|
b-minus1 posted:I expect to see d1 lumpen lists from everyone within the next 24 hours Scum B- Town Everyone else Sal make joke much laughing hahaha!
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 19:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 20, 2024 05:43 |
|
|
Analyze this: Day 1 sucks. Joke phase sucks. Mafia is a terrible, terrible game. Meta reads suck. Flavor cases suck. Mafia is a terrible, terrible game. Cases built on differing opinion suck. Cases built on behavioral analysis do NOT suck. Cases built on post inconsistencies do NOT suck. I am the best.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 19:11
|
|
|
##vote lando 
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 19:31
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Analyze this:
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 19:36
|
|
|
there had been times goons literally forgot about games so forcing them to post in d1 is good
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 19:39
|
|
|
Lurker rules are incredibly important in mafia games because otherwise afk people burn town lunches. This long term disadvantages town and encourages scum behaviour such that they murder talkative town members to slowly kill the game's chat. This is a legit strategy but drives people away from the game and over time encourages people to be quiet during games. tldr We have lurker rules because mafia is a game played over multiple games and lurker rules ensure that all games remain enjoyable.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:05
|
|
|
Is it too early to worry about what two mason teams means? I'm a little weirded by it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:06
|
|
|
Anyway, I've been shitposting a bunch because I want people talking. We've still two days to go on d1 and I don't want people falling asleep.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:07
|
|
|
Dick Bastardly posted:Is it too early to worry about what two mason teams means? I'm a little weirded by it. No not at all. Failing a good case in the next couple of days a lunch on one of them would be good information.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:10
|
|
|
Natural 20 posted:Lurker rules are incredibly important in mafia games because otherwise afk people burn town lunches. This long term disadvantages town and encourages scum behaviour such that they murder talkative town members to slowly kill the game's chat. That's all well and good but when I wake up in the morning to 100+ posts of pure nothingness from like two people I just tune everything out and do not feel like I can be bothered.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:12
|
|
|
Natural 20 posted:No not at all. Interesting. You may be on to something Gulag.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:15
|
|
|
we should kill the people that sat down and actually thought "hmm i dont actually want to post in this game"
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:19
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:Interesting. You may be on to something Gulag. You don't want to be confirmed town?
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:22
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:we should kill the people that sat down and actually thought "hmm i dont actually want to post in this game"
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:26
|
|
|
Natural 20 posted:Lurker rules are incredibly important in mafia games because otherwise afk people burn town lunches. This long term disadvantages town and encourages scum behaviour such that they murder talkative town members to slowly kill the game's chat. Yeah this a good point. I was MIA for an afternoon in my last game near deadline and was lynched as town doctor on d1. Sometimes I don't post a lot bc I'm always accused of being scum and it derails the thread and fucks over the town.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:26
|
|
|
Also I'm bad at mafia. But who isn't really
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:27
|
|
|
Natural 20 posted:You don't want to be confirmed town? Genuinely this is actually important. Amid a large number of early claims we have two claimed town masonries. I suggest absent good choices that testing these claims would be valuable and immediately get scum shade from KB.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:36
|
|
|
yes, amidst the torrent of lovely/joke posts, we should take some comments about masons super serious
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:39
|
|
|
if two people claimed that theyre town and in a masonry, I dont think the first thing we should kill is lynch them
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:40
|
|
|
ugh, im making typos. clearly im too tired.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:42
|
|
|
My new playstyle doesn't allow me to deep dive on this, this early in the game. But I'm sure others will see the many problems here. My vote on Nat20 is real now. Let the game begin in earnest.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:43
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:if two people claimed that theyre town and in a masonry, I dont think the first thing we should kill is lynch them I'm saying this with the caveat of absent a good case elsewhere. Caveats aren't a scum thing, nuance is important in mafia as a town weapon. I've established an opinion that people can own me on later and I now can't excuse myself from it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:43
|
|
|
why are you making me google up caveat
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:45
|
|
|
Natural 20 posted:Genuinely this is actually important. Amid a large number of early claims we have two claimed town masonries. Killing confirmed town seems like a bad idea but maybe that's just me
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:48
|
|
|
There's never gonna be a good case on day 1 nat
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:49
|
|
|
im inclined to keep them if they are in a masonry because kb and gulags are good players and thus them having a masonry is more of a boon than a bane
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:50
|
|
|
that sounded like shade to sal but it wasn't a reminder that I got pushed by my mason partner in day 1 because I didnt post too much 
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:53
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Killing confirmed town seems like a bad idea but maybe that's just me They're not confirmed until at least one flips. A scum gambit I once considered was claiming town masonry. Again this isn't "Let's deffo lunch the masons" it is "absent good options this might be an idea." King Burgundy posted:My new playstyle doesn't allow me to deep dive on this, this early in the game. But I'm sure others will see the many problems here. This is bullshit. "I'm a lurker now" doesn't excuse the need to substantiate cases.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 20:55
|
|
|
IcePhoenix posted:Lurker rules are dumb, especially on day one where nothing happens all you gotta do is poo poo out some chitchat posts about anime or something, sheesh King Burgundy posted:My new playstyle doesn't allow me to deep dive on this, this early in the game. But I'm sure others will see the many problems here. nah he sounds town to me 
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 21:20
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:all you gotta do is poo poo out some chitchat posts about anime or something, sheesh but the only good anime ended in March 
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 21:24
|
|
|
Sal wonders if maybe some of these "masons" are scum team who are lying to us. Sal would never be smarts enough to pull off that gambit but it is a possibility yes?
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 21:41
|
|
|
Lando131 posted:I'll play this but only if Bif isn't as much of a lurker as in Bif is a lurker mafia. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 21:47
|
|
|
SalTheBard posted:Sal wonders if maybe some of these "masons" are scum team who are lying to us. Sal would never be smarts enough to pull off that gambit but it is a possibility yes? yeah, it could be a lie. It's a risky one though cause if they claim to be confirmed masons, once one dies you essentially lose both cause the jig is up. having 4 confirmed town does feel like bullshit though, however. AnonymousNarcotics posted:Killing confirmed town seems like a bad idea but maybe that's just me hmmm, is this playing reasonable townie, from someone who already knows they're not lying scum? I do agree though that they wouldn't be good D1 lunches, despite not finding Nat scummy for considering it at all AnonymousNarcotics posted:There's never gonna be a good case on day 1 nat yep I might be onto something ##vote ANarc
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 21:48
|
|
|
oh lol. Yeah I'd add him to the list, Lando first choice in a lurker lunch
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 21:49
|
|
|
Natural 20 posted:This is bullshit. Not going to respond to this particular conversational thread again unless we get significantly more content from others, since I'm already higher in post count then I like. But on the off chance I haven't played with you since adopting this style, you aren't going to get more from me then gut reads with no substantiation in the early game. I'm not casing you. I do think you are scum. I think others will see it too. Here was my first stab at the new style in another game in case you want to see it in a game where I'm flipped: https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3849854 If I survive to end game you'll see the old me shine through more and more as time goes on to solve the game.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 21:52
|
|
|
ok feeling KB for town outside the whole mason claim. cause he sounds like if Nat argues this with him any more he's about to just slap the Minwu blinkers on and never fuckin let it go cause he knows he's right, and daring to doubt him proves you are lying scum
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 21:57
|
|
|
Yami Fenrir posted:Just a friendly reminder that anti-lurker rules are present in this game (10 posts per game day or bad things happen) and currently 5 people have less than 10 posts. Am I safe? 
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 21:58
|
|
|
morning, Beet!
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 21:58
|
|
|
Beetphyxious posted:Am I safe? For you, and you alone, I will change the rule to be specifically about USEFUL posts. (jk)
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 21:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 20, 2024 05:43 |
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:morning, Beet! 
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 22:00
|
|