Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Implied Consent
Jul 6, 2006

Im_Special posted:

Deathamns left. Unless I missing something, at least uBlock is in really great shape now, hopefully this chris guy (who is not comfortable with Firefox's APIs) can keep it afloat.

You beat my edit, I misunderstood the edit he made to a post.

gorhill seems to be some kind of prolific wunderkind code jesus or something though.

Implied Consent fucked around with this message at 00:20 on Apr 2, 2015

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

dud root
Mar 30, 2008

WattsvilleBlues posted:

Any indication why the developer left? To spend more time with his family?

Flappy bird syndrome maybe

edit: for some content, I've just updated to v37. How can I try HTML5 on Youtube? Do I need to uninstall flash, or is there a config setting to change?

zetamind2000
Nov 6, 2007

I'm an alien.

WattsvilleBlues posted:

Any indication why the developer left? To spend more time with his family?

Was it announced on April 1st?

Im_Special
Jan 2, 2011

Look At This!!! WOW!
It's F*cking Nothing.

WattsvilleBlues posted:

Any indication why the developer left? To spend more time with his family?

Seems he just got tired of all the idiots.

Aleph Null
Jun 10, 2008

You look very stressed
Tortured By Flan
I'm running 36.0.4 but when I check for updates, it says there are no updates. Yet if I go to the Firefox page it tells me it looks like I am running an older version.
Is there something wrong with the update check?

Im_Special
Jan 2, 2011

Look At This!!! WOW!
It's F*cking Nothing.
They turned them off because they don't like you.

Knormal
Nov 11, 2001

Celexi posted:

that unfortunately does nothing to the top bar on linux (gnome 3.x)
What system borders are you talking about? The titlebar, the edge around non-maximized windows? You're familiar with Classic Theme Restorer, right? That lets you control just about every theme element in Firefox, anything beyond that is going to be a Gnome setting. I know KDE lets you add application-specific rules for window styles, I don't know if Gnome has the same.

Ihmemies
Oct 6, 2012

So I've "always" used Chrome to watch youtube since firefox + flash has always been garbage. Now I installed Firefox 37 and I got the impression youtube should work with HTML5 videos. I go to the youtube.com/html5 and it shows everything except "MSE & WebM VP9" working. When I try to play any video, I just get a black box with a spinning circle of dots. In Chrome the video starts to play immediately.

I have a GTX 970 with newest drivers and HW acceleration on in Firefox. I guess the videos are supposed to work finally... except they don't?

xamphear
Apr 9, 2002

SILK FOR CALDÉ!

Ihmemies posted:

So I've "always" used Chrome to watch youtube since firefox + flash has always been garbage. Now I installed Firefox 37 and I got the impression youtube should work with HTML5 videos. I go to the youtube.com/html5 and it shows everything except "MSE & WebM VP9" working. When I try to play any video, I just get a black box with a spinning circle of dots. In Chrome the video starts to play immediately.

I have a GTX 970 with newest drivers and HW acceleration on in Firefox. I guess the videos are supposed to work finally... except they don't?

Go into about:config and find media.mediasource.webm.enabled and toggle it to TRUE. Then refresh the /html5 page on YouTuvbe and it should be all working.

Flipperwaldt
Nov 11, 2011

Won't somebody think of the starving hamsters in China?



All this Youtube/HTML5 talk has me so confused. I never had to opt into anything or had to change things in about:config. It all just worked perfectly by not having Flash installed at least since (verfied that) version 32.

Avenging Dentist
Oct 1, 2005

oh my god is that a circular saw that does not go in my mouth aaaaagh

Flipperwaldt posted:

All this Youtube/HTML5 talk has me so confused. I never had to opt into anything or had to change things in about :config. It all just worked perfectly by not having Flash installed at least since (verfied that) version 32.

Ditto.

The MSE stuff is really just an improvement to how Youtube buffers the video (I believe by allowing the site to grab chunks - potentially with different bitrates - and seamlessly paste them together in Javascript). HTML5 video has worked on Youtube/Firefox for a long time now. For what it's worth, I didn't have to set any hidden prefs, and I'm pretty sure everything's working as it should. The only thing I don't see is 1080p+ resolutions, but I'm guessing that's because Youtube just isn't offering them to me.

Avenging Dentist fucked around with this message at 20:14 on Apr 2, 2015

dont be mean to me
May 2, 2007

I'm interplanetary, bitch
Let's go to Mars



Avenging Dentist posted:

The second statement contradicts the first: if a build is only published on the FTP, it hasn't actually been released yet. I'd recommend waiting until the beta is officially released (read: it's posted on the website), unless you like running builds that haven't had a sanity check yet.

Even setting aside the whole Mozilla Win64 internal politics thing, [img-4k-:ironicat:]

Oh yeah, 38.0 beta Win64 is being pushed through autoupdate to 37.0 beta Win64 users now. I can't imagine why they wouldn't push it to Win32 beta users! (Oh wait yeah I can they saw how it worked with Chrome OS X.)

Flipperwaldt posted:

All this Youtube/HTML5 talk has me so confused. I never had to opt into anything or had to change things in about :config. It all just worked perfectly by not having Flash installed at least since (verfied that) version 32.

A lot of stuff is going MSE+H.264 though, which means on Firefox a lot of stuff is getting kicked back to Flash.

Workaround:

about :config posted:

media.mediasource.enabled = TRUE // may already be enabled
media.mediasource.mp4.enabled = TRUE
media.mediasource.webm.enabled = TRUE // may already be enabled
media.fragmented-mp4.enabled = TRUE // may already be enabled
media.fragmented-mp4.exposed = TRUE
media.fragmented-mp4.ffmpeg.enabled = TRUE // may not be necessary on Windows or OS X

Your call on whether you want to disable the media.mediasource.whitelist. I think Mozilla's waiting to see if their default-install Cisco OpenH264 and Adobe Primetime Content Decryption plugins do the trick first. If you're feeling especially human and not worried about Mozilla knowing about your goat porn or whatever you might consider turning on some of the phone-home stuff with it.

There's also something about ignore_codecs you might find searching for it but it doesn't seem to be necessary anymore so why clutter it up.

You still have to say yes to the HTML5 player.

dont be mean to me fucked around with this message at 22:36 on Apr 2, 2015

Booourns
Jan 20, 2004
Please send a report when you see me complain about other posters and threads outside of QCS

~thanks!

When I watch Twitch streams in Firefox, the amount of memory used steadily increases until there is no more memory to use, then it stops being able to display large images, and it won't free that memory up unless I restart Firefox. Is there any solution to this?

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.
gorhill just forked chrisaljoudi's uBlock project - https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock

zetamind2000
Nov 6, 2007

I'm an alien.

That was a lame April Fool's prank.

Avenging Dentist
Oct 1, 2005

oh my god is that a circular saw that does not go in my mouth aaaaagh

Well at least the fix was simple: https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release/rev/6d12f36cb8fd

Freakazoid_
Jul 5, 2013


Buglord

I've never said yes or no to html5, but according to this page I don't have that option anymore. 37 is causing youtube to load html5 but fails and refreshes back into flash on each video I watch, so I'd like to get this sorted out.

Is there a good reason to switch yet? I don't generally have problems with firefox handling youtube videos with flash.

dont be mean to me
May 2, 2007

I'm interplanetary, bitch
Let's go to Mars


Freakazoid_ posted:

I've never said yes or no to html5, but according to this page I don't have that option anymore. 37 is causing youtube to load html5 but fails and refreshes back into flash on each video I watch, so I'd like to get this sorted out.

Is there a good reason to switch yet? I don't generally have problems with firefox handling youtube videos with flash.

Technically: eh. I don't know if Google's willing to cut Flash loose quite yet. Maybe as a matter of principle.

If you use NoScript, you need to whitelist mediasource: and you might want to do it manually because you have less than a second to catch it when a video loads before YouTube defaults to a Flash version of the video's page.

Celexi
Nov 25, 2006

Slava Ukraini!

Knormal posted:

What system borders are you talking about? The titlebar, the edge around non-maximized windows? You're familiar with Classic Theme Restorer, right? That lets you control just about every theme element in Firefox, anything beyond that is going to be a Gnome setting. I know KDE lets you add application-specific rules for window styles, I don't know if Gnome has the same.

that didn't do anything useful, but https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/hide-caption-titlebar-plus-sma/ did, and in about :config enabling the "tabs on title bar" option

WattsvilleBlues
Jan 25, 2005

Every demon wants his pound of flesh

RZApublican posted:

That was a lame April Fool's prank.

So ublock is still being developed?

Im_Special
Jan 2, 2011

Look At This!!! WOW!
It's F*cking Nothing.
it's being maintained, it's open source so others can help and pitch in, but Gorhill the master mind is done, as well as the second main dev who was the firefox expert, it wasn't an April Fool's joke.

zetamind2000
Nov 6, 2007

I'm an alien.

Im_Special posted:

it's being maintained, it's open source so others can help and pitch in, but Gorhill the master mind is done, as well as the second main dev who was the firefox expert, it wasn't an April Fool's joke.

So which of these two uBlock forks is the one to use, gorhill's or chrisaljoudi's?

zetamind2000 fucked around with this message at 18:26 on Apr 3, 2015

Double Punctuation
Dec 30, 2009

Ships were made for sinking;
Whiskey made for drinking;
If we were made of cellophane
We'd all get stinking drunk much faster!

RZApublican posted:

So which of these two uBlock forks is the one to use, gorhill's or chrisaljoudi's?

The chrisaljoudi one is the one you want. You may need to reinstall the extension due to the ownership change. Also, consider donating to chrisaljoudi to keep the project going.

Nintendo Kid
Aug 4, 2011

by Smythe
Which guy has control of the extension on AMO?

Fapos
Feb 10, 2004

*FAP* *FaP* *faP*
AlexVallat who'll be contributing to chrisaljoudi's. https://github.com/chrisaljoudi/uBlock/issues/1173

emdash
Oct 19, 2003

and?
noob question: if you install the xpi from github, does it still automatically update?

EoRaptor
Sep 13, 2003

by Fluffdaddy

TheQat posted:

noob question: if you install the xpi from github, does it still automatically update?

That depends. If you are on development builds of Firefox or Chrome, yes, provided you have manually switched to the new chris controlled repository.

If you are on release builds of Firefox or Chrome, they only update from the add-on store, and currently the state of that is kind of messy (gorhill still wants control of his add-on dev account, so chris needs to make a new one and petition to have the name moved across). No idea if an extension can be upgrade to one with anew guid, which is what will need to happen for it to be automatic.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.
FF 37.0.1 is out now. You can auto-update from 36.x.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.
What's the reason that media.mediasource.webm.enabled defaults to false?

Avenging Dentist
Oct 1, 2005

oh my god is that a circular saw that does not go in my mouth aaaaagh

Fangs404 posted:

What's the reason that media.mediasource.webm.enabled defaults to false?

Because MSE doesn't work correctly for WebM yet.

Megillah Gorilla
Sep 22, 2003

If only all of life's problems could be solved by smoking a professor of ancient evil texts.



Bread Liar

RZApublican posted:

So which of these two uBlock forks is the one to use, gorhill's or chrisaljoudi's?

Graph from chrisaljoudi page which explains so goddamn much:




This is why poo poo kept loving up for me with my ageing computer.

Revitalized
Sep 13, 2007

A free custom title is a free custom title

Lipstick Apathy

isndl posted:

Do you use voice chat, like Skype? By default Windows will lower the sound of active media when it detects voice communications, and sometimes doesn't return it to normal levels afterwards. It's one of the things I have to disable on every install of Windows.

That's what I thought, but I disabled it and it's still happening. Just as annoying, sometimes the volume slider will jump up and down.

It could be a Windows issue, but it so far only happens with Firefox, particularly when something is using Flash it seems.

Spek
Jun 15, 2012

Bagel!
Has anyone ever had issues with YouTube playlists going to the next video prematurely? I've had this problem come and go for the past year or more and have never found a fix. It happens with both the flash and html5 player. It happens seemingly completely at random the video will be like 5 minutes done out of 30, or sometimes even just a few seconds in, or sometimes near but not at the end of the video and will stop and go to the next video. But then sometimes it works correctly and goes all the way to the end. When it starts happening it will usually continue to be a problem for the next several hours/rest of the day but then after that I might go weeks without it happening.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

Spek posted:

Has anyone ever had issues with YouTube playlists going to the next video prematurely? I've had this problem come and go for the past year or more and have never found a fix. It happens with both the flash and html5 player. It happens seemingly completely at random the video will be like 5 minutes done out of 30, or sometimes even just a few seconds in, or sometimes near but not at the end of the video and will stop and go to the next video. But then sometimes it works correctly and goes all the way to the end. When it starts happening it will usually continue to be a problem for the next several hours/rest of the day but then after that I might go weeks without it happening.

I've never experienced this. Do you have any YT-related extensions?

hooah
Feb 6, 2006
WTF?
I'm watching a streaming basketball game, and it'll hitch every so often. YouTube doesn't do this, as far as I've noticed (don't watch a ton, though). Any idea what's going on? I'll try it on Chrome to see how that goes.

Spek
Jun 15, 2012

Bagel!

Fangs404 posted:

I've never experienced this. Do you have any YT-related extensions?

Nope the only thing I have that could be considered a Youtube extension is BYTubeD which generates download links from Youtube playlists. But I installed that because of the problem, easier to just download a whole playlist and watch it in VLC than deal with it constantly jumping to the next video prematurely.

Helpimscared
Jun 16, 2014

Did anyone else notice that with 37.x YouTube in 60fps works natively, or is that just me?

so loving smooth

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

Helpimscared posted:

Did anyone else notice that with 37.x YouTube in 60fps works natively, or is that just me?

so loving smooth

Yeah, that was the major feature 37 brought. Not only that, but you can do HD HTML5 YT. Before, HTML5 YT was limited to SD.

Qtotonibudinibudet
Nov 7, 2011



Omich poluyobok, skazhi ty narkoman? ya prosto tozhe gde to tam zhivu, mogli by vmeste uyobyvat' narkotiki

Fangs404 posted:

Yeah, that was the major feature 37 brought. Not only that, but you can do HD HTML5 YT. Before, HTML5 YT was limited to SD.

It could definitely do 720p before, and I'm pretty sure 1080p on Windows at least.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mr.Radar
Nov 5, 2005

You guys aren't going to believe this, but that guy is our games teacher.

annapacketstormaya posted:

It could definitely do 720p before, and I'm pretty sure 1080p on Windows at least.

Before you could only do 360p and 720p since other resolutions were restricted to MSE which Firefox didn't support until 37. Now you can do all Youtube resolutions and 60fps videos.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply