|
Poque posted:This is a bad post that tries to hint toward a town alignment for PM through a case on Narc. This is a bad post that if Diqnol is town makes me think you're trying to shift momentum onto him with confirmation-bias led posts that look like scum hunting in earnest. I actually checked votefinder to see if you'd voted Diq up to this point, you didn't, you then quoted Ernie's case which is okay(?) and used that as your justification for the vote. I feel like you've been looking for adequate reason to get on Diqnol, and it's weird to me that Ernie's casing is that reason but not just enough trust in my night action claims/speculation. I don't like Poque right now.These kinds of posts are exactly why I was so disappointed that the response to my claim was Pmom and Opop being stupid, since it neutered this kind of poo poo. Now we're getting there.
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 19:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 07:40 |
|
|
Yeah I do think PM is town fwiw
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 19:43
|
|
|
Ernie. posted:the gloating wasn't 'theram what are you doing' it was 'look at what i made you do, I MADE YOU CLAIM JAILOR' - in what universe do the following make sense concurrently the universe where TheRam came in guns blazing claiming a result on Diq, Diq claimed roleblocker, and TheRam then claimed jailer. which is also this universe. TheRam posted:Diqnol, GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:And anyway, I was roleblocked last night. Go figure. TheRam posted:I expected at least two NKs, however the night I choose to jail our buddy Diqnol only a single NK occurs
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 19:44
|
|
|
TheRam posted:This is a bad post that if Diqnol is town makes me think you're trying to shift momentum onto him with confirmation-bias led posts that look like scum hunting in earnest. I actually checked votefinder to see if you'd voted Diq up to this point, you didn't, you then quoted Ernie's case which is okay(?) and used that as your justification for the vote. Ernie's posts are based on posts that Diqnol made and tones that can actually be read instead of speculation that there was a second kill out there that was stopped, I explained that earlier.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 19:45
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:the universe where TheRam came in guns blazing claiming a result on Diq, Diq claimed roleblocker, and TheRam then claimed jailer. I can agree with this, and with a BP dead I really doubt Diq was responsible for any NK, either way you look at it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 19:47
|
|
|
Or, could have been responsible for a NK that didn't happen.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 19:48
|
|
|
I think Poque wanting to talk about gulag and doug earlier over Ram is tellling and I think he vote on me there was opportunistic, it's very interesting
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 19:49
|
|
|
it's telling in that there is a confirmed liar in one group and something easily explained away in the other
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 19:50
|
|
|
Liar != scum
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 19:50
|
|
|
Here's a simple way of clearing it up: Exakt, are you VT?
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 19:51
|
|
|
It's a lot worse when it's used to save somebody who was headed for a clear lynch.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 19:51
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Here's a simple way of clearing it up: Exakt, are you VT? What question is this question supposed to answer?
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 19:53
|
|
|
Poque posted:It's a lot worse when it's used to save somebody who was headed for a clear lynch. Because obviously scum Exakt would know to go along with scum Gulag's claim.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 19:54
|
|
|
Poque posted:It's a lot worse when it's used to save somebody who was headed for a clear lynch. If that's the case I don't see why people are voting for Exakt over Gulag. If they are on a team then there is no reason to give up the ruse once Exakt replaces in. I can see finding Gulag kinda suspicious over that, but honestly it just looks like a way to generate content and see how people react to that claim.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 19:55
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Scum Gulag claimed mason to save town Exakt? Scum Gulag saving Town Rattman: easy buddying on Rattman who was getting lynched for a supremely negative and unhelpful attitude, somebody who's not going to be hard to kill later on. Rattman goes along with it because why not, I would Scum Gulag saving Scum Rattman: Doubt it, too risky especially given Rattman's attitude as mentioned above Town Gulag saving any-alignment Rattman: only explainable by "Gulag Dolls"
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 19:56
|
|
|
Poque posted:Why not? I am snipey because I've been banging my head against the wall since yesterday trying to get through to people. Gulag does this often. He has for years. It's a non starter.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 20:00
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:I am snipey because I've been banging my head against the wall since yesterday trying to get through to people. Gulag does this often. He has for years. It's a non starter. Yeah.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 20:01
|
|
|
I am not aware of Gulag's history but I can see why town might do it, so it's fine for now (to me)
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 20:02
|
|
|
Poque posted:Scum Gulag saving Town Rattman: easy buddying on Rattman who was getting lynched for a supremely negative and unhelpful attitude, somebody who's not going to be hard to kill later on. Rattman goes along with it because why not, I would I would definitely never go along with someone else claiming confirmed masons on me, especially if I'm on my way to being dunked. Contradicting the claim is an easy emergency brake on the bandwagon against you!
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 20:02
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:I would definitely never go along with someone else claiming confirmed masons on me, especially if I'm on my way to being dunked. Contradicting the claim is an easy emergency brake on the bandwagon against you! see you just admitted you're anti-fun
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 20:04
|
|
|
it's n ot wrong to be friends
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 20:12
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jnZMW8C6wA
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 20:14
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:I would definitely never go along with someone else claiming confirmed masons on me, especially if I'm on my way to being dunked. Contradicting the claim is an easy emergency brake on the bandwagon against you! And that would be awesome for you if you were scum. That's why I don't think Doug/Exackt are, scum would have gladly taken that distraction
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 20:18
|
|
|
WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:##vote Anonymous actually I want this explained
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 20:39
|
|
|
I missed that. Why would someone jump to an arsonist being in this game.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 21:14
|
|
|
I would assume WWM is either a Firefighter who is bad at their role or was doused with gasoline
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 21:20
|
|
|
if it's the latter it exonerates diqnol
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 21:21
|
|
|
Poque posted:if it's the latter it exonerates diqnol uh, why wouldn't the former?
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 21:25
|
|
|
TheRam posted:uh, why wouldn't the former? If WWM is a firefighter then he knows the existence of an arsonist without having action taken upon him. Just because you blocked Diqnol doesn't mean you couldn't have blocked a douse action.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 21:28
|
|
|
Poque posted:actually I want this explained She was the first person to bring up possibility of a sk, I inferred the possibility she has a killing role, which, now that I've caught up with the thread, I withdraw that accusation. ##unvote In other news, -Poque, I find your vote on Giuseppe/Diqnol to be really opportunistic. It seems like you're not paying attention to the thread, ie missing the fact that Exact/Gulag aren't masons, and overall you appear like you're ok with just putting your vote anywhere. -Opop, you continue to not take a single position in this game. You made a jokevote, a vote on Somber back when he and Poque were slapfighting about the whole 48 hour thing, and then you vote TheRam because "oh fine." You seem indifferent to who gets voted while trying to ride the notion that Gulag always claims confirmed masons as if it makes you appear to contribute. -Anonymous trying to link people who haven't even flipped yet - both scummy and bad play. LittleMac, I'd like to buy your wares today and sacrifice my vote.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 21:30
|
|
|
WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:She was the first person to bring up possibility of a sk, I inferred the possibility she has a killing role, which, now that I've caught up with the thread, I withdraw that accusation. wtf i wanna buy warez
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 21:31
|
|
|
I still fail to see opportunism behind making a vote based on tone and inconsistent posting rather than setup spec and a phantom second kill attempt that we have no indication of, but ymmv
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 21:38
|
|
|
Poque posted:I still fail to see opportunism behind making a vote based on tone and inconsistent posting rather than setup spec and a phantom second kill attempt that we have no indication of, but ymmv you just listed two reasons that have been offered to vote for diq. we're not picking reasons to vote for diq, we're trying to find scum.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 21:41
|
|
|
Poque posted:If WWM is a firefighter then he knows the existence of an arsonist without having action taken upon him. Just because you blocked Diqnol doesn't mean you couldn't have blocked a douse action. Ah right. I don't think I've ever been in a game with a fire fighter. Do vitctims or arsonists get covered in petrol and then told they are or what? I literally don't know the role.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 21:43
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:you just listed two reasons that have been offered to vote for diq. we're not picking reasons to vote for diq, we're trying to find scum. This post says nothing. I have been called out as an opportunistic voter twice now because I voted for Diqnol after Ernie made points related to his actual game content and not when the case against him was pure setup speculation. It's made that post and am making this post because people apparently are not divining the rationale behind my posts. It is in fact opportunistic to call me opportunistic for my votes while simultaneously ignoring the rationale behind the change in my thought process.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 21:45
|
|
|
TheRam posted:Ah right. I don't think I've ever been in a game with a fire fighter. Do vitctims or arsonists get covered in petrol and then told they are or what? I literally don't know the role. no clue, also never been in a game with one. That's why I'm still confused that WWM would immediately think arsonist instead of, say, SK, like he mentioned in his post as an explanation: WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:She was the first person to bring up possibility of a sk, I inferred the possibility she has a killing role, which, now that I've caught up with the thread, I withdraw that accusation.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 21:46
|
|
|
It's a really weird conclusion to jump to.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 21:47
|
|
|
no Pmoms post is actually good, your little point made it look like you wanted to frame diqnol as a good lynch, based on you saying he was doing something as a bad guy, rather than saying why he's a bad guy based on his overall interactions etc, it felt confirmation bias-y and an unnecessary tangent to very valid points made against diqnol by me and ernie. that's not really scum hunting dude, that's why I called you on it. I think you're OMGUS'ing here.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 21:48
|
|
|
TheRam posted:no Pmoms post is actually good, your little point made it look like you wanted to frame diqnol as a good lynch, based on you saying he was doing something as a bad guy, rather than saying why he's a bad guy based on his overall interactions etc, it felt confirmation bias-y and an unnecessary tangent to very valid points made against diqnol by me and ernie. Can you quote my "little point"? I'm not sure exactly what you're referencing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 21:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 07:40 |
|
|
Why do you keep insisting your points are valid, Ram? Do you know you're wrong?
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2015 21:50
|
|