|
Hav posted:Progress is usually better understood through seeing the scrum board, like this; has anyone ever attempted to make a reddit post asking for CIG to do something similar? I'm sure the shitizens would be all over it, most open development ever etc.
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 18:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 00:22 |
|
|
aleksendr posted:Its a "slow and snow" day over here, not even a 1/4 of the staff showed up. Need to entertain myself somehow so making noise with "Troll 101" is better than nothing. Nice self-doxx Lando
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 18:32
|
|
|
TrustmeImLegit posted:That's honestly just your uninformed opinion. You've clearly had a bad customer experience with CIG and its coloring your """"analysis"""" of the project. Look at what you posted, it clearly assumes so many things including what the motives of CIG are and whether or not we are in a dunkin donuts drivethrough. I'll try to parse through the rest of it but I can see you called Chris a fraud. Something so laughably and demonstrably wrong I won't even dignify it with a rebuttal. 300+ employees man. Ad hominem isn't a real defense, and the number of employees is not proof of legitimacy. At its peak Theranos had around 850 employees. Back in October they fired about as many people has CIG has working for them, and this month they're laying off the rough equivalent of every CIG employee outside of Manchester. Having twice as many employees as CIG didn't make Elizabeth Holmes any less of a fraud. AP posted:You dumb arseholes are so easy to troll I'm actually embarrassed. I enjoy it. I know it's meaningless, but it's still fun.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 18:35
|
|
|
Pope Corky the IX posted:What do you think Ben's office chair smells like? this is the debate we need
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 18:36
|
|
|
Gradis posted:this is the debate we need This is a new and very curious definition of "need" that I would like to hear more about.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 18:37
|
|
|
https://vimeo.com/129662453 I'll watch this and let you guys know if it's worth it
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 18:38
|
|
|
Tippis posted:This is a new and very curious definition of "need" that I would like to hear more about. getting some sample chairs in and i will pass the numbers to statistics cow to crunch.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 18:39
|
|
|
Ol Cactus Dick posted:This guy? I also have Derek's screeds bound as hotkeys
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 18:40
|
|
|
Tippis posted:This is a new and very curious definition of "need" that I would like to hear more about. It's a mixture of curiosity and nausea.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 18:40
|
|
|
cool new Polack jokes posted:I also have Derek's screeds bound as hotkeys are u derek smart
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 18:41
|
|
|
cool new Polack jokes posted:I also have Derek's screeds bound as hotkeys I only have the one bound but it's a pretty good summary
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 18:41
|
|
|
TrustmeImLegit posted:SC is clearly Agile. We get constant updates, buildwise and information wise on a near daily basis. A project like SC is going to take a long time to iterate to the final product to be sure. But to say this isn't Agile is really ignorant about what is being released on this project on a regular basis. If SC was agile, they would deliver many vertical slices with minimal feature changes that were Stable and On Time. So far CIG has done exactly the opposite.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 18:43
|
|
|
Colostomy Bag posted:I'm more of fan of the '67 style versus the '70. most violent car I have been in was a 440 road runner. I have been in tt911-lambos,ferr,vettes,audis etc. No vipers or buggs,paganis yet. S8with v10 is a beast.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 18:47
|
|
|
Ol Cactus Dick posted:lol It's never going to court and the financials will never be public. This is how it's going to end: They will run out of money, Chris will say "Welp we tried but it was just too ambitious and we faced constant antagonism from the (haters/media/big publishing), sorry." and then he and Sandi ride off into the sunset in matching limited edition 911s. I guess the docu will be like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7uPOGxUtZvk
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 18:47
|
|
|
Ol Cactus Dick posted:I only have the one bound but it's a pretty good summary Tbqh I was genuinely hyped when he posted that, it was like a week after I started following the thread I now see that rather than a Challenger-esque CATO for us to warm our hands by, SC is more like Columbia on a long slow atmospheric descent, gradually disintegrating and more sad than shocking.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 18:52
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Ad hominem isn't a real defense, and the number of employees is not proof of legitimacy. At its peak Theranos had around 850 employees. Back in October they fired about as many people has CIG has working for them, and this month they're laying off the rough equivalent of every CIG employee outside of Manchester. Having twice as many employees as CIG didn't make Elizabeth Holmes any less of a fraud. I think I have the proof I need. The person I represent has had his business financially damaged with your slander and its very possible there will be very real consequences. I'd be careful in the future bandying about accusations of fraud.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 18:56
|
|
|
The Titanic posted:As promised! lovely programmer art incoming. The Titanic posted:And the last for now. This is by no means lovely. It brightened up my rainy and windy morning. o9 Tank Boy Ken posted:I guess the docu will be like this: Raskolnikov fucked around with this message at 19:42 on Jan 18, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 18:56
|
|
|
cool new Polack jokes posted:Tbqh I was genuinely hyped when he posted that, it was like a week after I started following the thread Derek threatening legal action and then doing nothing is as old as the internet, it's what earned him his reputation.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:04
|
|
|
Lol, so many retards replying in earnest to SurfaceDetail :v ArfJason this dude is better at his craft than you've been so far haha
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:07
|
|
|
TrustmeImLegit posted:I think I have the proof I need. The person I represent has had his business financially damaged with your slander and its very possible there will be very real consequences. I'd be careful in the future bandying about accusations of fraud. That and about $3.50 will get you a cup of coffee at your local Starbucks son. I am sure we will all be more careful in the future with this open ended limp dicked threat you just made.  By the way? What fedora wearing bitch uses the term "bandying about" and expects to be taken seriously? Because you sure as poo poo aren't a "lawyer" and you aren't representing anyone. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:09
|
|
|
TrustmeImLegit posted:I think I have the proof I need. The person I represent has had his business financially damaged with your slander and its very possible there will be very real consequences. I'd be careful in the future bandying about accusations of fraud. The same business that accused me of committing corporate espionage in official correspondence?
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:11
|
|
|
TrustmeImLegit posted:I think I have the proof I need. The person I represent has had his business financially damaged with your slander and its very possible there will be very real consequences. I'd be careful in the future bandying about accusations of fraud. Slander is spoken. When it's written it's libel.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:12
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:The same business that accused me of committing corporate espionage in official correspondence? Have you ever officially denied it? For the record?
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:12
|
|
|
Scruffpuff posted:Slander is spoken. When it's written it's libel. Be pedantic if you like. I'm sure the judge will love that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:13
|
|
|
Hav posted:Have you ever officially denied it? For the record? Wouldn't I need to have a business first?
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:14
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:The same business that accused me of committing corporate espionage in official correspondence? You did though. You took information from their business and gave it to a direct competitor in the same field. I'm just playing though I'm not a lawyer haha. But you really should be more careful throwing the word fraud and scam around.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:14
|
|
|
What are you goddamn goons doing in here?
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:17
|
|
|
TrustmeImLegit posted:Be pedantic if you like. I'm sure the judge will love that. You raise a good point - judges are notorious for hating getting into technicalities regarding matters of law.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:18
|
|
|
TrustmeImLegit posted:You did though. You took information from their business and gave it to a direct competitor in the same field. I'm just playing though I'm not a lawyer haha. But you really should be more careful throwing the word fraud and scam around. Wrong. I never took information from CIG.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:18
|
|
|
TrustmeImLegit posted:That's Agile dev for you. Constant iterations. Basic software dev honestly. As a scrum master, I say you're full of poo poo!
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:19
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Wrong. I never took information from CIG. Thankfully that won't be up to either of us to determine soon.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:19
|
|
|
HycoCam posted:Holy crap!! If there is ever a Star Citizen book--this needs to be right there on the inside of the cover. If there ever is a star citizen book??? 
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:19
|
|
|
TrustmeImLegit posted:You did though. You took information from their business and gave it to a direct competitor in the same field. I'm just playing though I'm not a lawyer haha. But you really should be more careful throwing the word fraud and scam around.  This troll is really weird can we just see your nuts now?
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:21
|
|
|
Polish Avenger posted:
Same. Meridian posted:What are you goddamn goons doing in here? Beautiful damned goony things. How about yourself? Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Wouldn't I need to have a business first? OBJECTION!
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:22
|
|
|
Polish Avenger posted:
This is starting to constitute harassment of a sexual nature. I can have someone draw up a C n D later or you can stop demanding that I expose my genitals on the internet.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:23
|
|
|
oh hey sweet, more people, including a mod trolling themselves to the stone age. Hey guys. Star Citizen is good. Please quote this 20+ times and hit me with 40,000 words in response, thank you.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:24
|
|
|
TrustmeImLegit posted:This is starting to constitute harassment of a sexual nature. I can have someone draw up a C n D later or you can stop demanding that I expose my genitals on the internet. post a pic of the CnD, it will be like where's waldo
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:24
|
|
|
Fat Shat Sings posted:oh hey sweet, more people, including a mod trolling themselves to the stone age. I was hoping to have more backup by this point but I think SC is pretty good now as it is.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:25
|
|
|
Fat Shat Sings posted:oh hey sweet, more people, including a mod trolling themselves to the stone age. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 00:22 |
|
|
TrustmeImLegit posted:This is Decoded. Show us your nuts. Fat Shat Sings posted:Hey guys. Star Citizen is good. Please quote this 20+ times and hit me with 40,000 words in response, thank you. Seems legit.  Hav fucked around with this message at 19:32 on Jan 18, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2017 19:29
|
|