|
Combat Pretzel posted:Good to know about the 192bit bus, because it's still in recent more affordable cards. I suppose I'll be good with a 7xx series card, since Maxwell cards won't be coming in 2014 from what I just found out.
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 15:06 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 14:01 |
|
Alereon posted:On the GTX 760 they do it right and pair them with 1.5GB/3GB of VRAM, rather than trying to cram 1/2GB on there somehow, this should work without any complication. Yeah, 192bit buses aren't inherently bad, it's just that the 550ti had half of the VRAM chips hooked up to 2/3s of the memory bus while the other half had to work in clamshell mode with only 64bits, if I remember correctly. Fame Douglas posted:nVidia also has adaptive VSync, which is pretty aces. Are there any benefits to using adaptive V-Sync instead of just capping the framerate in Nvidia inspector/Radeon pro?
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 16:55 |
|
Don Lapre posted:I think the recommendation for dk2 is a 780 or better. I'd agree, it's only 1080p but DK2 runs natively at 75hz so that requires 25 percent more performance than 60hz. Plus frame drops are a lot more jarring with VR so overkill makes sense here.
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 17:01 |
|
Arzachel posted:Are there any benefits to using adaptive V-Sync instead of just capping the framerate in Nvidia inspector/Radeon pro? Capping the framerate does not eliminate tearing. And while Radeon Pro does offer Dynamic V-sync Control, its development has also been halted. With nVidia, adaptive VSync is a regular driver feature not dependent on third-party efforts.
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 17:04 |
|
Fame Douglas posted:And while Radeon Pro does offer Dynamic V-sync Control, its development has also been halted. Son of a bitch, you're absolutely right. Looks like the guy is on the Raptr dev team now, so RadeonPro has taken a back seat. I thought RadeonPro ∞ was on the horizon.
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 17:25 |
|
Alereon posted:Starting with the GTX 550 Ti nVidia has also had a few cards that used 192-bit memory buses but with even power-of-two VRAM, which resulted in 25% of the RAM being wasted. On a 1024MB card for example, you'd have 768MB accessible over the 192-bit bus, but 256MB that was only reachable via one 64-bit bus, making it essentially useless. If a game actually tries to access data in this memory performance tanks nearly as badly as if it wasn't there. As I recall they eventually released drivers that kept data out of this region to fix weird stuttering and other issues. I think I'm going to need a citation for that, as it is true that one memory bank has extra memory and lower bandwidth, in GTX 660Ti and 660 reviews there have not been any mentions of significant slowdown after going over 1.5 GB usage. Funnily though most memory usage I've seen my card is pretty much around 1.5 GB so I can't confirm as I don't think I have a game that would definitely use 2 GB of VRAM. Edit: Using Crysis 2 with MaldoHD texturepack memory usage reported by GPU-Z and Afterburner is 1529 MB maximum. I still have no stuttering or slowdown even if I increase resolution past my normal resolution and memory usage does not increase so it might be that the 2 GB is usable but it's not visible to monitoring tools. If there is some free benchmark that is guaranteed to use 2 GB VRAM, I could give it a run. Alereon posted:On the GTX 760 they do it right and pair them with 1.5GB/3GB of VRAM, rather than trying to cram 1/2GB on there somehow, this should work without any complication. I was going to say that the 760 has 256-bit memory bus but they've also introduced 192-bit version as well. Rosoboronexport fucked around with this message at 19:07 on Jun 2, 2014 |
# ? Jun 2, 2014 18:37 |
|
Zero VGS posted:I'd agree, it's only 1080p but DK2 runs natively at 75hz so that requires 25 percent more performance than 60hz. Plus frame drops are a lot more jarring with VR so overkill makes sense here.
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 19:03 |
Rosoboronexport posted:I think I'm going to need a citation for that, as it is true that one memory bank has extra memory and lower bandwidth, in GTX 660Ti and 660 reviews there have not been any mentions of significant slowdown after going over 1.5 GB usage. Funnily though most memory usage I've seen my card is pretty much around 1.5 GB so I can't confirm as I don't think I have a game that would definitely use 2 GB of VRAM. For what its worth I used about 2gb with a 660ti before pretty consistently. There was definitely a threshold you can cross with it that it coudlnt deal with but it definitely wasn't passing 1.5 gb
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 19:47 |
|
Combat Pretzel posted:The Rift site lists also 60hz and 72hz. But you want to run it at the highest hz possible.
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 20:37 |
|
Really Corsair? REALLY? HG10 for your GPU bracket? COME THE gently caress ON.
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 22:31 |
deimos posted:Really Corsair? REALLY? HG10 for your GPU bracket? COME THE gently caress ON. Wait what?
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 22:36 |
|
Ignoarints posted:Wait what? http://www.techpowerup.com/201497/corsair-unveils-the-hydro-series-hg10-gpu-cooling-bracket.html
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 22:37 |
deimos posted:http://www.techpowerup.com/201497/corsair-unveils-the-hydro-series-hg10-gpu-cooling-bracket.html edit: besides the name... it looks like it has more potential than the G10 if it has direct contact with the vrms and memory. Too bad its way uglier. Not something that usually matters to me but its a striking difference Also finally allow me to use all the square corsair coolers Ignoarints fucked around with this message at 22:42 on Jun 2, 2014 |
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 22:39 |
|
That thing looks great. Doubt it would work on my classified though.
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 22:53 |
Seems like they will have to have a separate design for each PCB. Since my MSI 780ti has a midplate that is separate from the heatsink the NZXT might still be the better option for me, or at least equivalent. I'm not sure if I should go all out with the AIO or not. One things for sure, it's time to throw out the Antec 300.
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 23:08 |
|
The G10 works wonderfully on my R9-290 on my latest iteration of the install, I used the bottom of the stock cooler by detaching the vapor chamber and fins, VRM temps are finally under control.
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 23:13 |
deimos posted:The G10 works wonderfully on my R9-290 on my latest iteration of the install, I used the bottom of the stock cooler by detaching the vapor chamber and fins, VRM temps are finally under control. Do you have a picture?
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 23:14 |
|
Ignoarints posted:Do you have a picture? No, but I have to redo the mount soon-ish because I ran out of thermal pad for the VRAM. Detaching the vapor chamber is pretty easy, screw driver + blow torch.
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 23:17 |
|
gently caress these elaborate cooler designs. I can't wait for socketed GPUs and stacked DRAM.
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 23:38 |
|
Elaborate coolers you say? Hoping that I'll be able to reuse or at least mod my Accelero XP cooler for use on a 280X since I'm considering jumping on one soon to replace my 6970. Can't believe this PC is 3 years old now since the 2600K sure as hell doesn't feel like it.. Seems like most of the available coolers are pretty quiet though so I might try one out stock and see how it goes first since it looks like I won't have to deal with the lovely blower-style coolers anymore. I don't know if they'll come close to my current nigh-silent cooler but as long as there's no loud ramp-up at load I can probably deal with it. The MSI Twin Frozr 280X's look pretty nice but I think I read some bad things about MSI cards so I'll have to look into it I guess.
|
# ? Jun 2, 2014 23:54 |
|
My Gigabyte WindForce 290 is pretty great. I can't really hear I above my system fans.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2014 01:02 |
|
HalloKitty posted:Son of a bitch, you're absolutely right. Looks like the guy is on the Raptr dev team now, so RadeonPro has taken a back seat. I could never get RadeonPro to work. I want dynamic V-sync so bad.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2014 01:51 |
|
Noise isn't really a concern of mine. I just think that they're hacked on and the form factor(slot in cards) really isn't optimal for the TDPs high end GPUs put out.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2014 01:54 |
|
eBay mining card trip report: A buddy of mine just got one of those previously-used-for-cryptocoin-mining 280X video cards linked earlier in the thread. It works fine and isn't melted! However, it smelled of burning and literally had soot deposits on it. I guess some other nearby cards in the datacenter didn't survive the mining torture test.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2014 03:51 |
|
td4guy posted:eBay mining card trip report: Basically buy the poo poo out of these cards idiots are dumping at hilarious prices, and reap the benefits of buttcoiner's tears.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2014 05:02 |
|
I got a 280x from that fdcservers guy on ebay that is supposedly brand new. It looks the part, I didn't see any dust on it and it came with the little plastic caps that cover up ports on the back and the cross fire connector. I am most pleased so far.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2014 05:50 |
|
Cactus Jack posted:I got a 280x from that fdcservers guy on ebay that is supposedly brand new. It looks the part, I didn't see any dust on it and it came with the little plastic caps that cover up ports on the back and the cross fire connector. I am most pleased so far. Same, so far I have only tested it out a little bit but it definitely looked new and also came with all the caps.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2014 06:59 |
|
DrDork posted:Basically buy the poo poo out of these cards idiots are dumping at hilarious prices, and reap the benefits of buttcoiner's tears. You weren't kidding, I now have a brand new MSI R9 290 off ebay on the way for $270 .
|
# ? Jun 3, 2014 08:14 |
|
DrDork posted:I got a Sapphire Tri-X OC 290 off a guy on Amazon. Box arrived and I noticed there was an extra letter on the box--a trailing X. Yeah, the genius sent me a 290X--for which he'd paid $700 not even two months prior--for the price of a used 290. And it works perfectly--overclocked it to 1125/1425, even. Sometimes you get lucky, I guess.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2014 09:20 |
|
TheRationalRedditor posted:I missed the incident that made all these literal bitcoin clowns pump and dump their radeons, what exactly happened to their totally stable business plans in the last little while? Litecoin difficulty went up a bunch and scrypt asics have gotten fairly common now. Maybe they caught up to the fact that all the scrypt altcoins poping up every night are pump and dumps, but buttcoiners. Fame Douglas posted:Capping the framerate does not eliminate tearing. I've never had noticable tearing or input lag with a cap at 59fps, YMMV I guess. Arzachel fucked around with this message at 10:13 on Jun 3, 2014 |
# ? Jun 3, 2014 10:10 |
|
DrDork posted:I got a Sapphire Tri-X OC 290 off a guy on Amazon. Box arrived and I noticed there was an extra letter on the box--a trailing X. Yeah, the genius sent me a 290X--for which he'd paid $700 not even two months prior--for the price of a used 290. And it works perfectly--overclocked it to 1125/1425, even. Sometimes you get lucky, I guess.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2014 10:16 |
|
TheRationalRedditor posted:I missed the incident that made all these literal bitcoin clowns pump and dump their radeons, what exactly happened to their totally stable business plans in the last little while? Difficulty went up and asics came out.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2014 13:34 |
|
MaxxBot posted:You weren't kidding, I now have a brand new MSI R9 290 off ebay on the way for $270 . Got a good deal on the modded card I'm using now on private forums, so I'm attempting to use eBay pricing to push down a couple new & barely touched cards instead of dealing with eBay directly. Almost considered getting another 69*0 for crossfire instead since they're so cheap, but I don't really want to bother with the extra power usage & heat. I still find myself surprised when I come across listings that claim they picked up the cards within the last 3 months or so - You'd think by that point even the most delusional miners might have seen the writing on the wall. future ghost fucked around with this message at 19:32 on Jun 3, 2014 |
# ? Jun 3, 2014 19:29 |
|
How does running 24/7 for weeks under full load in an overheating rig affect longevity of the cards?
|
# ? Jun 3, 2014 22:01 |
Combat Pretzel posted:How does running 24/7 for weeks under full load in an overheating rig affect longevity of the cards? It reduces the life span of many of the components, such as mosfets and capacitors. The key word there is "overheating" though. If it's cool enough chances are really high that its fine.
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2014 22:03 |
|
Josh Lyman posted:The fact that this happened with a card that isn't even covered by warranty (Sapphire) makes this even more lucky. And proof that not only did he buy it less than two months ago, but he was selling it to me at literally 1/2 the price he'd paid. I cannot imagine how disappointing this business transaction had to be for him.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2014 22:08 |
|
Combat Pretzel posted:How does running 24/7 for weeks under full load in an overheating rig affect longevity of the cards? How hot are you talking? Lots of your poo poo is rated up to 105c on a good card.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2014 22:10 |
|
Don Lapre posted:How hot are you talking? Lots of your poo poo is rated up to 105c on a good card.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2014 22:17 |
It's not in a miner's best interest to run cards overheated. Doesn't mean some aren't idiots though.
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2014 22:20 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 14:01 |
|
Combat Pretzel posted:Don't really know, I was just wondering about this regarding those cards used in bitcoin rigs being dumped onto Ebay, as just mentioned above. He was atleast using them in an actual data center and not milk crates. As long as there is a warranty i wouldn't worry. He was running a multi million dollar operation.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2014 22:22 |