|
If your one of the queers who likes Civ 4 better than Civ 5 I'm going to hunt you down and kill you Irl. You've been warned.
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 06:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 30, 2024 12:23 |
|
|
i think one unit per tile is okay
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 06:37
|
|
|
I liked Civ 5 better.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 08:28
|
|
|
Pewdiepie posted:If your one of the queers who likes Civ 4 better than Civ 5 I'm going to hunt you down and kill you Irl. You've been warned. You know I do.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 08:36
|
|
|
I will meet you outside the Auckland Manga Cafe for a fist fight, to be refereed by the Manager, Seong.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 08:37
|
|
|
0_o
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 08:41
|
|
|
*Leonard Nimoy voice* Do not throw the arrow which will return against you
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 09:31
|
|
|
Zergs are for rts's. They have no place in civ. Unless they're mind worms.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 09:42
|
|
|
I wish I could combine the two honestly. Civ 4 has some cool things, Civ 5 has some cool things. Give me....Civ 4.5
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 09:44
|
|
|
OkieMurse posted:I liked Civ 5 better.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 09:51
|
|
|
OkieMurse posted:I liked Civ 5 better after they put out two expansions
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 09:54
|
|
|
DrPaper posted:I wish I could combine the two honestly. Civ 4 has some cool things, Civ 5 has some cool things. Give me....Civ 4.5
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 09:58
|
|
|
DrPaper posted:I wish I could combine the two honestly. Civ 4 has some cool things, Civ 5 has some cool things. Give me....Civ 4.5 one unit per tile is unquestionably the more interesting combat model, but I miss civ 4's approach to religions
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 13:01
|
|
|
*kneels in the aftermath of this thread* There was...... a flamewar!!!!!!!!
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 13:03
|
|
|
im going to brutally and insanely murder all civ 4 and 5 likers with alpine troops and partisans
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 13:12
|
|
|
WINNERSH TRIANGLE posted:im going to brutally and insanely murder all civ 4 and 5 likers with alpine troops and partisans yeah okay napoleon bonaparte, chief executive of the alpine republic
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 13:13
|
|
|
everyone who likes games that I don't like, especially if they dislike games that I like, must die
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 13:35
|
|
|
Friends, why not take the middle ground and replay civ 2
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 14:21
|
|
|
I just imagine how much better 5 would have been with unit stacking and shake my drat head.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 14:30
|
|
|
One unit per tile ruins civ 5, sorry Pewds, but I think 4 is better, especially colonization
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 14:44
|
|
|
Knuc U Kinte posted:I will meet you outside the Auckland Manga Cafe for a fist fight, to be refereed by the Manager, Seong. 2 gamers enter 1 gamer leaves.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 15:10
|
|
|
Pewdiepie posted:2 gamers enter 1 gamer leaves.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 15:11
|
|
|
Who runs gamer town?
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 15:11
|
|
|
OkieMurse posted:I liked Civ 5 better.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 15:13
|
|
|
I like video games
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 16:05
|
|
|
DrPaper posted:I wish I could combine the two honestly. Civ 4 has some cool things, Civ 5 has some cool things. Give me....Civ 4.5 yeah
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 16:06
|
|
|
zeal posted:one unit per tile is unquestionably the more interesting combat model, wrong. use the model that fits the game. the way 1upt is implemented in civ5 is an absolutely terrible logistical mess
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 17:00
|
|
|
Stream the fight tyia
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 17:01
|
|
|
Borsche69 posted:wrong. use the model that fits the game. the way 1upt is implemented in civ5 is an absolutely terrible logistical mess your issue may be that you're just really bad at planning your deployment of a dozen or so armymans
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 17:04
|
|
|
*Draws blade* If that's the way it has to be...then have at you.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 17:06
|
|
|
zeal posted:your issue may be that you're just really bad at planning your deployment of a dozen or so armymans No.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 17:06
|
|
|
yea my experiences of watching someone move a murderstack of like 20+ units from tile to tile each turn are really fond memories if there's one thing civ really needs it's for turns to take longer
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 17:10
|
|
|
zeal posted:your issue may be that you're just really bad at planning your deployment of a dozen or so armymans hahaha holy moly no.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 17:40
|
|
|
Dexters Secret posted:yea my experiences of watching someone move a murderstack of like 20+ units from tile to tile each turn are really fond memories moving each unit individually takes a lot longer than moving a stack of units (hint: use the command 'select all - > move' which has been in the game for a long time)
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 17:41
|
|
|
Borsche69 posted:moving each unit individually takes a lot longer than moving a stack of units (hint: use the command 'select all - > move' which has been in the game for a long time) i was mainly talking about the ai, whom does not do that
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 17:43
|
|
|
Dexters Secret posted:i was mainly talking about the ai, whom does not do that You can turn AI moves off, so that the game doesn't pause to show the animation for every unit. I turn unit moves off for myself too, since they take time without really showing anything. You can do this in Civ5 too. If you're talking about processing power, well, I haven't noticed any slowdown for Civ4 for large maps with AIs. Huge maps are a little too big but they're always gonna be too big and have too many units.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 17:46
|
|
|
Borsche69 posted:You can turn AI moves off, so that the game doesn't pause to show the animation for every unit. I turn unit moves off for myself too, since they take time without really showing anything. You can do this in Civ5 too. i recall having issues with that but i don't remember what they were so you win this round
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 17:55
|
|
|
I think one unit per tile could be interesting and strategic if it was done well, but I don't think Civ 5 implemented it very well.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 18:35
|
|
|
Silver Striker posted:I think one unit per tile could be interesting and strategic if it was done well, but I don't think Civ 5 implemented it very well. I think Panzer General and Advance Wars both implement 1upt fairly well. They both have their flaws, where Panzer General the fighting can be a logistical nightmare when you're fighting over a city, and Advance Wars can turn into a carpet of doom too often especially on smaller maps or when someone is colin, sasha, or hachi.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 20:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 30, 2024 12:23 |
|
|
Civ 5 is dumb The WW2 normandy invasion was a doomstack One unit of tards with muskets should not inviolably occupy 10,000 square miles of rolling hills 1upt vs doomstax is a false dichotomy good game designers could have done something good instead of either The ai can't play the game lllllllloooooooooolllllllllll
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2014 21:26
|
|