|
I just tried to create a dynamic distribution group that contained all users that were listed as residing in the city Winnipeg get-dynamicdistributiongroup | set-dynamicdistributiongroup -identity "Winnipegdistributiongroup" -recipientfilter {city -eq Winnipeg} The command completes successfully and if I check the EAC it seems to have even worked. What could be causing none of the users to populate within the group though?
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 00:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 17:45 |
|
|
Methanar posted:I just tried to create a dynamic distribution group that contained all users that were listed as residing in the city Winnipeg Dynamic distribution groups do not have a membership, the recipients are calculated at the time the email is sent. You can preview what the membership would look like by opening the DDL in EMC, going to the filter tab and clicking on preview. If you're doing that and the preview is not turning anyone up then there's likely something wrong with your filter. You can test the filter by doing a Get-Recipient -ResultSize Unlimited -Filter { City -eq "Winnipeg" }, if that returns results the DDL should as well and if it doesn't you can mess with the filter here until it returns who you're looking for.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 00:20
|
|
|
PS C:\Users\administrator.PINSKE> Get-Recipient -resultsize unlimited -filter { city -eq "Winnipeg" } Name RecipientType ---- ------------- Bob dole UserMailbox Well then. It all seems to be working but I just can't send email through the group. Okay I figured it out, it was being applied to a very (very) poorly named OU. Thanks for the help. Methanar fucked around with this message at 01:39 on Sep 22, 2015 |
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 01:34
|
|
|
Newbie question. Is there a way I can prevent a user that has been disabled in AD from showing up in the global address list of Office 365?
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 18:31
|
|
|
Coredump posted:Newbie question. Is there a way I can prevent a user that has been disabled in AD from showing up in the global address list of Office 365? From Powershell: Set-Mailbox -Identity user@domain.com -HiddenFromAddressListsEnabled $true
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 19:01
|
|
|
mayodreams posted:From Powershell: I tried that. Problem is office 365 won't let you do that because the user is an AD user. Seems like it wants you to do it on an exchange server on premise but we don't have one, thus office 365. quote:The operation on mailbox "user" failed because it's out of the current user's write scope. The action
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 21:10
|
|
|
Coredump posted:I tried that. Problem is office 365 won't let you do that because the user is an AD user. Seems like it wants you to do it on an exchange server on premise but we don't have one, thus office 365.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 21:14
|
|
|
Alright, gonna try that and wait for replication and see how it does. Thanks for the suggestion! Edit: I think... its not possible? https://community.office365.com/en-us/f/148/t/280163 community.office365.com posted:However, currently syncing Exchange related attributes without on-premises Exchange servers installed is not officially supported in our forum, since many potential issues could occur in the scenario that we extend the Exchange related attributes where no on-premises Exchange server is deployed, and we have limited resources about the issues. AND https://community.office365.com/en-us/f/148/t/357377?ss quote:Q: Do you have any way to show only enabled users on global address book as office 365? Coredump fucked around with this message at 22:01 on Sep 22, 2015 |
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 21:43
|
|
|
You can kick replication off manually - just hit run on the scheduled task
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 21:55
|
|
|
Coredump posted:I tried that. Problem is office 365 won't let you do that because the user is an AD user. Seems like it wants you to do it on an exchange server on premise but we don't have one, thus office 365. I am fairly certain I did that in O365. I'll try and find what I did.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 22:19
|
|
|
If you're going to manage everything from on-prem and are using AD sync then this might be what you're after: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2939261
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 22:51
|
|
|
Hey holy poo poo the address is no longer showing. Hooray I did a thing! Thanks for the help everyone.
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2015 14:19
|
|
|
Methanar posted:PS C:\Users\administrator.PINSKE> Get-Recipient -resultsize unlimited -filter { city -eq "Winnipeg" } I manage and deal with hundreds of DDL's in O365, the way I test them real time is to do the following code:Then use it to generate the recipient preview filter code:
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2015 20:29
|
|
|
I have a site where there are 15 staff and a requirement that no email in the Exchange environment gets deleted ever. What is the best solution for me? Exchange Online + put In Place Hold on everybody?
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2015 16:23
|
|
|
Is that not a huge legal liability?
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2015 16:27
|
|
|
Methanar posted:Is that not a huge legal liability? Yes, it is.
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2015 16:36
|
|
|
There are tons of exchange archiving solutions out there to take care of that requirement since it's something that's common with a publicly traded company due to SOX regs.
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2015 17:11
|
|
|
bull3964 posted:There are tons of exchange archiving solutions out there to take care of that requirement since it's something that's common with a publicly traded company due to SOX regs. Right but I don't know anything about any of them other than their names. Is there a reason not use the built in Exchange functionality - would that not meet my req? I know these mail archiving solutions existed before Exch 2010 had online archive built in, and certainly before Exchange Online had all their ediscovery/legal hold/dlp stuff baked in.. So is there any value in the third party stuff at this point?
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2015 17:31
|
|
|
GFI Mail Archiver is leaps and bounds better than the Exchange built in functionality.
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2015 17:37
|
|
|
Any opinions on mimecast for the archiving piece (since we're using for spam mgmt anyway)
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2015 17:44
|
|
|
I've used that too and like everything mimecast, it is very good. If you have a mimecast rep see if they'll let you trial the archive part, usually they will since it is buco bucks for them
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2015 18:12
|
|
|
Mimecast archiving is good. Since you're new to it all I'd recommend that over whatever MS can bolt onto Office 365 since the support is a lot better, and they will help you with getting it all started up.
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2015 19:28
|
|
|
Thanks everyone I talked to my mimecast rep!
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2015 20:16
|
|
|
idk if this belongs in this thread but: I have an RDS server where people can run Office applications including Outlook*. With Exchange Online, Outlook runs like poo poo unless I have cached mode enabled. So I have cached mode enabled and it's eating up a bunch of space quickly with the OSTs. My question: what's the Right Thing to do here? * lmk if I need to explain why we're doing this to begin with
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2015 21:18
|
|
|
cached mode is generally the preferred method unless both your exchange server and outlook client live on the same LAN subnet.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2015 21:29
|
|
|
Are you open to the idea of publishing Office as a RemoteApp on Azure? You might have more luck running non-cached if you're in the same datacenters.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2015 21:38
|
|
|
NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:idk if this belongs in this thread but: If you have Outloook 2013+ you can only sync a week\month's worth of mail in the cache. It will increase slower but if your people have multi-gig mailboxes you'll buy yourself some time. Auto-archiving older mail, perhaps? You're gonna have a great time if your users do what mine do, and add each other's mailboxes. You'll end up storing everyones mail 50 times in various OSTs. Hurrah! Edit - I assume Outlook is required to be in RDS. But you could run it locally and sync via Outlook Anywhere. Swink fucked around with this message at 00:38 on Sep 29, 2015 |
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2015 00:31
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:Are you open to the idea of publishing Office as a RemoteApp on Azure? You might have more luck running non-cached if you're in the same datacenters. Negative, I need office on the same machine as these database applications that are on prem Swink posted:If you have Outloook 2013+ you can only sync a week\month's worth of mail in the cache. It will increase slower but if your people have multi-gig mailboxes you'll buy yourself some time. What I really want is a gpo that says "if OST gets to be over 5gb, don't cache the oldest stuff" or something like that. quote:You're gonna have a great time if your users do what mine do, and add each other's mailboxes. You'll end up storing everyones mail 50 times in various OSTs. Hurrah!
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2015 02:26
|
|
|
If I could map the OS mailto: to compose a new email in OWA that would be cool.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2015 02:30
|
|
|
We're launching a new initiative on mail data management: Operation "Drag the F* Email to a Network Share Folder if it Needs to Be Shared With Your Peers and/or Kept for Longer Than a Year." This initiative has been pioneered by student clerks in our office with associates degrees in Common Sense who have started moving info out of mail and into an actual, shareable, easily-searchable piece of wizardry called a "filesystem." Wish us luck.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2015 04:39
|
|
|
Yeah, good luck with that. You're going to need it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2015 05:20
|
|
|
NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:If I could map the OS mailto: to compose a new email in OWA that would be cool. Pretty sure this will do that for you. http://www.owatray.com/
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2015 13:05
|
|
|
Potato Salad posted:We're launching a new initiative on mail data management: Operation "Drag the F* Email to a Network Share Folder if it Needs to Be Shared With Your Peers and/or Kept for Longer Than a Year." This initiative has been pioneered by student clerks in our office with associates degrees in Common Sense who have started moving info out of mail and into an actual, shareable, easily-searchable piece of wizardry called a "filesystem." Wish us luck. that sucks rear end man sorry
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2015 19:16
|
|
|
Pop the bottles, exchange 2013 SP2 was released.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 00:18
|
|
|
incoherent posted:Pop the bottles, exchange 2013 SP2 was released. And by that I assume you mean Exchange 2016?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 03:12
|
|
|
incoherent posted:Pop the bottles, exchange 2013 SP2 was released. Eh?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 07:36
|
|
|
CU10 was released a couple weeks back?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 13:33
|
|
|
Maneki Neko posted:And by that I assume you mean Exchange 2016?  The flimsiest of feature updates to keep SA customers happy. It will sell adequately, but i'll be surprised if we see a version of exchange after Exchange 2018.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2015 01:29
|
|
|
incoherent posted:
oh come on this "cloud" trend will surely be over by 2018 and we'll all be ready to come back to prem exchange.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2015 06:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 17:45 |
|
|
On Prem Exchange and Sharepoint must be the biggest drag on their support. Question: I need a way to mark an incoming email based on which alias smtp address was used. I've got users with multiple alias' but the users aren't able to tell which address the sender used. Is this doable? I'd just want to append a text-flag to the end of the email or something. I'm on Exchange 2010
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2015 07:11
|
|