Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Hillary is giving her first unscripted interview since she declared tomorrow. It's an hour long and open to all subjects. It's airing tomorrow at 5 pm on CNN.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

quite the fucker
Apr 13, 2014

01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01100101 01110010

BI NOW GAY LATER posted:

When was the last time an "insurgent" won a nomination. (And if you say Barack I will hit you. Very Hard.)

barack obama

funtax
Feb 28, 2001
Forum Veteran

BI NOW GAY LATER posted:

VP's are basically a way to shore up whatever weakness you have.

Not really. VP choice barely matters at all, unless you do something ridiculous and wind up with a McGovern/Eagleton situation, in which case it can damage you.

As has been noted repeatedly in the past when this comes up, outside of background checking for actual scandal-bait, the only criteria that really matters is whether or not the Presidential candidate feels they can put up with the VP candidate - pretty much daily - for eight years (and that the candidate is willing to take the VP gig if offered). You don't pick someone who is ideologically different in any significant way and you don't pick anyone based primarily on their state of residence, aside from trying to avoid nominating someone from the same state as the Presidential candidate, because that would require extra Cheney-style paper work.

Hillary will pick someone she likes and trusts who is ideologically similar to herself. Everything else is super-secondary.

BI NOW GAY LATER
Jan 17, 2008

So people stop asking, the "Bi" in my username is a reference to my love for the two greatest collegiate sports programs in the world, the Virginia Tech Hokies and the Marshall Thundering Herd.

Obama wasn't really an insurgent. He had a lot of support from within the party.

funtax posted:

Not really. VP choice barely matters at all, unless you do something ridiculous and wind up with a McGovern/Eagleton situation, in which case it can damage you.

As has been noted repeatedly in the past when this comes up, outside of background checking for actual scandal-bait, the only criteria that really matters is whether or not the Presidential candidate feels they can put up with the VP candidate - pretty much daily - for eight years (and that the candidate is willing to take the VP gig if offered). You don't pick someone who is ideologically different in any significant way and you don't pick anyone based primarily on their state of residence, aside from trying to avoid nominating someone from the same state as the Presidential candidate, because that would require extra Cheney-style paper work.

Hillary will pick someone she likes and trusts who is ideologically similar to herself. Everything else is super-secondary.

Your basically supporting my argument that she will pick someone safe and white.

Brannock
Feb 9, 2006

by exmarx
Fallen Rib

BI NOW GAY LATER posted:

Obama wasn't really an insurgent. He had a lot of support from within the party.

It could be helpful if you provided the definition of "insurgent" you're operating with. If that definition includes "is not supported by the party he's running for" then pretty much no one ever is going to qualify.

BI NOW GAY LATER
Jan 17, 2008

So people stop asking, the "Bi" in my username is a reference to my love for the two greatest collegiate sports programs in the world, the Virginia Tech Hokies and the Marshall Thundering Herd.

Brannock posted:

It could be helpful if you provided the definition of "insurgent" you're operating with. If that definition includes "is not supported by the party he's running for" then pretty much no one ever is going to qualify.

That's kind of my point. Bernie does not have the support of the DNC or establishment Democrats (Hillary has managed to rack up a record number of endorsements -- more than even Al Gore had at this stage of the game.)

I am asking when someone who had near zero or no support from within the party establishment was able to win the nomination of either party.

JT Jag
Aug 30, 2009

#1 Jaguars Sunk Cost Fallacy-Haver

Brannock posted:

It could be helpful if you provided the definition of "insurgent" you're operating with. If that definition includes "is not supported by the party he's running for" then pretty much no one ever is going to qualify.
I presume he just meant dark horse, a complete unknown who ends up getting nominated somehow, and I suggested Jimmy Carter as the most recent one of those.

BI NOW GAY LATER
Jan 17, 2008

So people stop asking, the "Bi" in my username is a reference to my love for the two greatest collegiate sports programs in the world, the Virginia Tech Hokies and the Marshall Thundering Herd.

JT Jag posted:

I presume he just meant dark horse, a complete unknown who ends up getting nominated somehow, and I suggested Jimmy Carter as the most recent one of those.

Which I agreed with, though I don't think a candidacy like Carter's can happen in the modern campaign system. (Carter won by the party bosses not understanding the world had changed, and underestimating the power if an 'outsider')

Powered Descent
Jul 13, 2008

We haven't had that spirit here since 1969.


The only time anyone ever hears Evan Bayh's name is when people are making lists of possible running mate picks. Never at any other time or for any other reason.

I'm starting to think that there is no "Evan Bayh", that it's just a placeholder name that people can use to pad out their veepstakes lists.

BI NOW GAY LATER
Jan 17, 2008

So people stop asking, the "Bi" in my username is a reference to my love for the two greatest collegiate sports programs in the world, the Virginia Tech Hokies and the Marshall Thundering Herd.

Powered Descent posted:

The only time anyone ever hears Evan Bayh's name is when people are making lists of possible running mate picks. Never at any other time or for any other reason.

I'm starting to think that there is no "Evan Bayh", that it's just a placeholder name that people can use to pad out their veepstakes lists.

He's like the most boring, generic white dude ever with the bonus of people kind of knowing who he is.

He was kind of a rising star in the party once.

Thump!
Nov 25, 2007

Look, fat, here's the fact, Kulak!



Saying Obama was an insurgent wasn't a closet-Muslim joke?

For shame, goons.

VanSandman
Feb 16, 2011
SWAP.AVI EXCHANGER
McGovern.

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

BI NOW GAY LATER posted:

I am asking when someone who had near zero or no support from within the party establishment was able to win the nomination of either party.

Matt Santos?

JT Jag
Aug 30, 2009

#1 Jaguars Sunk Cost Fallacy-Haver

Powered Descent posted:

The only time anyone ever hears Evan Bayh's name is when people are making lists of possible running mate picks. Never at any other time or for any other reason.

I'm starting to think that there is no "Evan Bayh", that it's just a placeholder name that people can use to pad out their veepstakes lists.
i've heard Evan Bayh's name in the context of him jumping out of a plane saying "I'm gay."

BI NOW GAY LATER
Jan 17, 2008

So people stop asking, the "Bi" in my username is a reference to my love for the two greatest collegiate sports programs in the world, the Virginia Tech Hokies and the Marshall Thundering Herd.
:lol: apparently Bayh has 10m in unspent campaign funds just sitting around in trust. you know. just in case. you never know. really. you don't.

Mr Ice Cream Glove
Apr 22, 2007

Trump retweets and deletes



http://time.com/3946544/donald-trump-mexican-jeb-bush-twitter/

Monkey Fracas
Sep 11, 2010

...but then you get to the end and a gorilla starts throwing barrels at you!
Grimey Drawer
I'm excited to see how much longer Trump can keep his little publicity stunt going.

BI NOW GAY LATER
Jan 17, 2008

So people stop asking, the "Bi" in my username is a reference to my love for the two greatest collegiate sports programs in the world, the Virginia Tech Hokies and the Marshall Thundering Herd.

Monkey Fracas posted:

I'm excited to see how much longer Trump can keep his little publicity stunt going.

As long as Fox thinks they can distract us from real politicians.

Mister Facetious
Apr 21, 2007

I think I died and woke up in L.A.,
I don't know how I wound up in this place...

:canada:

don Jaime posted:

That's what worries me no end. The parallels to Nader's gently caress the Democrats campaigns are worrying, particularly since so many Sanderistas openly say they won't vote for Clinton if they can't have Bernie. At least the candidate himself lacks the venom of Nader. I'm hoping he bows out gracefully when the time comes.


Nader ran as a third candidate in the general. Sanders is already on record as saying he won't run as an independent if he loses the primary.
There aren't any similarities to Nader at all, other than they were both the least evil in their respective eras.

People saying they won't vote for Hillary in the general wouldn't have voted for her anyways. It's like counting torrents as lost sales. :jerkbag:

quite the fucker
Apr 13, 2014

01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01100101 01110010
i'm voting for donald trump

Zaphod42
Sep 13, 2012

If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now.

Raskolnikov38 posted:

Matt Santos?

Bartlet '16

Monkey Fracas
Sep 11, 2010

...but then you get to the end and a gorilla starts throwing barrels at you!
Grimey Drawer

BI NOW GAY LATER posted:

As long as Fox thinks they can distract us from real politicians.

I guess ya gotta fill that 24-hour cycle with something. Why not Trump I guess?

Dolash
Oct 23, 2008

aNYWAY,
tHAT'S REALLY ALL THERE IS,
tO REPORT ON THE SUBJECT,
oF ME GETTING HURT,


quite the fucker posted:

i'm voting for donald trump

You can only participate in one primary usually, right? If I were an American I'd have a hard time deciding between voting for Bernie to raise the profile of left issues or voting for Trump to perpetuate the Republican side-show. I'm assuming the other Republican candidates are treating his unusually large share of support as functionally a grab-bag of undecideds for when he inevitably drops out before Iowa, so it's kind of masking the true breakdown of support in the polls.

funtax
Feb 28, 2001
Forum Veteran

BI NOW GAY LATER posted:

Your basically supporting my argument that she will pick someone safe and white.

Probably so, but not because of any sense that she needs to "shore up" her safe or white credentials somehow.

She'll pick someone she likes and trusts, which doesn't necessarily mean someone "safe" in the sense of just being a boring, invisible specimen. In spite of the fact that he is objectively a cringe-inducing weirdo with the capacity to Out-Biden Onion Biden, there's a better chance of her picking Terry McAulliffe than Jim Webb or Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders (which is not to say that there's much of a chance of McAuliffe getting tapped).

As for the race, the chances are pretty strong that her VP nominee will be white, but only for mathematical reasons - that is, because the majority of Clinton allies are white. But she could easily decide that someone like Julian Castro understands how she expects a VP to operate and go with him. If race is considered at all, it will be way down on her list of wants.

Mister Facetious
Apr 21, 2007

I think I died and woke up in L.A.,
I don't know how I wound up in this place...

:canada:
Seriously, who was the last candidate to fill a ten thousand seat stadium a year and a half out from the election?

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


quote:

The ample crowds and unexpectedly strong showing by Senator Bernie Sanders are setting off worry among advisers and allies of Hillary Rodham Clinton, who believe the Vermont senator could overtake her in Iowa polls by the fall and even defeat her in the nation’s first nominating contest there.

The enthusiasm that Mr. Sanders has generated — including a rally attended by 2,500 people in Council Bluffs, Iowa, on Friday — has called into question Mrs. Clinton’s early strategy of focusing on a listening tour of small group gatherings and wooing big donors in private settings. In May, Mrs. Clinton led with 60 percent support to Mr. Sanders’ 15 percent in a Quinnipiac poll. Last week the same poll showed Mrs. Clinton at 52 percent to Mr. Sanders’s 33 percent.

“We are worried about him, sure. He will be a serious force for the campaign, and I don’t think that will diminish,” Jennifer Palmieri, the Clinton campaign’s communications director, said Monday in an interview on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe."

Some of Mrs. Clinton’s advisers acknowledged that they were surprised by Mr. Sanders’ momentum and said there were enough liberal voters in Iowa, including many who supported Barack Obama or John Edwards in 2008, to create problems for her there.

“I think we underestimated that Sanders would quickly attract so many Democrats in Iowa who weren’t likely to support Hillary,” said one Clinton adviser, who like several others spoke on the condition of anonymity to candidly share views about the race. “It’s too early to change strategy because no one knows if Sanders will be able to hold on to these voters in the months ahead. We’re working hard to win them over, but yeah, it’s a real competition there.”

Asked on Friday about the crowds Mr. Sanders was drawing, Mrs. Clinton seemed to walk a careful line with her answer. “Well, we each run our own campaigns, and I always knew this was going to be competitive,” she told reporters at an ice cream stand in Lebanon, N.H.

Those who see Mrs. Clinton as being at risk in Iowa say she is still far better positioned to win the nomination than Mr. Sanders, who lags by double digits in Iowa polling. He also has far less money than she does, and his socialist leanings are anathema to many Americans.

But a loss in an early state like Iowa would signal a vulnerability for Mrs. Clinton at a time when she has sought to unite the Democratic Party behind her candidacy, and especially to demonstrate to its restless liberal wing that she can represent their interests. A Sanders victory could also further energize his fund-raising base.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/07/us/politics/hillary-clintons-team-is-wary-as-bernie-sanders-finds-footing-in-iowa.html

BI NOW GAY LATER
Jan 17, 2008

So people stop asking, the "Bi" in my username is a reference to my love for the two greatest collegiate sports programs in the world, the Virginia Tech Hokies and the Marshall Thundering Herd.

Mister Macys posted:

Seriously, who was the last candidate to fill a ten thousand seat stadium a year and a half out from the election?

That does't translate into money, votes, or support.

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

BI NOW GAY LATER posted:

I am asking when someone who had near zero or no support from within the party establishment was able to win the nomination of either party.

Serious Answer: John Kerry prior to Dean's collapse? The establishment lined up behind him right up until he came in third.

Killer robot
Sep 6, 2010

I was having the most wonderful dream. I think you were in it!
Pillbug

Mister Macys posted:

Seriously, who was the last candidate to fill a ten thousand seat stadium a year and a half out from the election?

I'm hoping Sanders does at least well enough to shape the primary narrative, but this says at least as much about how the campaign process has shifted and lengthened over the years as it does about him.

BI NOW GAY LATER
Jan 17, 2008

So people stop asking, the "Bi" in my username is a reference to my love for the two greatest collegiate sports programs in the world, the Virginia Tech Hokies and the Marshall Thundering Herd.

Raskolnikov38 posted:

Serious Answer: John Kerry prior to Dean's collapse? The establishment lined up behind him right up until he came in third.

Ehhhhh. Kerry had a pretty dece chunk of support from the establishment, and I think you can argue that Dean's implosion was at least egged on by said establishment.

Mr Ice Cream Glove
Apr 22, 2007

Oh Huck



Chick Fil A

Video of him running drive thru

https://twitter.com/JHoganGidley/status/618136244254584832

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:

Oh Huck



Chick Fil A

that's the least-crowded Chik-Fil-A i've ever seen

The X-man cometh
Nov 1, 2009

Mister Macys posted:

Seriously, who was the last candidate to fill a ten thousand seat stadium a year and a half out from the election?

She didn't release the number, but the crowd at Hillary's announcement on Roosevelt Island was probably over 10,000, especially since there were people standing outside the fence listening in.

Zaphod42
Sep 13, 2012

If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now.

So loving awkward.

Gotta love how Chic-fil-a has gone from 'our CEO really likes God and we're closed on Sundays' to 'CHRISTIAN CHICKEN'

You'd think the right wing would rally around Church's Chicken instead :cheeky:

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


It is pretty funny reading all the posts about how Bernie has no chance at all, while the bible of Very Seriousness the New York Times is publishing articles about Hillary possibly losing Iowa six months before the caucus.

The X-man cometh posted:

She didn't release the number, but the crowd at Hillary's announcement on Roosevelt Island was probably over 10,000, especially since there were people standing outside the fence listening in.

I read it was around 4,500.

JT Jag
Aug 30, 2009

#1 Jaguars Sunk Cost Fallacy-Haver

Sheng-ji Yang posted:

It is pretty funny reading all the posts about how Bernie has no chance at all, while the bible of Very Seriousness the New York Times is publishing articles about Hillary possibly losing Iowa six months before the caucus.
I'm not sure how much of that is actually due to good signs for Bernie, the New York Times loves to poo poo on Hillary

Also, horserace narrative

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

JT Jag posted:

I'm not sure how much of that is actually due to good signs for Bernie, the New York Times loves to poo poo on Hillary

Also, horserace narrative

The NYT has actually been kinda schizophrenic on Bernie alternating between ignoring him and then saying he's a real challenger.

Iron Twinkie
Apr 20, 2001

BOOP

team overhead smash posted:

Hiliary has announced she is anti-BDS



It isn't exactly surprising but I'd have hoped she'd at least steer clear of the issue unless pressed on it, not dive straight into it without any prompting.


Unfortunately, maybe this is one of the issues she is actually passionate about which is why she went out of her way to make a public statement.

I knew that was her position but reading that still made my blood boil. I support a two state solution but I have and will do everything in my power to prevent Palestinian state hood. Boycotting Israel for being an Apartheid state is bad because Israel isn't an Apartheid state because Reasons and also there was an anti-Semitic attack in Europe which is related to the Palestinians living in an open air prison also because Reasons. God drat just gently caress you Hilary. The only thing that will keep my bile down long enough to vote for you is the constant stream of molten poo poo pouring forth from the thousand mouths of the Republican party and the terror that fills my mind of any one of them being President of the United States.

Mister Facetious
Apr 21, 2007

I think I died and woke up in L.A.,
I don't know how I wound up in this place...

:canada:

The X-man cometh posted:

She didn't release the number, but the crowd at Hillary's announcement on Roosevelt Island was probably over 10,000, especially since there were people standing outside the fence listening in.

Fair enough, but for a stump speech?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Samuel Clemens
Oct 4, 2013

I think we should call the Avengers.

Tatum Girlparts posted:

Except Gabbo was fuckin cool, you SOB.

Yeah, I'd like to see Scott Walker do the Hully Gully.

  • Locked thread