|
ukle posted:This is the new libel act for the curious - Oh good, it looks like they fixed the loophole of the truth not always being a valid defense.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 02:40 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 16:53 |
|
Northern Ireland's libel laws have not been and will not be updated, as libel tourism is a cottage industry here- some solicitors here like to work in Belfast and Dublin simultaneously, doubling the defence costs.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 13:45 |
|
Am I too late to make a "Pedophile Island" joke?
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 15:24 |
|
Mycroft Holmes posted:Am I too late to make a "Pedophile Island" joke? Probably been done before, but why not go for it anyway? Also: Sup, dude?
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 15:31 |
|
Mycroft Holmes posted:Am I too late to make a "Pedophile Island" joke? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcU7FaEEzNU At least 14 years.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 15:33 |
|
There's already a pedophile island where literally over 50% of the people on the island were pedophiles. They were all the descendents of British too.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 15:33 |
|
Guavanaut posted:There's already a pedophile island where literally over 50% of the people on the island were pedophiles. They were all the descendents of British too. What?
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 15:35 |
|
drilldo squirt posted:What? (Also your username is illegal to depict in the UK)
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 15:37 |
|
Mycroft Holmes posted:Am I too late to make a "Pedophile Island" joke? Surely "Pedophile Ilse"
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 15:44 |
|
Oh, god. My sympathy to the Brits, here. This is going to echo, isn't it? Here's the question - this is recent enough in time that newer politicians could qualify as, er, 'groomed' by them - their proteges. Who is potentially shadowed by this theoretical list?
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 15:50 |
|
^ maybe an american can post it
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 16:12 |
|
Guavanaut posted:Pitcairn. It's a British Overseas Territory. Sadly they didn't pick up cricket and went for the other national hobby. I'm not racist, but what is with this demographic and child molestation? It seems like every week we hear of a new paedophile ring just full of these people. I'm not saying all British and/or white men are bad, but we can't allow them to bring their culture into Britain. Why don't any prominent white men speak out against this? The Supreme Court fucked around with this message at 16:26 on Aug 5, 2015 |
# ? Aug 5, 2015 16:24 |
|
Ron Paul Atreides posted:Surely "Pedophile Ilse"
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 16:29 |
|
Christ, someone send me the list and I'll post it. I did a search and found nothing, so I don't think anyone has it though. Ran Mad Dog fucked around with this message at 19:29 on Aug 5, 2015 |
# ? Aug 5, 2015 18:53 |
|
Post the list and this will be the last face you see.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 20:06 |
|
Ran Mad Dog posted:Christ, someone send me the list and I'll post it. Are we talking about the list Philip Schofield waved under Cameron's nose? Because that was pretty much compiled from David Icke forums posts and is (or at least was ) freely available from there, and the level of proof they offer is around about the same level of proof that they have for Prince Phillip being a reptiloid alien. (Although the last year is seriously beginning to make me look at the necks of the rick for evidence of gills)
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 20:23 |
|
Warcabbit posted:Oh, god. My sympathy to the Brits, here. This is going to echo, isn't it? It isn't a political thing, it's a byproduct of the old school tie network. The very best of public schools used to have a tradition of younger boys serving and being physically abused by the older, and by repute that often included a bit of solid character-building buggery. It's hardly surprising when some of the students find they have a taste for it. It faded out over the last 30-50 years, though, so the incumbent generation will hopefully be the last.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 20:36 |
|
Jedit posted:It faded out over the last 30-50 years, though, so the incumbent generation will hopefully be the last. We assume.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 20:37 |
|
Jedit posted:It isn't a political thing, it's a byproduct of the old school tie network. The very best of public schools used to have a tradition of younger boys serving and being physically abused by the older, and by repute that often included a bit of solid character-building buggery. It's hardly surprising when some of the students find they have a taste for it. It faded out over the last 30-50 years, though, so the incumbent generation will hopefully be the last. I think what's been happening in Rotherham and elsewhere proves that paedophilia transcends bounds of class and race. What has to change (and hopefully we're seeing the first big wave of that change) is the culture of silence around it.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 20:47 |
|
Warcabbit posted:Who is potentially shadowed by this theoretical list? At the moment, the whole drat government, paedo or no, is threatened. One of the reasons the police are being so hush-hush with names is that being caught up in this scandal (even if not actively involved or later found to be not culpable in any way) is obviously so politically poisonous as to destroy careers. Slinging around names of high profile politicians is dicey at the best of times, but with the Tory party holding a tiny majority of 12 MPs, there's a chance that this scandal could take down a sitting government if anyone currently in a high profile position is involved. Any government can normally expect to lose a few MPs during it's run through ill health, death or resignations through the more mundane forms of scandal. By-elections are used as an opportunity for opposition parties to prey on weakness in the current government, and as such are prone to high intensity shock campaigning. Losing even a couple of sitting politicians at the wrong time could theoretically trigger a chain reaction that forces a mid term coalition or even a collapse in government.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 21:10 |
|
Also, when the Government is looking to make more 'austerity savings', no superintendent is going to stick his/her neck out to name names for fear of the Chancellor's Cuts Lottery drawing the Home Office.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 21:40 |
|
Spangly A posted:Yo if someone can demonstrate a similar case where the US has told the UK to gently caress off on a national security libel issue, then I'll post everything I can dig up that wont jeapordise any of the victims. Some things will out them by their very nature, like bank records, and I won't post those without being certain they're determined. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPEECH_Act But I don't know how jurisdiction works on t'interwebs. Though if a USican posted something to a USican site whilst in the US, that would seem pretty clear-cut. Note that the law still means that USican libel laws apply.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 22:10 |
|
Right and US libel cases are extremely difficult to lose as the defendant.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 22:17 |
|
VanSandman posted:Probably been done before, but why not go for it anyway? Nothing much. Found some other people to D&D with now that you're gone.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 23:54 |
|
The Supreme Court posted:I'm not racist, but what is with this demographic and child molestation? It seems like every week we hear of a new paedophile ring just full of these people. I'm not saying all British and/or white men are bad, but we can't allow them to bring their culture into Britain. Why don't any prominent white men speak out against this? Not a great joke to make, considering the Rotherham scandal.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2015 23:57 |
|
Jedit posted:It isn't a political thing, it's a byproduct of the old school tie network. The very best of public schools used to have a tradition of younger boys serving and being physically abused by the older, and by repute that often included a bit of solid character-building buggery. It's hardly surprising when some of the students find they have a taste for it. It faded out over the last 30-50 years, though, so the incumbent generation will hopefully be the last. Yes, I'm aware of this. I was just thinking - good lord, what if some more current politicians had the same proclivities, perhaps were given a leg up by their, er, elders. This could snowball wider.
|
# ? Aug 6, 2015 00:48 |
|
boom boom boom posted:Not a great joke to make, considering the Rotherham scandal. i feel like you missed the point a bit
|
# ? Aug 6, 2015 01:37 |
|
The Supreme Court posted:I'm not racist, but what is with this demographic and child molestation? It seems like every week we hear of a new paedophile ring just full of these people. I'm not saying all British and/or white men are bad, but we can't allow them to bring their culture into Britain. Why don't any prominent white men speak out against this? Didn't the Pitcairn pedos actually try to justify themselves by saying sex with young girls was part of their Polynesian cultural heritage?
|
# ? Aug 6, 2015 02:30 |
|
ukle posted:As long as the courts decide that the British courts are the correct place for the case to be heard, yes. Nearly: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/aug/05/investigation-edward-heath-child-abuse-claims-go-national posted:A nationally coordinated police investigation into claims that the former prime minister Edward Heath sexually abused children is to be set up by the end of the week.
|
# ? Aug 6, 2015 09:10 |
|
Silver2195 posted:Didn't the Pitcairn pedos actually try to justify themselves by saying sex with young girls was part of their Polynesian cultural heritage? It was either that it their pirate cultural heritage. Also most pitcairners were moved to Norfolk island in the 50s so I guess they just left all the paedos behind.
|
# ? Aug 6, 2015 09:10 |
|
boom boom boom posted:Not a great joke to make, considering the Rotherham scandal. Rotherham was the point. Specifically, poking fun at all the racists who have blamed the Rotherham culprits on genetics/ culture while conveniently ignoring that argument's implications with the Catholic church, political, and media child molesting circles.
|
# ? Aug 6, 2015 09:25 |
|
a pipe smoking dog posted:It was either that it their pirate cultural heritage. If it wasn't for all the child rape, I would have been interested to see community-scale sovereign citizenism vs. the last clawing relics of imperialism and might have been on their side.
|
# ? Aug 6, 2015 09:37 |
|
Guavanaut posted:They made an interesting argument that their island wasn't part of Britain because of their ancestors' capital crime of burning the Bounty. It's an interesting issue, but Pitcairn had been sending their various incidents to the UK's legal system and accepting the rulings for decades. Add in the islander testimony that the population was aware they were living under British law and there's really not much of an argument. The Supreme Court fucked around with this message at 10:18 on Aug 6, 2015 |
# ? Aug 6, 2015 10:16 |
|
The Supreme Court posted:It's an interesting issue, but Pitcairn had been sending their various incidents to the UK's legal system and accepting the rulings for decades. Add in the islander testimony that the population was aware they were living under British law and there's really not much of an argument. As it was, it was pretty awful and only half the island wanted to do it.
|
# ? Aug 6, 2015 10:32 |
|
If it were anything else I would love for them to parachute in one single bobby in dress blues to investigate.
|
# ? Aug 6, 2015 15:42 |
|
OwlFancier posted:If it were anything else I would love for them to parachute in one single bobby in dress blues to investigate. And then get burned in a giant statue made of palm fronds and coconuts?
|
# ? Aug 6, 2015 16:59 |
|
a pipe smoking dog posted:And then get burned in a giant statue made of palm fronds and coconuts? KILLING ME WONT BRING BACK YOUR GODDAMN HONEYS
|
# ? Aug 6, 2015 17:59 |
|
Kegluneq posted:Paedoph Isles.
|
# ? Aug 6, 2015 18:28 |
|
It is literally the thread title.
|
# ? Aug 6, 2015 23:08 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 16:53 |
|
Mr. Squishy posted:It is literally the thread title. Ah ah, nope. Missing the ph
|
# ? Aug 6, 2015 23:38 |