|
This looks to be almost the companion piece to the behind-the-scenes book (that I still have to get  )https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1s267t9bOA Looking forward to this, and Ghostheads. Crazy to think that THREE of the people being interviewed (Ramis, Marguilies, and Michael C Gross) passed away from when they were interviewed to when this was/will be released  EDIT: And just for the hell of it, have some original film score (linked the entire playlist): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5JgvmilwNI And my favourite part of the whole film, musically (should start at around 7:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrB94IlCARs&t=391s Rupert Buttermilk fucked around with this message at 19:26 on Feb 5, 2016 |
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 19:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 14:11 |
|
|
What are these people?
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 21:27
|
|
|
Kevyn posted:What are these people? Various stages of Stay Puft models?
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 21:52
|
|
|
xezton posted:Oh poo poo... I didn't even notice the red-eyed version! That verifies something I suspected when somebody posted about a supposed scene where Kevin seems to have troubles understanding that his hand doesn't pass through glass objects. They were kind of describing it like he was just supposed to be an extreme airhead, but it kind of reminded me of possessed Louis Tully doing things like sniffing that popcorn container. Like he's secretly a demon in disguise who doesn't quite understand the rules of our world.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 21:59
|
|
|
Drink-Mix Man posted:That verifies something I suspected when somebody posted about a supposed scene where Kevin seems to have troubles understanding that his hand doesn't pass through glass objects. They were kind of describing it like he was just supposed to be an extreme airhead, but it kind of reminded me of possessed Louis Tully doing things like sniffing that popcorn container. Like he's secretly a demon in disguise who doesn't quite understand the rules of our world. Oooh, I kind of like this 
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 22:06
|
|
|
Oh God I'm going to have to bail on this thread just like the star wars one. You goons with your spoilers. Talk to you in five months or whatever
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 22:13
|
|
|
hhhat posted:Oh God I'm going to have to bail on this thread just like the star wars one.  Rupert Buttermilk posted:Oooh, I kind of like this  I wonder if this movie is going to include a token Giant Walking Object™. I mean it has to, right? Pretty sure the GB2 trailer gave away Lady Liberty, but I don't think any of the GB1 original trailers showed Mr. Staypuft.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 22:46
|
|
|
xezton posted:
I think there's a trailer for the first film on the website, and I thought I saw Stay puft.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 23:33
|
|
|
Regarding Kevin's secondary face: The scene where he's kinda dumb has nothing to do with him being possessed. He gets possessed by the (supposedly) main bad guy for a little while. That was one of scenes they showed in Munich as well. The one with the endless vomiting.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 23:34
|
|
|
Hmm. Sounds like I might end up liking my idea better.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 23:58
|
|
|
xezton posted:Oh poo poo... I didn't even notice the red-eyed version! I dont see it anywhere which pic is it
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 07:22
|
|
|
The LEGO Facebook pages says they uploaded 36 pics to the album but there's only 31 available, maybe they removed the spoiler hints.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 07:31
|
|
|
zVxTeflon posted:I dont see it anywhere which pic is it Ha! Yup, they removed them. There are several news pages that still have the SPOILER pics up tho! Like this one: http://www.hitfix.com/news/check-out-the-new-ghostbusters-lego-set-which-might-have-a-spoiler
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 08:29
|
|
|
Still working my way through Halloween photos.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 02:10
|
|
|
Boomerjinks posted:Still working my way through Halloween photos. That is an extremely beautiful shot. So vibrant, too. Anyway, guys.... FOUR DAYS LEFT! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYndBvhz8hU
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2016 17:58
|
|
|
Bummer.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2016 20:04
|
|
|
Rupert Buttermilk posted:That is an extremely beautiful shot. So vibrant, too. What used to be an empty lot opposite the firehouse is now an office building with windows that reflect the sun perfectly. Expect pictures of the firehouse taken on the simplest camera to be gorgeous now that it's getting hit with light!
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 00:17
|
|
|
A special announcement from Elaine... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IYMIszcDfg
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 01:38
|
|
|
http://ghostbustersnews.com/2016/02/11/ghostbusters-monopoly-is-coming/ So there's going to be a Monopoly game.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 18:58
|
|
|
It would be amusing to see the contrast between a bunch of friends growing to hate each other while still dishing out thematically appropriate quotes from the movies over the course of the game. "You're never gonna regret this, ray!" "My parents left me that house. I was born there!" "You're not gonna lose the house; everybody has three mortgages nowadays!" Lastdancer fucked around with this message at 19:59 on Feb 11, 2016 |
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 19:55
|
|
|
Ugh, loving Monopoly.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 20:07
|
|
|
Lastdancer posted:It would be amusing to see the contrast between a bunch of friends growing to hate each other while still dishing out thematically appropriate quotes from the movies over the course of the game. "Why shouldn't I invest in Baltic?" "It would be bad" "I'm fuzzy on the whole good/bad thing... what do you mean 'bad'?"
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 21:33
|
|
|
Rupert Buttermilk posted:http://ghostbustersnews.com/2016/02/11/ghostbusters-monopoly-is-coming/ Given the merchandise blitz that started in 2009, I'm shocked it took this long.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 22:11
|
|
|
Rupert Buttermilk posted:http://ghostbustersnews.com/2016/02/11/ghostbusters-monopoly-is-coming/ So... is most of the merchandise for the new Ghostbusters going to be the original Ghostbusters? That is kind of weird.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 22:34
|
|
|
Wank posted:So... is most of the merchandise for the new Ghostbusters going to be the original Ghostbusters? That is kind of weird. Kind of STUPID. So they got into all kinds of dumb bad publicity for leaving out the main character of the new Star Wars when they dropped Star Wars Monopoly. So what's the next thing they do? Well just leave out the entire new female cast from the new Ghostbusters flick of course. That'll go over well. Not saying it's a huge deal, but lots of people are gunna hate that and make a stink over it, even if a lot of people are gonna love it. AndyElusive fucked around with this message at 23:07 on Feb 11, 2016 |
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 23:02
|
|
|
 I dig it. The lovely logo and the duct tape.  Edit: source http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/02/11/ghostbusters-first-look-photo-of-the-ecto-2?abthid=56bc94233eb4dd213f00000b Edit: also I made a cute radiation+heart symbol smilie :3 xezton fucked around with this message at 00:00 on Feb 12, 2016 |
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 23:37
|
|
|
Wank posted:So... is most of the merchandise for the new Ghostbusters going to be the original Ghostbusters? That is kind of weird. The Monopoly thing is pretty specific but a lot of the upcoming merchandise seems to be being kept as generic as possible across the whole GB brand in order to appeal to the widest audience. This stuff is some of the laziest merchandise I've seen and I've practically been collecting GB stuff since birth. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2016 00:13
|
|
|
AndyElusive posted:Kind of STUPID. Nothing stupid about playing it safe since theres a 70% chance this movie bombs hard
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2016 00:22
|
|
|
It's probably really cheap to use all old art assets over and over again, also they can double dip some things like Monopoly, and make two versions.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2016 00:28
|
|
|
Rupert Buttermilk posted:"Why shouldn't I invest in Baltic?" "If nothing happens we go to jail. Quietly, peacefully, we'll enjoy it. We won't pass Go, we won't collect $200."
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2016 00:42
|
|
|
Kevyn posted:"If nothing happens we go to jail. Quietly, peacefully, we'll enjoy it. We won't pass Go, we won't collect $200." "Who does your taxes?" Alternatively, "Top hat and Thimble Fleming! Top hat owns Marvin Gardens, which is in receivership, and Thimble's drawing a deferred rent payment from the green property set, so they're ok! Would anyone rather play Parcheesi?"
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2016 02:21
|
|
|
 To quote Egon in the photo lab, "What... the hell... is that (in the back)?"
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 01:55
|
|
|
Why, I'd say that looks like some sort of spook, specter, or ghost (in the back)...
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 02:05
|
|
|
A class 3 vaporous, full torso apparition?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 02:58
|
|
|
Sockser posted:A class 3 vaporous, full torso apparition? I wonder how many of those stupid "Ghost Hunters" style shows actually believe that the "science" that was written in the the Ghostbusters script was real? I heard some use the terms "Class A", "Class B", and "Full Body Apparitions".
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 03:22
|
|
|
Wasn't it though? Didn't Akroyd use real terminology and ideas for the script?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 03:45
|
|
|
Well, "real" in the sense that he didn't make it all up is my understanding. Both Ghostbusters and those shows draw from the same pool of pseudoscience.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 03:49
|
|
|
Yeah. It may be a buncha bullshit, but it's the terminology they use. I've been looking that poo poo up for a script I'm writing. It adds a nice little insane layer to it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 04:18
|
|
|
I want Spates Catalog and Tobin's Spirit Guide to be real.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 05:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 14:11 |
|
|
CelticPredator posted:Yeah. It may be a buncha bullshit, but it's the terminology they use. I've been looking that poo poo up for a script I'm writing. It adds a nice little insane layer to it. Got any good links?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 12:53
|
|
