|
VivaNova posted:I assumed scum would prefer to be in battle. This is a strange assumption.
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 02:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 17:07 |
|
|
VivaNova posted:I assumed scum would prefer to be in battle. Not quite: quote:- The scum get a nightkill that they may use during the Battle phase. The scum player performing the nightkill must NOT be in the battle themselves, and likewise the target of the kill must not be conscripted for battle either. If there are no free scum players to perform a kill because they are all in battle, then there can be no nightkill that phase.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 02:05
|
|
|
GOD DAMMIT KASH
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 02:05
|
|
|
smh podima........
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 02:07
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:This is a strange assumption. not really obv not all of them would want in but I imagine some stat allotments/maybe-the-cleric? would do better in thread then in battle, too null tell imo
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 02:08
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:Love this vote. It feels like a preemptive vote so you can say I'm OMGUSing you. Alternatively it was a vote because you outed yourself as scum. Sorry you suck at this game.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 02:10
|
|
|
Viva does your volunteer alignment question work on people other than 100yrs?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 02:13
|
|
|
BabeLiker90 posted:Alternatively it was a vote because you outed yourself as scum. Sorry you suck at this game. Because I'm curious why you included me in a list?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 02:15
|
|
|
Birdstrike posted:Viva does your volunteer alignment question work on people other than 100yrs? I suppose anyone who feels they should be lynched or catapulted D1 can speak up.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 02:21
|
|
|
Gwyn what do you think about the catapult claim?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 02:59
|
|
|
 The Current Day 1 Votecount   BabeLiker90 (3): Doktor Per, Birdstrike, Gwynplaine Doktor Per (2): 100YrsofAttitude, Podima Ridonkulous (2): Kashuno, Gamerofthegame TMMadman (2): Murmur Twin, BabeLiker90 bowmore (2): Tommunist, Rascyc King Burgundy (1): CapitalistPig Ixtlilton (1): CapitalistPig, -CapitalistPig, bowmore CapitalistPig (1): King Burgundy Gwynplaine (1): Max Kashuno (0): TMMadman, bowmore, -bowmore, -TMMadman Dominoes (0): Gamerofthegame, Birdstrike, -Birdstrike, -Gamerofthegame Podima (0): BabeLiker90, -BabeLiker90 Not Voting (10): Chic Trombone, Dominoes, EXAKT Science, fiery_valkyrie, Ixtlilton, Rarity, Ridonkulous, tithin, TMMadman, VivaNova With 25 players alive, it takes 13 votes to be executed.  The current deadline is January 11th, 2016 at 8 p.m. EST -- that's in about 2 days, 22 hours.Kermish politics are divided into two classes: the merchants and the matriarchs. The matriarchs enforce canon law on the land, but leave trade and sea travel for the merchants. In response, the merchants built the city of Ledola - "The City on Stilts" - twenty miles from shore.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 03:07
|
|
|
hi thread just a heads up I will be gone pretty almost the entirety of this weekend because I have all day plans tomorrow and I will be spending my Sunday studying for an exam that is more important than this game I hope you all understand!
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 03:09
|
|
|
Birdstrike posted:Gwyn what do you think about the catapult claim? I think it sounds hilarious. If it is true, it is more of a town power in the vein of being a vigilante. That said, the way this game works, it would be equally double edged for scum. Say its a scum power and you can use it to definitely launch and kill a member of the town your skulking in. For all you know, the person they hit will be the other teams town, which if your this towns scum, would be your own team. Overall though, a power where your conspicuously killing someone is generally town. For that reason, it would be a good thing to claim. I have one other thought and it's a little out there but level with me, strike. Does the arguement between tmm and babeliker remind you of anything?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 03:12
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:hi thread just a heads up I will be gone pretty almost the entirety of this weekend because I have all day plans tomorrow and I will be spending my Sunday studying for an exam that is more important than this game I hope you all understand! Good luck on your SATs!
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 03:19
|
|
|
Can you even study for SATs?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 03:21
|
|
|
Gwynplaine posted:I think it sounds hilarious. If it is true, it is more of a town power in the vein of being a vigilante. quote:I have one other thought and it's a little out there but level with me, strike. Probably not what you're thinking but Babeliker dropping a content less vote after TMM said he wouldn't engage with those reminds me of something Beet or your bro would do.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 03:22
|
|
|
Also! I promise to put in effort to at least be around for deadline Monday. I know it sucks that I won't get a ton of interactions in but my exam is Tuesday so after that I will be free to post a fuckton again!
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 03:22
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:Can you even study for SATs? yes
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 03:26
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:Can you even study for SATs? If you're a garbage student then yes 
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 03:27
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:Because I'm curious why you included me in a list? Because of your approach.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 03:52
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I'm a little curious about why diqnol included me in his catapult thoughts. He named me, Podima and Birdstrike as three people he is thinking about launching. Podima is who he is currently voting and Bird is one of the people who voted him last night (and he has said he thinks one of the votes on him is scum), but I'm not sure why I got included in the mix.However, I don't really know if I fully believe his claim, so I just let it go at the time. Also think it's curious that he left bowmore off his catapult list when he had earlier said that bowmore had the worst vote. While one of the votes on diqnol may be scum, I think it's more likely a scum bussing/distancing himself from diqnol.[/b] I want everyone to read this paragraph and tell me if the conclusions he draws are logically consistent or not
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 03:54
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:This is a strange assumption. Not really when Ecco specifically said in the giant OP that scum would want to be in battle to kill lots of townies. That's multiple possible nightkills instead of the one they get outside of battle.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 05:36
|
|
|
I'm also gonna ##unvote for now.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 05:55
|
|
|
Addressing Viva's question, that was something I had actually thought of as well when 100yrs volunteered to be launched. I don't see the reasoning behind it, because knowing your town and volunteering to be killed in the hopes of maybe hitting someone worth hitting in the other thread only really hamstrings us.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 05:57
|
|
|
Gonna just work my way through the thread in a chronological order. 100YrsofAttitude posted:##vote doktor per You could just post better? Forgoing your pointless joke vote? Thank you. That's a fair point. Last evening before crashing I really didn't like that people were joining up on BabeLiker for sleights I did not sense. Would have put in the effort to ##unvote had I feared any real danger to them. Who I must admit has become cooler than me ITT.  Now for reference, my read on the Podima vote was non-serious, but BabeLiker was clearly being hypocritical. I found it funny in a rude sort of way. I still don't have a strong enough read of anyone to want to really go all in on serious vote. (I'll be refraining from using my vote till I mean it from now on.) Podima posted:Doktor Per has contributed one joke vote and no actual content while trying to explicitly stay out of battle: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3759143&userid=111306 You have already been admonished for reading comprehension, I'll spare you the repeat. I feel there's more responsibility on Scum players (closely knit society that can gently caress one another over.) so it was the side I mentally prepared for joining. (Also hoping for scum insight as I most likely would be town) I reached the conclusion that Scum would always want to be in battle, in the rear guard. That way they can potentially attack any team member and minimum accidental friendly fire. So I assume many scum would claim "ranged characters" to just obliterate the front line, or cripple their ranged capabilities with a knife to the neck. Now Scum are about 5-7 players and only three spots in each row. So filling a team with scum seems unlikely (though awesome), and thus we should assume that it's best to avoid putting scum altogether in battle, unless you can fill your own team with scum completely. Which is a highly unlikely scenario. Although this could work in towns' advantage if the FRONT LINES are filled 100% with Scum, making them incapable of killing the ranged Townies. ~~~~~~~~ That stuff about battle did not help scum hunt, I admit. I want to believe that the town catapult is real, and I feel as if I've only seen about 12-14 names in the thread. Counting Team Mascot Venom Soag.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 07:37
|
|
|
Ok, there's 12 pages of posts to get through so my catchup is going to be a bit slow and sporadic but I'll be all good by this evening, pinky swearIxtlilton posted:f_v you seem unnecessarily aggressive about two posts. Are you scum this game? You do know what TM and Kash are like, right? I completely get where FV was coming from here. Why do you think being aggressive about it is inherently scummy?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 09:45
|
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:Ixt and I were you and TMM, Kash. Except now we are bff's. I thought I was your BFF 
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 09:46
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:Naw. How serious was this vote? Cause Cpig gonna Cpig and I don't think that's a valid reason to vote him in itself.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 09:48
|
|
|
Podima posted:Doing a reread and this jumped out at me: True or not it seems overpowered for scum to have. So maybe that's why? TMMadman posted:To me, it was plainly obvious what you were trying to do, so why should I bother to engage with it? He says and then follows up with  Shine on Madman, shine on!  BabeLiker90 posted:I want everyone to read this paragraph and tell me if the conclusions he draws are logically consistent or not Madman's mind it may very well be. I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt D1 if only because he is such an easy target to harp on and I know that I can have incredibly particular train of thoughts all to myself at times that no one else gets. It's not that unusual.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 09:49
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:Real question: 100 years, would you also volunteer to be the D1 lynch? No I wouldn't. Like I said there's a definite gain to the catapult in that we hit one of their guys making it a worthwhile sacrifice. I thought I explained this? 100YrsofAttitude posted:Like I said, I'm essentially vanilla, discounting my battle role, and unless we know who the scum is for sure I feel it's a bit of a crapshoot, and rather than risk shooting someone of actual importance better to go with a null choice in my opinion. It's especially due to the nature of the vig, it's not just killing someone in our game but rather an assault on there's, so that's the trade-off I see for it. If he was just weeding out only our thread then I think the circumstances are different since we need our town to stay alive, but here it's a 1:1 tradeoff so better send vanilla than risking a power role that we can still make use of. The other option I use here is a vig but you could apply it just as easily to an execution.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 09:50
|
|
|
Doktor Per posted:Gonna just work my way through the thread in a chronological order. I don't immediately like this but I don't have the time to revisit it right now. I've got work. I may check in tonight briefly but otherwise you'll have to wait for Sunday night. Good weekend to all.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 09:51
|
|
|
bowmore posted:nah because your probably scum and you are too hard to read because you post scummy all the time And here I thought your vote on Kash was a joke vote. I really don't like this, the game had only just started here and bowmore's already making alignment calls based on essentially no content. bowmore, please point to the posts that gave you that read (unless someone's called you on this already and I will get to it in my catchup in which case ignore  )
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 09:51
|
|
|
bowmore posted:nah I just prefer games that you are not in so i'm trying to fix the problem bowmore posted:bit early to have that read isn't it? this is a suss post I also don't like bowmore throwing shade on someone for defending Kash. It's too soon for someone to have a town read on Kash but it's fine for bowmore to have a "probably scum" read on Kash? However, at this point I'm not sure this is bowmore being scum, I think it might just be bowmore wanting to push that lynch due to a personal issue and not doing a very good job of it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 09:55
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:Hi friends! Hi Exakt, how are you? 
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 10:24
|
|
|
bowmore posted:I didn't mean it, I was just wondering what kind of response I would get I... Just... What?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 10:25
|
|
|
Ridonkulous posted:Can I vote because someone else voted because of personal feelings and nothing else? Why does someone voting out of personal feelings make them scum?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 10:26
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:So what do you think of the reactions? TM makes a really good point. Reaction tests are worthless if you don't analyse the results which bowmore hasn't done yet. I'm not going to put down a vote until I'm all caught up but if I was going to vote now, it would be on bowmore.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 10:32
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:I've been doing great, just moved south and in with my girlfriend. It's been ages since I played mafia so I don't recognize half the faces here, I was hoping to end up with some familiar faces so I'm happy I got Rarity/f_v/you in this game. D'awww I've been wondering where you disappeared to, good to see ya 
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 10:33
|
|
|
Ridonkulous posted:Why did you call out f_v? Hi, do you understand fun?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 10:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 17:07 |
|
|
Venom Soag posted:apparently i got replaced You live on forever in our hearts
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 10:35
|
|