|
Is that a WWE Shop Brian Pillman t-shirt?
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 10:02 |
|
|
JBL kind of looks like poo poo, I don't know why. Edit: Why is he praising James Ellsworth, what the hell
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:18
|
|
|
I love foreplay.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:19
|
|
|
surf rock posted:JBL kind of looks like poo poo, I don't know why. Because this show isn't kayfabe
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:21
|
|
|
Yay or Boo? YAY TO EVERYTHING, EVERYTHING'S GREAT!!!!
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:22
|
|
|
Sasha def, Sasha Banks
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:22
|
|
|
This is almost literally "Rosenberg reads these threads and asks JBL and Heyman about it". 
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:23
|
|
|
That DICK! posted:[To Romans theme] bow wow. Bow wow. Bow wow. Ruff. Ruff.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:23
|
|
|
I enjoy all of the WWE Superstars.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:23
|
|
|
That DICK! posted:[To Romans theme] bow wow. Bow wow. Bow wow. Ruff. Ruff.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:24
|
|
|
SamuraiFoochs posted:This is almost literally "Rosenberg reads these threads and asks JBL and Heyman about it". "JBL, would you like to live in Alexa Bliss' rear end?" "Absolutely!"
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:24
|
|
|
These questions are softball as gently caress but I think the discussion is fairly candid and thus I don''t hate it
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:25
|
|
|
SamuraiFoochs posted:These questions are softball as gently caress but I think the discussion is fairly candid and thus I don''t hate it It just seems to be a thing to try and get a lot of people over and doesn't seem particularly Vince-y. It's pretty watchable. JBL just said he wants Nakamura in the Rumble, it's up to "good" for me! Man, Paul's got our number tonight.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:27
|
|
|
SamuraiFoochs posted:These questions are softball as gently caress but I think the discussion is fairly candid and thus I don''t hate it Yeah I'm enjoying this. I'd watch more of these.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:28
|
|
|
this shows ok
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:28
|
|
|
VJeff posted:It just seems to be a thing to try and get a lot of people over and doesn't seem particularly Vince-y. It's pretty watchable. Yeah Paul owns and I think this is very watchable. Better than Raw!
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:29
|
|
|
Okay, the picture just catapulted this into amazing.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:30
|
|
|
VJeff posted:Okay, the picture just catapulted this into amazing. Yeah, show now 11/10.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:31
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:32
|
|
|
It's kind of an odd show, it's kayfabe but trying to be edgy at the same time.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:32
|
|
|
lol this is literally First Take but to piss off the ISEC instead of whoever is watching ESPN2 at 10am
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:32
|
|
|
We know why it's 3 hours, JBL, doesn't change that we hate it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:33
|
|
|
I like that the argument for keeping three hours is "it makes money" not "there's good content"
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:34
|
|
|
JBL candidly discussing WWE finances  Also Paul Heyman rules.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:34
|
|
|
lol paul
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:35
|
|
|
Eltoasto posted:It's kind of an odd show, it's kayfabe but trying to be edgy at the same time. There's nothing kayfabe about this at all?
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:35
|
|
|
"Why are you yelling at me?" "There's only room for one jew on this panel!"
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:35
|
|
|
Erebus posted:I like that the argument for keeping three hours is "it makes money" not "there's good content" One matters and it's not the one fans believe
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:36
|
|
|
Erebus posted:I like that the argument for keeping three hours is "it makes money" not "there's good content" But that's literally why going RAW SHOULD BE 2 HOURS is loving pointless and that's the point.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:37
|
|
|
SamuraiFoochs posted:But that's literally why going RAW SHOULD BE 2 HOURS is loving pointless and that's the point. People say Raw should be 2 hours because the 3 hour show is bloated poo poo. It's an argument about content, so saying "it makes money" is not a response to the actual complaint. It won't happen because, as JBL said, contracts are locked in. But that's not a response to the complaint either.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:41
|
|
|
well that show was pretty poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:44
|
|
|
Erebus posted:People say Raw should be 2 hours because the 3 hour show is bloated poo poo. It's an argument about content, so saying "it makes money" is not a response to the actual complaint. No, see, the point is they're saying that the bitching online is futile for those reasons. JBL sorta apologized for it but I think it's pretty obvious they know the program is bloated but  .
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:44
|
|
|
A show built entirely around showing open contempt for your viewers, immediately after exposing them to 3 hours of your product
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:45
|
|
|
The entire show was JBL and Heyman saying "stop complaining"
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:45
|
|
|
Leans a little too hard on the worked side of worked shoot for my taste. It strains at the points where it's ostensibly candid but is pretty charming when it is actually candid, like getting a picture of Taker as a groomsman
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:46
|
|
|
Smackdown still the #1 at postshow talking
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:46
|
|
|
I realize that was essentially two guys telling the fans to shut the hell up for 30 minutes but I still found it kinda neat.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:47
|
|
|
Chris James 2 posted:A show built entirely around showing open contempt for your viewers, immediately after exposing them to 3 hours of your product
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:47
|
|
|
Chris James 2 posted:A show built entirely around showing open contempt for your viewers, immediately after exposing them to 3 hours of your product I thought parts of it were quite good actually. Not all of it by any means, but a solid outing. oatgan posted:The entire show was JBL and Heyman saying "stop complaining" Heyman at least did it in a Heyman way which I found entertaining.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 10:02 |
|
|
Eltoasto posted:Smackdown still the #1 at postshow talking They'd have an honest shot if they gave it the name it was meant to have, RAW Jawing
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 05:48
|
|