|
SKY COQ posted:Well, we could have coordinated actions like this for starters... what, you decided to robo-rumble with busb, since no one stuck their neck out? I don't know how night actions resolve, couldn't Uber have blocked you then gotten vigged? (the Worm game I got a successful result of my night action, and then the death message)
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 07:56 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2024 06:12 |
|
I'm going out tonight, will have my phone but may not be able to post much.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:10 |
|
There could be other role blockers in the game, probably not the same alignment though.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:13 |
|
Votecount for Day 3 SKY COQ (3): busb, Bifauxnen, Seagull, Kat Delacour, thatbastardken, Gough Suppressant, busb (3): Those On My Left, Avshalom, Zetsubou-san Mithranderp (1): Tirade Not Voting (10): Anidav, Bifauxnen, Birdstrike, black_tangled, Fruity Gordo, Gwynplaine, Kat Delacour, Mithranderp, Seagull, SKY COQ With 17 alive, it's 9 votes to lynch. The current deadline is March 29th, 2015 at midnight EST -- that's in about 5 hours, 46 minutes.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:13 |
|
Beep boop, I am a helpful robot. Activate Sensor! *vibrates violently*
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:16 |
|
Anidav posted:Beep boop, I am a helpful robot. Activate Sensor! YOU HAVE ACTIVATED THE METABOMB!! I AM HERE TO TELL YOU HOW MANY SCUM WERE PART OF YESTERDAY'S LYNCH! ... ... ... THERE WAS NO LYNCH YESTERDAY!! THANK YOU FOR USING THE METABOMB!!
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:19 |
|
Those On My Left posted:Ha ha, nvm. how's this for persuasion: you're scum and maybe Zets too, TBK's voting Coq instead in the meantime so you guys stay divvied up.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:20 |
|
lmfao Anidav
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:21 |
|
Anidav, asking the hard questions but failing to ask the right questions.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:21 |
|
Hot drat it Gaspy. Italics doesn't work on phone old.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:21 |
|
Guess I need to update this thing:Zetsubou-san posted:[strike]WILD THEORY[/strike]
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:21 |
|
My pms had squaresquaresquare lynch. I didn't see your italics Gaspy.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:22 |
|
I'm pretty sure we're playing to no takebacksies rules.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:24 |
|
Anidav posted:My pms had squaresquaresquare lynch. I didn't see your italics Gaspy. I had no way of knowing that! Maybe in that case question "hey what as that word before "lynch", was it important?"
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:24 |
|
Ah gently caress that was my only power too. loving hell. If only I were in a pc that could read bbcode properly.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:25 |
|
If only
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:26 |
|
Gaspy put successful in italics and my phone read it as a unidentified character set.zzzzz
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:28 |
|
Deep calming voice aside you're such a liability, I'm starting to agree with whoever questioned Coq for choosing you. You're like an evil Pikachu.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:28 |
|
Pikachu ant got no deep voice.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:29 |
|
Anidav posted:Beep boop, I am a helpful robot. Activate Sensor! Oh. Oh my god.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:31 |
|
lmfao was suss on busb yesterday, so ##vote busb
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:32 |
|
uh, well anyway I really liked your no-lynch idea Kat, but I suspect scum are already staked out on both sides conveniently ignoring it.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:34 |
|
code:
Bifauxnen posted:uh, well anyway I really liked your no-lynch idea Kat, but I suspect scum are already staked out on both sides conveniently ignoring it. It was too good to be true. I'm going to see if Uber laid any hints that might incriminate either of them as a back-up plan.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:36 |
|
lynch early lynch often
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:36 |
|
Okay I don't really know what's going on now. busb was d2 scummy but seemed to get better later in the day. I'm unconvinced about either of them so
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:37 |
|
##vote Anidav
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:38 |
|
Bifauxnen posted:how's this for persuasion: you're scum and maybe Zets too, TBK's voting Coq instead in the meantime so you guys stay divvied up. How would you like me to vote today? Also, anidav. I mean, just Anidav
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:41 |
|
I'm deeply sorry for my absence, had my orientation day at uni which turned out to be extremely full on with no real breaks to read or post. I was butting heads with busb last night however I didn't have much on either of these candidates. Bif pointed out about the lightning rod being in the other game, and although I thought I had a nice gotcha I guess it wasn't that good :sadface: busb was protecting WMB pretty hard, could they be masons together? I'm about to eat but will ##vote SkyCoq in the meantime.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:42 |
|
##vote Skycoq
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:42 |
|
honestly bif I don't know what you want from me, I am voting entirely in line with who I've suspected of being scum. Would you like me to just unvote so that I don't split the vote? What do you actually want?
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:44 |
|
lmao at anidav
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:46 |
|
Asphyxious posted:YOU HAVE ACTIVATED THE METABOMB!!
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:47 |
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:48 |
|
imagine i did this for the rest of the page and that's how i feel about the progress for today
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:49 |
|
Those On My Left posted:honestly bif I don't know what you want from me, I am voting entirely in line with who I've suspected of being scum. If you're taking suggestions, I want you to please not nightkill anybody.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:51 |
|
i guess we could go for another tie the question is though, tbk's lynch was stopped by force or forces unknown - the most obvious assumption is he's a governor, right? (unless i'm missing something) because he was pretty clearly worse off in that showdown, with no real defenders, so it's safe to guess that nobody else stepped in to prevent the lynch. he claims to be optimus prime, which would make sense. it's looking like we've got an equal-opposite setup with ken and coq, so coq might be a governor as well; in which case, trying to lynch him is as good as wasting a day. i feel pretty confident that either ken or coq is scum. the question is, which?
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:51 |
|
Avshalom posted:lmao at anidav I'm so sorry!
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:52 |
|
Uber summary: Makes pointed discussion with Seagull and b_t day 1 asking about their votes When Avvy asks him why he is looking for reasons when nobody has a reason for anything D1 says "Granted, but it's certainly an easy way for scum to blend in early on." Starts D2 by saying he feels "out in the cold" His effort post has weird line wraps, probably from word wrap, but it also has weird formatting all over busb. It's plausible he just gave up on the formatting. Says it was "hard to read" on: Gwyn b_t Zets Or that the observations are "(not exactly out of character...)" on: Fruity Avs Seagull And at the end lists his most suspicious targets as "#1 busb, #2 WMB, and #3 TOML." In the showdown he votes for WMB as "Can't disobey Prime" When TOML calls him out for some mistakes in the summary he apologises This doesn't help me as much as I hoped in the showdown between Coq and busb
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:53 |
|
Avshalom posted:i guess we could go for another tie I'm not a governor, and I'm not scum.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:53 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2024 06:12 |
|
fwiw, my vote is still ken. forcing a vote between two players when you're the clear loser and then cancelling your own lynch is a good play for a scum gladiator-governor, or whatever the gently caress he might be, because it forces town to lose a day. i was suspicious that coq was doing the same thing today, but he doesn't have the train started on him that ken already did yesterday when he set off the showdown condition, so i think he's just being a dickhead. that's why i'm voting busb today and will be voting ken tomorrow, and if he flips town and i'm still alive, it's brit milah time for coq i'm also suspicious of birdstrike, purely because he crossed the streams yesterday to try to cast shade on mith with a really, really tenuous foundation. not just because i think afk claims should remain pretty sacrosanct to keep all the players sane and using specific posts from the other thread as evidence in this one is a bit of a dick move, but because it reeks of trying to desperately whip up a case against someone, anyone, on any basis. fabricating evidence is actually pretty hard when you're scum and know that the person you're accusing is innocent. this type of desperate tactic strikes me as trying way too hard.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2015 08:58 |