|
come play the newest fantasy game: http://spellsofgenesis.tumblr.com/quote:Spells of Genesis Artwork: Satoshi Creator of the Blockchain Wallpaper 
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 02:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 20:10 |
|
|
karples stole all the bitcoins. he stole them all.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 02:52
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:what possible reason can there be for these assholes to just leave teamviewer running all of the time tons of people use teamviewer like it was splashtop. often without bothering to have a password/a password that isn't "password" because clearly noone can guess their ip
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 02:55
|
|
|
Dr. Honked posted:karples stole all the bitcoins. he stole them all. and that's terrible
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 02:55
|
|
|
Old Kentucky Shark posted:I don't understand how this happens. I don't understand how a business that produces nothing runs up a $223,000+ electric bill in only four months. They were burning through ~360 tons of coal a month for four months. this poo poo legit pisses me off to everytime i think about it because its just ..really dumb. this is the hate that drives me when it comes to butts
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 03:10
|
|
|
Nintendo Kid posted:tons of people use teamviewer like it was splashtop. often without bothering to have a password/a password that isn't "password" because clearly noone can guess their ip loving idiots
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 03:12
|
|
|
Nintendo Kid posted:tons of people use teamviewer like it was splashtop. often without bothering to have a password/a password that isn't "password" because clearly noone can guess their ip since logmein cut off free users team viewer saw a massive increase in inexperienced, unskilled users trying to use their software in the same manner of remote viewing but neglected the whole security part
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 03:15
|
|
|
Chris Knight posted:and that's terrible no its great
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 03:25
|
|
|
Cantorsdust posted:the best part about anonymous ownership is that you can't actually prove for tax or bankruptcy purposes that you don't actually own the coins, either I'm curious: how do you prove that you don't own a pile of cash or gold?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 03:32
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:I'm curious: how do you prove that you don't own a pile of cash or gold? the government takes it and you don't sue
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 03:35
|
|
|
Dr. Honked posted:no its great whoosh
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 03:51
|
|
|
FCKGW posted:since logmein cut off free users team viewer saw a massive increase in inexperienced, unskilled users trying to use their software in the same manner of remote viewing but neglected the whole security part rip logmein free, it was a really awesome thing hell even the android app i bought for 15$ just up and said "nope, we're bricking this in 6 months, until then enjoy a complimentary upgrade to pro for a machine" being able to shoot an .exe to someone who needed a cj and fix poo poo myself was magical, now i either decline remote assistance or guide people with join.me, also gently caress trying to explain to computer stupids how to port forward rdp
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 04:24
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:what possible reason can there be for these assholes to just leave teamviewer running all of the time http://plussizedominatrix.tumblr.com/post/26791768793/teamviewer
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 05:21
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:what possible reason can there be for these assholes to just leave teamviewer running all of the time A) serving as willing proxies for carders in eastern Europe/southeast Asia B) scamming old folks by calling them up, scaring them with bullshit about viruses, and then using teamviewer to remote into their computer and "fix" it (delete temp files and a couple old restore points) for exorbitant prices. C) saw dad having a teleconference and since that's what the grownups do they had to try it
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 05:37
|
|
|
I'm not a fan of being the family cj (though I never have to because my father cjs in the major leagues) but I never want to give up my secret for fixing poo poo google
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 05:38
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:I'm not a fan of being the family cj (though I never have to because my father cjs in the major leagues) but I never want to give up my secret for fixing poo poo google go ahead and tell them you googled it. guaranteed most of them will come back to you anyway copy/pasting an error message into a search engine is apparently still magic to some people
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 06:16
|
|
|
Perhaps someone could answer these 2 bitcoin questions? (self.Bitcoin) submitted an hour ago by TravisPatron 1. Would a solar flare actually destroy the bitcoin network as we know it? If so, how? If not, why not? 2. How can a bitcoin transaction be sent without the internet? ie. radio frequency transmission or other pre-dated technology [–]Above_The_Law 1 point 50 minutes ago 1. A solar flare could theoretically disrupt/destroy the internet and all networking devices. That would effectively disrupt/destroy bitcoin. 2. A bitcoin transaction comprises just a few hundred bytes. You could manually create a bitcoin transaction on paper and carrier pigeon it to someone with internet access and then they could enter it for you. has anyone said pigeoncoin yet?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 06:44
|
|
|
FAUXTON posted:A) serving as willing proxies for carders in eastern Europe/southeast Asia running like always remoted in or just running in the background? cause it's default setting is just to sit in the background so I could easily see people forgetting about it
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 06:45
|
|
|
JaysonAych posted:2. A bitcoin transaction comprises just a few hundred bytes. You could manually create a bitcoin transaction on paper and carrier pigeon it to someone with internet access and then they could enter it for you. i too remember having my internet go out and sending a pigeon with my bank login and password to a buddy
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 06:49
|
|
|
JaysonAych posted:
depends on Krillin's current power level
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 06:52
|
|
|
Dr. Honked posted:'buttcoins lol' - teacher i was under the impression we left the laughing stage quite some time ago and are preparing for imminent collapse of the social order though
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 07:02
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:i too remember having my internet go out and sending a pigeon with my bank login and password to a buddy aren't carrier pigeons extinct anyways?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 07:02
|
|
|
Beast of Bourbon posted:aren't carrier pigeons extinct anyways? your thinking of Passenger pigeons. who are extinct because we ate them.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 07:04
|
|
|
i finally found something that's not good news for bitcoin: good news for bitcoin Isn't it great to see Bitcoin-positive articles on the WSJ, Bloomberg, Forbes, et al? Well, I don't think it's so great. Here's why. (self.Bitcoin) submitted 2 hours ago * by catsfive I'm new. Hi. Sorry, I'll get right to it. I was reading this post: [85] Why we need bitcoin: Citi Economist Says Time to Abolish Cash (bloomberg.com) I love seeing postive news about Bitcoin, but I kind of hate getting this news from Bloomberg, Forbes, and the NYT, etc. Positive coverage aside, I firmly believe that these guys are not on our side and that we do not treat their interest with the proper levels of care and suspicion. Articles like this are merely lip service to Bitcoin, and though many of them explain what it is and cover its current events, very few present the truly disruptive nature of Bitcoin, much less portray its potential to remove the secrecy, manipulation and corruption that is inherent in our current financial system in a positive light. They are just pumping up Bitcoin so that people can become more aware of it, so it becomes more popular, so that the needed infrastructure organically grows up around it and then—bam!—they're going to make a carefully-planned and tested move against the decentralized nature of Bitcoin. A total bait and switch. They'll try to keep all the progressive things it offers (I'm mostly aware of the difference between the coins and the ledger, etc.), but will work to centralize everything, "for national security, oh, and for your own good." Did you just laugh reading that?? Then maybe you're under 30. Remember IE, the browser? It's gone for now, but it used to be the dominant browser. HOW it got to be dominant (I realize that Bitcoin isn't a browser, but, bear with me) was a textbook lesson on how these Powers work: They used what Microsoft called EEE—Embrace, Extend, Extinguish. Microsoft's PR cronies entered the browser www/ecosystem as "friendly participants," embraced everything good that it stood for, then extended its capabilities so that it would only support/work with core Microsoft products and goals, and then remember what happened? No one enjoyed the Extinguish part of their end-game where they co-opted that browser to serve their bottom line (because gently caress freedom, amirite?). All competing products were hobbled in some way. I remember coding my website three different ways for three different browsers. It was triple the work to not get sucked into the assimilation portal that IE had become. Those of you that remember that era well, let me ask you: how many times, sitting there at 0300, did you utterly curse Microsoft and swear that if you ever saw Bill Gates you'd do something you'd regret? Maybe I'm the suspicious type, but I fear that this is a stage that Bitcoin will go through as well. Do we really think that the fiat powers that be won't act decisively against any truly decentralized, unstoppable, and impossible to game/manipulate currency??? The absence of this sort of discussion in this sub literally boggles my mind.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 07:36
|
|
|
JaysonAych posted:impossible to game/manipulate currency??? i will not stand by as the achievements of mark karpeles are so flagrently ignored
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 07:41
|
|
|
JaysonAych posted:i finally found something that's not good news for bitcoin: good news for bitcoin
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 08:15
|
|
|
i read the pos for the postive bitcoin news
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 08:34
|
|
|
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/btcgaw-is-now-buying-bitcoins-with-11-more-than-blockchain-official-rate-300063216.html BTCGaw is now buying Bitcoins with 11% more than Blockchain official rate quote:MILFORD, Del., April 8, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- BTCGaw INC. ( https://www.btcgaw.com ) has announced yesterday its latest offer for Bitcoin sellers: a conversion rate with an 11% increase compared to Blockchain's official rate. The company conducts its marketing campaign with a lot of confidence that their deal for Bitcoin trade is the best on the market at the moment. https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3279zm/btcgaw_is_a_scam_after_saying_i_will_expose_them/ BTCGAW is a scam! After saying I will expose them on Reddit, they threatened to send me child porn & stolen credit cards! (self.Bitcoin) отправлено 3 hours ago, изменено * автор Alibitco quote:I have just been scammed by BTCGAW.com. I was exploring their service when I found out that they use one bitcoin address to fulfill all orders (notwithstanding the fact that real operations needs to know who sent what), and the coins are all unmoved at this address:
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 08:56
|
|
|
so he admits to A) ordering child porn and B) blackmail? i'm not sure what's better, the scammer or the guy agreeing to "come live chat" with the scammer
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 09:25
|
|
|
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/btcgaw-is-now-buying-bitcoins-with-11-more-than-blockchain-official-rate-300063216.html
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 09:54
|
|
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:i approach programming like a late 80s early 90s lucasfilm computer game Splicer posted:but my mom says I'm funny nah you did good the bitcoin fanfiction/parables derails are the best downtime fillers other than tcc safaris
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 09:58
|
|
|
bucketmouse posted:nah you did good  hobbesmaster posted:business school and finance people probably think Bitcoin is even funnier than we do
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 10:48
|
|
|
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/btcgaw-is-now-buying-bitcoins-with-11-more-than-blockchain-official-rate-300063216.html idgi what does only having one address have to do with anything and how did it take him longer than reading the letters GAW to figure out it was a.scam
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 11:22
|
|
|
A Pinball Wizard posted:idgi what does only having one address have to do with anything and how did it take him longer than reading the letters GAW to figure out it was a.scam bitcoin is ~~anonymous~~ (but not actually anonymous) so the only real way to figure out if someone's actually paid you is to use different addresses for every transaction. otherwise if you sell two things but only get one payment you have no way to figure out which of your "customers" sent the transaction and which one just looked up the list of recent transactions you received and said "yup that one's mine".
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 11:37
|
|
|
/r/buttcoin is having a haiku contest, it's greatquote:"bitcoins." and then he
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 12:22
|
|
|
Herman Merman posted:/r/buttcoin is having a haiku contest, it's great
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 13:12
|
|
|
Jabor posted:bitcoin is ~~anonymous~~ (but not actually anonymous) so the only real way to figure out if someone's actually paid you is to use different addresses for every transaction. otherwise if you sell two things but only get one payment you have no way to figure out which of your "customers" sent the transaction and which one just looked up the list of recent transactions you received and said "yup that one's mine". jfc currency of the future
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 13:14
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:haikus are the best form of poetry for bitcoins because they also go from 5 to 7 to 5
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 13:14
|
|
|
[–]Ishmael_Vegeta 8 points 5 hours ago Lol what a joke. Go to jail for having a certain arrangement of bits in your computer. "Oh No! You have the forbidden bits!!!" [–]7MigratingCoconuts 22 points 4 hours ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_prime https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_number No matter how absurd it seems, the state can and will try to make anything illegal. Not even math is safe. [–]jaydoors 8 points 4 hours ago Well yeah.. ..but, I dunno, murder is just a certain arrangement of atoms in space time, so.. [–]Ishmael_Vegeta -3 points 3 hours ago murder is not something you can possess And if we had the ability to manipulate spacetime perhaps murder would be meaningless [–]JackBond1234 1 point an hour ago I mean technically neither is data. Data is merely one of many configurations you can coerce your possessions into, just like murder is a configuration of atoms you can coerce somebody else into. [–]sudofox -7 points 3 hours ago "Perhaps murder would be meaningless." The only one with that ability is God, who is the only one who has authority to give or take life anyway, so it's a moot point :P [–]imsodope210 1 point 51 minutes ago Maybe you shouldn't show that you are religious on reddit. [–]MulattoLatte 1 point 14 minutes ago I'm not religious but I'll be damned if people are trying to silence other peoples beliefs, the down votes are unnecessary. If you don't agree with someone's opinion just leave it alone, come on guys. good god how do you guys quote this poo poo without having to spend 10 minutes reformatting it e: hooooly poo poo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMoys5noqm4 A Pinball Wizard fucked around with this message at 13:26 on Apr 11, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 13:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 20:10 |
|
|
Sovereign binary
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 13:37
|
|
