|
also yeah ##vote dj
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 06:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 16:44 |
|
|
Aren't Mystics the ones who know exactly how many scum remain each day?EXAKT Science posted:Still think it's big up for similar reasons to yesterday and also due to the lack of hammer. Just to clarify, you think bigup was scum because of the lack of a hammer, so scum are likely to be among those who didn't vote for him?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 06:33
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:Still think it's big up for similar reasons to yesterday and also due to the lack of hammer. Also the scums probably like mafia because they killed a lurker, so that's something to think about I don't think lack of hammer means anything. I don't know how many people were here, and scum would be happy to keep another big distraction around for another day.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 06:34
|
|
|
 Wow rude
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 07:11
|
|
|
I don't really know what to think of big right now, but I'm inclined to vote for him. but i also have a feeling in my gut that this is just a big distraction
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 07:14
|
|
|
Gnomevotecount for Day 2  Bigup DJ (2): EXAKT Science, totino boy Not Voting (11): Asiina, Bigup DJ, Chic Trombone, Epsilon Plus, imgay, JakeP, Kashuno, Murmur Twin, Puntification, Somberbrero, TommunistWith 13 gnomes, it's 7 gnomevotes to lynch. The current gnomedeadline is January 06th, 2016 at 10 p.m. EST -- that's in about 2 days, 20 hours. Please leave a comment on this webzone if you would like a pizza roll.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 07:26
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:Still think it's big up for similar reasons to yesterday and also due to the lack of hammer. Also the scums probably like mafia because they killed a lurker, so that's something to think about can you clarify this at all for me? so far as i can tell the case is that he shitposted and scumclaimed.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 09:00
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:Still think it's big up for similar reasons to yesterday and also due to the lack of hammer. Also the scums probably like mafia because they killed a lurker, so that's something to think about HMMMMM THIS SOUNDS LIKE SOMEONE I KNOW ##vote exakt
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 13:12
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:Still think it's big up for similar reasons to yesterday and also due to the lack of hammer. Also the scums probably like mafia because they killed a lurker, so that's something to think about ##vote EXAKT My opinion hasn't really changed. Also, the vague word choice above ("similar reasons to yesterday" as opposed to "for scumclaiming") makes me think EXAKT is constructing a lie instead of sharing an honest opinion.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 15:07
|
|
|
What kind of a maniac puts a deadline on new years day? sorry/notsorry etc.Murmur Twin posted:My opinion hasn't really changed. Also, the vague word choice above ("similar reasons to yesterday" as opposed to "for scumclaiming") makes me think EXAKT is constructing a lie instead of sharing an honest opinion. Why does vagueness make it more likely to be deceit in this scenario? Are you implying he's hoping that the ambiguity will lead people to think his reasons are better than they are or something?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 15:25
|
|
|
i forget what s happening except that I remember bigup dj was playing some really good mafia and shouldn't be lynched forhis bravery
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 15:37
|
|
|
Murmur is also probably scum, imo
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 16:03
|
|
|
holy poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 16:05
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:Murmur is also probably scum, imo because...
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 16:21
|
|
|
Puntification posted:Why does vagueness make it more likely to be deceit in this scenario? Are you implying he's hoping that the ambiguity will lead people to think his reasons are better than they are or something? In this case, I think that the vagueness is a tell. Even if we ignore EXAKT's meta When I try and look at the game from the point of view of a town EXAKT, my response to a vote on BigUp petering out would be to case the people who didn't vote there. EXAKT Science posted:Yeah, because you screwed yours up. I'm also casting a sideways glance at the way Somber is calling me a good vote but it's also hedging his bets on me. Somberbrero posted:Yeah, I don't think bigup is a smart move. I'm playing board games and being rude right now but I will check back in. Like for example, if EXAKT had an eye on Somber on D1 and then Somber was one of the deciding votes leading to not hammering BigUp. I find it suspicious that EXAKT doesn't have anything to say about that and is instead focused on BigUp "for reasons similar to yesterday". EXAKT Science posted:Murmur is also probably scum, imo What makes you say this?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 17:01
|
|
|
She's pushing a bad case, and I've seen her jump on an early case super seriously as scum before
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 17:01
|
|
|
Like, one of your very first posts was casing me super seriously, which, tonally, did not fit with the rest of the discussion that was happening at the time
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 17:02
|
|
|
Somber is pinging me, but in the past, when I'm town and he's vocal about how he thinks I'm scum, he's town
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 17:04
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:Like, one of your very first posts was casing me super seriously, which, tonally, did not fit with the rest of the discussion that was happening at the time I saw something that I viewed as suspicious and made a case based on it. Are you saying I shouldn't have done so because we were in jokephase?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 17:10
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:Like, one of your very first posts was casing me super seriously, which, tonally, did not fit with the rest of the discussion that was happening at the time How is that a criticism?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 17:23
|
|
|
~tone~
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 17:27
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:~tone~ I dunno what you are trying to argue here.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 17:32
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:She's pushing a bad case, and I've seen her jump on an early case super seriously as scum before EXAKT Science posted:Like, one of your very first posts was casing me super seriously, which, tonally, did not fit with the rest of the discussion that was happening at the time Out of curiosity, do you think it's scummy that I didn't vote BigUp to break up the no lynch
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 17:37
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:Out of curiosity, do you think it's scummy that I didn't vote BigUp to break up the no lynch? mafia edit, don't know where my question mark went
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 17:38
|
|
|
Yeah, a bit. It means that we're now in day 1 2.0 and are going to have the same dead-end conversations add yesterday since we only have the flip if someone with like two game-related posts, and it's the flip from a night kill rather than a dunk
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 18:44
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:Yeah, a bit. It means that we're now in day 1 2.0 and are going to have the same dead-end conversations add yesterday since we only have the flip if someone with like two game-related posts, and it's the flip from a night kill rather than a dunk I agree with this statement, in that my failure to prevent a no-lynch is more incriminating than my having a serious tone on D1 when I made a case. Why not mention it when you originally cased me?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 19:51
|
|
|
I think EXAKT has a pretty bad case on both DJ and MMT so far
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 19:57
|
|
|
what does that make you think about exacts alignment
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 20:03
|
|
|
JakeP posted:what does that make you think about exacts alignment I am already voting exakt.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 20:07
|
|
|
I'd vote exact if you can convince me that his "bad cases" were made maliciously in order to force a lynch and weren't made in good faith of scum hunting
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 20:16
|
|
|
ok
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 20:37
|
|
|
Does anyone not from New England have anything to say about anything?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 22:22
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:Does anyone not from New England have anything to say about anything? pls don't locationshame tia.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 22:26
|
|
|
drat mmt don't want me to speak anymorr
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 22:28
|
|
|
imgay posted:drat mmt don't want me to speak anymorr I never knew you were from NE and my role PM doesn't say I dislike you this time around, so please feel free to speak 
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 22:37
|
|
|
JakeP posted:I'd vote exact if you can convince me that his "bad cases" were made maliciously in order to force a lynch and weren't made in good faith of scum hunting What makes you think there was a good faith attempt? If anything you've mostly laughed off the BigUp case. Why would it make sense for you to back up Exakt here?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 22:41
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:What makes you think there was a good faith attempt? If anything you've mostly laughed off the BigUp case. Why would it make sense for you to back up Exakt here? im not saying that or doing that, i haven't reread anything and was telling Kash I would vote with him if he could show me that the votes he called bad were scum votes, and not just a towny trying to generate some content
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 23:10
|
|
|
like calling someones votes bad to me has nothing to do with that persons alignment in and of itself, being wrong is a town tell if anything, it comes down to why the cases/votes were wrong and thats what I want Kash's opinion on if he actually feels confident about the statement he made
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 23:11
|
|
|
If someone is scum, doesn't making a bad case that allows them to dodge the lunch make sense on its own? Town have no motivation to make 'bad' cases and I think that it's apparent that the case on DJ is bad, because no one can take the time to actually explain its merit. If the case is not bad, then I'd like someone to explain it to me in a way that is at least a little bit compelling.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 23:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 16:44 |
|
|
Somberbrero posted:If someone is scum, doesn't making a bad case that allows them to dodge the lunch make sense on its own? Town have no motivation to make 'bad' cases and I think that it's apparent that the case on DJ is bad, because no one can take the time to actually explain its merit. If the case is not bad, then I'd like someone to explain it to me in a way that is at least a little bit compelling. Is this a hypothetical or are you saying that is what happened?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2016 23:30
|
|