|
Epsilon Plus posted:
Nothing? FFS
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2015 23:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 11:54 |
|
|
GG is being weird and awkward but I really would rather dunk Pmach, who is around but not even pretending to try to be helpful.
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2015 23:51
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:GG is being weird and awkward but I really would rather dunk Pmach, who is around but not even pretending to try to be helpful. Again, what am I doing wrong here? What's weird and awkward???
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2015 23:54
|
|
|
You always read as weird and awkward!
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2015 23:58
|
|
|
Ghastly Gangsta posted:Again, what am I doing wrong here? What's weird and awkward??? You started off really weird and aggressive and that has turned people off quite a bit. I need to sit down and rereada bunch of stuff before I comment more, I will be around for deadline. First impression, I don't know if I found GG scummy, I think they made themselves a target by being somewhat off putting on the front end, but I will give it a review shortly.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 00:01
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:You are the living embodiment of your username, trying to parse this has made me very tired indeed. Couple of things about this. #1. I gotta be honest. That hurts a little bit. #2. I find myself doubtful that this is true, but you flatter me. #3. I was very pleased with myself when I learned the origins of that idiom.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 00:28
|
|
|
Ghastly Gangsta posted:Nothing? Twenty minutes before you get all pissy. God forbid some of us have something to do other than  the game. You belong on straightwhiteboystexting.tumblr.com with patience and understanding like you've presented.You are acting excessively high-strung. You are outright diving on Hal for making jokes. I can't believe that you're not following the logic of some posters like Foo. I do not believe you are acting in a town-oriented fashion.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
Ghastly Gangsta posted:I think he's doing it in such a way that seems pro-town, but is artificial is what I'm saying. I think that's a good thing to do, but I don't think he's doing it for the sake of actually hunting scum. I don't know if I agree with you, and I'm not sure how you could tell. I didn't see anything spectatular about this, perhaps you could go back and elaborate? I still think this point is weak, and you haven't done much to clarify.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 00:30
|
|
|
Ghastly Gangsta posted:The only reason I've been "exceptionally hostile" is because of unprovoked criticisms from drive by and or smarmy posters right out the gate. My chains ain't ruffled. I don't know if you are just playing around with the theme/flavor of the game, or if you really talk this way to people, but I think that it is coming off as aggressive and off putting. Perhaps your play for street cred is lost on others? Making you seem overly aggressive and inspiring suspicion?
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 00:32
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:this isn't a good vote at all, reads like an attitude vote instead of anything with real content behind it. Still pretty happy w/ my vote here I agree with this statement completely. When Bottle cast their vote, I thought it was also particular fishy. I think this is why the case on Captain Foo doesn't work for me. This far, I think that Captain Foo has been playing things fairly straight. And they're a voice that I have actually been trusting so far. I think that there are a lot of voices out there that GG could be turning attention to. Trying to flip it to Foo seems more like trying to target somebody who has been playing as an asset to town. That being said, I am a little unsure about Foo because they have come across as so helpful and confident. Being that confident often comes from a place of having more information than other people, or that could just be how they play. As I do my read through, I'll give it a look, but I think you're trying a move WAY to early with very little to actually go on.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 00:37
|
|
|
Ghastly Gangsta posted:Yeah, I guess breadcrumbing my rapper is dumb, but I didn't post my vote for Foo in my case on him so I just decided to spice up the post where I actually did. This is a weird attempt at trying to inject some levity into the situation. It feels weird, and I think that can account for Epsilom's vote. The whole playing to flavor thing came off as weird and off putting, Then there is the aggressive play (which is understandable because you are in a tight spot) Then you turn it around with this line... it literally is weird and awkward.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 00:48
|
|
|
Roydrowsy posted:I agree with this statement completely. When Bottle cast their vote, I thought it was also particular fishy. GG has kind of gone after everyone who has voted him though so it isn't like he ONLY went after Foo, Foo is just the only one who really responded.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 00:49
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:GG has kind of gone after everyone who has voted him though so it isn't like he ONLY went after Foo, Foo is just the only one who really responded. And it all seems pretty weak too. That being said, I don't know if I get that much of a Scum vibe from GG. I think they're just doing a very bad job of playing this particular game and they keep paying for it. At this point, I don't know If I've see anything that would get me to cast one of the last two votes to lynch. I'd like to hear more from BottleKnight in the meantime. I also think it is seriously worth note that HiipFire has contributed absolutely nothing of value this entire time. With the action that PizzaPie generated early on and GG currently, they've pretty much been coasting, Dr. Hurt as well.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 00:55
|
|
|
apostateCourier posted:claiming vt means claiming vt, "confirmed" means you got your role pm. That's a really weird argument to make. just remembered you are in this game.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 00:57
|
|
|
Roydrowsy posted:I also think it is seriously worth note that HiipFire has contributed absolutely nothing of value this entire time. With the action that PizzaPie generated early on and GG currently, they've pretty much been coasting, Dr. Hurt as well. Quelle suprise. hiip do you even like mafia
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 00:58
|
|
|
Roydrowsy posted:And it all seems pretty weak too. this is exactly how he played in the most previous game and he flipped town so that's where i'm coming from in my reactions to him
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 01:06
|
|
|
BottleKnight posted:I just want to be clear, since you never asked me about it, just accused me of it, I said Diqnol set up an OMGUS because he posted an OMGUS half an hour later, and my read was that he setup that. I wasn't making that up out of thin air. He responded to my questions and then I suspected him less. If you have any questions for me, I'll be happy to answer them. hmm let me re-read those interactions
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 01:07
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:hmm let me re-read those interactions hm nope, still reads like za has an actual point to his vote
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 01:11
|
|
|
oic what you were say about za answering your questions later in the thread
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 01:14
|
|
|
BottleKnight posted:I just want to be clear, since you never asked me about it, just accused me of it, I said Diqnol set up an OMGUS because he posted an OMGUS half an hour later, and my read was that he setup that. I wasn't making that up out of thin air. He responded to my questions and then I suspected him less. If you have any questions for me, I'll be happy to answer them. ok in conclusion i see what you're saying, your argument makes a lot more sense now. i just never saw an za's vote on GG as omgus at all so i bored in on that narrative as being scummy ##unvote
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 01:17
|
|
|
holy drat are there enough people around to lynch anyone but GG fuckkkkkk ##vote propmachine
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 01:24
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Don't be a drama queen. this is really bizarre, actually pmach hadn't posted in a little while, pinmom drops this vote, two posts later pmach shows up to kvetch
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 01:33
|
|
|
c.f.Propaganda Machine posted:I'd rather have that on d1 than five pages of arguing about confirmation post vt claims.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 01:34
|
|
|
I am around!
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 01:36
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:this is really bizarre, actually Between this and the whole "I have questions for SOMEONE ON THIS PAGE" and then not asking them, I agree it's very little content, but how is that an alignment tell anymore than GG's high-strungness?
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 01:41
|
|
|
BottleKnight posted:Between this and the whole "I have questions for SOMEONE ON THIS PAGE" and then not asking them, I agree it's very little content, but how is that an alignment tell anymore than GG's high-strungness? Picking fights and making snarky comments the way Pmach has is a lot easier than faking reads. She isn't not participating like Hiip is, she's contributing pure noise in lieu of making any attempt at all to find scum.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 01:48
|
|
|
BottleKnight posted:Between this and the whole "I have questions for SOMEONE ON THIS PAGE" and then not asking them, I agree it's very little content, but how is that an alignment tell anymore than GG's high-strungness? tbqh it's a meta read for me on GG, his play of getting aggro on anyone who looks at him funny is identical to how he played in the previous game I played with him (where he flipped town)
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 01:50
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Picking fights and making snarky comments the way Pmach has is a lot easier than faking reads. She isn't not participating like Hiip is, she's contributing pure noise in lieu of making any attempt at all to find scum. ##vote pmach
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 01:51
|
|
|
generally snark and being pointed is one thing, but you have to actually probe and get responses out of people or proffer theories or do something instead of weakly hopping on a vote (za) and sniping around
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 01:53
|
|
|
BottleKnight posted:##vote pmach this isn't the first time you've let somebody do the work for you, and toss out a weak vote.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 01:56
|
|
|
I'm going out to watch the hockey game so deadline is floating until I get home.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 01:56
|
|
|
Roydrowsy posted:this isn't the first time you've let somebody do the work for you, and toss out a weak vote. I was not fully buying the PMach case, which is why I asked a question, and then when PMom said something I found convincing I voted. Would you rather I fabricate reasons to vote? What do you think about PMach, Roydrowsy?
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 01:58
|
|
|
Roydrowsy posted:this isn't the first time you've let somebody do the work for you, and toss out a weak vote. this is true but it's a better vote than his vote on gg before, imo
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 02:01
|
|
|
What is the case on Pmach besides you don't wanna vote out the Ghastly ghostlies?
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 02:04
|
|
|
I'm coming back from the store, will be on in 15
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 02:04
|
|
|
Dr. Hurt posted:What is the case on Pmach besides you don't wanna vote out the Ghastly ghostlies? don't be lazy, i've stated my reasons 
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 02:06
|
|
|
So why PMach and not someone like me who has essentially been a noncontributer or Hiip or Chic who has been the whitest of noise? Or Apostate Courier? I just don't see what makes the ideas on PMach so drat compelling compared to a whole bunch of other folks.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 02:12
|
|
|
I don't see a "get's voted, then comes into the thread" as particularly damning evidence since there's a million other possible ways for someone to react to a callout as scum. Charging in face first to defend oneself just seems super idiotic for a scum move, and I just can't see Machine making that.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 02:13
|
|
|
Dr. Hurt posted:So why PMach and not someone like me who has essentially been a noncontributer or Hiip or Chic who has been the whitest of noise? Or Apostate Courier? I just don't see what makes the ideas on PMach so drat compelling compared to a whole bunch of other folks. i don't policy lynch for flat-out lurking d1 which is basicaly hiip and apostate tho i remember AC posting some stuff that at least seemed helpful before vanishing. pmach's posting has been more disruptive chic looked fairly bad too, i guess
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 02:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 11:54 |
|
|
huh i had you pegged for contributing more than the 2 (maybe 3) posts you actually did
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2015 02:16
|
|