|
MeLKoR posted:Hahaha this motherfucker doesn't even play the game, how much does he work on it do you think? Is he furiously coding in bed while Sandi snuggles up to him and tries to seduce him only to be rebuffed with "not now honey, I have to finish coding the procedural generation"? Is that what you think he's doing? You stupid mongoloids, you deserve everything that is coming. He's spent the majority of the last year in a mocap studio in the UK. He's barely even involved anymore.
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 01:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 18:59 |
|
|
The main issue is that they are right now, in December 2015, is where they should have been and needed to be in December 2013. From the list on the CIG forums, they have 26 ship variants flyable, they have 105 or so planned. Many of the current ships are horribly broken and really can't be considered complete, and several have rework planned. They have one star system complete, about 100 planned. They would have a hard time being set up to release in 2017. And of course the overarching problem, by putting an FPS inside their Space game, they're going to end up with a substandard quality FPS inside a substandard space game due to the limitations and compromises needed to join them. Final question: Did they drop the individual thruster simulations with damage states idiocy? Seems like it was sacrificed to the gods of netcode, exactly as predicted here.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 01:56
|
|
|
Comedy Gold. Do stay for the comments https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/3wuo1c/star_citizen_21_before_christmas_as_of_10ftc/
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 01:57
|
|
|
Eonwe posted:The reason the ED one maybe doesn't look 'as good' is because its real and they take the approach of make it work and then make it flashy What was hilarious was seeing the broad level of detail of the planet surface, and then the completely incongruous landing zone bit where they'd actually made cliff faces and rocks and so on - it stuck out like a sore thumb. This is what makes the E:D planetary stuff good; the interesting (and contextually accurate) landscapes they've made with vast canyons, overlapping craters etc. The SC stuff from tonight looked like a low-detail generic noise map surface, albeit with some decent atmosphere vfx. As a counterpoint, the ship design stuff is really cool and I would love to see Derek go even more apeshit if and when this ridiculous game was somehow released in a half-decent form that generated lots of sales.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 01:57
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:Comedy Gold. Do stay for the comments Star Citizen: Edit: The List got deleted by CIG
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:00
|
|
|
Gryphon0468 posted:You are a failure and need psychological help. Call 911. He's a doozy
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:03
|
|
|
Eonwe posted:The reason the ED one maybe doesn't look 'as good' is because its real and they take the approach of make it work and then make it flashy Namaste
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:04
|
|
|
I get out from work to this glorious 500 posts. Thank you Star Citizen, your entertainment has been absolutely gratifying. This
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:06
|
|
|
Eonwe posted:The reason the ED one maybe doesn't look 'as good' is because its real and they take the approach of make it work and then make it flashy Atmospherics make things look purty. I think thats the main difference.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:08
|
|
|
mashed_penguin posted:Atmospherics make things look purty. I think thats the main difference. Hell, just look what a fairly simple atmospheric filter does for something as cartoony as KSP: 
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:18
|
|
|
lmao Anybody notice in Christ Roberts stream that the dude who tried to salute Christ in-game, had his model get stuck in the T-position immediately. Right in front of Christ Roberts. That was fantastic, I honestly hope that was shitizen. If it was goon, well done, haha. http://www.twitch.tv/starcitizen/v/30277203 Time: 2:40:40
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:18
|
|
|
 Yeah, I'm sure admiral superdick here is only in for $30.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:23
|
|
|
Bait and Swatch posted:Star Citizen: Edit: The List got deleted by CIG The Million Mile High Club: (An exclusive bar only accessible to early backers.) Character Customizer (armor / Clothes) Increase number of supported players FPS cover system FPS Starts/Stops FPS Aim/look pose separation Physicalized EVA Holotable improvement Main menu art FPS Hit reaction FPS No weapon locomotion FPS P4AR polish FPS ArcLight polish SPACEFLIGHT UI optimization SPACEFLIGHT Focus Mode polish
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:24
|
|
|
hanales posted:I'm downloading the full broadcast now in case it gets edited/deleted. If anyone wants gifs/highlights let me know a timestamp and I will see what I can do (or if you want the full video I can upload it somewhere, it's about 2GB) I was hoping that someone was going to archive this, as I can see it being deleted from the twitch archive very quickly. The whole thing is a goldmine of fuckups... I wondered what the hell was happening when the audio from the beginning of the livestream started again whilst Chris was trying to sort out his computer. The point that Chris doesn't know his way around the game speaks volumes. lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:25
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:The Million Mile High Club: (An exclusive bar only accessible to early backers.)
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:28
|
|
|
1500 posted:After 6 weeks, CIG denied my request for a refund. When did you first pledge? I'm just wondering what version of the TOS you fall under. (Not that that's any justification, that refund denial was bullshit anyways.)
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:31
|
|
|
This is the song, written 'bout the livestream, This is the stream, Derek and Chris, He triiiiied to kill me with a news van, ole!
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:32
|
|
|
I can't help but roll my eyes at the Shitzens who think that procedural planet gen means something. Its another flashy commercial to sell jpegs. It is long past the point where flashy commercials and trailers matter. It is put your money where your mouth is time. You've had 4 years and produced a portion of content that should have been available two years ago and barely represents anything promised. Even if you have procedural planetary generation, so what? The game is so badly optimized it has trouble running on a computer with SLI Titans, a machine that can conceivably run any game ever made on the highest settings at 4k. How do you think it is going to handle planetary generation with that level of fidelity (hint: it won't). Also, explain to me the logic of putting in procedural planetary generation when: You have released jack and poo poo regarding squadron 42, except for developers who had to make pew pew noises at PC gamer journalists because there wasn't even anything to show for it, major systems are still missing (the whole game part) and how are you going from a 16 player instance to a seamless world with thousands of players? Also mushmouth hasn't even played his own loving game. And lol at these retards complaining about ED when the average shitzen is in for $90+ and people who paid $180 don't even get the loving game included (which coincidentally, is the lifetime price for ED). These people are so loving stupid it boggles my mind
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:36
|
|
|
Sarsapariller posted:
Just like the 64-Bit bullshit, this is just more of the same. In fact, if you compare the video trailer and the live play through, it's very easy to see how they used post-processing on the video because all the flaws are quite visible in the live play through, even with the compression of the TwitchTV stream. They do this. All the time. They do these tech proof-of-concept for which half the poo poo either gets trashed, or is released in a shoddy fashion. Fan boys lap it up; then go give them money. They have yet to deliver even 10% of a game promised, but they're pissing around with a stretch goal for a feature that was promised *after* the loving game was delivered. Think about that for a minute. Those engineers could be working on the loving game. But no, they needed something new to show.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:39
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:Just like the 64-Bit bullshit, this is just more of the same. In fact, if you compare the video trailer and the live play through, it's very easy to see how they used post-processing on the video because all the flaws are quite visible in the live play through, even with the compression of the TwitchTV stream. Can you go into this a bit more? I'm trying to understand what about the reveal, particularly the live demonstration, indicates they're not being honest.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:43
|
|
|
This Killzone 2 game is pretty cool. Is the promotional video going to be the same quality as the final product? I hear it'll release in 4 years.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:44
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:44
|
|
|
Reddit trying to justify the SQ42/PU split as "always part of the plan" is some jaw dropping revisionism. Check out this clown who says "early backers have already gotten both games" without a hint of irony or awareness of what a released game looks like https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/3x4l8v/star_citizen_and_squadron_42_will_be_separated/cy1jmxq
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:45
|
|
|
MeLKoR posted:Really, today Chris Roberts admitted live on air that it was the first time he was seeing the chat interface in his game. He couldn't even get his own game started on a 100% controlled environment, I'm absolutely flabbergasted, this is loving huge. Yup. That's where we are now. He looked completed out of touch. Fish out of water money. This is the end folks. They end.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:45
|
|
|
Atheist Sunglasses posted:Derek how do you feel about Croberts quote which was most likely aimed at you: I didn't catch that. Do you have a time stamp in the stream. But if he knows I'm tweeting all the time, then he must have people reporting to him about my tweeting habits. I'm flattered that they still keep tabs on me. Which is great because it means they're paying attention to me.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:46
|
|
|
 https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/3x50zr/to_the_star_citizen_community_thank_you/
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:46
|
|
|
Mirificus posted:Why would they take it down? Because some nasty, evil, faithless, heathen cur might hold them to it…
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:47
|
|
|
Eonwe posted:The reason the ED one maybe doesn't look 'as good' is because its real and they take the approach of make it work and then make it flashy It will work perfectly for the intelligent cats evolving after WWIII killed off all humans in 3715 AD. They will marvel at Chris' prowess as video game producer human thing. Especially when they see development only stopped literally days before the bombs fell. Only 1704 years! Those humans were smart! Their sarcasm will be so biting, it'll open a hole in time and space itself, swallowing the Earth and ending all life forever.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:48
|
|
|
Lol at least shill that madcatz hotass idiots
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:49
|
|
|
Tippis posted:Because some nasty, evil, faithless, heathen cur might hold them to it…
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:51
|
|
|
Mirificus posted:Is this what open development looks like? It's open like a CYOA game. Get an outcome you didn't like? Good thing you kept your finger on that last page 
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:52
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:Comedy Gold. Do stay for the comments Why are they even pretending to commit to 2.1 before Christmas? I thought they would have enough trouble as it is getting 2.0 live. They made every whale's Christmas by delivering 2.0, giving them false hope for 2.1 is just going to leave them frustrated and quietly stewing. What is the over-under that they will release a bug fix patch in the next week and call it 2.1? "The stability in this patch is so good that we are naming it 2.1"
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:53
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:Yup. That's where we are now. He looked completed out of touch. Fish out of water money. This is the end folks. They end. I disagree with you on this. If they were smart about it they could easily drag this on for years. Even if they are dumb they should easily make it through the drier patches until the next big sale, a minimum of 18 months if nothing spectacular happened. I admit though that I can't make heads or tails of their actions, they have ramped the money grabbing to 11 and everything they do screams desperation but there is no way they could have blown through most of $100 million is there? Even if they had, unless they had committed to further expenses beyond the normal development costs they should be able to bring in $30 million per year without too much effort. It's too big to fail at this point, they'll have no lack of whales willing to throw in good money after bad in a dire spot so why this desperate money grab?
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:56
|
|
|
The funniest thing about Chris hating the chat so much is that I'm pretty sure you can easily enter it just by pressing enter. Also if you want to hear him rail about it yourself, click here and skip to 2:37:40. It's amazing.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:56
|
|
|
The funniest thing to come out of star citizen is the footage of Roberts breaking the game and then stupidly tapping buttons and hitting keys like a toddler pretending to type. I don't think he's ever demoed his movie without this happening to the point where It feels like any progress made on the actual game (lol) is reset the second croberts gets his hands on it in live from studio environment and wrecks poo poo so much that it basically pushes development back to square one.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:57
|
|
|
the dreams happening were the dreams of Chris being a literal crazypants ideas guy who walks around and then sits down in front of his game and has no idea what it looks like and hates the interface
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:58
|
|
|
Not sure who I like more, Christ Roberts or Robert Durst.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:58
|
|
|
This bit made me lol where they faded from a video to Chris without sound, then to the ATV studio desk, and they didn't know they were live for quite a few seconds. Their livestreams and shows make Bruce Wagner of OnlyOneTV look professional.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:59
|
|
|
hanales posted:I'm downloading the full broadcast now in case it gets edited/deleted. If anyone wants gifs/highlights let me know a timestamp and I will see what I can do (or if you want the full video I can upload it somewhere, it's about 2GB) Steampunk Santa rolling in at 2:31:10, please!
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 18:59 |
|
|
Mirificus posted:Is this what open development looks like? Yes. For certain values of “open” and “development”.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 03:01
|
|