|
Max posted:PM, why are you defending Rarity again? hahahaha ##unvote
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 18:01 |
|
|
##vote max
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:42
|
|
|
Why unvote and vote me again?
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:43
|
|
|
Look, at this point, I'm just going to say why to everything.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:43
|
|
|
I was making a rhetorical point, with my vote.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:44
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:I was making a rhetorical point, with my vote. OK, but why are you defending Rarity again?
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:44
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:What does Like, why are you jumping in and asking me about this when Rarity could easily (and did) answer it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:45
|
|
|
It's all about quality, not quantity. And it seems to me that you're trying to generate a lot of noise right now, Max. I'm not sure how I feel about the JOAT claim, but your reaction to the pressure on you does not speak favorably.
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:48
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:It's all about quality, not quantity. How is this relevant to you though? 
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:49
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:It's all about quality, not quantity. And it seems to me that you're trying to generate a lot of noise right now, Max. So quality to you is posting the agreed emote and voting me based on tone and incorrectly saying I'm not engaged?
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:50
|
|
|
Max posted:Like, why are you jumping in and asking me about this when Rarity could easily (and did) answer it. I understood what you were referring to.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:50
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:I understood what you were referring to. By why speak for Rarity?
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:51
|
|
|
I'm interested in knowing why you think I posted that.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:53
|
|
|
im gonna go cut a music video be back later
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:53
|
|
Rarity posted:How is this relevant to you though? fuuuuuu Max posted:So quality to you is posting the agreed emote and voting me based on tone and incorrectly saying I'm not engaged? Say no more than is needed. These two posts speak to a very specific and intentional disengagement on your part: Max posted:For the record, I'm just skipping every post with italics and photos. Max posted:This conversation is getting really specifically pointed and insulting so I don't really want to take part in it any more. Feel free to keep yelling into the void.
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:55
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:What does Are we both on the same page here? I'm refering to this post.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:56
|
|
|
Max posted:Are we both on the same page here? I'm refering to this post. We are! What do you think I was asking?
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:56
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:I'm interested in knowing why you think I posted that. gently caress, now I get what you're asking. You can pretty much tell why I was saying that. I wasn't aware that choosing one person on the scum team to make the kill was so homogenized, and was suspicious of Rarity just jumping to that conclusion.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:58
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:fuuuuuu Those are pretty bad reasons to vote for me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:59
|
|
|
The first quote has been taken pretty far out of proportion, but I've still been actually participating in this game. You hadn't up until you, again, posted an agreed emote and voted me. The second point was a genuine response to that series of posts, but there isn't any way to convince anyone of that so there isn't much point in talking about it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 21:01
|
|
|
Max posted:gently caress, now I get what you're asking. Right. That post about Rarity ~knowing about night kills~, and then switching to me defending Rarity - you look like you're stretching (or maybe grasping, more accurately) to try to make behaviour look suspicious.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 21:01
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Right. That post about Rarity ~knowing about night kills~, and then switching to me defending Rarity - you look like you're stretching (or maybe grasping, more accurately) to try to make behaviour look suspicious. Well I actually thought it was suspicious at the time and wanted to see how Rarity would respond.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 21:04
|
|
|
You do realize you have spoken up now twice in a single game day in response to suspicion being thrown at Rarity?
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 21:06
|
|
|
And you're implying what? That me and Rar are a scumteam and I'm dumb enough to make the same mistake twice?
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 21:08
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:And you're implying what? That me and Rar are a scumteam and I'm dumb enough to make the same mistake twice? That it's strange and scummy? I'm not saying you're dumb, but I don't get why town would do that.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 21:10
|
|
|
And you still haven't answered why you defend Rarity the way you do.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 21:18
|
|
|
When I notice you trying to make innocuous behaviour look suspicious, that's not defending Rarity, it's pointing out something in your posting. And I did answer why I defended her when she volunteered: I would have done the same thing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 21:20
|
|
|
Yeah, well, I don't think we're going to get much else out of this. I thought it was scummy at the time. Is anyone else around?
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 21:23
|
|
|
I'm not going to be here for the deadline so this will be my last post so I can't back and forth with anybody. Dr. Hurt, I still don't like that post from you - and to add, you have't really been active in discussion. I keep harping on that post because it's the things I like to look for D1: Max posted:I was out suit shopping for my wedding today, I'll look over the lengthy . . . page and a half I need to catch up. Dr. Hurt posted:Tonight I'm going to a Big Trouble in Little China and Raiders of the Lost Ark double feature. If there is something awesome later hopefully I'll be able to participate. Posts like these. Not really needed. It just pings of subconscious guilt from you guys. "I have to update the thread on things I may or may not be doing even though I will most likely be around for, or I already am around for!" It looks like a small thing but I tend not to overreact on the bigger picture sort of issues D1. It's the smaller actions I like to look at D1. If you won't be around, that's one thing. If you're just informing the thread for no apparent reason other than ??? it's a bit strange. If I'm not doing that on D1, I'm playing super defensive and see how people interact with me and usually after a bit of OMGUS I can lean towards their alignment. (before anybody calls me a hypocrite, I literally won't be around later so this will be my last post so I'm informing ya'll that I can't reply so this will be my thoughts on the day) That combined with Max's brash attitude towards PR and the game (it's not that serious) doesn't sit right with me. I don't think anybody plays super serious townie game like he's trying to portray. I'm ok where my vote is at for now, later dudes
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 21:25
|
|
|
This is tiresome.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 21:29
|
|
|
I know he's not here but I like to check in because it forces me to actually make a post instead of forgetting about the game.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 21:33
|
|
|
max is so obviously town what the aitch-ee-double-hockey-sticks is wrong with you guys
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 21:54
|
|
|
Why would we lynch max if he has abilities that could potentially be a benefit for the town?
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 22:20
|
|
|
I'd like to take this moment of calm to point out that I think Meinberg is an excellent choice to lynch.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 22:26
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:"I had some questionable feelings" - past tense capps's case on Max is built around verb tense. This is a bad case. This may be a scummy case. Ghostly Gangsta posted:You came out the gate opinionated, which is to be expected in this type of 'game'. I don't have concrete evidence of you being scummy either so it's nothing like that... GG's case is "you talked to me." Rarity posted:This is such an awkward reaction, drat. This is true, but too often lately we've lynched because awkward and found it's not scum. Rarity posted:Byers, how do you feel about voting for Max? I hate it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 22:45
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:GG's case is "you talked to me." OK so I'm not crazy and other people can see his posts? Because no one else was commenting on it and I couldn't get why people thought it was an A-OK case, especially when I got to -2.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 22:47
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:i'm more of the spotter really capps is shitposting. And he thinks he can get away with it because we've allowed it to happen for so many games. If I could control my vote, I'd be very tempted to vote capps for this, despite knowing it's a horrible move. scum/vig/SK/whatever, shoot capps. Please. mr.capps posted:the problem here max is you made your vote and created your reason, instead of the other way around Seriously, someone kill capps. Ghostly Gangsta posted:If someone presents reasonable evidence to vote otherwise before the cut off I'll make amends, but like I said. It's not personal, just playing the game. I do not like GG's posting; it's this passive aggressive "I'm just voting" tone that feels fake. This feels like scum pushing a soft case on someone freaking out a little from pressure in the thread. GG gets a mislynch, and he wasn't hammering the case home. Max posted:Things must have changed around here then, I haven't played in a while and sometimes you just make a general kill as a group in stuff I've done before. This is accurate, btw. Once upon a time, it was common for the kill to not be performed by a set person. You still get that occasionally, but it's more the exception than the rule now.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 22:54
|
|
|
I'll vote ghostly, yeah. ##vote ghostly (Max admitting he was tried to paint Rarity as scummy for her nightkill explanation, instead of retreating to the easy "Oh, no, I just meant she literally seemed to know more than me and deferring to her" excuse made me soften on him a lot.)
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 22:55
|
|
|
Not to pick at you, but you softened on me so much that you had to re-iterate your vote on me?
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 22:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 18:01 |
|
|
OK, I'm actually picking at you. I don't really buy that you softened on me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 22:58
|
|