|
Snooze Cruise posted:cpig is a good vote because they act unengaged with the game Hi, have you met me?
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 4, 2024 06:28 |
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:how is it sneaky to tell the truth. uhh what if you say it in a whisper?
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:37
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:Hi, have you met me? yeah so why you keep signing up in these games!?
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:38
|
|
|
Snooze Cruise posted:in scenario one there is the normal hance of pera being mafia or not in which cause i want actual reasons why you would vote her in scenario two i think its more likely to be 3p aligned than mafia aligned because that is wat makes the sense peramene posted:obviously I'll just grant my scum team peramene posted:my scum team
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:38
|
|
|
Snooze Cruise posted:yeah so why you keep signing up in these games!? Because I have fun. Also, like , it's day one and this game is insanity, maybe you are trying too hard to engage?
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:39
|
|
|
Tobbs Gnawed posted:More importantly, pera isn't in votefinder as a player and therefore cannot be voted unless there's a specific hidden mechanic that allows us to extirpate her. this is a testable hypothesis and also she's in the player list i don't understand the resistance to this, i truly truly don't
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:39
|
|
|
i won't stand for the hypocrisy in this community no longer, my goal in this game is to no longer defeat pera, but defeat mafia itself and you the players who let things fall in ruin while i left and also defeat pera my scum team my game the scum in my game = scum team so half rear end ##vote soaring kestrel
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:40
|
|
|
i just skipped 3 pages of posts, ama
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:40
|
|
|
Soaring Kestrel posted:this is a testable hypothesis and also she's in the player list to clarify: the player list in the OP
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:40
|
|
|
big fan of david lynch's work. just some incredible movies
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:40
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:Because I have fun. its a game about communication
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:40
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:big fan of david lynch's work. just some incredible movies i like mullohand drive
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:40
|
|
|
Soaring Kestrel posted:this is a testable hypothesis and also she's in the player list vote pera right now and see what happens (it's nothing. nothing happens)
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:41
|
|
|
Soaring Kestrel posted:this is a testable hypothesis and also she's in the player list Actually you are wrong. https://votefinder.org/player/peramene Here have a evidence
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:41
|
|
|
the phonecall scene in lost highway
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:41
|
|
|
Snooze Cruise posted:i won't stand for the hypocrisy in this community no longer, my goal in this game is to no longer defeat pera, but defeat mafia itself and you the players who let things fall in ruin while i left and also defeat pera fine the first serious rule that we talked about in thread was clearly scum slanted, also pera NO's were granted to all players to use as a town focused mechanic to kill rules, and pera Yes's were granted to scum to keep rules in place how is this not a pro scum role?
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:41
|
|
|
GeneX posted:Let’s fix things This vote didn't show up in votefinder. Votefinder's the first thing in the OP. I think we gotta trust that votefinder is true here.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:41
|
|
|
Soaring Kestrel posted:fine uhh those rules were once again assigned before the game even started again half assed reasonings lets vote this pal
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:42
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:vote pera right now and see what happens i am aware of this and posit that there may be a manual votecount; if we got 12 players to vote pera in game, i am curious whether nat20 would do something from a mod perspective Tobbs Gnawed posted:Actually you are wrong. i clarified this; read the OP of this thread
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:42
|
|
|
Snooze Cruise posted:its a game about communication No, it's a game about shitposting and calling people dumb.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:42
|
|
|
scum is gonna win by all of town modkilling themselves
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:43
|
|
|
Snooze Cruise posted:uhh those rules were once again assigned before the game even started I'm confused as to why that matters?
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:43
|
|
|
the major irony of mafia is its a game about communication but nerds are so bad about communication some of them play it like poker or some of them play it like something other than poker and i don't know if this is actually irony
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:44
|
|
|
Soaring Kestrel posted:I'm confused as to why that matters? im confused as to why you think this is a good case and not flimsy reasoning that as you dig further and further in you are exposing more and more of yourself as the scum you are
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:45
|
|
|
Soaring Kestrel posted:i am aware of this and posit that there may be a manual votecount; if we got 12 players to vote pera in game, i am curious whether nat20 would do something from a mod perspective ok you herd 11 cats to manually vote for pera even though it won't show up in votefinder i'll watch
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:45
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:ok you herd 11 cats to manually vote for pera even though it won't show up in votefinder its almost like they keep wanting to engage on this subject because its something they can freely talk about without much investment or real logic to make a true case and they are scum hmm
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:46
|
|
|
i think my vote is in a pretty good spot for today, see everyone day 2
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:46
|
|
|
that wasn't directed at you it was directed at the others since you are already voting em
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:47
|
|
|
Soaring Kestrel posted:i am aware of this and posit that there may be a manual votecount; if we got 12 players to vote pera in game, i am curious whether nat20 would do something from a mod perspective Nat20 isn't going to manually track everyone's votes and unvotes to try and see if the mod gets lynched. Maybe you can ask pera to make you a dodecauple-voter except it only affects people who aren't living players in this game and we can find out for sure!
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:48
|
|
|
Snooze Cruise posted:im confused as to why you think this is a good case and not flimsy reasoning that as you dig further and further in you are exposing more and more of yourself as the scum you are it's not a bad idea to test the hypothesis IMO and loses us nothing if I'm wrong. maybe it's too late in the day now but i still think this should be tested day 2 whatever i'll drop it for now
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:49
|
|
|
jesus ##vote kestrel I may be coming around to this kestrel thing. kestrel, please tell me why we should potentially waste our vote after having lost 2 town players to modkills today?
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:50
|
|
|
Snooze Cruise posted:its almost like they keep wanting to engage on this subject because its something they can freely talk about without much investment or real logic to make a true case and they are scum hmm I think this might actually be true. ##vote Soaring Kestrel Soaring Kestrel posted:it's not a bad idea to test the hypothesis IMO and loses us nothing if I'm wrong. maybe it's too late in the day now but i still think this should be tested day 2 I think this is actually quite bad as well because if we're wrong then we potentially lose an execution or at the very least discussion time around an execution.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:50
|
|
|
now your switching your reasoning from "this person is scum" to "this is a testable hypothesis' also can i just say i hate it when people in mafia games talk about certain votes like hypothesis. like the goal isn't to test things its to kill the baddies you think its bad. i mean there are some like, setups that are more mafia likes where you do have to like use votes as tests sometimes, but even though this is a weird game itself this was still a bad case to use it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:50
|
|
|
What is the argument here and how does it make sense at all
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:51
|
|
|
why would it be a waste? if it doesn't do anything, we can just go back to voting and casing like normal. like, the only case in which we actually lose something would be "i'm right about pera being a player; oh, also, she's immune to being voted" if she is a player, then the vote goes through if she's not a player, then we just vote someone else.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:52
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:What is the argument here and how does it make sense at all I'm having difficulty following
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:52
|
|
|
Soaring Kestrel posted:why would it be a waste? if it doesn't do anything, we can just go back to voting and casing like normal. like, the only case in which we actually lose something would be "i'm right about pera being a player; oh, also, she's immune to being voted" also a reminder this isn't actually your vote why not put this amount effort in the person you are actually voting for lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:52
|
|
|
##unvote hmm.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:53
|
|
|
Soaring Kestrel posted:why would it be a waste? because its a waste of time and a distraction.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 4, 2024 06:28 |
|
|
oh my god disclaimer: i said i'd drop this but y'all keep asking me questions azure: it would take like 15 minutes at the beginning of day two to test it that doesn't lose us a ton of time for casing or whatever sc: nope, she's still scum or scum adjacent based on everything i've seen of her posting, the hypothesis of "she can be voted" is separate from that but regardless of whether she can or not i think she's scum?? i don't feel like i'm switching my reasoning
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2019 23:54
|
|