|
I am around all night if you want me to prod players. Most players have posted today, though. NEW PAGE:  Day 1 Votecount jedit (5): merk, Quandary, LM, PMom, Amoeba, -Amoeba, imgay Somber (3): Ninth, CPig, -Ninth, Anonnarco, Asiina, Ninth, -Asiina AnonymousNarcotics (3): Somber, Amoeba, QPQ PMom (1): Keane merk (1): Somber, Ninth, -Somber, -Ninth, Amoeba, Asiina, -Amoeba Quandary (1): merk, -merk, merk, -merk, 100Yrs  20 alive 11 to execute. Deadline 11:30 EST, or in about 2 1/4 hours from this post.
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 15:43 |
|
|
Assuming there are not enough votes to lynch Narco (which we might not have this close to the deadline), does everyone have an alternative candidate in mind? I like Quandary for the lynch over jedit, but would be fine with either.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:13
|
|
|
I'll be going to lunch soon, but since it's 2 hours - I'll be back well before deadline.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:15
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:Narcotics: Does your role explicitly state that you are both pro-town confirmed masons? Are you misreading or assuming anything that is not actually in the PM? Amoeba102 posted:Is it literally your role as confirmed mason?  YO, NARCOTICS. ANSWER QUESTIONS THAT ARE DIRECTED TOWARD YOU.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:15
|
|
|
The Ninth Layer posted:CCKeane's posting in Taste's game but not here as deadline approaches. Yes, I am catching up on both.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:16
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:We should probably vote out Narco because we have either: They are lying and scum, or this game is designed poorly. I'd rather get an answer to that D1. An asymmetric masonry would not be unheard of (it's something I have considered for my setup) but it would be a strange game for Narco to have merk as a confirmed mason but for merk not to know he is confirmed town to Narco. Hard for me to reconcile that bit.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:16
|
|
|
If the roles are literally different that's bad. If it's something else - well I'd like to hear from Narco first.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:17
|
|
|
The Ninth Layer posted:I don't think Jedit is scum but I'll vote that way if that's the only option on the table. I would still rather lynch Somber. With that said we're not getting anybody if half the thread is absent. Honestly I think you're just locked on and wrong and I think you need to step back before Somber pulls you down to the briny deep as you stab him with a harpoon, stabbing him from hell's heart, spitting your last breath at him, for hate's sake.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:18
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:Assuming there are not enough votes to lynch Narco (which we might not have this close to the deadline), does everyone have an alternative candidate in mind? I am pretty neutral on Quandary and would be fine voting him. I don't want to lynch Narco for this masonry stuff because I don't have a compelling reason for why Narco as scum would call merk confirmed town unless they were both scum which would be one goofy WIFOM gambit (though not out of the question I suppose).
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:18
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:Honestly I think you're just locked on and wrong and I think you need to step back before Somber pulls you down to the briny deep as you stab him with a harpoon, stabbing him from hell's heart, spitting your last breath at him, for hate's sake. I don't see better lynches out there.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:18
|
|
|
The Ninth Layer posted:I don't see better lynches out there. How do you feel about 100? Anyone is free to answer.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:20
|
|
|
Asiina posted:How do you feel about 100? Leaning town. Has talked about most of the game and in a manner I've found agreeable.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:20
|
|
|
Asiina posted:How do you feel about 100? Meh. No strong feelings. Hasn't been on my radar.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:21
|
|
|
winvirus posted:i will play this game,......and actually put in effort Ironically winvirus has not posted since Sunday.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:23
|
|
|
There's definitely a ridiculous situation going on here but I'd rather not further back myself into a corner or gently caress over anyone. Yes this whole thing is stupid, but does it make me scum? No.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:23
|
|
|
Narco, literally type out your role.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:24
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:There's definitely a ridiculous situation going on here but I'd rather not further back myself into a corner or gently caress over anyone. Yes this whole thing is stupid, but does it make me scum? No. how would clarifying what is happening back you into any more of a corner than you are now just help me understand tell me why i should not vote for you, not just for the masonry, but also because you're post history is the most bland white noise in all mafia history
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:26
|
|
|
Asiina posted:How do you feel about 100? Dude talks a lot but I'm feeling town.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:26
|
|
|
The part where it goes "You are ________ and you are ________-aligned." What is the first blank.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:26
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:The part where it goes "You are ________ and you are ________-aligned." What is the first blank. Stop role fishing. I'm not going to answer that.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:27
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Stop role fishing. I'm not going to answer that. oh my god oh my god
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:28
|
|
|
It's not role fishing if you have claimed. It's clarification.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:28
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Stop role fishing. I'm not going to answer that. lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:28
|
|
|
Okay, yeah, I'd vote Narco.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:31
|
|
|
Here is every post merk has made in which he discussed me:merk posted:No, this is the right vote. ##unvote; ##vote Quandary merk posted:This is going to sound completely backwards, but I'd vote Jedit solely for the post that sparked Quandary's vote. It was a driveby vote on numerrik that didn't do anything. merk posted:Actually, I will leave my vote on ##unvote; ##vote Jedit In summary: his entire case on me is that I "drive-by voted" a player he thinks is scum - which, according to him, is scummy - then went on to justify my vote with a case when asked to - which, according to him, is scummy. In the process I triggered a player he also thinks is scum to vote for me - which, according to him, is scummy. He's also pushing me for low effort posting followed by high(er) effort posting when I had been perfectly clear about not being able to post in detail until Monday evening UK time because I was travelling, and he dropped a better case on Quandary to do it. Pinterest Mom posted:TNL, this is the Jedit post that's scummy. Quandary voted for you because you claimed a team name other than Town. Why would he vote you for that if he also had the same name and knew you were a good guy?
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:45
|
|
|
Jedit posted:Quandary voted for you because you claimed a team name other than Town. Why would he vote you for that if he also had the same name and knew you were a good guy? To be clear, that's what you meant by Jedit posted:Lest you think I'm tunnelling: other people on my "shopping list" for today are T9L, Pin Mom and Quandary. I already explained the first, but for the other I'm pretty drat sure that Quandary and Pin Mom are not on the same team. I am phone posting right now and will not be around at deadline because it's 3am here, but there's a window between where I should be able to explain in more detail. "explaining in more detail" how me and Quandary aren't on the same team? l o l
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:47
|
|
|
The only way I can fathom a player being this resistant to clarify is if clarifying would prevent them from playing the game any further. Narcotics's behavior suggests that she is either scum or an anti-town 3P who slipped up in an attempt to get town cred. I have no qualms in lynching her today and would encourage everyone to support her vote.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:51
|
|
|
I should have gone to bed an hour ago. Looking at the last hour, Narco really is starting to act suspicious over nothing. Having claimed the meat, why so reluctant to claim the flavour? ##vote Narco Good night.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 02:52
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:The only way I can fathom a player being this resistant to clarify is if clarifying would prevent them from playing the game any further. Narcotics's behavior suggests that she is either scum or an anti-town 3P who slipped up in an attempt to get town cred. I have no qualms in lynching her today and would encourage everyone to support her vote. She could have a power role on top of being mason.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 03:05
|
|
|
##unvote ##vote narcotics I'm not buying what you're selling, but I believe Merk.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 03:09
|
|
|
Little Mac posted:##unvote What does believing merk have to do with voting ANarc?
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 03:10
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:What does believing merk have to do with voting ANarc? Merk says he was told they're in an unconfirmed masonry. Anon says they're confirmed. I think she's lying to seem townie.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 03:14
|
|
|
There is a clear contradiction which should not be ignored. Narco isn't being transparent enough either for me to accept that it's not a result of her lying.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 03:19
|
|
|
Just gimme a few minutes guys. I'll talk.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 03:20
|
|
|
Or I will. ANarc and I are confirmed masons who share an alignment. She's not scum. I thought I was town because all scum have to be dead for me to win and I have a confirmed masonry. ta~da~
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 03:25
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Just gimme a few minutes guys. I'll talk. This is going to be good
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 03:27
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Or I will. What
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 03:27
|
|
|
Little Mac posted:What
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 03:28
|
|
|
##unvote ##vote:PMom Hooray!
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 03:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 15:43 |
|
|
Little Mac posted:What
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 03:29
|
|