:

That's no big surprise. The ram has come a long way since 1999, the silverado not so much.

It turns out not making progress while relying on commercials that say "progress sucks" and "america, baseball, apple pie!" is still a poo poo business strategy. Nice to see them not accepting that they're doing something wrong, as well. Especially when the first thing you're greeted with when you go to the chevrolet website is $7,500 on the hood of their brand new, just released this year pickup, vs the $7200 dodge advertises on the hood of theirs.

I test drove a Ram 1500 4x4 with the $1500 air suspension and it drove nothing like trucks of the past. I don't know about the 2014+ but the 2012 Silverado's still drive like 2001 models.

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin
In unrelated news, GM increases incentives on Silverado.

quote:

Automotive News

April 4, 2014

Article Quotes:

DETROIT -- Within hours of a General Motors spokesman saying it was easy to “buy market share” after the Ram pickup outsold the Chevrolet Silverado in March, GM opened its wallet to buy it back.

The Ram pickup outsold the Chevrolet Silverado in the United States last month for the first month since August 1999. The Ram posted sales of 42,532 vs. the Silverado’s 42,247.

After the sales results Tuesday, Chevrolet announced that it was extending its March Truck Month promotion into April, boosting lease incentives and increasing consumer savings on certain models of the Silverado.

Chevrolet Vice President Brian Sweeney wrote in the brand’s Dealer Playbook for April that Chevy was adding “an additional $1,000 of bonus cash on light-duty Silverado double cabs that will help us get after the heart of the pickup market.”

Chevrolet’s Truck Month promotion in March offered discounted supplier pricing for all customers on its 2014 Silverado pickups and savings off sticker on certain models of up to $7,541.

For April, Chevrolet will expand those discounts. Savings now on 2014 models top out at $8,162 for the light-duty double cab V-8 and up to $8,974 for a 4x4 diesel Silverado 2500HD crew cab.

GM spokeswoman Ryndee Carney characterized GM’s additional April Truck Month spiffs as “strategic and targeted incentives” to move double-cab versions of the Silverado.

However, in an e-mail sent to scores of dealers in the northeast United States and obtained by Automotive News, a GM district manager in the northeastern United States expressed incredulity that Ram had sold more pickups in March than Chevrolet.

“Okay — time to take the gloves off and go back and take back what rightfully belongs to every one of you … Silverado truck sales,” the GM district manager wrote.

The e-mail contained details of a regional lease offer that would put Silverado payments at $269 per month, with about $1,900 due at signing, compared with a Ram advertised lease of $259 per month, with $2,999 due at signing.

“Don’t you think you can SELL and WIN potential truck buyers with what was announced,” the GM district manager wrote. “I am asking for YOUR commitment this month TRUCK MONTH to market - promote and sell our Silverado’s [sic]… dress ‘em up on your front line and on your website… you will not be disappointed.”

On Tuesday, as March sales totals were released, GM spokesman Jim Cain accused Ram of buying the monthly sales win.

“The 1980s called. They want their marketing strategy back,” Cain told Automotive News. “It’s really easy to deeply discount your truck, mine the subprime market and offer cheap deals to buy market share.”

EDIT: Oh man the new Colorado and Canyon are just going to fly off the shelves when they arrive.

Terrible Robot
Jul 2, 2010

FRIED CHICKEN
Slippery Tilde
Hahahahahahahahahaha

edit: I have nothing constructive to add, I just love me some schadenfreude.

Mental Hospitality
Jan 5, 2011

Oh GM. :allears:

I actually think the Silverado is a pretty nice truck too. But with a new F150 coming and the Ram actually having some really unique features I just can't see its sales reaching far above the Ram.

Fender Anarchist
May 20, 2009

Fender Anarchist

So what happens when a company that gets most of its margins from trucks starts losing truck sales?

KakerMix
Apr 8, 2004

8.2 M.P.G.
:byetankie:

Fucknag posted:

So what happens when a company that gets most of its margins from trucks starts losing truck sales?

Government Motors v2

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Seizure Meat
Jul 23, 2008

by Smythe
Ford has the Ecoboost, Ram has the Express, GM has......???

That's basically the reason.

e- as a Mopar homer and a Ram owner hahahahaha

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply