Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Milkfred E. Moore
Aug 27, 2006

'It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.'

Jedit posted:

No, he didn't. That's how Lyta's mind interpreted Kosh's memory of the event, but Kosh himself had to have been poisoned through his encounter suit. It's the big unexplained plot hole of the pilot.

My preferred explanation is that it was actually the encounter suit that was poisoned. Kosh was affected because he was connected to it in the same way as he connected to his ship.

I haven't seen The Gathering in a very long time but isn't the sequence of events...

Kosh comes out of his ship. The security cameras are turned off under specific instructions from the Vorlon government.
Kosh sees 'Sinclair', whom he knows is Valen. Why Kosh doesn't have any awareness of the Minbari under the Net is a question.
Kosh extends a hand/tentacle/whatever in greeting.
'Sinclair' applies poison to hand/tentacle/whatever.
Kosh collapses.
Later, Lyta interprets as a hand because she has a human mind -- also, Kosh was aware of her on some level (the encounter suit opens before she touches it).

Why would Kosh have to have been poisoned through the suit when we plainly see him extending a limb? How is it a plot hole? We've seen plenty of times that Kosh can open up his encounter suit to no ill-effect, because the encounter suit is a disguise and not actually a life-support mechanism.

edit: I mean, I can find heaps of things where people are saying "JMS, how did Kosh get poisoned if he's wearing a suit?" and responses like "It's not a plot hole but a plot point", it wasn't "faked" by Kosh, and even a "It didn't have to get past the encounter suit; he was distinctly shown extending a portion of himself *outside* the suit."

Milkfred E. Moore fucked around with this message at 08:53 on Sep 20, 2017

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Party Plane Jones
Jul 1, 2007

by Reene
Fun Shoe

Narsham posted:

Some actors rely a lot on directors, especially if they're uncomfortable with their role, and some don't. I think much of the "bad acting" in the early part of the show is down to actors getting little or no help from their directors. Try watching S1 performances from episode to episode tracking the director and you'll see some interesting variation.

Compton appears to have been more interested in action and effects than in characterization, and he directed "The Gathering".

Season 1 is really the only time you can sort of notice that Biggs is deaf, because the shot framing has him staring to the other actors mouths very often. Once you get to the second season they don't frame him with other actors, they'll switch cameras instead.

Also tidbit: JMS hated Jerry Doyle's habits of putting his hand in his pockets because it hosed with continuity and caused reshoots, so he ended up giving him uniforms without pockets. Doyle responded to this by punching his fists through the sitched seams and driving the costumers crazy.

Party Plane Jones fucked around with this message at 09:24 on Sep 20, 2017

Dirty
Apr 8, 2003

Ceci n'est pas un fabricant de pates

Milky Moor posted:

Why would Kosh have to have been poisoned through the suit when we plainly see him extending a limb? How is it a plot hole? We've seen plenty of times that Kosh can open up his encounter suit to no ill-effect, because the encounter suit is a disguise and not actually a life-support mechanism.

I'm not sure "plot hole" is the right term, but it's certainly inconsistent/strange. Throughout the series, Vorlons fiercely hide their identity until the time is right. It's a big point that no one has ever seen a Vorlon. Then Kosh sees Sinclair and goes in for a human-style handshake? I get that Sinclair is going to be important, but you don't see Kosh ever trying this again. Sinclair visits him plenty of times in his quarters, and Kosh is always in his suit, except for that time when he's a ball of light behind a screen, and makes a point of whizzing into his suit when Sinclair isn't looking.

Yes, in The Gathering Kosh could easily have been literally shaking Sinclair's hand, but it's a familiar and very human gesture for a species that builds an identity around being aloof, indirect and guarded. Kosh simply isn't the handshaking type, except for this one time when the plot requires it. So either they aren't shaking hands, in which case what actually is happening, or they are shaking hands and it's totally out of character. Considering that the Vorlons seem generally out of character in The Gathering, I'm assuming the latter. It's a pilot. It happens.

Also worth noting that they actually added in the line where's Kosh is all like "yo, Valen" when he goes for a handshake for the special edition, presumably to justify this familiarity and try make it seem less out of character. That in itself is pretty odd, as well as a big spoiler. Also it makes Kosh seem like he doesn't understand what's going on. Lucky Sinclair wasn't like "Wait... I'm Valen?? Holy crap, this changes everything..."

Milkfred E. Moore
Aug 27, 2006

'It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.'

Dirty posted:

I'm not sure "plot hole" is the right term, but it's certainly inconsistent/strange. Throughout the series, Vorlons fiercely hide their identity until the time is right. It's a big point that no one has ever seen a Vorlon. Then Kosh sees Sinclair and goes in for a human-style handshake? I get that Sinclair is going to be important, but you don't see Kosh ever trying this again. Sinclair visits him plenty of times in his quarters, and Kosh is always in his suit, except for that time when he's a ball of light behind a screen, and makes a point of whizzing into his suit when Sinclair isn't looking.

Sinclair is Valen.

Kosh being deliberately enigmatic on numerous occasions (rushing into his suit, basically laughing about the Feeder, giving Sinclair the cold shoulder by shutting down his suit at one point) isn't really an argument against Kosh recognising Valen.

Arguing that Kosh wouldn't handshake is weird, particularly in any context involving the actual messiah figure Valen. As mentioned, even the Vorlon government knew that something was going to happen between Kosh and Sinclair that required absolute secrecy -- maybe something identity related (why request the cameras be turned off otherwise?)

quote:

Yes, in The Gathering Kosh could easily have been literally shaking Sinclair's hand, but it's a familiar and very human gesture for a species that builds an identity around being aloof, indirect and guarded. Kosh simply isn't the handshaking type, except for this one time when the plot requires it. So either they aren't shaking hands, in which case what actually is happening, or they are shaking hands and it's totally out of character. Considering that the Vorlons seem generally out of character in The Gathering, I'm assuming the latter. It's a pilot. It happens.

This one time 'when the plot requires it' is an incredibly weird 'one time'. It isn't like Kosh was getting his mail.

quote:

Also worth noting that they actually added in the line where's Kosh is all like "yo, Valen" when he goes for a handshake for the special edition, presumably to justify this familiarity and try make it seem less out of character. That in itself is pretty odd, as well as a big spoiler. Also it makes Kosh seem like he doesn't understand what's going on. Lucky Sinclair wasn't like "Wait... I'm Valen?? Holy crap, this changes everything..."

You are overthinking this and imagining possible problems instead of engaging with the text as-is.

For example, why do you assume Sinclair would have any idea what Kosh meant, or even interpret it as anything other than a greeting? It's a big leap to assume that he, Sinclair, is also Valen. How could Sinclair possibly figure it out? For all he knows, it's a weird Vorlon ritual.

There's a big thread running through B5, albeit one that gets dropped and picked up seemingly at random, that the Vorlons knew exactly what was going on. For example, an earlier version of Severed Dreams had the Vorlons riding in to protect B5 instead of the Minbari.

But if you want to argue the evolving production side of things, that's a whole different conversation. In that case, Gathering-Sinclair isn't Valen at all. But also, JMS has said that the Valen remark is Kosh's internal thoughts, so...

Milkfred E. Moore fucked around with this message at 10:47 on Sep 20, 2017

Dirty
Apr 8, 2003

Ceci n'est pas un fabricant de pates

Milky Moor posted:

Kosh being deliberately enigmatic on numerous occasions (rushing into his suit, basically laughing about the Feeder, giving Sinclair the cold shoulder by shutting down his suit at one point) isn't really an argument against Kosh recognising Valen.
No, it's an argument that the handshake in The Gathering is inconsistent with all his other behaviour. You've said that Kosh is "deliberately enigmatic on numerous occasions" - I think that's an understatement. His whole deal is being enigmatic. Except for the handshake. And he's so enigmatic after The Gathering that he never seems to want to get that handshake with the revered Valen. So is it normal for Kosh to want to handshake Valen or not? Yes in The Gathering, no in the rest of the series. That's why I think there's inconsistency.

quote:

Arguing that Kosh wouldn't handshake is weird, particularly in any context involving the actual messiah figure Valen. As mentioned, even the Vorlon government knew that something was going to happen between Kosh and Sinclair that required absolute secrecy -- maybe something identity related (why request the cameras be turned off otherwise?)
Indeed - so in The Gathering, they were expecting them to shake hands or something, yes. I'm not arguing that it did or didn't happen. I'm arguing that it feels inconsistent with Vorlon behaviour.

quote:

This one time 'when the plot requires it' is an incredibly weird 'one time'. It isn't like Kosh was getting his mail.
Vorlons have never shown an interest in handshakes or normal human-style social interaction anywhere outside of this scene. Even with Valen/Sinclair in all the other times they are alone together. This is the only time. A Vorlon gets poisoned while doing the one thing they're never otherwise depicted to do - unless you're saying that Vorlons routinely give chummy handshakes offscreen. If your argument is that Kosh would always want to handshake Valen and only Valen, that kind of implies that the Minbari agent knew Kosh was going to do that. Which raises some questions.

quote:

You are overthinking this and imagining possible problems instead of engaging with the text as-is.

For example, why do you assume Sinclair would have any idea what Kosh meant, or even interpret it as anything other than a greeting? It's a big leap to assume that he, Sinclair, is also Valen. How could Sinclair possibly figure it out? For all he knows, it's a weird Vorlon ritual.

There's a big thread running through B5, albeit one that gets dropped and picked up seemingly at random, that the Vorlons knew exactly what was going on. For example, an earlier version of Severed Dreams had the Vorlons riding in to protect B5 instead of the Minbari.

But if you want to argue the evolving production side of things, that's a whole different conversation. In that case, Gathering-Sinclair isn't Valen at all. But also, JMS has said that the Valen remark is Kosh's internal thoughts, so...
Yes, I was being facetious here - what Kosh says isn't really important to the discussion, I just think it's funny that Kosh apparently seems to be going "Oh hey, Valen!" to Sinclair's face. And every other Vorlon watching through his eyes is spacepalming, or hissing "not yet, idiot!"

Neddy Seagoon
Oct 12, 2012

"Hi Everybody!"
Considering Kosh was also surgically operated on in the The Gathering, the real takeaway from it is "it's the series pilot and things changed". Especially when it aired a full year before the series got underway.

Milkfred E. Moore
Aug 27, 2006

'It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.'
I had a job interview at a school. I introduced myself with a handshake to the man doing my interview. When I came to start my first day, I didn't handshake him again. Is my behavior inconsistent?

I can't argue against something you feel. But there's a difference between feeling something is inconsistent and something actually being inconsistent.

quote:

that kind of implies that the Minbari agent knew Kosh was going to do that. Which raises some questions.

This is definitely more of a weird thing that doesn't make much sense.

Milkfred E. Moore
Aug 27, 2006

'It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.'

Neddy Seagoon posted:

Considering Kosh was also surgically operated on in the The Gathering, the real takeaway from it is "it's the series pilot and things changed". Especially when it aired a full year before the series got underway.

Vorlons have physical forms.

Clouseau
Aug 3, 2003

My theories appall you, my heresies outrage you, I never answer letters, and you don't like my tie.
I've never bought the Kosh "Valen" line as a spoiler- considering that at the time it's just a nonsense sci-fi word in a pilot uttered by a mysterious source. I watched that version of The Gathering and wasn't later let down during the Valen reveal. It more feels like a rewatch easter egg.

bobkatt013
Oct 8, 2006

You’re telling me Peter Parker is ...... Spider-man!?

Milky Moor posted:

Vorlons have physical forms.

Yes as energy

Dirty
Apr 8, 2003

Ceci n'est pas un fabricant de pates

Milky Moor posted:

I had a job interview at a school. I introduced myself with a handshake to the man doing my interview. When I came to start my first day, I didn't handshake him again. Is my behavior inconsistent?

Well that depends. Was the man doing an interview actually not really him, but an agent from a different school trying to kill you. Once everything had been sorted out, on your first real meeting, did you then go for that handshake, or politely refuse because you'd already shook hands with someone who looked like him?

Do you also engage in other social norms with this person? The handshake is strange because it sits totally in isolation. There's a whole level of interaction missing there that makes the handshake... well... inconsistent. Kosh never otherwise has any interactions with Sinclair that fit in with starting your relationship with a warm handshake.

quote:

But there's a difference between feeling something is inconsistent and something actually being inconsistent.
Well... ugh. There's also a difference between feeling something is consistent and it actually being consistent.

As I've said, this is where I sit:

Neddy Seagoon posted:

... the real takeaway from it is "it's the series pilot and things changed". Especially when it aired a full year before the series got underway.
I'm cool with this. The handshake isn't the only inconsistency in the pilot, and the real explanation for them is this. I've never tried to rationalise the handshake or any of the other stuff, they're just products of the process, inconsistencies and all. It doesn't all need to fit, or be made to fit.

Dirty
Apr 8, 2003

Ceci n'est pas un fabricant de pates

Clouseau posted:

I've never bought the Kosh "Valen" line as a spoiler- considering that at the time it's just a nonsense sci-fi word in a pilot uttered by a mysterious source. I watched that version of The Gathering and wasn't later let down during the Valen reveal. It more feels like a rewatch easter egg.

Yes, true. They say "Valen" a lot, but not that much. And I think Kosh says "Entil'Zah Valen" or something, so yeah it's even muddier. Kosh just saying "hi" in Vorlonese, you wouldn't really know where those words start and end.

Milkfred E. Moore
Aug 27, 2006

'It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.'

bobkatt013 posted:

Yes as energy

Incorrect.

A lot of noise is made about the Vorlons being 'energy beings', like they're ghosts, but it's inaccurate. The Vorlons have physicality. They have a physical form that can be poisoned and ripped apart (and you'd assume Lyta is being pretty accurate!) Again, you have to go to JMS' comments on this, but I think even The Gathering mentions that Kosh's physical form is weird and crystalline (hence why the poison worked on Kosh in the first place).

Look at the far-future human in Deconstruction. He has a physical form and can also take on properties of light and energy (turning into a ball). The Vorlons have physicality -- Kosh can be poisoned on his hand, Kosh can catch Sheridan, Kosh can be ripped apart by Shadows, Kosh can get tired and require rest -- but can also render themselves somewhat insubstantial (Kosh and Kosh 2 flying through Babylon 5's decks). Essentially, the Vorlons can incarnate. And, if they can do that, it's not a stretch to assume that taking a physical form can make them vulnerable.

Shadows have fallen to PPG fire before, after all. And they are older than the Vorlons.

Dirty posted:

Well that depends. Was the man doing an interview actually not really him, but an agent from a different school trying to kill you. Once everything had been sorted out, on your first real meeting, did you then go for that handshake, or politely refuse because you'd already shook hands with someone who looked like him?

Hah, good point. Got me there.

Milkfred E. Moore fucked around with this message at 12:17 on Sep 20, 2017

Neddy Seagoon
Oct 12, 2012

"Hi Everybody!"

Milky Moor posted:

Incorrect.

Look at the far-future human in Deconstruction. He has a physical form and can also take on properties of light and energy (turning into a ball). The Vorlons have physicality -- Kosh can be poisoned on his hand, Kosh can catch Sheridan, Kosh can be ripped apart by Shadows, Kosh can get tired and require rest -- but can also render themselves somewhat insubstantial (Kosh and Kosh 2 flying through Babylon 5's decks). Essentially, the Vorlons can incarnate. And, if they can do that, it's not a stretch to assume that taking a physical form can make them vulnerable.

The problem is you're still relying on The Gathering's events as the crux of your argument and;

Neddy Seagoon posted:

...the real takeaway from it is "it's the series pilot and things changed". Especially when it aired a full year before the series got underway.

The series proper brushes over those events pretty casually for just the key details it needs (Someone tried to assassinate Kosh, Lyta getting a look inside the Encounter Suit and touching Kosh's mind). Don't forget Delenn's Magic Rings, the Changeling Net, the phaser knockoff PPG's, and the flying camera drones following Sinclair.

Neddy Seagoon fucked around with this message at 13:11 on Sep 20, 2017

Angry Salami
Jul 27, 2013

Don't trust the skull.

Neddy Seagoon posted:

...the flying camera drones following Sinclair...

They show up elsewhere! The reporters in "And Now for a Word" and "Illusion of Truth" have them!

Neddy Seagoon
Oct 12, 2012

"Hi Everybody!"

Angry Salami posted:

They show up elsewhere! The reporters in "And Now for a Word" and "Illusion of Truth" have them!

I stand corrected then on that one :cripes:

Milkfred E. Moore
Aug 27, 2006

'It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.'

Neddy Seagoon posted:

The problem is you're still relying on The Gathering's events as the crux of your argument and;

When talking about a text should I not rely on the text-as-presented?

My evidence comes directly from the text. I'm arguing what is there, what we were told and what we were shown. I'm not here to talk headcanons built from 'feelings' about the text.

For example, here is something else we were shown that supports my argument -- that is, an energy being taking a corporeal form to physically affect the world around him: Lorien.

Neddy Seagoon posted:

I stand corrected then on that one :cripes:

The Changling Net is also mentioned a few times throughout the series proper.

Lyta's whole arc is based off the events of The Gathering, too. It's not exactly brushed over.

Milkfred E. Moore
Aug 27, 2006

'It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.'
but seriously what happened to lorien's ship

mossyfisk
Nov 8, 2010

FF0000
I probably wouldn't ever shake hands again if it got me poisoned the first time.

Narsham
Jun 5, 2008

Milky Moor posted:

When talking about a text should I not rely on the text-as-presented?

My evidence comes directly from the text. I'm arguing what is there, what we were told and what we were shown. I'm not here to talk headcanons built from 'feelings' about the text.

If you want an explanation in-setting that explains what we actually see, simply imagine that Sinclair described this incident to Kosh after travelling back in time and that leads to Kosh deliberately allowing himself to be poisoned by extending a hand/whatever.

Milky Moor posted:

but seriously what happened to lorien's ship

Obviously, there was never a ship: that was all Lorien.

The Babylon 5 Wars game (which is, arguably, canon, or at least JMS endorsed) identifies one of the First One groups as the Triad, a group of three entities born immortal like Lorien who have the ability to create limited amounts of matter at will and who thus can create ships that way. When they stop maintaining a ship, it just disperses again. So Lorien just did that.

You would think someone would notice it was missing, but presumably we just missed that scene. Would have been useful for Garibaldi to notice and add that to the list of suspicions.

Winifred Madgers
Feb 12, 2002

We just watched "Objects in Motion" as we've been putting off the end of this. I'll tell you this, I've been enjoying DS9, but coming back to B5 is like the first time you open the windows in springtime.

I can't think of any other show that has a whole quarter of the last season as epilogue and denouement, but it is so good to have this.

mllaneza
Apr 28, 2007

Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1993-1952




I'm doing a slow re-watch on a lunch break or two a week. Last night I skipped ahead to The Coming of Shadows. Oh god that was the good stuff.

Open Source Idiom
Jan 4, 2013

turn left hillary!! noo posted:

I can't think of any other show that has a whole quarter of the last season as epilogue and denouement, but it is so good to have this.

I've got an answer to this, but you won't like it. It's Girls.

Winifred Madgers
Feb 12, 2002

I don't even know what that is, haha. And I suspect I wouldn't care if I did.

pentyne
Nov 7, 2012

turn left hillary!! noo posted:

We just watched "Objects in Motion" as we've been putting off the end of this. I'll tell you this, I've been enjoying DS9, but coming back to B5 is like the first time you open the windows in springtime.

I can't think of any other show that has a whole quarter of the last season as epilogue and denouement, but it is so good to have this.

DS9 still has all the trappings and window dressings of the TNG trek so it doesn't have the same feel as B5 once it goes into the darker plot territory. Also, aside from Sisko and Dukat no one could yell and get loud and really command a screen presence and mean it. Whereas in B5 you had Londo, Garibaldi, G'Kar, Franklin, Sheridan, Delenn, Ivanova, Sinclair, etc. Even a lot of the guest actors showed up ready to act in intense scenes and brought their A game.

bobkatt013
Oct 8, 2006

You’re telling me Peter Parker is ...... Spider-man!?

turn left hillary!! noo posted:


I can't think of any other show that has a whole quarter of the last season as epilogue and denouement, but it is so good to have this.

Six feet under did!

The Unlife Aquatic
Jun 17, 2009

Here in my car
I feel safest of all
I can lock all my doors
It's the only way to live
In cars
What I wouldn't give to listen to Garak and Londo have a conversation over dinner.

Farmer Crack-Ass
Jan 2, 2001

this is me posting irl

The Unlife Aquatic posted:

What I wouldn't give to listen to Garak and Londo have a conversation over dinner.

Dude. Gul Dukat and G'Kar.

The Unlife Aquatic
Jun 17, 2009

Here in my car
I feel safest of all
I can lock all my doors
It's the only way to live
In cars
You know that'd degenerate into a fight within five minutes. G'Kar would do his weird squatting combat stance and Dukat would bring the double handed axe handle.

Winifred Madgers
Feb 12, 2002

G'Kar and Kira would be good for a wholly different reason.

And I'm trying to decide if Odo and Garibaldi would get along, or hate each other.

But for my money, give me Quark and Morden.

ConfusedUs
Feb 24, 2004

Bees?
You want fucking bees?
Here you go!
ROLL INITIATIVE!!





turn left hillary!! noo posted:


And I'm trying to decide if Odo and Garibaldi would get along, or hate each other.


They'd have the most cordial conversation and then, the moment the other was out of sight/earshot, they'd begin a full-scale investigation.

Neddy Seagoon
Oct 12, 2012

"Hi Everybody!"

ConfusedUs posted:

They'd have the most cordial conversation and then, the moment the other was out of sight/earshot, they'd begin a full-scale investigation.

That's absurd and stupid.

They'd have profiled eachother well before the conversation.

Narsham
Jun 5, 2008
How about Bashir and Zathras? Or Dax and Ivanova?

Winifred Madgers
Feb 12, 2002

Narsham posted:

How about Bashir and Zathras? Or Dax and Ivanova?

Bashir would just have an increasingly confused, then baffled, then dumbfounded look on his face the longer it went on.

Bieeanshee
Aug 21, 2000

Not keen on keening.


Grimey Drawer
*click* *click* *click* "Zathras see O'Brien have very sad life too."

Kibayasu
Mar 28, 2010

Bareil and Byron. Bareil is silent because Byron is too boring to talk to and Byron won't read Bareil's mind because it's just too boring.

Winifred Madgers
Feb 12, 2002

Sisko and Sheridan would be natural allies, and unstoppable.

I'm not sure about Lwaxana and Lady Morella though....

Delsaber
Oct 1, 2013

This may or may not be correct.

Ivanova and Chekov would spend the whole crossover discussing all the cool poo poo Russians invented.

The Unlife Aquatic
Jun 17, 2009

Here in my car
I feel safest of all
I can lock all my doors
It's the only way to live
In cars

Delsaber posted:

Ivanova and Chekov would spend the whole crossover discussing all the cool poo poo Russians invented.

"Wait, don't I know you?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Winifred Madgers
Feb 12, 2002

Bester would eat Chekov alive.

Morn would fit right in on B5.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply