|
I don't necessarily dislike the direction they took with the ghosts, but I do feel they have a stronger physical presence than in the originals, and it's kind of weird for the concept of ghosts to give off the idea of a "strong physical presence." Of course, the original movies had entities of all kinds with varying forms of physicality, but from the trailers for the new movie, the vibe I get is that ALL the ghosts have the same prominence to them. It's mostly due to the intense lighting and the deep colors. It's a choice I'd need to see in the context of the entire movie to tell how if it really bothers me or not.
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 02:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 07:45 |
|
|
Blazing Ownager posted:I felt a great disturbance in CD Well, I think it looks fantastic and TBQH I've started using people's reaction to this movie as a barometer as to wether their a lovely person with MRA tendencies or not
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 03:19
|
|
|
Retarded_Clown_ posted:Well, I think it looks fantastic and TBQH I've started using people's reaction to this movie as a barometer as to wether their a lovely person with MRA tendencies or not My worst fear 
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 03:21
|
|
|
Retarded_Clown_ posted:Well, I think it looks fantastic and TBQH I've started using people's reaction to this movie as a barometer as to wether their a lovely person with MRA tendencies or not Retarded_Clown_ posted:it looks fantastic
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 03:24
|
|
|
Timby posted:It just strikes me as patently absurd to assume that the guy either responsible or involved with some of the best and most memorable comedic works of the past decade and a half or so, a guy who turned down Sony's invitation to do the project in the first place before coming up with an idea, is just doing a soulless find-replace gender swap on the original movie. Feig isn't a studio hack. Oh HELL yes, as soon as I saw PF was working on this I was sold. Any other #feigheads pumped for this?
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 03:28
|
|
|
Retarded_Clown_ posted:Oh HELL yes, as soon as I saw PF was working on this I was sold. Any other #feigheads pumped for this? Oooh your real opinions are making me so mad!!
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 03:56
|
|
|
Dude. We get it, you don't care for this movie. You've said your piece, now don't think it's time for the people who actually want to see the film discuss it? On topic: Do those computer screens that say Dana Barett on them mean we can still have hope for a possible Signoruney Waver/ Rick Moranis cameo?
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 04:05
|
|
|
Retarded_Clown_ posted:Dude. We get it, you don't care for this movie. You've said your piece, now don't think it's time for the people who actually want to see the film discuss it? Those are nothing but throwaway references; Weaver has been confirmed in, but not as Dana, and Moranis has declined to participate.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 04:33
|
|
|
Timby posted:It just strikes me as patently absurd to assume that the guy either responsible or involved with some of the best and most memorable comedic works of the past decade and a half or so, a In what universe Feig's movies are soulless garbage.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 04:39
|
|
|
Rupert Buttermilk posted:Those are nothing but throwaway references; Weaver has been confirmed in, but not as Dana, and Moranis has declined to participate. I suppose that's to be expected since Moranis hasn't acted since the early 90s IIRC.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 04:39
|
|
|
Retarded_Clown_ posted:I suppose that's to be expected since Moranis hasn't acted since the early 90s IIRC. His wife died and he retired from acting to raise his children and, at last report, doesn't really miss it or have any interest in getting back into it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 04:58
|
|
|
ImpAtom posted:His wife died and he retired from acting to raise his children and, at last report, doesn't really miss it or have any interest in getting back into it. Yep. He did a brief spot of voice work for some animated movie a while back but what was originally intended as a brief hiatus eventually became a semi-permanent retirement outside of occasional nostalgia bits for Canadian acts like Rush.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 05:02
|
|
|
Retarded_Clown_ posted:Well, I think it looks fantastic and TBQH I've started using people's reaction to this movie as a barometer as to wether their a lovely person with MRA tendencies or not that's amazing
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 14:19
|
|
|
Retarded_Clown_ posted:Well, I think it looks fantastic and TBQH I've started using people's reaction to this movie as a barometer as to wether their a lovely person with MRA tendencies or not I use people's reaction to Pacific Rim to determine their opinion on nuclear power
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 15:10
|
|
|
ALFbrot posted:Actually, there's a third option: e.g. Retarded_Clown_ posted:Well, I think it looks fantastic and TBQH I've started using people's reaction to this movie as a barometer as to wether their a lovely person with MRA tendencies or not
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 17:42
|
|
|
Retarded_Clown_ posted:Well, I think it looks fantastic and TBQH I've started using people's reaction to this movie as a barometer as to wether their a lovely person with MRA tendencies or not I've started to use this post to diagnose retardation. E: Apologies to Mr. Clown for assuming the worst of him :-) steinrokkan fucked around with this message at 17:57 on Mar 10, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 17:45
|
|
|
What really burns me up is how definitely serious and not at all ironic Retarded_Clown is being.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 17:53
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:What really burns me up is how definitely serious and not at all ironic Retarded_Clown is being. Are there actions figures of the girls yet? I saw the ghost logo guy a few dozen pages ago but thats it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 17:59
|
|
|
Cage posted:I dunno you posted about the same thing twice on this page so you do seem pretty mad, even though you're being a quirky irony guy. Why can't you get over your desire to objectify women?
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 18:01
|
|
|
I want to see Chris Hemsworth too.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 18:03
|
|
|
Guys, it's just a movie.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 18:05
|
|
|
As both a pinball and ghostbusters fan, let me say, the Ghostbusters pinball looks pretty awesome. http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/03/10/ghostbusters-pinball-machine-announced-by-stern-pinball
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 18:11
|
|
|
boom boom boom posted:I use people's reaction to Pacific Rim to determine their opinion on nuclear power I'm a big fan of analog nuclear power.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 18:14
|
|
|
Cage posted:I dunno you posted about the same thing twice on this page so you do seem pretty mad, even though you're being a quirky irony guy. I am mad for real at R_C's definitely true sentiments.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 18:54
|
|
|
this movie is mood slime
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 19:04
|
|
|
Cage posted:I dunno you posted about the same thing twice on this page so you do seem pretty mad, even though you're being a quirky irony guy. Dude's rationalizing his lovely hater argument by saying that if someone likes the film = it's obviously a joke, which is p. Stupid. He might wanna head back to the GBS GB thread since it's more of a hate than this one. Doubt he's going to "convert" anyone here anytime soon. On topic: I have yet to see any toys shown so far, though I think I may have seen a few LEGO sets of the firehouse. That may be for the original though. I'm sure though that in the coming months plenty of merch will be available.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 19:47
|
|
|
retarded_clown taint reapin all y'all
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 19:51
|
|
|
I've watched the trailer like, five more times, and while I'm not super optimistic, I'm giving it a pass for the loving awesome theme song remix. Definitely gonna see it when it releases. Even if it sucks, it literally can't be worse than Battlefield Earth. You filthy man-animals.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 19:58
|
|
|
Retarded_Clown_ posted:He might wanna head back to the GBS GB thread since it's more of a hate than this one. Doubt he's going to "convert" anyone here anytime soon. Yea this isn't something that's specific to Ghostbusters. Generally, in CineD, its frowned upon to poo poo all over a movie without having seen it. Of course, as we know, even then there can sometimes be backlash when someone expresses a negative opinion, but at a bare minimum you gotta watch the movie before anyone is going to take your opinion seriously.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 19:59
|
|
|
Okay, I actually got a few laughs out of the international trailer. I think it will be a fine, funny movie loosely based on an old movie called Ghostbusters.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 20:09
|
|
|
Retarded_Clown_ posted:On topic: I have yet to see any toys shown so far, though I think I may have seen a few LEGO sets of the firehouse. That may be for the original though. I'm sure though that in the coming months plenty of merch will be available. The film is still four months from hitting screens so yeah, once Batman v Superman and Captain America: Civil War and their merchandising blitzes are out of the way expect to see some new GB stuff hitting shelves. Edit: poo poo, GB 2016 drops after TMNT 2, Warcraft, Finding Dory, Independence Day and The Secret Life of Pets and will be followed by Star Trek Beyond, Ice Age: Collision Course and Jason Bourne. TMNT 2 should have died down by then but that's still some pretty stiff competition. Snowglobe of Doom fucked around with this message at 20:16 on Mar 10, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 20:12
|
|
|
will ghostbusters be better than the warcraft movie?
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 20:54
|
|
|
boom boom boom posted:will ghostbusters be better than the warcraft movie? I loving hope so, for their sakes.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 20:57
|
|
|
Well, I think Warcraft looks fantastic and TBQH I've started using people's reaction to it as a barometer as to wether their a lovely person with MRA tendencies or no
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 21:07
|
|
|
boom boom boom posted:will ghostbusters be better than the warcraft movie? not a doubt in my mind it'll be better.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 21:18
|
|
|
ALFbrot posted:Well, I think Warcraft looks fantastic and TBQH I've started using people's reaction to it as a barometer as to wether their a lovely person with MRA tendencies or no Murlock Rights Advocates?
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 23:13
|
|
|
Bloody Hedgehog posted:Murlock Rights Advocates? Aaaaaughibbrgubugbugrguburgl!
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 23:32
|
|
|
For me, what's putting me off slightly is that the proton packs and equipment all seem somewhat weightless in those trailers. Maybe there'll be a line about them being some new age lightweight material but i think i remember the originals having some industrial level 'heft' in them. Not that the original guys were in shape or anything like that but there was a level of physical acting that seemed almost janitorial in a sense. These guys were essentially lugging hugeass vacuum cleaners around on their backs and it looked and sounded like effort. I wouldn't be surprised if that was supposed to be the point. They're ghost janitors, cleaning up the spooky poo poo that no-one else wants to deal with. From the trailer i dont get that, i see people with toys. Which seems to be reinforced by the new team not seeming like they'd be physically strong enough to carry around equipment of the same 'heft' as the original film. Especially with stuff like that slapstick crowdsurfing scene.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 01:40
|
|
|
Kin posted:From the trailer i dont get that, i see people with toys. Which seems to be reinforced by the new team not seeming like they'd be physically strong enough to carry around equipment of the same 'heft' as the original film. Especially with stuff like that slapstick crowdsurfing scene.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 02:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 07:45 |
|
|
I hope this works, I'm on mobile, couldn't find a YouTube link. Know what the new GB needs? More Janosz. This is my favourite of the re-edits, holy gently caress. https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10153586900021633&id=59685491632 Rupert Buttermilk fucked around with this message at 03:09 on Mar 11, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 02:52
|
|