|
Infinitum posted:Are you laughing? No I am shaking my head at everyone being dumb and lamenting the state of the shine business these days.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 17:39 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 22:06 |
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:I think this is probably a huge town slapfight and scum are just sitting back and ing Yeah, that chain of AA posts also made me wonder. There was nothing there.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 17:40 |
|
I think Adahn is likely what he says he is.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 17:41 |
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:I got the role I picked, s' all I know. same! but i assume it was for the vanilla town and then they choose one they wanted and pod did some rng or something to determine who got their role but i was prob the only one who picked mine lol anyways infinitum is prob scum he always plays super aggresive as scum
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 17:43 |
|
flerp posted:same! but i assume it was for the vanilla town and then they choose one they wanted and pod did some rng or something to determine who got their role but i was prob the only one who picked mine lol same with me, most people probably looked at my role and went "that's totally useless"
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 17:50 |
|
i choose it for the lols
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 17:50 |
I'm going to bed, almost 3am. Here's my summarised case for Adahn, including links to all the relevant points.quote:tl;dr summary of why Adahn is scum - He's scum slipped all over the place Also keep in mind that Adahn was on Dongsbot list that got a positive hit for a Boss. dongsbot 9000 posted:i snooped absurd, adahn, aa, an, cpig, ccat and got positive result too Finally from a meta perspective, he's not playing a town game, which AR picked up on. Absurd Revolver posted:and while I didn't want to lynch you before, the evidence is pretty damning. your town game is super solid, but you tend to struggle as scum, as you did in Trump. Infinitum posted:This as well. Adahn is my vote for today. Will be around for lynch. He's claiming Loved Universal Shine Backup, but that is likely a ploy to get the real backup to counter-claim to get taken out. Other things to keep in mind: - Truth Quark is pinging me as a likely scumbro for coming to Adahn's defence. - Mayor Glowku played an extremely scummy opening with all the turbos, and is unlike him. Once called out on it has gone extremely quiet.
|
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 17:51 |
|
flerp posted:i choose it for the lols i'm glad i picked mine because it has some grade a podima flavor in there
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 17:54 |
|
anywaysssssss adahn seems super defensive and most likely ill vote for him so we dont have a no lynch but ill also vote for infinitum noted irl scum
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 17:55 |
Oh that's what I forgot to add as the 3rd thing. JakeP claimed Reckless Night Vigilante. Potentially looking at 3 deaths tonight: - JakeP either killing himself or killing scum - Scum nightkill - Killer assassination, who can chose his target from a list of targets submitted via the bosses (1 name per boss. Bosses submit the name to Podima. We do not know who the Killer is)
|
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 17:55 |
|
I could actually see Glowku being scum with his rush in and disappear tactic, which we all agree is scum 101, but I don't know if we can get a drive behind it. I'm putting out my feels vote ##vote Glowku but I am concerned over wether lynching him is possible with how lurky people have been so far.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 17:59 |
|
I actually am really starting to think this is Infinitum's scum game but I would rather wait before we lynch any bosses. ##vote Flying Leatherman
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 18:09 |
|
That or he's just being a Quidnose and tunneling super hard to the exclusion of everything else.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 18:09 |
|
Truth Quark posted:I actually am really starting to think this is Infinitum's scum game but I would rather wait before we lynch any bosses. I've been around most of the morning, friend. At the moment, I'd rather lynch into the remainder of dongsbot's list (AR, AA, AN, Cpig, Cat); as I stated before, I have a feeling that there's a non-town boss somewhere in that list. Adahn's claim is believable to me based on game information that I have. Of those, I'd be most interested in AA right now. ANarc made a good point that the "drunk reread" was more of a summary than commentary (I believe that was the phrasing used), and I tend to agree. Cpig reads like Cpig to me, I don't have anything from Cat yet to make a decision, Anarc made some good points (the "assassin" thing does feel like a semantic point especially after this came out), and while AR's been relatively quiet so far there hasn't been anything overtly scummy per se.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 18:53 |
|
Catching up:Adahn1986 posted:FYI I'm loved today so if you're going to lunch me today make sure you have an extra vote. Wouldn't want the day to accidentally end in a no-lynch. Did you address why you were loved today?
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:40 |
|
I really, really hope you're scum infini. You're likely going to get me with all of this insanity and deceit, but I'm pretty sure you'll be the lynch tomorrow.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:42 |
|
Oooooh noooo it's Shine 1 all over again where I come back to D1 and there are a million posts Quidnose posted:Catching up: Before I go back and catch up, I am also loved today. I don't know why, other than "an event has occurred".
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:42 |
|
Quidnose posted:Catching up: Someone else's N0 action? I didn't get more info than that.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:43 |
|
i can confirm that i am not loved
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:43 |
|
Murmur Twin posted:Oooooh noooo it's Shine 1 all over again where I come back to D1 and there are a million posts Adahn1986 posted:Someone else's N0 action? I didn't get more info than that. Is it just me or do these claims not match up
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:44 |
|
Also this boss chat is insufferable for anyone not reading the Boss role PM and I am real tired of trying to parse it. Is Adahn claiming to NOT be a boss, because I thought dongs & Inf both said he has boss Role PM info (even if it's the strongman vs. assassin thing) and for him to keep claiming he doesn't have that role PM if he does is real susp.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:45 |
|
Podima said a N0 event was going to happen for some players and Infinitum confirmed he had N0 actions to take. They don't seem to conflict to me.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:45 |
|
Flying Leatherman posted:I've been around most of the morning, friend. I really think we should be scumhunting instead of blindly following lists of people who's alignments we do not know. This post reeks of capitalizing on this distraction and going after a whole bunch of chaindunks without taking any responsibility for doing so. Would vote FL.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:46 |
|
Infinitum posted:So my ability is each night I can ##snoop on a list of players (As many as I want) and I get told if any of them are rival bosses trying to take over the outfit. I might suggest for future snoops that it would be better to pick like 1 or 2 players so there's no/less doubt about who the bosses might be. Quidnose posted:Is it just me or do these claims not match up How so? Absurd Revolver posted:i can confirm that i am not loved For what it's worth, I think you're a fun person to Mafia with
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:46 |
|
Truth Quark posted:Podima said a N0 event was going to happen for some players and Infinitum confirmed he had N0 actions to take. They don't seem to conflict to me. Right but MMT said she was loved "because of an event" and Adahn said he was loved "because someone did something to me" and those are in conflict. Are you saying there's an event that made MMT loved AND someone specifically targeted Adahn to make him loved AS WELL? That's weird.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:47 |
|
No I'm just not being incredibly pedantic about it
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:50 |
|
Quidnose posted:Right but MMT said she was loved "because of an event" and Adahn said he was loved "because someone did something to me" and those are in conflict. Are you saying there's an event that made MMT loved AND someone specifically targeted Adahn to make him loved AS WELL? That's weird. It says it was because of an event for me as well, I just assumed it was because of N0 actions.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:50 |
|
Do I believe that Backpedal or not~ Adahn are you still insisting you are not a boss? You're claiming Universal Shine Backup right?
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:51 |
|
Unless you think Adahn just claimed loved in order to try to get us to move off of him for fear of a no lynch? Getting MMT to corroborate if their both scum outs both of them if either flip, that would be a really stupid move D1.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:52 |
|
Quidnose posted:Do I believe that Backpedal or not~ I full claimed 1-shot Universal Shine backup, yes. I'm loved only for today, which you will more than likely discover to be true.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:52 |
|
Truth Quark posted:Unless you think Adahn just claimed loved in order to try to get us to move off of him for fear of a no lynch? Yeah I guess without knowing someone else is loved that would be useless. Unless he was the one who made the loved happen but Meh.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:53 |
|
Quidnose posted:Right but MMT said she was loved "because of an event" and Adahn said he was loved "because someone did something to me" and those are in conflict. Are you saying there's an event that made MMT loved AND someone specifically targeted Adahn to make him loved AS WELL? That's weird. Excellent catch. Still it seems strange for them to both be in the know about being loved unless it's a coordinated gambit and that seems like a stretch. I am also not loved, nor had no prior knowledge of that as everything my pregame stuff had to deal with was selecting a PR and a second question which was ambiguous as to whether pr not it helped a player, but it was clear neither I or they would know. So adahn claiming to be targeted by a player is either him reconciling the actuality of n0 actions or somewhat disingenuous, again though, seems farfetched that both him and MMT would end up with the same effect and that be false.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:53 |
|
AA spending a lot of time talking about and "putting thought" into how I just made an excellent catch when I really didn't and it took TQ two seconds to see why is setting off some alarm bells there, looks like the dunk argument from Ferngully all over again.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:54 |
|
##vote AA
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:54 |
|
Quidnose posted:AA spending a lot of time talking about and "putting thought" into how I just made an excellent catch when I really didn't and it took TQ two seconds to see why is setting off some alarm bells there, looks like the dunk argument from Ferngully all over again. Eh it's not ferngully though.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:56 |
|
Quidnose posted:Right but MMT said she was loved "because of an event" and Adahn said he was loved "because someone did something to me" and those are in conflict. Are you saying there's an event that made MMT loved AND someone specifically targeted Adahn to make him loved AS WELL? That's weird. how the gently caress are "an event" and "someone did something to me" in conflict???
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:57 |
|
Yeah I'm not a fan of that AA post either. It seems like buddying up on a very minor inconsistency.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:57 |
|
for someone frustated with the pedantic talk of bosses ur being awfully pedantic
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:57 |
|
Also you seem to latch onto that first part of my response and nothing else in the post. I'm fine being lynched this game. Don't have anything to lose and I'm not scum so my death might be useful albeit wasted.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:58 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 22:06 |
|
Oh, poo poo. I need to stop making leaps in logic don't I? Part of why Infini is sure I'm a boss is because dongs claimed boss and said he also submitted a list, so I'm like, infini must also be a boss even though he never claimed that. That's not special knowledge, that's common sense.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2016 19:58 |