|
I had a great experience owning my 330Ci for 8 years. 
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2018 15:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 22:01 |
|
|
suck my woke dick posted:Though I wonder to what extent those decisions were actually done by engineers and to what extent they were driven by dumbass requirements and an executive-imposed desire to force the customer to pay for basic maintenance which were then engineered in to the letter. Looking it up the hood is so hard to get off because it's got a rear engine and the hood covers batteries for the hybrid engine that you'd kill yourself on if you got in there and started messing with instead of parts you'd be able to do anything with.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2018 16:08
|
|
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:Looking it up the hood is so hard to get off because it's got a rear engine and the hood covers batteries for the hybrid engine that you'd kill yourself on if you got in there and started messing with instead of parts you'd be able to do anything with. In that case they should have just screwed it down and put a "danger high voltage" sign somewhere though?
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2018 16:23
|
|
I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!
|
suck my woke dick posted:In that case they should have just screwed it down and put a "danger high voltage" sign somewhere though? Like this? (the actual batteries)  Seems like the stuff in the front being stuff you don't need to touch and the engine being in the rear and having it's own access makes the hood being removable but not easy for someone to open without tools seems reasonable. The door latch breaking easily seems like the unacceptable one.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2018 17:08
|
|
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:Like this? (the actual batteries) Yeah but if there's nothing to do under the hood in the first place just bolt the whole thing down instead of making it operate like a normal hood but shittier. quote:The door latch breaking easily seems like the unacceptable one. Yeah definitely. There's no real reason to not have it release the door (or fail to engage at all if you're worried about people accidentally opening their doors on the Autobahn) if you yank it without also pulling on the slider underneath. For that matter, if you already include a mechanical door release, why not just make it the main one.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2018 19:00
|
|
|
At least you can open it without power.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2018 19:05
|
|
|
http://twitter.com/EmilyGorcenski/status/964800099674218496
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2018 19:23
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2018 20:30
|
|
|
suck my woke dick posted:Yeah but if there's nothing to do under the hood in the first place just bolt the whole thing down instead of making it operate like a normal hood but shittier. They made it so it only really opens if you use a special tool and frame to open it and keep it open, you opening it requires two people to simultaneously jam two screwdrivers through a seam to pop a mechanism then jam it up to keep it from closing. If all they had done is bolt it closed they'd have been doing less to keep people out.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2018 21:10
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/sehurlburt/status/965005400335532033 
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2018 00:34
|
|
|
Solution: never take VC money. It keeps the vampyres out.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2018 01:20
|
|
|
The dumbest part of that conscious effort to maximize worker exploitation is that it doesn't even generate returns in the short-term.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2018 01:26
|
|
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:They made it so it only really opens if you use a special tool and frame to open it and keep it open, you opening it requires two people to simultaneously jam two screwdrivers through a seam to pop a mechanism then jam it up to keep it from closing. If all they had done is bolt it closed they'd have been doing less to keep people out. Tbf,german engineers ,especially german auto engineers are absolutly loving insane,the aproach to solving problems or inventing stuff is the most rube goldberg-est though logic i ever saw.they're pretty good at everything else though. And a lot of car manufacturers push for special snowflake ways to work on their cars,to force people to go to official shops and dealerships for maintenance/repairs. Some auto oems barelly turn a profit from supplying parts to car manufacturers,they make their money on consumer replacement parts.continental and saint gobin for example.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2018 02:32
|
|
|
mycomancy posted:Solution: never take VC money. It keeps the vampyres out. This is one reason for the rush to ICO's. Many of which are absolute bullshit, but the overall % of good ones isn't much different than the VC picks. And you avoid the VC nonsense. Note: I have run companies that were VC funded. Not a big fan of it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2018 08:20
|
|
|
VideoGameVet posted:This is one reason for the rush to ICO's. The overall rate of "good ICOs" is 0% and the scam rate is 100%. Hope this helps
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2018 09:38
|
|
|
Weatherman posted:The overall rate of "good ICOs" is 0% and the scam rate is 100%. Hope this helps same for VC picks, and if by accident you end up getting money out of it it's because some idiot with more money than sense wasted his
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2018 09:50
|
|
|
it really is comical how bad the snapchat update is. too bad the people at the top never go bankrupt from this poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2018 13:40
|
|
|
Groovelord Neato posted:it really is comical how bad ... snapchat ... is. too bad the people at the top never go bankrupt from this poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2018 14:01
|
|
|
Groovelord Neato posted:elon musk could spend his money electing politicians that would undo this. You mean libertarians, it's code for I'm a libertarian moron
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2018 05:02
|
|
|
Weatherman posted:The overall rate of "good ICOs" is 0% and the scam rate is 100%. Hope this helps Like this one? https://thesunexchange.com Buy solar cells and lease them to schools and businesses in the sunniest places on Earth. Mainly Africa. The Sun Exchange arranges your monthly lease rental collection and distribution. Get paid in local currency or Bitcoin.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2018 08:15
|
|
|
VideoGameVet posted:Like this one? if there is no C then this isnt a ICO
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2018 09:39
|
|
|
VideoGameVet posted:Like this one? That’s a solar leasing company that happens to accept bitcoin. So far so good. Then it goes and gets stupid with blockchain and https://solarcoin.org and tell me, what the point of any of that? What problem(s) does this blockchain/ICO stuff claim to solve with the original idea?
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2018 13:41
|
|
|
true leftist posted:i will loving destroy each and every one of you. your bodies shall be as putty in my hands and your names will vanish from the book of ages, and i will take you all into my mouth and grind you in my teeth and swallow you and digest you and then i will poo poo you out into a turd deep in the desert where the rain never falls and a turd can lie for a thousand years without decomposing  There goes a v good poster 
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2018 13:47
|
|
|
Flesh Forge posted:
Don’t worry, she’ll be back.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2018 16:44
|
|
|
LOL https://twitter.com/ceejbot/status/965750766370668544
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2018 02:21
|
|
|
Well, what is the preferred web framework for anti-harassment?
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2018 02:53
|
|
|
Steve Jorbs posted:Well, what is the preferred web framework for anti-harassment? I dunno. What do the mods on SA use?
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2018 03:24
|
|
|
Ynglaur posted:I dunno. What do the mods on SA use?
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2018 03:28
|
|
|
I thought twitter spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a machine learning department.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2018 03:52
|
|
|
Dmitri-9 posted:I thought twitter spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a machine learning department.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2018 03:53
|
|
|
Edit: ^^ I like that interpretation more.Dmitri-9 posted:I thought twitter spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a machine learning department. Kinda, but for how to make money off user data, not how to police their walled garden.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2018 03:54
|
|
|
Steve Jorbs posted:Well, what is the preferred web framework for anti-harassment? Rabbi on Rawls
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2018 03:54
|
|
|
The dirty secret of "machine learning" is that it's easy to get away with excusing bad/nonfunctional results by just claiming it needs more training. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2018 05:52
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:Rabbi on Rawls 
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2018 12:54
|
|
|
fishmech posted:The dirty secret of "machine learning" is that it's easy to get away with excusing bad/nonfunctional results by just claiming it needs more training.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2018 13:39
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:Rabbi on Rawls lmao
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2018 14:33
|
|
|
fishmech posted:The dirty secret of "machine learning" is that it's easy to get away with excusing bad/nonfunctional results by just claiming it needs more training. Funny, that can work for developers/IT too.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2018 15:58
|
|
|
pangstrom posted:Not replying to you, but no, nobody would accept that answer. The dirty secret is that if you drive the models in reverse you can see that their "platonic ideals" of the categories are crazy thus you can trick them with google toaster stickers etc. Though if guys like me know it then it's much of a secret, I suppose. ??? ?
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2018 17:11
|
|
|
Maybe: They do very well at their task, but if you peek under the hood they're relying on weird abstractions that are very exploitable. The old secret was how narrow the "tasks" were but that's improving a bit.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2018 17:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 22:01 |
|
|
Ynglaur posted:I dunno. What do the mods on SA use?
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2018 17:23
|
|
