|
Yeah, ok. How are they going to do it?
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 11:07 |
|
|
Cao Ni Ma posted:Yeah, ok. How are they going to do it? With words. Lots and lots of words. ----------------
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:02
|
|
|
I wonder how Matlock would have handled all this hot space court action.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:02
|
|
C-Bangin' it 
|
Cao Ni Ma posted:I dont see how anything skadden posts as a motion in an update can be apocalyptic save for some poo poo they shouldn't have access without discovery being granted. Like if they have a tax statement from CIG/F42 that has them counting SQ42 as a individual game for tax purposes, signed by the loving queen. Stop hating on the dream, you meanie. D_Smart posted:Just remember who called it. Ghostbusters… customers…?
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:03
|
|
|
Nyast posted:I think 2018 is going to be a tough year for them financially, because they've used most of their ace cards in 2017. You’re not thinking outside the box enough here, friend. When there was nothing, suddenly there was render to texture. When there was drought, suddenly there was face over ip. This year... what could it possibly be? What hideously outrageous, extraneous and extravagant and totally useless and probably detrimental to implant technology is out there for CR to exploit? I’m thinking maybe an add on to face over ip where you can get your face scanned and put on a character... but only with the Star Citizen fidelity camera! For non technology gameplay stuff, I’m totally going to stick with what I thought they were going to do last year for the big unveil: 1: a carrier or pocket carrier ship 2: showing off a second star system you can jump to That’s my guess! Calling it!
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:03
|
|
|
Quavers posted:Sleeping Dogs Field Report Preview: It’s alpha!  
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:05
|
|
|
Yet another ship design needing revision so that the player can actually fit in it... Come on guys, it’s year six. Ship sales are your money printer and presumably your core competence. Can you not add a design requirement earlier in your vaunted pipeline? Before the modeling starts? “Player must fit in ship.”
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:05
|
|
|
Hobold posted:I want to say they announced something akin to power armor a long while back. Early Star Marine days. They did. It was basically an elemental like suit.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:10
|
|
|
G0RF posted:Yet another ship design needing revision so that the player can actually fit in it... You people and your demands! Just accept the inherent greatness of what offerings Chris almighty gracefully bestows on you.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:11
|
|
|
Quavers posted:Sleeping Dogs Field Report Preview: Hey, Sleeping Dogs was in development for centuries before it came out. Star Citizen is just now starting development, and it's already the greatest game past, present and future.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:17
|
|
|
I'm calling it, that I will continue not to give a poo poo about the contents of the court filings until we get to the judgement.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:18
|
|
|
Lladre posted:I mean just check out these babies. A nice shot of a long stick between two tits.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:20
|
|
|
Raskolnikov posted:Thread patch notes: Must be naked when posting on the Star Citizen thread, ready at a moments notice if a post appears that must be jacked or rubbed to.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:24
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:24
|
|
|
G0RF posted:“Player must fit in ship.” Not sure that's a requirement I mean, you can just rub up against the cockpit and <USE> to get in, so why bother needing to fit in the doors.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:24
|
|
|
Beet Wagon posted:Also they're totally gonna sell (and then never work on) mechs. This is nothing but a sentence of lies and goon rhetoric. I bet you can’t name a single example where this has ever happened with Star Citizen. And to counter each and every single one of the fraudulent claims you will make, moma is going to post screenshots and YouTube videos proving you totally wrong. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:28
|
|
|
CIG doesn't have to do poo poo to make mechs work. Just scale up the player model to stupid proportions. Just like they turn players into space ships.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:30
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:31
|
|
|
Brutal takedowns are back!
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:35
|
|
|
Brazilianpeanutwar posted:Time for another totally real DOOM session that totally happened guys! Please. She’s probably designing some new shoes for her shoe company on one monitor and writing up a marketing plan on another monitor and identifying some marine life on another monitor and making the work schedule for her club on another monitor and writing a customer service email on another monitor and none of the monitors are playing Star Citizen but it’s ok. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:36
|
|
|
Geez, if only there was a game or games where he could accurately fly a 737.  Roberts please save us.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:39
|
|
|
G0RF posted:Yet another ship design needing revision so that the player can actually fit in it... Let’s see here.... hmmm... ship... player... size vs size.... can the player.... Hmmmm... No. That’s why they have a pipeline for revisions. It’s really best if they complete the high detail model and the low detail models and all animations and black boxing before they even test dumb stuff like “can the dumb player fit inside even”. Let’s just not even open up that can of worms because that’s not how AAAA studios like CIG roll.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:49
|
|
|
Hobold posted:CIG doesn't have to do poo poo to make mechs work. You can just stop here. It’s best to just develop the jpeg, then the 6 page write up about how awesome it is and how it will integrate and how there are loader mechs like aliens or fighter mechs like battle tech or news mechs with arm cameras and repair mechs that can hold hands and form chains of repairs on ships or bigger mechs. Just the picture and the dream, friend. Just the picture and the dream.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:54
|
|
|
tuo posted:That's what I find so odd about that bugsmashers episode. Either the guy is really bad at explaining stuff, or he has a basic misunderstanding of Lambda functions. If you listen to him, it sounds like async execution and Lambda go hand in hand, allthough neither is a clear indicator for the other. In many languages, you have to specifically define a Lambda to be async. Groundbreaking concepts! (from 1st year CS coursework)
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:57
|
|
|
The Titanic posted:You can just stop here. It’s best to just develop the jpeg, then the 6 page write up about how awesome it is and how it will integrate and how there are loader mechs like aliens or fighter mechs like battle tech or news mechs with arm cameras and repair mechs that can hold hands and form chains of repairs on ships or bigger mechs. Oh, for sure. Just pointing out they don't have to do any magic to make it work. At least anything more than they've already done, lied about, tried to hide, and claimed they were innovative.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 01:58
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 02:07
|
|
|
big nipples big life posted:Brutal takedowns are back!
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 02:20
|
|
|
Ghostlight posted:I have a degree in brutal takedowns and that was only classifiable as a knock-about tussle. don't fud my dreams dude
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 02:22
|
|
|
I never told anybody this before, thread, but I really love FUD.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 02:32
|
|
|
SPERMCUBE.ORG posted:I never told anybody this before, thread, but I really love FUD. What about the FLUDD?
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 02:40
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 02:44
|
|
|
My inside sources are telling me to call it that there may be a response tomorrow that may have legal implications that may lead to further legal stuff. Just FYI because I know this is important info that I couldn’t just sit on while nobody else was calling it. You saw it here first. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 02:56
|
|
|
OK, wow that ATV was beyond horrible. Did CIG's budget for ATV went to poo poo? So when's Skadden gonna file that response, and when will we have access to it? e: Mark looks like he doesn't even give a gently caress anymore. Thats good for Star Citizen.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 03:07
|
|
|
There will be two spikes of one million calls before the end of the month.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 03:07
|
|
|
I firmly believe that there are more lines spoken in all the shows combined than lines of code written for Star Citizen.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 03:10
|
|
|
no_recall posted:OK, wow that ATV was beyond horrible. Did CIG's budget for ATV went to poo poo? it's all gone to the development of the game
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 03:11
|
|
|
In other news. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Op_cKfFeYbg&t=485s New ED Ship in action.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 03:12
|
|
|
Weird that there's gameplay in that video.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 03:33
|
|
|
CIG wants ships to have some lore, backstory, realization of realism, context within the world, artistically sound - fidelitiness speaking - CR wants all these things and I personally think its OK. However, having all these things for ALL YOUR loving ships is just insane. Maybe have 10 ships and make those 10 ships really speak for themselves. But then if they did 10 ships they would have absolutely nothing to sell. ED throws a ship into the game, carefully managing its internal module capability, hardpoint placement defining convergence, thrusters placement and design that actually makes sense, and has a narrative on why its created and what its meant to do (help you shoot space bugs better). The philosophies between the two ship pipelines are monumentally different. ED gives your a ship, artificially limits its capabilities and forces you to play around them. SC tells you every single ship punches above its weight and has no gameplay mechanic to support modifying internals, and testing them in the different gameplay scenarios. ED enforces gameplay realism, by artificial means. SC is artificially crippled because of very realistic and fundamental issues.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 03:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 11:07 |
|
|
Dusty Lens posted:Weird that there's gameplay in that video. Even weirder, it's FD devs and employees playing that gameplay, almost as if they regularly play. Very odd.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 03:49
|
|
