|
Tippis posted:Since I can't be arsed to register, explain this to Cmdr Cheese Wedge on FDev — I'm sure it'll piss off the shill even more that the first example is from a filthy console game: Done 
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 13:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 08:37 |
|
|
undocumented feature in patch 2.4   nothingness is in boys!!
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 13:51
|
|
|
StarBegotten posted:Done TYVM.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 13:51
|
|
|
Sabreseven posted:LOL at the Gary Oldman 'mid-poo poo' screen shot at the top of the article. do they have depends that far in the future? or is it a mini space vacuum that sucks it bags and ejects it out the back in a little package right there on the podium?
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 13:51
|
|
|
AP posted:https://twitter.com/RayRoocroftCIG/status/741597355900821504 you cant feel bad about pikers!
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 13:52
|
|
|
AP posted:Feel bad for the UK customer support team at the moment. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. gently caress those labelling assholes who have nothing better to do than lie to the very people giving them their wages.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 13:53
|
|
|
EminusSleepus posted:undocumented feature in patch 2.4 New stealth mode?
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 13:55
|
|
|
EminusSleepus posted:Derek did your elite legal team anticipated this move by CIG? Yes. I've written about it. In fact, there is an update about that from May 24 http://www.dereksmart.org/forums/topic/star-citizen-tos/ quote:UPDATE 16/05/24: Sources are telling me that a new ToS revision is in the works and will be shoved through either in the upcoming public release of 2.4 or thereafter. If you ever hope to get financial accountability or refunds – two of the key provisions of the current ToS v1.2 – do not agree to it. On June 1st, backers have the legal right to both a refund and financial accountability as promised.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 13:57
|
|
|
Lets see how much this lives this time. http://i.imgur.com/t2TUdBF.jpg https://forums.robertsspaceindustri...-article#latest It will be really ironic if closed for rule 9.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 13:57
|
|
|
intardnation posted:New stealth mode? Stealth gameplay was added in! Time to release the game, Chris!
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 13:57
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Hey, they are just doing their job and Ray obviously feels bad for the backers given how negative his tweets have been recently about the whole project. He even made fun of Chris Roberts "Dream Team" the other day.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 13:58
|
|
|
Dante80 posted:Lets see how much this lives this time. 3...2...1 Moved to concern. no pole, removed rule #87875645645476586977565 toast (totally not moma)
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:00
|
|
|
DOCa Cola posted:on a serious note: To add to this, I'd advise anyone to ensure they choose a username that's totally different from they have ever used elsewhere - CIG are watching, and will try to connect you to your account on the SC forum. Then they will use any excuse to permaban you. Edit - And when you post on the FD forum, write like you were talking to your mother. FD aim to have a 'family friendly' forum, and there are rules about being respectful to other posters. State your opinion without resorting to emotional/insulting language. Just let the facts speak for themselves. On another note, I wonder if CitizenCon will be like this in 2016: https://youtu.be/RdR6MN2jKYs?t=12 Ponzi fucked around with this message at 14:08 on Jun 11, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:01
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:Stealth gameplay was added in! you have been playing it this whole time. It is in there! Thats a wrap guyz. #fuckpublishers
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:02
|
|
|
https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/4nl1lx/i_want_to_share_a_few_reasons_why_i_enjoy_the_24/
It's all pretty nice. I wish we could get less freezes and more stable fps though. I know it's alpha and I understand bugs, just that there's so many changes that it'd really help if game ran a bit smoother. Crashed out of the online universe with no warning due to some kind of authentication issue(?) Graphics bugs Choppy performance in online universe (though less so in the drone simulator) Even a thread that's meant to be positive ends up feeling sad and depressing, as if they're trying to find reasons to like it but are steadily getting more and more disheartened.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:02
|
|
|
AP posted:Hey, they are just doing their job and Ray obviously feels bad for the backers given how negative his tweets have been recently about the whole project. He even made fun of Chris Roberts "Dream Team" the other day.  No.Good customer service doesn't take months to respond to poo poo, nor do they apply labels, nor do they claim to be the best marketing person in the whole world every since they were a little girl.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:03
|
|
|
considering how much work we do for CIG why arent we getting paid? We direct marketing, development and web shows.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:03
|
|
|
EminusSleepus posted:undocumented feature in patch 2.4 Feels like i'm wearing nothing at all... nothing at all... nothing at all.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:04
|
|
|
This is insane If you continue playing or "testing" after this i officially no longer feel bad for you
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:04
|
|
|
my longest wait was thrustmaster at 3 weeks but once they did respond they took great care of me.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:05
|
|
|
Just so I'm clear: Backers are a-okay with never receiving a product. They have given CIG millions of dollars that they, for some reason, trust the company to not gently caress off with to Mexico. There is zero time limit on this. They have given money to what amounts to a clickbait ad to the tune of a small military budget. In the event that CIG does indeed declare failure, shitizens get their money back - but, of course, that won't happen until CIG runs out of money, QED, there still won't be any refunds after the sad trombone.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:06
|
|
|
Oh, and they've hosed the streamers completely. See the new Section XIII http://imgur.com/a/Ov1Tt
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:07
|
|
|
intardnation posted:considering how much work we do for CIG why arent we getting paid? Some of us are.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:07
|
|
|
Derek on discord brought up a good point, they made a whole tos section, Xlll, a pgabz clause. http://imgur.com/a/Ov1Tt DO NOT NEGATIVE STREAM, OR RECORD OR ELSE! Now that's hilarious. edit : beaten, but still worth repeating. 115 million dollar company folks.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:08
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:
Ray is running a big risk tweeting like that, you've got to have some respect for him sticking to his guns like this. Sure he'll say he didn't mean anything by it but it's a dramatically critical change to his tweeting style, I have no clue what's going on there but he's obviously really unhappy with CIG at the moment.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:09
|
|
|
On the other hand Ray's a racist shitheel who makes up ridiculous bullshit about how real-life fake-spaceship doors are made from balsa wood and sticky-tape.  He's probably upset at work because he got a dressing down for being a fuckwit and letting us get some good laughs.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:12
|
|
|
MoMA: I don't care about your retarded belt, or your $4k "investment", or any of that dumb stuff. But if you actually had anything to do with this new ToS, you should reevaluate yourself as a human being. Because that is piece-of-poo poo level scum and villainy right there.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:12
|
|
|
AP posted:Ray is running a big risk tweeting like that, you've got to have some respect for him sticking to his guns like this. Sure he'll say he didn't mean anything by it but it's a dramatically critical change to his tweeting style, I have no clue what's going on there but he's obviously really unhappy with CIG at the moment. Maybe he's already been told that the customer labels are his fault and problem, when Sandi ordered him to do it she was clearly just joking.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:13
|
|
|
LOL if they use this new TOS to ban PGabz. I'm fairly sure they're going to. Holy poo poo CIG please do it. The response will be incredible. $115 million company bans user for making videos of pre-alpha showing bugs that got too many views.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:14
|
|
|
WhiskeyWhiskers posted:On the other hand Ray's a racist shitheel who makes up ridiculous bullshit about how real-life fake-spaceship doors are made from balsa wood and sticky-tape. It's like actual humans are complicated things and not one dimensional cardboard cut outs like Sandi
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:14
|
|
|
Lime Tonics posted:
Where exactly does it say that?
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:14
|
|
|
AP posted:Ray is running a big risk tweeting like that, you've got to have some respect for him sticking to his guns like this. Sure he'll say he didn't mean anything by it but it's a dramatically critical change to his tweeting style, I have no clue what's going on there but he's obviously really unhappy with CIG at the moment. WhiskeyWhiskers posted:On the other hand Ray's a racist shitheel who makes up ridiculous bullshit about how real-life fake-spaceship doors are made from balsa wood and sticky-tape.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:15
|
|
|
https://www.reddit.com/r/Starcitizen_trades/comments/4nktc7/discuss_chnages_to_sc_tod_affecting_the_grey/ ManofManyAliases posted:I have everything in the Armada Pack + a Glaive, Sabre, BMM, Carrack, Caterpillar, Cutlass Blue, M50, 350R, Khartu-Al and Phoenix That $2,500 Armada pack seems like a top investment choice there mate. A little legal grey area that the grey market traders haven't thought of, if you buy something with melted credits are you covered under the 14 day from purchase refund period as it's a new purchase? CIG might say no, in the EU....
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:17
|
|
|
I'm the 115 million $ company that has it in their TOS that you can't monetize anything connected with making video content containing SC-related stuff.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:17
|
|
|
Dante80 posted:Where exactly does it say that? 
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:17
|
|
|
Clause XIII, Section B: So CIG don't want their artwork to be stolen, but it's OK if they do it and use the stolen artwork the persuade people to give them money?
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:18
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:18
|
|
|
Dante80 posted:Where exactly does it say that?  Like others have said, they will probably selectively enforce it. Since pgabz is a RSI customer, well.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:18
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:I'm the 115 million $ company that has it in their TOS that you can't monetize anything connected with making video content containing SC-related stuff. only cig are allowed to steal jpegs and use them to make money silly.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 08:37 |
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:I'm the 115 million $ company that has it in their TOS that you can't monetize anything connected with making video content containing SC-related stuff. It is pretty standard stuff really. If CIG denied advertising, then that would be novel. You can monetize your content via that avenue, or via donations.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2016 14:19
|
|