|
##vote Amoeba
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 16:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 30, 2024 12:05 |
|
|
Case: kid gloves on Chic, forward thinking posturing on me re: Chic.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 16:41
|
|
|
Yeah that's a pretty good vote.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 16:51
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:Well I guess this is one of those games where I'm wrong about literally everything all the time.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 17:35
|
|
|
##vote merk I'm quite confident merk was bussing chic.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 17:53
|
|
|
wins32767 posted:##vote merk Can you show your work? I'm not exactly opposed but the man did lynch scum.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 17:59
|
|
|
True and Real posted:Can you show your work? I'm not exactly opposed but the man did lynch scum. I really don't care for that phrasing. Wins even if you're right, and I don't think you are, that's not a very good case.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 18:02
|
|
|
What about it? I've been considering merk as scum since d1 but he just lynched Chic against what I felt best about and it ended in scum dead. Needless to say I considered a bus there but I am far more hesitant to vote Merk after he was right and I was (very possibly) wrong. I'll of course reread myself but I want to see wins' reasoning anyway.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 18:06
|
|
|
I was going to attack you for fence-sitting but I thought better of it. I reread Asiina/Pinterest and a lot of
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 18:49
|
|
|
wins32767 posted:##vote merk Hahahahahahahhahahahahhahahhahahhahahhahhahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahaha Great case.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 18:55
|
|
|
##vote Somberbrero same case as d2
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 19:38
|
|
|
That seems a little unbelievable Ras.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 19:40
|
|
|
How so? You excused yourself from responding to it on d2 by saying you are sick. You appear to not be sick now. Respond to it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 19:44
|
|
|
This is what you're going off of, right? I will agree that my interactions with Byers look bad in hindsight but then I probably wouldn't have nightkilled him if I had that option. Honestly this thread was too much to keep up with and I couldn't really keep track of what Byers was saying. Man did I case Chic day one and then drop her in this game or was that CS:GO mafia?
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 19:44
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:How so? You excused yourself from responding to it on d2 by saying you are sick. You appear to not be sick now. Respond to it. I'm still sick, it sucks.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 19:44
|
|
|
Chic did make a post that looked like awful distancing wrt Somber iirc
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 19:45
|
|
|
Byers had to be night killed. He was clearly town after pointing out Chic' error.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 19:45
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:Who plays mafia on the weekend? There was a lot of craziness happening in the Megaman game Friday too. Somberbrero posted:I'm sick and I don't feel like moving out of this chair, much less making a case. I'm vanilla, good luck. The rest of your posts are either tunneling yuming for her case or going back and forth with yourself on EP. Starting d3 by launching into yuming without going back is what prompted me to just bring this back up again.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 19:46
|
|
|
I meanTrue posted:He has, at multiple points in this game, come away with interpretations that I not only disagree with but find hard to believe he'd interpret that way at all, though a number of those things were in regards to things I said so I've been assuming my initial read of him was biased. just sounds like 'scum because wrong,' which i can't really respond to.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 19:46
|
|
|
That's only the intro about why I looked at you in the first place lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 19:47
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:The rest of your posts are either tunneling yuming for her case or going back and forth with yourself on EP. Starting d3 by launching into yuming without going back is what prompted me to just bring this back up again. it seems like a natural starting point to me.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 19:47
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:I mean Ok? Ignore that sentence and read the rest of the post, wtf
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 19:48
|
|
|
True and Real posted:That's only the intro about why I looked at you in the first place lol well i already responded to why i dropped Byers.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 19:48
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:Ok? Ignore that sentence and read the rest of the post, wtf I mean it's an okay case besides the conclusion. What exactly do you want me to respond to that I haven't? It's presuming of a level of effort and involvement I haven't put into this game.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 19:50
|
|
|
I heard from a little bird that Yuming went nowhere last night.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 19:52
|
|
|
I'm rereading some specific interactions and I think I'm wrong about yuming. Sorry yuming.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 19:54
|
|
|
Oh my god.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 19:54
|
|
|
I read your response, but I don't believe it. Including the bit about how you wouldn't NK him makes you sound like you are trying to add a little weight as to why you can't be scum rather than why you dropped your Byers case. And yuming is not a natural starting point at all imo. You also consistently undercut your own cases with yuming anyway with lines like Somberbrero posted:I do take pause at her emotionality because it reads as genuine, but I'm starting to think you should never trust those reads. I don't even think the yuming case is good but I need to find time to click more links. The way you start it is off though, focusing on how she moved her vote initially instead of the actual content. You frame the whole thing in testing the waters, which is what Diqnol pointed out in the original case about how you seem to be litmus testing than actual hunting.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 19:58
|
|
|
You don't believe that it was hard to keep focused and stay relevant in this thread?
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 20:01
|
|
|
I think it's possible but I think you just made it up.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 20:06
|
|
|
I am still at work and I will catch up in a few hours when I am home. Meantime I do want to double check byers posts for anything interesting (though merk's point about him looking very townie after getting chic is a good one)
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 20:07
|
|
|
Also you are 2 for 2 for picking at specific bits of cases instead of entire cases so I feel good.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 20:07
|
|
|
I think Asiina/Pinterest is scum. Read her entire post history. The only strong points she ever makes are against Chic and she's really on-point there. It feels off in comparison to the rest of her history and doesn't match up with the frustrated image she projects.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 20:21
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:I am still at work and I will catch up in a few hours when I am home. Don't. Look at Chic instead. Byers died because of the claim issue yesterday.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 20:22
|
|
|
merk posted:Don't. Look at Chic instead. I'll look at both, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 20:27
|
|
|
Who sees the first scum of the game flip and immediately go after the guy leading that lynch with a case that says nothing more than "bussing?" How is that ever going to be persuasive enough to get a second vote?
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 20:30
|
|
|
wins32767 posted:##vote merk You're kidding right? What possible reason could Merk have for pushing him scum buddy to the lynch on D2.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 20:53
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:##vote Somberbrero same case as d2 If you look at Chic's posts she was pushing Somber pretty hard as an alternate lynch candidate. Do you really think she was doing that to a scum buddy? Based on Chic's posting, I'm not going to vote Somber or EP. I think they're town given her focus on them.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 20:57
|
|
|
Fiery, do you think Asiina/Pinterest bussed Chic? I'm definitely getting that vibe from Asiina's laser focus on her.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 20:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 30, 2024 12:05 |
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:If you look at Chic's posts she was pushing Somber pretty hard as an alternate lynch candidate. Do you really think she was doing that to a scum buddy? You have a weird definition of hard.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 21:01
|
|