|
Norns posted:I'll deal with a lot of poo poo. But saying the dead ghost of nando has autism is loving unacceptable. Learningcurve will be the judge of that thank you very much
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 20:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 00:27 |
|
|
learnincurve posted:With formula 1 cars the argument against closed cockpit is that no one has found a solution to them trapping drivers with a car on fire. Problem solved. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 20:17
|
|
|
I really want F1 to go back to crazy invention time, when a team developed something crazy and they got a huge advantage because of it and other teams tried to get it banned if they couldn't develop their own, that's what F1 is for me.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 20:24
|
|
|
MustardFacial posted:Problem solved. Yes, the addition of explosives on a F1 car is a really good idea.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 20:42
|
|
|
ImplicitAssembler posted:Yes, the addition of explosives on a F1 car is a really good idea. not any worse than a deathly electric field that runs through the cars bodywork that can kill anyone who touches the car anyways
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 20:46
|
|
|
F1 would be vastly improved if it became more like The Running Man.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 20:59
|
|
|
El Hefe posted:not any worse than a deathly electric field that runs through the cars bodywork that can kill anyone who touches the car anyways Yes, worse. Relatively easy to isolate with rubber gloves/boots. With this you would need marshalls in full bomb-disposal suits.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 21:07
|
|
|
ImplicitAssembler posted:Yes, worse. Relatively easy to isolate with rubber gloves/boots. With this you would need marshalls in full bomb-disposal suits. not really the explosives would only need to be strong enough to break the hinges or bolts or whatever is holding the canopy, rockets that send the canopy flying like in jets are not necessary.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 21:13
|
|
|
Solkanar512 posted:If they can figure it out with hydroplane boats which not only catch fire but also risk sinking at the same time, they can figure it out with F1 cars. they should get rid of all the safety equipment on those boats. they should be prepared to die. safety is dumb and bad.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 21:30
|
|
|
You may mock but this is just another thing that will be quietly dropped when no one will agree on anything that is another team's idea just in case it gives them some sort of secret advantage. Just watched the FIA 2007 season review and it's like a magical story of a marriage that quickly turns to poo poo with bitterness and recrimination, cheating, snitching, the loss of £150,000.000, more bitterness, more cheating, and then suddenly Kimi.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 21:58
|
|
|
I love to poo poo my pants.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 22:07
|
|
|
be nice wicka posted:they should get rid of all the safety equipment on those boats. they should be prepared to die. safety is dumb and bad. They need to think of more ways to kill the drivers faster.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 22:08
|
|
|
El Hefe posted:not really the explosives in exploding bolts are only a little more powerful than a firecracker, they're just shaped so they cut through the steel. Really, all you need is those and the driver can pop the rest of the canopy off themselves.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 22:12
|
|
|
El Hefe posted:not really And a flying bolt is safe how? Also, the crash structure would have to be strong enough that it can still be opened after a severe crash. I'm not sure how many G's a regular road car is exposed to in crash tests, but probably not as much as a F1 car and you still end up with doors that cannot be opened after a crash.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 22:14
|
|
|
ImplicitAssembler posted:And a flying bolt is safe how? Also, the crash structure would have to be strong enough that it can still be opened after a severe crash. I'm not sure how many G's a regular road car is exposed to in crash tests, but probably not as much as a F1 car and you still end up with doors that cannot be opened after a crash. Let's get rid of seatbelts because I had this dream once where the person wearing a belt drove into a wall and was cut in half by the belt.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 22:17
|
|
|
Just ban auto racing and hold the championship on iRacing.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 22:17
|
|
|
El Hefe posted:not really Exactly! Every car you drive today that has an air bag has a bomb directed toward your loving face FFS
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 22:18
|
|
|
Just get a bunch of safety experts, give them a max amount of money their proposals can cost and do whatever they say. Don't let the teams have a say, there's more than enough boring gridlock politics already
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 22:21
|
|
|
learnincurve posted:You may mock but this is just another thing that will be quietly dropped when no one will agree on anything that is another team's idea just in case it gives them some sort of secret advantage. seriously shut the gently caress up
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 22:25
|
|
|
Preseason testing can't come fast enough then you idiots can shut up about all this theoretical horseshit and get onto analyzing the glorious 2016 McLaren Honda car and how quickly it'll wrap up both championships
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 22:35
|
|
|
be nice wicka posted:seriously shut the gently caress up 
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 22:41
|
|
|
El Hefe posted:I really want F1 to go back to crazy invention time, when a team developed something crazy and they got a huge advantage because of it and other teams tried to get it banned if they couldn't develop their own, that's what F1 is for me. This is a good opinion
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 23:02
|
|
|
Günther Steiner has to be up to something, watch Haas pull a Brawn and then Ferrari call shenanigans.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 23:12
|
|
|
learnincurve posted:Günther Steiner has to be up to something, watch Haas pull a Brawn and then Ferrari call shenanigans. probably plotting how to more efficiently kill his drivers
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 23:31
|
|
|
ImplicitAssembler posted:And a flying bolt is safe how? The bolts aren't going to be pointing at the drivers face you jerkass. They'll likely be housed in a carbon fibre channel to prevent the sheared bolts from bouncing around inside the cockpit. But go ahead and keep freaking out about easily solvable problems.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2016 00:16
|
|
|
gently caress this thread is even worse then usual atm.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2016 00:20
|
|
|
MustardFacial posted:The bolts aren't going to be pointing at the drivers face you jerkass. They'll likely be housed in a carbon fibre channel to prevent the sheared bolts from bouncing around inside the cockpit. But go ahead and keep freaking out about easily solvable problems. tbf i think literally everyone involved has decided that exploding bolts would be an added danger and are not the solution to being trapped in a canopy
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2016 00:23
|
|
|
I haven't seen a Claire Williams post in pages so this thread is indeed quite bad right now.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2016 02:38
|
|
|
Norns posted:This is a good opinion Hell, it might be the best garbage he has posted in the thread
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2016 03:05
|
|
|
Mercedes already has the technology to blow doors open https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMNVVHI2ZNg
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2016 03:15
|
|
|
1500quidporsche posted:F1 would be vastly improved if it became more like The Running Man. quote:Nico Rosberg: [to Lewis Hamilton] You cold-blooded bastard! I'll tell you what I think of it: I live to see you eat that contract, but I hope you leave enough room for my fist because I'm going to ram it into your stomach and break your god-drat spine!
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2016 03:57
|
|
|
geeves posted:Running Man quote Hamilton to Nico after a Hamilton race win: "What's the matter now bitch, why aren't you laughing?"
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2016 05:41
|
|
|
Wait so is Lewis killian or dynamo
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2016 06:04
|
|
|
Farmland Park posted:Mercedes already has the technology to blow doors open https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMNVVHI2ZNg there you go they even have the tech and all
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2016 08:06
|
|
|
Rev. Dr. Moses P. Lester posted:I haven't seen a Claire Williams post in pages so this thread is indeed quite bad right now. I'd explode Claire Williams' bolts, if you know what I mean fellas? That work?
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2016 11:04
|
|
|
Hey does anyone else remember the 191? Man what a great looking car, amirite guys?
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2016 11:08
|
|
|
Somewhat F1 related... apparently EX F1 driver Robert Doornbos sells sex toys now.... https://www.foxsports.com.au/motors...2b0b11509fbb6e9
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2016 11:19
|
|
|
Dudley posted:I'd explode Claire Williams' bolts, if you know what I mean fellas? Surely it would be your bolt that would explode?
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2016 12:12
|
|
|
be nice wicka posted:tbf i think literally everyone involved has decided that exploding bolts would be an added danger and are not the solution to being trapped in a canopy Because that hasn't worked in fighter jets for the last 60-odd years...
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2016 13:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 00:27 |
|
|
Barnsy posted:Because that hasn't worked in fighter jets for the last 60-odd years... you have to be some kind of retard to think that the standards for what's considered acceptably "safe" in a fighter jet are comparable to racing cars.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2016 13:28
|
|