|
imgay posted:i haven't logged in in awhile, been up in the korean game too deep dont miss the value man
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 06:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 20:50 |
|
|
i guess, i can't figure out the reason i keep playing this game though oh thats why
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 06:22
|
|
|
lol thats ridiculous
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 06:40
|
|
|
dont be shaming me
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 06:46
|
|
|
so hey lets lynch anon. Like i jailed her 2 nights in a row and no kills happened so thats a thing, but with this whole summon thing, even if she ends up flipping town, then at that point lil mac is confirmed town based on anons claim. There is way to much of a likelihood based on my claim that anon was the scum attempting the night kill the first 2 nights, and the worst case scenario of lynching her is we end up with a confirmed town player. Cant lose
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 08:14
|
|
|
Ya but giving littlemac a night lets him make another scum
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 08:18
|
|
|
Also mad dumbsaying scum comes back as confirmed town since they already would know who the scum team is. Why would u claim something so retarded anarc
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 08:31
|
|
|
##vote Little Mac
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 09:02
|
|
|
You're right that is dumb. But that's not at all what I said or what happened. I summoned someone completely new, not a scum who died. It's interesting that you say that though And I'm wondering if you have some extra setup knowledge. My given role was that I could return someone to life. But since everyone who died was scum, Tomm said he reworked some setup stuff and I could instead summon someone new. You're suspicious af right now.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 09:04
|
|
|
imgay posted:but littlemac can seed dudes imgay posted:Ya but giving littlemac a night lets him make another scum How do you know this? I don't think mac was serious when he said he was the beast :\ JakeP posted:so hey lets lynch anon. Like i jailed her 2 nights in a row and no kills happened so thats a thing, but with this whole summon thing, even if she ends up flipping town, then at that point lil mac is confirmed town based on anons claim. There is way to much of a likelihood based on my claim that anon was the scum attempting the night kill the first 2 nights, and the worst case scenario of lynching her is we end up with a confirmed town player. Cant lose If jake's right then we would be in a great place, with 2 scum down and one confirmed town, in a 11 player game, I'd say that's good odds for the rest of the game
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 13:37
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:You're right that is dumb. But that's not at all what I said or what happened. I summoned someone completely new, not a scum who died. lol what i refuse to play against the mod but that's ridiculous!
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 14:12
|
|
|
I'm a little rusty: are votes reset at the end of the day or am I still voting Anonymous? Because I'd like to keep my vote there, thank you very much. Flying Leatherman posted:If jake's right then we would be in a great place, with 2 scum down and one confirmed town, in a 11 player game, I'd say that's good odds for the rest of the game I disagree; I think that, unless there's a mechanic somewhere to prevent beast seeding, this game might actually be unwinnable. But I guess we'll find out. preview edit: ##vote AnonymousNarcotics just so we're clear. Second preview edit: TheCog posted:This post is pretty bleh, the first line reads like scum pretending to be overly happy over something they're not. As I said yesterday: that is a scumpost. I'm glad we agree.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 14:12
|
|
|
Also even if Met was apparently not lying about being an alignment cop, he was beast-aligned and lied about who he visited so  The lack of a NK makes Jake's way of thinking seem pretty legit.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 14:13
|
|
|
Podima posted:lol what I suspect this game is unwinnable, but goddamn if I'm not going to try.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 14:13
|
|
|
FilthIncarnate posted:I'm a little rusty: are votes reset at the end of the day or am I still voting Anonymous? Votes get reset at the end of each day yeah.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 14:14
|
|
|
Podima posted:Also even if Met was apparently not lying about being an alignment cop, he was beast-aligned and lied about who he visited so Your claim from yesterday is vindicated; thanks for being cool, man. Unfortunately since the beast can seed and mutate people and poo poo the fact that you were town yesterday might now be totally meaningless but Preview edit: Podima posted:Votes get reset at the end of each day yeah. Thank you.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 14:15
|
|
|
I propose we kill Anonymous and jail little mac. I'm open to further discussion, however.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 14:20
|
|
|
actually hang on a tickFilthIncarnate posted:I disagree; I think that, unless there's a mechanic somewhere to prevent beast seeding, this game might actually be unwinnable. FilthIncarnate posted:I suspect this game is unwinnable, but goddamn if I'm not going to try. but... we killed two beast-aligned people in a row?  This comes off as a very strange opinion when you actually think about the context of the game and who might be concerned about unwinnability
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 14:27
|
|
|
FilthIncarnate posted:I propose we kill Anonymous and jail little mac. Actually, if you're right about the seed mechanic, this makes perfect sense. If ANarc flips beast tonight and Mac is jailed, he wouldn't be able to spread the seed (assuming Kash's flip is accurate in terms of how the mechanic works). The roles that we've seen so far kind of make sense given that. From Kash's flip: quote:only one person may be seeded at a time, even if you can seed a new person each night, only the most recent seed, is considered seeded so if we can successfully kill the current seeder and jail the seed, we can win. It's all a little speculative, but it's a reasonable theory to test today. ##Vote: ANarc
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 14:28
|
|
|
The thing is we vigged the beast day 1 before he could have seeded anyone. If this is just some stupid gimmick disguised as a mafia game where the mod is just loving with us I will be pretty disapointed that I didn't sign up for a real mafia game. I am confused as to how Met could have been turned unless there were multiple beasts, or the mod just didn't want to let go of their gimmick and beasted some rando.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:05
|
|
|
JakeP posted:The thing is we vigged the beast day 1 before he could have seeded anyone. If this is just some stupid gimmick disguised as a mafia game where the mod is just loving with us I will be pretty disapointed that I didn't sign up for a real mafia game. I am confused as to how Met could have been turned unless there were multiple beasts, or the mod just didn't want to let go of their gimmick and beasted some rando. I'm just as confused as you are - but occam's razor, we vigged someone with a killing role on d1 and you jailed the same person n1/n2 and there was no kill Either anarc is a second killing role or, as someone else said, the doc has been batting 1.000. scum could be withholding kills but that seems tremendously unlikely 2 days in a row. if anarc flips beast, cool, we nail little mac and we're done. if she flips town then we lynch tommunist
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:09
|
|
|
Also if ANarc flips beast this will be the second time you've personally solved a game largely through lucky night action choices!
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:10
|
|
|
JakeP posted:The thing is we vigged the beast day 1 before he could have seeded anyone. If this is just some stupid gimmick disguised as a mafia game where the mod is just loving with us I will be pretty disapointed that I didn't sign up for a real mafia game. I am confused as to how Met could have been turned unless there were multiple beasts, or the mod just didn't want to let go of their gimmick and beasted some rando. I am unironically okay with this game no matter how things turn out? It's been fun and interesting. Podima posted:actually hang on a tick Looking at Kashuno's flip, the seed mechanic seems like it means it's potentially mechanically impossible to eliminate all Beast-aligned players, especially since the seeding process works alongside the nightkill instead of in lieu of it. i.e. unless the town has resources I don't know about to shut seeding down, there might be no way the town can win. But, again, this is setup speculation and therefore useless. I mention it only now, after I've already made my case and placed my vote.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:22
|
|
|
FilthIncarnate posted:I am unironically okay with this game no matter how things turn out? I just don't like being tricked into playing experimental non mafia games that are specifically labled mafia, but that might not even be the case and there might actually be a scum team
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:31
|
|
|
FilthIncarnate posted:
The thing is Kashuno never had an opportunity to seed anyone, yet Met was somehow seeded and turned anyway. If it was similar to kash's role this could only have happened if a beast died after seeding him, which was impossible, since kash died before night 1, and no one else died between him and Met
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:33
|
|
|
and if anon is telling the truth about her role and flips town then I don't even know what to say "yeah sure I will let you modify your role into something it isn't and summon an additional player into the game that sounds fine!!!" isn't something a mod should ever say
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:35
|
|
|
##vote anon thought i was voting anon
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:35
|
|
|
JakeP posted:and if anon is telling the truth about her role and flips town then I don't even know what to say Right? JakeP posted:The thing is Kashuno never had an opportunity to seed anyone, yet Met was somehow seeded and turned anyway. If it was similar to kash's role this could only have happened if a beast died after seeding him, which was impossible, since kash died before night 1, and no one else died between him and Met That's true, as far as we know. I'm just operating under the assumption that we have no idea what is happening rolewise this game and that it'll be a better strategy to scumhunt traditionally. Speaking of which: if Rarity's been seeded, we might just be letting them coast to victory on the strength of their successful dayvig. But I don't know that we should tear ourselves to paranoid pieces yet.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:46
|
|
|
A thought I had along those lines - do dayvigs usually end the day? I haven't seen town dayvigs do that, and it seems kinda anti-town to remove the town's ability to lynch for a day.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:47
|
|
|
Podima posted:A thought I had along those lines - do dayvigs usually end the day? I haven't seen town dayvigs do that, and it seems kinda anti-town to remove the town's ability to lynch for a day. I've seen things work like that before; I've also seen dayvigs not end the day, tho. Often it boils down to moderator preference. I don't know that we should read into it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:48
|
|
|
I'm talking too much. I'd like to hear more from Rarity, Opop, Anon, and LittleMac; I'll be quiet until we do.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:50
|
|
|
JakeP posted:The thing is Kashuno never had an opportunity to seed anyone, yet Met was somehow seeded and turned anyway. If it was similar to kash's role this could only have happened if a beast died after seeding him, which was impossible, since kash died before night 1, and no one else died between him and Met I can see it being possible if there was a pregame action that we weren't told about (which might make sense if Kash was the only scum dude originally). That's about all I can come up with, though. FilthIncarnate posted:Speaking of which: if Rarity's been seeded, we might just be letting them coast to victory on the strength of their successful dayvig. I can't figure out a set of actions where this would happen. The only way that she could be scum (assuming this is still a game of mafia and not something wacky and experimental) is if she started as scum.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:51
|
|
|
Podima posted:A thought I had along those lines - do dayvigs usually end the day? I haven't seen town dayvigs do that, and it seems kinda anti-town to remove the town's ability to lynch for a day. They usually don't, I don't think it makes sense to try to make an alignment call on how this mod decided to handle a vig, it could go either way.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:55
|
|
|
FilthIncarnate posted:
I mean I am not, I am just voting anon because she is very likely scum. If people are still being seeded there is no scum hunting that will win this game, its just random as gently caress. Its not like someone who gets seeded is going to suddenly act differently and become scummy. If there isn't a mafia team then this game is a crapshoot
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:57
|
|
|
Podima posted:it seems kinda anti-town to remove the town's ability to lynch for a day. And yes this is true, but if Rarity is scum she is going to say she didn't know it would end the day
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:58
|
|
|
Eh, I have a pretty strong town read on Rarity, not at all based on her vig, which is non-alignment dependent. I'm not going to treat this any differently than a real mafia game, because if there are two beasts and two+ scum then we're hosed anyway. You can play the game, but you can't play the mods. Right now, my scum list: imgay AnonymousNarcotics: Thematically, it might make sense to have a role that summons the beast. I also don't know what to make of it, I have never seen a role that did anything like this. Resurrection? Yeah, summon random player from out of the game? No. But the jailing is indicative. My "are you even playing this game" list: Opopanax: You've made 5 posts, of which one is a lovely "I bet we mislynched!" post, which frankly, makes me wonder if you're mafia and we're just swimming in a pool of mafia. gently caress it, this game is weird. I'm going to vote Anonymous, but I would like for the day to play out a little longer so I'm not going to vote for him yet.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 16:03
|
|
|
I have no idea what's going on
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 16:07
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:I have no idea what's going on just vote anon
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 16:08
|
|
|
whys anon still alive
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 16:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 20:50 |
|
|
I don't know man, I think there's too many variables here
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 16:36
|
|