|
I think it's just some introductory context for international audiences.
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2015 00:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 16:59 |
|
|
Yeah you're right, it's late and I'm an idiot, it's all about Janner.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2015 00:06
|
|
|
Freddie Starr Groped My Hamster http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jul/10/freddie-starr-groped-teenage-girl-on-savile-show-judge-finds quote:Freddie Starr groped a 15-year-old girl while she was attending a Jimmy Savile show 41 years ago, a high court judge has found. I wonder if charges will be brought now, considering. The proceedings brought up a lot of things that are now a matter of legal record. quote:Ward had told the court that Starr, who was not present for the ruling, had attempted to give her what was known as “a goose”. This occurred when a man “would put his hand under a girl’s buttocks and give it a squeeze and usually say ‘goose’ and, at the same time, reach for her breasts and say ‘honk, honk,’” she said. 
Murderion fucked around with this message at 17:39 on Jul 10, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2015 17:34
|
|
|
As horrible as the context is I can't not laugh at the idea of someone having to explain that in court.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2015 17:36
|
|
|
60 Minutes Australia just did a report on Paedo-Britain, with new accusations and details of various lords sexual preferences when it came to little boys http://www.9jumpin.com.au/show/60minutes/videos/4361923189001/
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2015 14:44
|
|
|
Brown Moses posted:60 Minutes Australia just did a report on Paedo-Britain, with new accusations and details of various lords sexual preferences when it came to little boys I think I'm going to be sick. At this point wouldn't it be easier to list people who aren't a pedophile in the British upper classes?
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2015 15:55
|
|
|
OhYeah posted:I think I'm going to be sick. i do so in every post i make
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2015 15:57
|
|
|
Exaro has details, including naming Lord Mountbatten as a paedo http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5608/richard-kerr-names-powerful-men-who-covered-up-kincora
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2015 16:04
|
|
|
quote:Sir Anthony Blunt, master of the Queen's pictures Say it aint so Liz
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2015 16:08
|
|
|
What pictures? 
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2015 16:28
|
|
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paedophile_Information_Exchange
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2015 17:17
|
|
|
Why is it that the only people getting named or accused in the msm in the UK are labour? The Tories are going to turn this into a party things aren't they, and the newspapers are going to help them.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2015 18:57
|
|
|
I'm not sure even the Tories would stoop low enough to blame labour for having paedophiles among their number.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2015 19:03
|
|
|
stickyfngrdboy posted:I'm not sure even the Tories would stoop low enough to blame labour for having paedophiles among their number. Yes they would. Whether they would consider it politically expedient to do so or not is another matter.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2015 19:07
|
|
|
I think there might be a bit of selection bias going on here because of the major political figures accused it's been a pretty even mix (if anything the Lib Dems and their forerunners are a little over-represented). What would be interesting would be to check how often the party affiliation is mentioned in the press copy compared to not mentioned - I feel like in particular every story about Janner has mentioned his party affiliation multiple times while Cyril Smith and Leon Brittan have just been called an MP or a Lord, although again that may be my selection bias showing there too. (e: Parliamentary privilege is a wonderful thing, so I can uncensor one name from there: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmhansrd/cm141028/debtext/141028-0003.htm#141028103001800 ) goddamnedtwisto fucked around with this message at 19:21 on Jul 19, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2015 19:19
|
|
|
In an era of Wikileaks and publications installing anonymous drop boxes, I'm amazed how well hidden these people's names are. For example, I have a pretty good hunch at who the Sun are talking about today, but there's more chance of me being nicked for mentioning it than the hordes of people around the culprit who protected them for so long.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2015 19:38
|
|
|
tdrules posted:In an era of Wikileaks and publications installing anonymous drop boxes, I'm amazed how well hidden these people's names are.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2015 19:42
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:I'm surprised that the Scottish papers haven't dropped any larger hints. As it's an active investigation and there's at least a tiny chance there might be a prosecution then naming them at least prior to arrest risks screwing up any future trial. Yes, I realise how insanely optimistic this sounds.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2015 21:03
|
|
|
Has Exaro been taken down?
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2015 22:13
|
|
|
Filboid Studge posted:Has Exaro been taken down? Likely a bandwidth issue, they seem to having a hosting package from the late 90s.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2015 22:37
|
|
|
I'll be surprised if I don't hear of vigilante reports after this entire decades long abuse of kids. Then again Catholic Church.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 23:29
|
|
|
Annointed posted:I'll be surprised if I don't hear of vigilante reports after this entire decades long abuse of kids. Then again Catholic Church.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 23:32
|
|
|
tdrules posted:In an era of Wikileaks and publications installing anonymous drop boxes, I'm amazed how well hidden these people's names are. For the politically ignorant, any hints? No matter how vague?
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 23:47
|
|
|
Any yanks who follow this stuff and might have an insight, you can probably safely say poo poo, just us subjects of the queen who will get old bill coming round. Theres actually a proper US organisation set up to protect you from our lovely anti-free speech laws.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 10:48
|
|
|
Couldn't someone set up a service on a US server that allows people in the UK to submit encrypted anonymous info about it privately, which is then publicly displayed? (I'll set up the wiki)
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 10:51
|
|
|
the children's charity Barnardo's have said today that they raised concerns seven years ago about the child sex ring, from which six men were yesterday found guilty of child sexual offences insufficient action was taken as far as we were concerned, they said. quote:When she was 12 or 13, one of the girls - known as A - was passed between 60 Asian men for sex and had been conditioned to think it was normal behaviour, the jury was told. insufficient indeed.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 12:29
|
|
|
quote:When she was 12 or 13, one of the girls - known as A - was passed between 60 Asian men for sex and had been conditioned to think it was normal behaviour, the jury was told. Asian? So they were Chinese, Japanese or Korean? Oh no, they weren't. loving misleading media pricks.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 12:57
|
|
|
OhYeah posted:Asian? So they were Chinese, Japanese or Korean? In the UK we use Asian to describe those of South Asian descent. East Asia gets oriental or slopes or whatever Jeremy Clarkson is using currently.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 13:03
|
|
|
Asian basically means "everyone who looks a bit arab" which is probably about a quarter of the earth's population depending on how racist you want to be.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 13:11
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:Asian basically means "everyone who looks a bit arab" which is probably about a quarter of the earth's population depending on how racist you want to be. Doesn't work like that here. If you say "Asian", you mean China, Korea, Japan, Vietnam or the countries in Eastern Asia. Then there is Central-Asian (people from Caucasus), Indian and Middle-Eastern. To call a bunch of Pakistanis "Asian" is beyond absurd, at least where I'm from. I didn't even consider it could be widely spread in other parts of the world, my bad.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 13:42
|
|
|
The UK apparently derives it's use of "Asian" from the original Roman, which is to say it starts at Mesopotamia and keeps going east.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 13:56
|
|
|
I see Sikh groups in the US refer to themselves as "Asian-indians" all the time in press releases and the like. The sub-continent is in Asia.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 14:22
|
|
|
OhYeah posted:Asian? So they were Chinese, Japanese or Korean? the uk had a lot of commonwealth immigration from india and pakistan, who have formed the basis of what they normally call "asian" you idiot
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 14:48
|
|
|
stickyfngrdboy posted:In the UK we use Asian to describe those of South Asian descent. East Asia gets oriental or slopes or whatever Jeremy Clarkson is using currently. Or "East Asian", sans JC slurs.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 15:02
|
|
|
OhYeah posted:To call a bunch of Pakistanis "Asian" is beyond absurd, at least where I'm from. To call a bunch of Pakistanis "Indian" is a good way to get your head kicked in.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 15:16
|
|
|
It's almost as if both countries use Asian to describe the type of Asian they have the most of.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 18:20
|
|
|
OhYeah posted:Doesn't work like that here. It's almost like that newspaper isn't based 'here'.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 20:28
|
|
|
Doesn't seem likely, it must be those pricks deceiving us.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 20:31
|
|
|
OhYeah posted:Doesn't work like that here. Well then you're in the wrong thread then.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 20:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 16:59 |
|
|
MooCowlian posted:Doesn't seem likely, it must be those pricks deceiving us. They do it all the time, how many articles refer to Jimmy Savile as a catholic pedophile? Or the white pedophile rings this thread is about?
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 21:03
|
|
