|
Lord Lilf posted:Well she's not my gf but there is mutual interest but I think I'm gonna tell her that maybe we shouldn't pursue this any further. Hmmmm, looks like Hot Dog Day #91 gave you advice and you took it. I'm pretty sure that means he's your lawyer, now. You have created joinder.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2015 22:02 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 09:34 |
|
Oh cool. I've always wanted to be your lawyer. My first act as your lawyer is to regretfully inform you that I must end my representation of you immediately. To my knowledge there are no pending deadlines in your case. I am waiving any outstanding earned fees and your retainer balance is $0.00. I encourage you to contact another attorney immediately. I however refuse to return your client file.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2015 22:47 |
|
Lord Lilf posted:Well she's not my gf but there is mutual interest but I think I'm gonna tell her that maybe we shouldn't pursue this any further. Eh, at least see if she actually does cut the guy off. Also, student loans are discharged on death.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2015 22:48 |
|
Blue Footed Booby posted:Eh, at least see if she actually does cut the guy off. Turns out she got a restraining order against him so game on I guess?
|
# ? Jul 22, 2015 23:38 |
|
Don't take relationship advice from an internet stranger who knows next to nothing about whatever situation you're in.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2015 23:55 |
|
the littlest prince posted:Don't take relationship advice from an internet stranger who knows next to nothing about whatever situation you're in. Agreed. Do, however, take legal and/or medical advice.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2015 00:24 |
|
the littlest prince posted:Don't take relationship advice from an internet stranger who knows next to nothing about whatever situation you're in. She willingly brought him to a place where a man sucker punched him with the knowledge that he had done so in the past to at least one other person. From those facts alone, I can foresee the entire future of his life. We learned that in law school.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2015 01:06 |
|
LAW 101: Sucker Punching the Future Learn how to combine the cold hand of the law with the cold fist of some girl's uncle and the mysterious whims of time-yet-unknown. Class materials: Ice pack, Tarot deck For a more advanced course see LAW 201: Legislation Across Dimensional Borders
|
# ? Jul 23, 2015 01:17 |
|
I think OP should take boxing lessons, and kick that guy's rear end.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2015 10:48 |
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:She willingly brought him to a place where a man sucker punched him with the knowledge that he had done so in the past to at least one other person. From those facts alone, I can foresee the entire future of his life. We learned that in law school. Sucker punch my friend once, shame on you...
|
# ? Jul 23, 2015 13:41 |
|
Lord Lilf posted:Turns out she got a restraining order against him so game on I guess? Sure, why not. Please keep posting about it. Kazak_Hstan posted:I think OP should take boxing lessons, and kick that guy's rear end. No, just a little sucker punching practice. Studying martial arts in order to pummel a drunk is kinda pathetic. Besides, OP might hurt his new GF when she inevitably attacks him. Self defense would be smarter. The first principal of self defense being avoidance of situations calling for the other principals of self defense. But that contradicts the "game on" plan. No self defense classes for OP.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2015 21:22 |
|
So if the uncle is judgement proof, could he have a case against the (ex) girlfriend for negligently exposing him to a serial violent offender? If he's going to break up with her anyway he has nothing to lose, and may as well try to get something out of the situation.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2015 21:23 |
|
Austen Tassletine posted:So if the uncle is judgement proof, could he have a case against the (ex) girlfriend for negligently exposing him to a serial violent offender? If he's going to break up with her anyway he has nothing to lose, and may as well try to get something out of the situation. No.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2015 21:29 |
|
blarzgh posted:No. And even if he did, if the uncle is judgment proof and she's having friends hang out with her uncle, she's probably judgment proof as well. (Also probably 16.)
|
# ? Jul 23, 2015 21:30 |
|
I read a nuisance case today in which a condo owner sued for a constructive easement against his neighbor's condo in order to abate the nuisance-y noise. The moral of the story is you always have a case, you just need a lawyer crazy enough to try it. Epilogue: that suit resulted in sanctions, attorney's fees, and a countersuit for slander of title. Second moral is to be willing to get laughed out of court.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2015 21:33 |
|
I for real know of a District Court case filed over a facebook post.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2015 21:49 |
|
blarzgh posted:I for real know of a District Court case filed over a facebook post. Bojanglesworth posted:back with more stupid questions for you smart folk! I had a friend whose ex filed a motion to modify custody because he posted their child's picture on his facebook.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2015 21:55 |
|
blarzgh posted:I for real know of a District Court case filed over a facebook post. There ws a guy who got a big settlement against his former employer, and then lost it because his kid posted about it on Facebook, violating the nondisclosure clause of the settlement.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2015 23:46 |
sullat posted:There ws a guy who got a big settlement against his former employer, and then lost it because his kid posted about it on Facebook, violating the nondisclosure clause of the settlement. Sue the kid?
|
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 00:01 |
|
sullat posted:There ws a guy who got a big settlement against his former employer, and then lost it because his kid posted about it on Facebook, violating the nondisclosure clause of the settlement. Thats not true.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 00:03 |
|
euphronius posted:Thats not true. You sure? http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/02/us/facebook-post-costs-father/ I know, technically it was the father telling the daughter about the settlement that violated the confidentiality, not the following Facebook post since the daughter wasn't a party to the agreement.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 00:05 |
|
ulmont posted:You sure? wow lol every confidentiality clause u reviewed had a family exception.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 00:08 |
|
euphronius posted:wow lol Actual opinion is here: http://www.3dca.flcourts.org/opinions/3d13-1952.rh.pdf ...but yeah, I would have expected some sort of family exception. Of course, in exchange for the family exception I would have expected that the daughter's post be attributed to the father, so he was hosed either way.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 00:12 |
|
ulmont posted:Actual opinion is here: Snay hosed up . He should have lied and presented the story that his wife told the daughter.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 00:16 |
|
Like I was not prepared for someone to be that loving stupid so my point is still correct. Did you guys notice the lawyers still got paid. gently caress yeah.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 00:17 |
|
wanna read that settlement agreement
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 00:23 |
|
euphronius posted:Like I was not prepared for someone to be that loving stupid so my point is still correct. Justice served then.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 00:25 |
|
No no. Defendant posted on Facebook, "In my opinion, Plaintiff shouldn't be on the board of our HOA or whatever." And Plaintiff sued for defamation. For real.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 05:05 |
Need a lawyer for a Thing. Filled out state bar referral form + threw e-mails at the top few google results for "lawyer (area of issue) (city)". Is there any more useful searching to be done or do I just hope somebody gets back to me on a Friday?
|
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 06:19 |
|
Javid posted:Need a lawyer for a Thing. Filled out state bar referral form + threw e-mails at the top few google results for "lawyer (area of issue) (city)". Is there any more useful searching to be done or do I just hope somebody gets back to me on a Friday? Define "thing" Some things you can hire basically anyone, others you need a good lawyer.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 06:27 |
Traffic.
|
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 06:30 |
|
I wouldn't email people, I would call them, especially if you are working on any sort of deadline.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 14:37 |
|
is there a lawyer that can deal with traffic for me? northern virginia sucks.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 14:56 |
|
So lets say I'm hypothetically getting sued for about $2000 of credit card debt. Would it even be worth hiring a lawyer seeing as how it's a small amount and I'm going to lose the case regardless? Is there any realistic chance that having an attorney will save me any money, or would it just add to the bills that I apparently can't pay?
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 15:22 |
|
Well you can't hire an attorney without paying them so it appears to be moot.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 15:27 |
|
euphronius posted:Well you can't hire an attorney without paying them so it appears to be moot. Do they take credit cards?
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 15:32 |
|
It's cool, I can pay them in goats and/or cats.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 15:41 |
|
You should probably head over to the debt collection thread, but if that debt is actually yours and its the creditor suing you (ie, the card company and not the 8th person to buy that debt) I can't imagine a lawyer is actually going to save you any money overall.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 15:44 |
|
fordan posted:Do they take credit cards?
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 15:45 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 09:34 |
|
Stabby_McBitchslap posted:So lets say I'm hypothetically getting sued for about $2000 of credit card debt. Would it even be worth hiring a lawyer seeing as how it's a small amount and I'm going to lose the case regardless? Is there any realistic chance that having an attorney will save me any money, or would it just add to the bills that I apparently can't pay? You might stick your head in the Ask me about dealing with/suing/being sued by debt collectors! thread. Stabby_McBitchslap posted:It's cool, I can pay them in goats and/or cats. Sorry, I hold the goat to cash concession in this thread.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 15:49 |