|
Yeah, we did. We even left a bunch of poo poo behind as proof. I understand that it might be hard to believe that America was ever capable of doing anything that doesn't involve eating bad food or murdering people, but we loving did that poo poo. We did that poo poo 6 times.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:20 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 01:49 |
|
loving right we did. also, this is cool too http://www.asteroidzoo.org/
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:21 |
|
tbh the moon landing at this point was basically us going to a dumb rock and realizing everything on it was stupid as hell and the only people interested in it at this point are the chinese but their made in china robot broke (shocker)
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:21 |
|
How is the flag blowing in the wind when there's no atmosphere on the moon? Eat poo poo homo OP.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:24 |
|
dots and arrows arent' proof of anything
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:25 |
|
The purpose of the Apollo program was to test ICBMs. That's it. The Apollo program was also super unpopular because everyone knew it was a waste of time and money.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:26 |
|
We currently have the opportunity to bring back the cold war. It can be just like those days when we actually got poo poo done.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:28 |
|
Wooten posted:Yeah, we did. We even left a bunch of poo poo behind as proof. I understand that it might be hard to believe that America was ever capable of doing anything that doesn't involve eating bad food or murdering people, but we loving did that poo poo. We did that poo poo 6 times. New moon theroy is in, is wasn't earth ejecta that caused it, it was earth saying, hey rock comere and a bucnha asteriods hit it, causing the mass of jupiter to swell 12X its mass. also, gently caress the moon, and i hate it.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:29 |
|
Whirlwind Jones posted:How is the flag blowing in the wind when there's no atmosphere on the moon? Eat poo poo homo OP. vibrations of the flag pole
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:30 |
|
Ron Paul Hype Man posted:We currently have the opportunity to bring back the cold war. i kind of agree with Neil Tyson if Russia or China decided to go to Mars we'd be there in ~3 yrs + the few months it would take to make the rocket for it
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:31 |
|
Nope.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:35 |
|
If we really went to the moon than why is the moon still there? Surely we would have taken it back with us. Makes you think.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:35 |
|
Robo Reagan posted:i kind of agree with Neil Tyson if Russia or China decided to go to Mars we'd be there in ~3 yrs + the few months it would take to make the rocket for it Didn't they recently do a study & decide that the radiation levels in deep space are so hosed up that sending humans to Mars was going to end up being sending corpses to Mars? e: nevermind
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:36 |
|
lollin' at this username/post combo over here.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:37 |
|
Trixie Hardcore posted:Didn't they recently do a study & decide that the radiation levels in deep space are so hosed up that sending humans to Mars was going to end up being sending corpses to Mars? Gotta start somewhere.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:37 |
|
Trixie Hardcore posted:Didn't they recently do a study & decide that the radiation levels in deep space are so hosed up that sending humans to Mars was going to end up being sending corpses to Mars? Hey that ain't bad for 500 days
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:41 |
|
Trixie Hardcore posted:Didn't they recently do a study & decide that the radiation levels in deep space are so hosed up that sending humans to Mars was going to end up being sending corpses to Mars? there's all kinds of other problems to worry about. bone atrophy is the obvious one, but now people are starting to realize that people on the ISS go farsighted in space since the low/zero gravity fucks with the shape of your eyes. it'll be interesting to see what problems crop up when people are stuck on a shuttle for ~2 years round trip along with whatever time they spend on Mars, which has something near 40% of Earth's gravity basically humans and all life on Earth except for water bears, which are immortal, is designed for earth's exact pressure and earth's exact amount of gravity and earth's exact heat. things start messing up when suddenly the gravity is gone for very long periods of time Robo Reagan fucked around with this message at 06:45 on Jul 21, 2014 |
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:43 |
|
If we actually landed on the moon then Bart Sibrel wouldn't have called Neil Armstrong a liar and got punched in the face. But he did, so obviously we didn't land on the moon. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wptn5RE2I-k
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:43 |
|
ThaGrandCow posted:If we actually landed on the moon then Bart Sibrel wouldn't have called Neil Armstrong a liar and got punched in the face. buzz aldrin swear on the bible
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:48 |
|
doesn't Buzz go on rants about NASA covering up aliens now or something?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:49 |
|
america #1 go to moon always go to moon
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:54 |
|
Robo Reagan posted:there's all kinds of other problems to worry about. bone atrophy is the obvious one, but now people are starting to realize that people on the ISS go farsighted in space since the low/zero gravity fucks with the shape of your eyes. it'll be interesting to see what problems crop up when people are stuck on a shuttle for ~2 years round trip along with whatever time they spend on Mars, which has something near 40% of Earth's gravity You can create artificial gravity fairly easy by causing the spacecraft to spin, but I'm guessing they aren't going to send a craft there that does that.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:54 |
|
CommonTerry posted:You can create artificial gravity fairly easy by causing the spacecraft to spin, but I'm guessing they aren't going to send a craft there that does that. how fast would it have to spin to create gravity
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:56 |
|
sether01 posted:how fast would it have to spin to create gravity
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:56 |
|
Whirlwind Jones posted:9 metters per second round and round?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:58 |
|
sether01 posted:round and round? yah
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:59 |
|
also you forgot to ^2 it
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 06:59 |
|
i want a real answer as to how fast it would have to rotate create artificial gravity "rather easily" i don't think it's easy i dunno tho
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 07:00 |
|
Robo Reagan posted:there's all kinds of other problems to worry about. bone atrophy is the obvious one, but now people are starting to realize that people on the ISS go farsighted in space since the low/zero gravity fucks with the shape of your eyes. it'll be interesting to see what problems crop up when people are stuck on a shuttle for ~2 years round trip along with whatever time they spend on Mars, which has something near 40% of Earth's gravity
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 07:01 |
|
sether01 posted:round and round? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06ivpojdfKM
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 07:02 |
|
Instead of spinning the ship, which would cost a lot in R&D, and then for the parts, and the quality control, could we just spin the person?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 07:02 |
|
Whirlwind Jones posted:9 metters per second No that would be acceleration, but you could build the ship so the decks are parallel to thrust and just accelerate at 9/ms until you're half way there and then flip around and decelerate at 9/ms when you get there. How fast you have to spin depends on the radius of the ship, so you would have to make it fairly large if you didn't want to throw up a lot. But if the ship was 500 meters wide it would have make one revolution every 44 seconds to simulate gravity. Which seems kind of fast to me, but I'm not a rocket scientist.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 07:02 |
|
sether01 posted:i want a real answer as to how fast it would have to rotate create artificial gravity "rather easily" i don't think it's easy i dunno tho
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 07:03 |
|
Go ahead. Ask me again.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 07:04 |
|
space is falling at 11'317~23,435 miles a second, depends on who you ask.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 07:04 |
|
Guy Fleegman posted:Go ahead. Ask me again. came to post dis. owns forever.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 07:04 |
|
sether01 posted:how fast would it have to spin to create gravity the smaller the craft, the faster it has to spin. the math is pretty simple, v^2/r =9.8 (earth's gravity) and find your required angular velocity with a = v/r then just plug in. At with a 100 meter craft shaped like a cylinder you'd need to spin at 31 m/s consistently through the craft which means you're doing roughly 3 rpm. the trick in the near future will probably be to do something like simulate 60% of Earth's gravity, not as demanding and you don't suffer like you're in 0g the entire time. probably not going to have lumpy ships though, simulating gravity requires having most of your mass in the center or else things get wobbly. Robo Reagan fucked around with this message at 07:10 on Jul 21, 2014 |
# ? Jul 21, 2014 07:06 |
|
By the way a dyson sphere would require more mass than the galaxy known exists, to create.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 07:11 |
|
Chinatown posted:came to post dis. owns forever. You know, I'd go through that humiliation just to be able to say that I got punched in the moosh by an astronaut.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 07:11 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 01:49 |
|
Disappointed in the lack of Goku option.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2014 07:15 |