|
Do bosses know who other bosses are? Or no? Like that's the point of snoop right? So I wonder what happens if boss includes themselves on the snoop list.. does it still return boss? Is there maybe a fake boss? Like boss miller?
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 01:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 18:36 |
|
|
Quidnose posted:I have never heard that rule, I bought my first avatar. Buy away lady. My first avatar was a slender man reference cuz I was that guy.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 01:40
|
|
|
That is a very good point, a boss doesn't want to limit that pool because they are almost certainly a 3p or another faction at this point since I am confirmed town and Dongs boss went to me, and Inf is confirmed scum boss from his flip.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 01:42
|
|
|
I know I am literally just repeating that but I am doing so because I think it's a good thread to follow
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 01:42
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:This got me thinking. If you're the boss on the list, you don't want it narrowed down, correct? So the boss wouldn't be pushing someone else on the list. I can definitively prove that I'm not the boss if I need to, but I'd prefer not.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 01:43
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:This got me thinking. If you're the boss on the list, you don't want it narrowed down, correct? So the boss wouldn't be pushing someone else on the list. This is actually a pretty good point and something I didn't think about when looking it over. I'm not not entirely convinced that there is a 3P boss and think it might be either a separate outfit or some kind of law faction. And I didn't see what I was looking for with Moat, but I skimmed Li Dawny and I'm giving her a slight town lean at the moment.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 01:43
|
|
|
Cuz I like him decided to do Flerps. loving is supposed to be eating terror FYI.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 01:48
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:This is actually a pretty good point and something I didn't think about when looking it over. I'm not not entirely convinced that there is a 3P boss and think it might be either a separate outfit or some kind of law faction. Also, AR and AA probably participated in the shine lottery, and neither Dongs nor infinitum had a shine role. It doesn't take a huge leap of logic to exclude them from the boss pool.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 01:51
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:I know I am literally just repeating that but I am doing so because I think it's a good thread to follow People were very convinced adahn was town going into today, but perhaps all we really should be concluding that he's not NY aligned. Other problems I have with him are that he seems overly reliant on set-up assumptions and his "I <3 quiddad" vote on KB. There's also CC, who will have no trouble getting lynched. Adahn1986 posted:I can definitively prove that I'm not the boss if I need to, but I'd prefer not.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 01:52
|
|
|
Li Dawny posted:Yes, for the most part. I'm getting married in a month and a half and things seem to be crumbling around me with every plan I make. I hope everything resolves itself and if you're ever looking to vent to a nonjudgemental stranger on the internet, my door is open  (I still think there's a good chance you're scum this game though  )
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 01:55
|
|
|
Adahn1986 posted:Also, AR and AA probably participated in the shine lottery, and neither Dongs nor infinitum had a shine role.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 01:56
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:Thank you for saying so, it confirms that I should put more thought into this. I'm sorry that you hate it, but I can't be less cryptic without being on the block. I guarantee you that I'm not lying, though!
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 01:56
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:Is this based on them supporting someone who claimed loved? That, and having knowledge of the process and speaking up about it first. Unless scum has TWO bosses (which would suck), they shouldn't have that kind of info unless they picked it up from the scumdoc.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 01:57
|
|
|
Adahn1986 posted:they shouldn't have that kind of info unless they picked it up from the scumdoc.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:00
|
|
|
Does anyone else find it odd that AA didn't respond to MMTs catch of his day 1 apathy? Or is this not something important I should be following?
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:13
|
|
|
So uh deadline is in 45 minutes
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:16
|
|
|
Looking at dongs snoop listdongsbot 9000 posted:i snooped absurd, adahn, aa, an, cpig, ccat and got positive result too I have a town read on Adahn and Absurd for now. CPig is being strangely "helpful" compared to his usual shitposty self but I'm willing to file that as meta for now. ANarc has been making points I agree with, and I'm willing to wait on AA for more information. Which leaves... CC.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:18
|
|
|
Li Dawny posted:That is actually a really good point that I didn't think of.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:20
|
|
|
Ccat has lurked Ccat has put forth minimal effort Ccat has openly contradicted themselves I think they are a good lynch candidate for the day.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:22
|
|
|
CC will be the lynch is we don't put any more effort into this. I guess I'm ok with that if everyone else is.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:23
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:CC will be the lynch is we don't put any more effort into this. I guess I'm ok with that if everyone else is. cc is a good vote i tried running my crime computer on cc like I did AN and it gave me a printout of "lurker garbage"
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:24
|
|
|
You scumbos better start voting because we don't have a whole lot of time
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:26
|
|
|
oh well. ##vote curious cat Anomalous Amalgam posted:Ccat has openly contradicted themselves
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
Truth Quark posted:You scumbos better start voting because we don't have a whole lot of time ##vote curiouscat
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:29
|
|
|
psych.VivaNova posted:You said this 45 minutes ago.... so did it cause you to want to case or vote anyone?? ##vote Li Dawny
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:30
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:psych. god you're dumb
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:30
|
|
|
psych we don't have the people online for a lynch at this point regardless
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:31
|
|
|
Absurd Revolver posted:god you're dumb Literally what I am saying to everyone not voting Anarc the scum.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:31
|
|
|
you don't have the votes(you don't have the votes) you're gonna nolynch and let scum win cause you don't have the votes
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:32
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:Literally what I am saying to everyone not voting Anarc the scum. i tried but no one listened
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:33
|
|
|
I could pick any lurker and be alright with their lynch, because we'd be getting more from their lynches than we are getting from them at the moment. Adahn seems scummy to me about 99% of the time because we have opposing styles, but he giving me the benefit of the doubt so I'll do the same for him. KB is a split decision between my mind and my gut, gut says scum mind says no ones that dumb. flerp is flerp, and I'm trying to respect his wishes as per his name even if it pisses me off to look at it, all dumb and lower case and poo poo. AN is leaning town because of their effort, seems genuine to me. Moat I'm unsure on, I haven't played much with them so I don't know how to read their actions. And most everyone else is pretty town in my eyes.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:34
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:Literally what I am saying to everyone not voting Anarc the scum.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:34
|
|
|
Insufferable lurker CuriousCat has been around and could contribute if they wanted to. They are likely the 3P boss anyways, so can't hurt to rid ourselves of them. ##vote CuriousCat
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:35
|
|
|
Li Dawny posted:I could pick any lurker and be alright with their lynch, because we'd be getting more from their lynches than we are getting from them at the moment. -30 is not the time to make a post like this. You said you thought I had a good point regarding dong's list. From this post, I see no evidence that you made any effort to actually use that info.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:38
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:Sorry. Consolation prize- You can be the decider between CC, AA + LD umm no? This is a bad post, number one I don't want to vote AA and have said a bunch of times why. I don't think Li dawny is scum and I'm not going to vote for someone I don't think is scum. I'll vote cat to avoid a no lynch but I'd really rather vote anarc who I'm fairly drat certain is scum instead of some lurker question mark.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:39
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:umm no? extremely rapid concise Anarc case?
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:40
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:-30 is not the time to make a post like this. JFC, does it matter what I chose to use in May cases and what I chose to apply another night's worth of information to? Let me play my way, you play your's. I will post what I have when I have it, and it's not up to you what I do/don't use at any particular time.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:41
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:umm no? ##vote curious cat it is then
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:41
|
|
|
Adahn1986 posted:extremely rapid concise Anarc case? Can you really not be bothered to read back a few pages?
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 18:36 |
|
|
Well, I guess let's lynch the lurker. ##vote CuriousCat
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2016 02:41
|
|